Scientist Supreme!
Banned
sigh
this industry
Getting better everyday.
sigh
this industry
It made them uncomfortable because it didn't fit the character which makes it feel like pandering.No, but making people uncomfortable was the justification for the change.
Well no, if we just go off their response without context, as you do, Widowmaker is as good as gone.
RIP Widowmaker 2016.
Getting better everyday.
Except there is no lore conflict. It is a from the back pose shown like she is leaving people behind. If you have an issue with it then you are the one sexualizing it, just like those people who shame women for breast feeding in public.Ok I'll highlight it for you. It's obviously not changing what's being said.
"This character is great, but she has a pose that undermines her personality completely and it feels so out of character that it's pandering. The other sexy character is fine."
"You know what, you're right. I could totally see that even making some uncomfortable"
Lore conflict and making people uncomfortable are not mutually exclusive. His second statement doesn't somehow erase the first statement.
It's absurd that you think that's what happened. The person wrote their opinion. How is that post on the Blizzard forums "demanding a developer bow down" to them?
I don't know how you could possibly believe that.Getting better everyday.
It's called editingI can't see why people would praise the removal of content, especially optional content.
Even if you like this change don't be silly.
I can't see why people would praise the removal of content, especially optional content.
Haha, okay everyone, I'm sorry. Can we go back to sex = guns thing again?Except there is no lore conflict. It is a from the back pose shown like she is leaving people behind. If you have an issue with it then you are the one sexualizing it, just like those people who shame women for breast feeding in public.
I don't think RIP Widowmaker 2016, so much. Widowmaker will probably stick around. I think next time Blizzard sits around discussing characters though, this is going to stick in their minds. I think it'll affect design going forward, and in the future, they'll err on the side of caution. That in mind, RIP Widowmaker Analogues, we never knew ye.
Maybe.
Or maybe they'll keep producing flirty and reserved characters, who can say.
Video games and especially eSports have historically been an unfriendly environment toward women. So trying to put an end to that and do what they can to make it a less hostile environment is a good thing.
That is the key issue. Do you understand that part at least?
I can't see why people would praise the removal of content, especially optional content.
How is it that changing a victory pose will help to adress that problem?
Getting better everyday.
How is it that changing a victory pose will help to adress that problem?
I don't feel it's this way anymore. There are consequences for ignoring fans and media on these things since Sarkeesian videos. They had an impact on the industry and we're seeing these type of reactions more and more.
I don't think they were in the position to ignore anymore.
The original post wasn't some mother outraged by the pose because it doesn't fit the character design? Many people agreed with her position, the post grew and we've seen the reaction.
I don't believe in this anymore. Specially when it can create a snowball effect.
I think like you guys are being naive.
Well, or not... maybe I'm the one who's wrong... who knows. I'm just noticing a trend recently. I don't remember every game that removed sexy poses, but I'm sure that I've seen many of these type of topics in this forum.
How is it that changing a victory pose will help to adress that problem?
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?
One victory pose.
They found it distasteful to the point that it detracted from their enjoyment of the greater whole.
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?
Just curious - what's the worst that have happened when a game dev said "No, we won't change our design to fit with what people complain about"?
The only thing I can think of is when Hatred initially was rejected by Steam, but that's kind of a special case.
They removed it because people complained.
Lol, seriously? They'll replace the pose.Right, but it is still objectively removing content that would otherwise be there.
It's not a huge deal (it is just a victory pose) but the game I buy is less of a game because of it.
If blizzard agrees with the poster and is cool with changing it, then what is the damn problem? Why has this turned into another dumb slapfight over something that was resolved quickly and easily?
Right, but it is still objectively removing content that would otherwise be there.
It's not a huge deal (it is just a victory pose) but the game I buy is less of a game because of it.
They removed it because people complained.
It seems more a problem with her clothes than anything else.
Getting better everyday.
Ubisoft, AC: Unity. Negative press, likely lost sales.
I am so sick of the hyper-sensitivity.
Right, but it is still objectively removing content that would otherwise be there.
It's not a huge deal (it is just a victory pose) but the game I buy is less of a game because of it.