• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Tracer's butt victory pose will be removed from Overwatch

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well no, if we just go off their response without context, as you do, Widowmaker is as good as gone.

RIP Widowmaker 2016.

I don't think RIP Widowmaker 2016, so much. Widowmaker will probably stick around. I think next time Blizzard sits around discussing characters though, this is going to stick in their minds. I think it'll affect design going forward, and in the future, they'll err on the side of caution. That in mind, RIP Widowmaker Analogues, we never knew ye.

Maybe.

Or maybe they'll keep producing flirty and reserved characters, who can say.
 

Cynar

Member
Ok I'll highlight it for you. It's obviously not changing what's being said.

"This character is great, but she has a pose that undermines her personality completely and it feels so out of character that it's pandering. The other sexy character is fine."

"You know what, you're right. I could totally see that even making some uncomfortable"

Lore conflict and making people uncomfortable are not mutually exclusive. His second statement doesn't somehow erase the first statement.
Except there is no lore conflict. It is a from the back pose shown like she is leaving people behind. If you have an issue with it then you are the one sexualizing it, just like those people who shame women for breast feeding in public.
 

KiraXD

Member
It's absurd that you think that's what happened. The person wrote their opinion. How is that post on the Blizzard forums "demanding a developer bow down" to them?

i dont think thats what happened here... but its that mentality that comes across when stuff like this happens.

It feels like so often people think they deserve games to be changed... now whether Blizzard did it for them or not is beside the point. They did it when someone asked, all thats going to be perceived is that:
Complain = Devs do what i want

Regardless of actual motivation.

The fact that people feel entitled to the outcome of game development is whats insane to me. If someone doesnt like a character gender, race, sexuality, they feel as though theyre entitled to the game being changed, and if its not, they make an even bigger deal accusing the dev of all sorts of things from sexist, racist homophobes to pandering.
 

RM8

Member
Getting better everyday.
I don't know how you could possibly believe that.

- We can't see Mika's bare ass for like 3 entire frames during her CA in SFV
- We can't see Tracer's butt in one victory pose
- We can't have underage girls in thongs in XCX

And you seriously believe that!?
 
Preorder canceled......

Seriously the game isn't out yet out so I don't see the problem in any form. Good for them trying to do female characters right.
 

Quote

Member
Except there is no lore conflict. It is a from the back pose shown like she is leaving people behind. If you have an issue with it then you are the one sexualizing it, just like those people who shame women for breast feeding in public.
Haha, okay everyone, I'm sorry. Can we go back to sex = guns thing again?
 

Nosgotham

Junior Member
so....whats wrong with a woman or a man being portrayed as sexy. is that a bad thing? whats next, we cant have a buff male flexing his muscles? how are you going to design a character than runs around in skin tight pants but then get rid of a pose that shows her in the skin tight pants you designed the character to wear? just seems silly.
 
I don't think RIP Widowmaker 2016, so much. Widowmaker will probably stick around. I think next time Blizzard sits around discussing characters though, this is going to stick in their minds. I think it'll affect design going forward, and in the future, they'll err on the side of caution. That in mind, RIP Widowmaker Analogues, we never knew ye.

Maybe.

Or maybe they'll keep producing flirty and reserved characters, who can say.

There should be room for both. Flirty / Sexualized as well as more reserved "normal" characters. There are sexy people in real life.

As long as Blizzard and other studio's keep a nice mix like Overwatch has its all good in my book.
 

El_Mau

Member
Video games and especially eSports have historically been an unfriendly environment toward women. So trying to put an end to that and do what they can to make it a less hostile environment is a good thing.

That is the key issue. Do you understand that part at least?


How is it that changing a victory pose will help to adress that problem?
 

SZips

Member
How is it that changing a victory pose will help to adress that problem?

Things snowball. Something as "insignificant" as this could lead to bigger changes in the future. Imagine how much more shitty things would be in the world if even the smallest issues went unchecked because "eh, it doesn't really impact much right now."
 

Blueblur1

Member
I think this was a silly thing to get worked up over. I haven't and still don't take issue with other complaints lobbed at games (I've found myself agreeing with Anita many times). But getting worked up over a pose? That character model is still going to be in the game. If anything lobby to change the character and not one single pose.
 
Her new pose can still be from behind but this time she's in a "I'm about to run" position while still looking behind. That could be a good compromise.
 
I can't place it, but there's something off about that butt. It's too high up or something. Or like, too flat for how round it's supposed to be. Like it's two round thigh stumps, there's actually no butt there at all.
 
It seems more a problem with her clothes than anything else.

butt.jpg

 

Merc_

Member
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?
 

ymgve

Member
I don't feel it's this way anymore. There are consequences for ignoring fans and media on these things since Sarkeesian videos. They had an impact on the industry and we're seeing these type of reactions more and more.



I don't think they were in the position to ignore anymore.





The original post wasn't some mother outraged by the pose because it doesn't fit the character design? Many people agreed with her position, the post grew and we've seen the reaction.



I don't believe in this anymore. Specially when it can create a snowball effect.



I think like you guys are being naive.

Well, or not... maybe I'm the one who's wrong... who knows. I'm just noticing a trend recently. I don't remember every game that removed sexy poses, but I'm sure that I've seen many of these type of topics in this forum.

Just curious - what's the worst that have happened when a game dev said "No, we won't change our design to fit with what people complain about"?

The only thing I can think of is when Hatred initially was rejected by Steam, but that's kind of a special case.
 

Dice//

Banned
How is it that changing a victory pose will help to adress that problem?

Outright and overt sexism or racism or whatever -ism is easy to notice and quell.
It's the small ways it's continuously reinforced that add a LOT of drops to the bucket. Trying to stop those "little drops" creates the whole rhetoric of "outrage culture".
 
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?

Becuase this is the internet and people tend to overreact in these type of situations on both sides of it.
 

jediyoshi

Member
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?

I can't tell whether you are genuinely confused as to what the actual conflict is or not.
 
Just curious - what's the worst that have happened when a game dev said "No, we won't change our design to fit with what people complain about"?

The only thing I can think of is when Hatred initially was rejected by Steam, but that's kind of a special case.

Ubisoft, AC: Unity. Negative press, likely lost sales.

They removed it because people complained.

We're talking about different 'theys,' but yeah. You asked why they'd praise it. That's why.
 
I wish people would have complained about this game continuing the trend of charging full price for a game that will adapt a f2p model as well. As well as not having any kind of single player. But yeah, that pose was completely inappropriate.
 

RM8

Member
Right, but it is still objectively removing content that would otherwise be there.

It's not a huge deal (it is just a victory pose) but the game I buy is less of a game because of it.
Lol, seriously? They'll replace the pose.
 

Opto

Banned
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?

Because artistic vision! Unless it isn't about the female form then I will criticize the shit out of the developers for every tiny thing.
 

Kinsei

Banned
Right, but it is still objectively removing content that would otherwise be there.

It's not a huge deal (it is just a victory pose) but the game I buy is less of a game because of it.



They removed it because people complained.

Things get added or removed during development all of the time. Yes, sometimes even due to outside criticism.
 

ymgve

Member
Ubisoft, AC: Unity. Negative press, likely lost sales.

"Likely lost sales" is pretty hard to prove, though. Especially with a game like Unity, where being a bad game with horrible frame rates overshadowed any other factors.

Also, bad PR isn't necessarily a negative thing. I bet a ton more people discovered and bought Dragon's Crown, for example, due to the controversy and all the articles written about the game.
 
they should've changed it to where she's bending over instead.

this makes people feel uncomfortable? how fragile are people these days where a digital derriere makes you have a panic attack.
 

ironcreed

Banned
I am so sick of the hyper-sensitivity.

No doubt. 'Oh no, an ass crack in tight pants! Remove it at once or we rage!' It's sickening that this kind of shit is dictating decisions like this for everyone else. It's becoming as bad or worse than ultra right wing christian groups.
 

Opto

Banned
Right, but it is still objectively removing content that would otherwise be there.

It's not a huge deal (it is just a victory pose) but the game I buy is less of a game because of it.

The game is probably already less of a game because they probably built other characters and didn't fully develop them or found them to be too imbalanced to work with the rest of the cast. Levels have probably been scrapped as well as dialog lines.

We're just privy to this one creative decision
 

AkumaNiko

Member
Are we so weak in this country that a fictional character posing her rear end offends people now?

There is still major racial divide, continuous racial police brutality, actual real life women are still be discriminated against, harassed and treated poorly, but no, tracers rear end bothered the OP in the bliz thread enough to whine about it.

I dont care about it being removed, still hyped for it and it is just a pose, but for God's sake, priorities people
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom