Plus, Nintendo don't have the staff to make a new 3D Metroid game every 2/3 anyway.well deserved success.
Nintendo squandered Metroid by chasing other audiences it wanted and shitting on its core fans.
Fromsoft had a bold vision and created a niche for itself and GREW something
Take notes, Nintendo
It's truly remarkable that the Souls series is so successful. I don't think anyone could have predicted this in the Demons Souls days!
I'm ready for a 2-3 year break though. Bloodborne 2 would be nice in 2018, but I really want to see what else they have cooking. I'm hoping for something quite far removed from the Souls gameplay (Otogi please)
I still remember that no one thought we would ever see a sequel to Demon's Souls. How times have changed. Seriously one of the greatest video game series of all time. Congrats to From. Here's hoping they're allowed a well deserved break so they can focus on something new and don't get burned out creatively.
well deserved success.
Nintendo squandered Metroid by chasing other audiences it wanted and shitting on its core fans.
Fromsoft had a bold vision and created a niche for itself and GREW something
Take notes, Nintendo
Screw that. I want a similar game core mechanic wise but in a completely different setting. No one else makes games like they do. I'll get my fill for all the other stuff from other devs.
well deserved success.
Nintendo squandered Metroid by chasing other audiences it wanted and shitting on its core fans.
Fromsoft had a bold vision and created a niche for itself and GREW something
Take notes, Nintendo
And it's certainly better than most areas in DS3 too.Lmao what.
I only played Sunken City but that's one of the best areas in the series and easily better than anything in the main game.
So it's not considered niche anymore?
Good. I'd certainly buy a Souls game every 2 years for the foreseeable future.
And it's certainly better than most areas in DS3 too.
I don't get it. Went to youtube to see what the area looks like and it's super bland :/
3 games of the same setting and art direction can do that. Hopefully they take the series in another direction. Maybe self publish to break away from the current setting of DaS.
Good. I'd certainly buy a Souls game every 2 years for the foreseeable future.
And it's certainly better than most areas in DS3 too.
well deserved success.
Nintendo squandered Metroid by chasing other audiences it wanted and shitting on its core fans.
Fromsoft had a bold vision and created a niche for itself and GREW something
Take notes, Nintendo
Nintendo hasn't given a shit about Metroid since Super flopped in Japan, and has been mis-managed even before that.
Maybe actually play it. Sunken City is great. And I agree its better than a lot of areas in DS3.I don't get it. Went to youtube to see what the area looks like and it's super bland :/
So it's not considered niche anymore?
A lot of people fail to realize that niche does not mean sells bad. A niche product can easily sell millions.
Maybe actually play it. Sunken City is great. And I agree its better than a lot of areas in DS3.
That's already wrong. There's absolutely nothing Souls-related you should watch on Youtube. Nothing.I don't get it. Went to youtube
I'll stake my claim right here that I always thought it was the best Souls game. And I have hundreds of frustrated posts in "DS2 sucks" threads to prove itIt's going to be fascinating to watch Dark Souls II slowly grow in reputation over time.
I havent finished DS3 yet, but from what I've seen the areas are pretty solid/good but look a bit familiar. My biggest gripe is the lack of interactivity/puzzles that all of the DS2 dlc had. Every map had different layers(buttons, moving walls/platforms, ghost statues, bombs, melting ice etc).To be blunt I think all three dlc areas in DS2 are better than any individual DS3 level.
I'll stake my claim right here that I always thought it was the best Souls game. And I have hundreds of frustrated posts in "DS2 sucks" threads to prove it
I'll stake my claim right here that I always thought it was the best Souls game. And I have hundreds of frustrated posts in "DS2 sucks" threads to prove it
To be blunt I think all three dlc areas in DS2 are better than any individual DS3 level.
Yeah, my main issue with DS3 is exactly that.I havent finished DS3 yet, but from what I've seen the areas are pretty solid/good but look a bit familiar. My biggest gripe is the lack of interactivity/puzzles that all of the DS2 dlc had. Every map had different layers(buttons, moving walls/platforms, ghost statues, bombs, melting ice etc).
I'd pretty annoyed if From Software took the fan criticism of DS2 too harshly that they reverted to DS1 completely and ignored everythig good about the second game.
It's going to be fascinating to watch Dark Souls II slowly grow in reputation over time.
It's going to be fascinating to watch Dark Souls II slowly grow in reputation over time.
Sunken city and other DLC are good then you play 'that level' in DS3, which is the best area since Tower of latria 3-1, and realize how superior is the enemy and level design in DS3.
Well deserved, DS3 is the best souls game.
It's going to be fascinating to watch Dark Souls II slowly grow in reputation over time.
It's going to be fascinating to watch Dark Souls II slowly grow in reputation over time.
If you're talking about what I think you're talking about,no, that level was much better the first time around in Demon's.
If you're talking about the other level everyone is raving about,it was better when it was called Eleum Loyce and didn't have a 1:1 copy of the back half of anor londo literally copy/pasted on top of it to get fanboys' dicks hard.
I doubt this will happen. The user's who like it always liked it, I don't think people who used to dislike it are now changing their minds.