• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The Chinese Room accuses CD Projekt Red of making sexist games

Status
Not open for further replies.
I expected better from someone that gets drive-bys like walking simulator and "non-games", if there is anyone that should know how receiving something like that is shit, it should be them.
 

QaaQer

Member
If you aren't going to read the thread then why are you here exactly? To act superior and claim some sort of high ground?

Virtual conversation. Some threads need a few pages before that can happen, I was guessing this is one of them.

I always read the OP tho, fwiiw.
 
Shit does that mean that all sexual images of man and woman, in atypical poses and dress is sexist? like when that conversations starts and ends. What's considered all right and not all right given the context being portrayed, plus that will butt heads with creativity in general.
 
Also, I know that one might be annoyed if their favorite game/developer is being slighted by someone but geeeezzzzzzzzzz some of you can be really nasty in your remarks attacking the Chinese Room.
 

RevenWolf

Member
Also, I know that one might be annoyed if their favorite game/developer is being slighted by someone but geeeezzzzzzzzzz some of you can be really nasty in your remarks attacking the Chinese Room.

This I do agree with. It would be better if it was a discussion rather than "walking simulator" jokes
 

Teeth

Member
You mean the first trailer from a few years back? Yes, that had a women in it and dudes with guns. Still don't see it as really sexist myself, but I can see why others can. But that is not the thing the tweet refers to. They pick an out of context image.


Whether it's "objectively" sexist or not is entirely irrelevant: anyone in a marketing department would know that there would be people who would find it sexist, even if the grand beholder wouldn't. That's the controversy that would be stirred up (and it was and now is again) and is good for promotion.


The gaming industry is in the process of maturing on this subject. CDProjekt also. Judging them on things from 10 years ago isn't really fair I think. In The Witcher 3, those cards and such weren't there.

What do you mean by a whitewashed world? In The Witcher 3 that is the setting of the game, a northern kingdom. It would have white people in it, just like northern Europe would have in the Middle Ages. They even deal with things like racism and such in some quests.

I specifically cited that CDPR has been dealing with these modern culture war issues with all of their games going back to TW1. First with the cards, then the Playboy spread for W2 (as well as general sexuality), then with Ciri's peekaboo costuming and the all-white-people-only world of the W3.

In my statement, I'm not taking a side on any of the controversies, I'm just saying that CDPR has been dealing with this since their infancy and their general MO is to say nothing. Which has been working for them because people will argue for them based on their own political leanings.
 
Also, I know that one might be annoyed if their favorite game/developer is being slighted by someone but geeeezzzzzzzzzz some of you can be really nasty in your remarks attacking the Chinese Room.

A lot of developers I would take the criticism with some weight, but I just can't take them seriously, gone to the rapture was so so bad and here they are calling out a factually superior Dev in a childish tweet. Just reeks of a want for attention

Like, I'm sorry rapture didn't sell a ton but don't take that out on CDPR
 

6.8

Member
Okay, The Chinese Room. Have you looked at your name? With founders called Pinchbeck and Curry? Cultural misappropriation much? I guess they would know a thing about discrimination.
 

Audioboxer

Member
Whether it's "objectively" sexist or not is entirely irrelevant: anyone in a marketing department would know that there would be people who would find it sexist, even if the grand beholder wouldn't. That's the controversy that would be stirred up (and it was and now is again) and is good for promotion.




I specifically cited that CDPR has been dealing with these modern culture war issues with all of their games going back to TW1. First with the cards, then the Playboy spread for W2 (as well as general sexuality), then with Ciri's peekaboo costuming and the all-white-people-only world of the W3.

In my statement, I'm not taking a side on any of the controversies, I'm just saying that CDPR has been dealing with this since their infancy and their general MO is to say nothing. Which has been working for them because people will argue for them based on their own political leanings.

Probably for the best for themselves. They just continue making the entertainment they want and not get all harassed at the internet debate/rage.
 

RevenWolf

Member
Whether it's "objectively" sexist or not is entirely irrelevant: anyone in a marketing department would know that there would be people who would find it sexist, even if the grand beholder wouldn't. That's the controversy that would be stirred up (and it was and now is again) and is good for promotion.




I specifically cited that CDPR has been dealing with these modern culture war issues with all of their games going back to TW1. First with the cards, then the Playboy spread for W2 (as well as general sexuality), then with Ciri's peekaboo costuming and the all-white-people-only world of the W3.

In my statement, I'm not taking a side on any of the controversies, I'm just saying that CDPR has been dealing with this since their infancy and their general MO is to say nothing. Which has been working for them because people will argue for them based on their own political leanings.

But the thing is, there will ALWAYS be someone that finds something sexist to a degree, that's why the term "objective" is important, because subjective standards will NEVER be unified.
 
Okay, The Chinese Room. Have you looked at your name? With founders called Pinchbeck and Curry? Cultural misappropriation much? I guess they would know a thing about discrimination.

For real why are they called the Chinese room? is that some type of inside joke.
 

maxcriden

Member
Huh?

Geralt is an existing character and he is straight. He's not going to start courting dandelion in his related quests, ever.

It's OK to not like any version of sex, but it's also not sensible to expect every taste to be catered to in a game where you play as a well defined character.

What's courting dandelion? Never heard this term.
 

mclem

Member
A lot of developers I would take the criticism with some weight, but I just can't take them seriously, gone to the rapture was so so bad and here they are calling out a factually superior Dev in a childish tweet. Just reeks of a want for attention

...joke post?

Opinions, sure, but 'factually superior' is pushing it, there are quite a few facts out there that contradict that.
 
It invalidates the point that the image was born in the sexist mind of CDPRs employee.
Sure, they still aproved and supported it though.
What makes it sexist in the first place? what is sexist in this context? especially without context in this instant.
Ask the people who made the claim but having the only we've seen from this game look like that and in that position, it's not hard to see where that comment comes from.
 

mclem

Member
For real why are they called the Chinese room? is that some type of inside joke.

It's the name of a thought-experiment about principles of AI. Basically challenging the notion that "following a fixed set of instructions" could be regarded as having a "mind".
 

Audioboxer

Member
But the thing is, there will ALWAYS be someone that finds something sexist to a degree, that's why the term "objective" is important, because subjective standards will NEVER be unified.

In a world where simply wearing a bikini or crop top can be called sexist, this is true.
 

kAmui-

Member
A lot of developers I would take the criticism with some weight, but I just can't take them seriously, gone to the rapture was so so bad and here they are calling out a factually superior Dev in a childish tweet. Just reeks of a want for attention

Like, I'm sorry rapture didn't sell a ton but don't take that out on CDPR

The credibility of the argument shouldn't be based on the quality of the games they make. I agree on the bolded part though.
 
But the thing is, there will ALWAYS be someone that finds something sexist to a degree, that's why the term "objective" is important, because subjective standards will NEVER be unified.

Correct that means everything is sexist or racist or homophobic. Fuck the context and objectivity. The creative sphere would be a beak canvas and super tame, if everything fell into a certain label and is lambasted for using any of those themes. Where does it stop?
 
Eight pages on, TCR succeeded in stirring.

Good conversation to have. I just wish they who tweeted had contributed instead of simply sparking a storm and bailing.

No comment on the imagery. Seems fine.
 

Caronte

Member
They should have used a man with his head blown off and his brains exposed. Then it would have been perfectly okay.
 
The irony being literally no one defending the trading cards, which ironically you would know if you read the thread!

Your comment is ridiculous and proves that other posters point man.

The cards are harmless. Crass? Maybe so, but again it's nude drawings that cause no real harm.

As for the rest of your argument I don't agree. No one needs to be a straight man to enjoy sexually stimulating material, regardless of sexual preference.

????
 

Teeth

Member
But the thing is, there will ALWAYS be someone that finds something sexist to a degree, that's why the term "objective" is important, because subjective standards will NEVER be unified.

Relative morality gets messy when you get bogged down in minutiae. Some people are bothered by this stuff. Some people aren't.

Some people think that every little bit mounts an impressive hill that creates a structure that certain people have to overcome to move at the same pace as those that don't have to climb that hill (or a differently shaped hill). The refuse we decide we should throw on that hill is a fight worth having.



What's courting dandelion? Never heard this term.

If anything positive comes out of this thread, I hope it's a neologism of "Courting Dandelion".


Dandelion is a male character in the Witcher games.
 

MUnited83

For you.
A lot of developers I would take the criticism with some weight, but I just can't take them seriously, gone to the rapture was so so bad and here they are calling out a factually superior Dev in a childish tweet. Just reeks of a want for attention

Like, I'm sorry rapture didn't sell a ton but don't take that out on CDPR

lmao, these kinds of posts are the best: "Hey I didn't like your game so fuck you, you don't have the right to have opinions! Also your game is shit and this is remark is supposed to be relevant somewhat!"

These threads do bring out the best in people alright.
 

Audioboxer

Member

I defend their right to do it. It's not causing any harm or hurting anyone.

The ESRB agrees with me as well, and so do other ratings boards. Or it wouldn't have received an adult rating and been cleared for release.

Personal opinion on how crass they are withstanding, but like any other adult medium using sex appeal, it's the buyers wallet that votes for them, not censorship.

I don't know how some of you posters watch Game of Thrones or any HBO series for this matter. Or read books. If you're triggered at nude pictures on cards it must be a hell of a life to navigate through in the real world.
 

xevis

Banned
The irony in fair representation is that it allows women to be dedicated as they wish to be. A model? Probably sexy, if not sexy, then I'm sure they'll say or refuse the job.

Because exploitation of women is totally not a thing, right? As long as nobody complains, yeah?

An in game character? In line with their narrative and story. That is equal representation. To be equal is not to be censored, for better or worse.

Narrative and story do not exist in a vacuum. Considering all the bullshit women put up with, in this industry especially but also in general, it's a bit sad that CDPR would go with an image like that to promote their game.
 
Can't even be tame, because then the sexist argue abt comes from covering up too much :p

No middle ground. Might as well have a police force stopping people from using anything remotely preserved as sexist or misogynistic. Or any other accusatory word in the works of humanity.
 

maxcriden

Member
Dandelion is a male bard character in the games :p

Lmao I just came back to say I figured that out from subsequent posts. whoops. Thank you.
Lol Dandelion is a character in The Witcher.

It should be "courting Dandelion".

If you are joking then nvm.

My name at the weekend is Dandelion, so I think GAF is referring to all those who try vigorously to court me on Saturday and Sundays.

If anything positive comes out of this thread, I hope it's a neologism of "Courting Dandelion".

Dandelion is a male character in the Witcher games.

Dandelion is a character in the witcher srries and my phone autocorrected the D to a lowercase. Sorry.

Thanks for the clarification all, and np at all of course Link. Sorry to bring things off-topic.
 
Geralt as a character, at least in the early short stories and early books, is intentionally presented as immature and hypocritical, which is why he always struggles with choosing the lesser evil. Like, he's a literal manchild in some of the books. This aspect is the entire basis of The Witcher 1 where the whole game revolves around the consequences of Geralt's behaviour and hypocrisy. Also why it has the best story of the three games.

In the case of sexism, you could argue that Geralt is to some degree chauvinistic but that's intentional. In the books, I don't think its really played to Geralt's benefit as he's taken advantage of quite often and characters often admonish his immaturity.

To CDPR's discredit, this aspect doesn't really come into play in the games. Geralt doesn't really suffer any significant consequences for what he does and I don't think he ever gets called out for it either, except for a single scene in The Witcher 3 which is still presented as a joke rather than anything serious. They've ditched the cards but sex scenes are still presented as a reward for doing something "positive", like saving Mottle, beating Ves and Jutta, or helping Sasha.

Simplifying sexual relationships to input, output and reward is like in every video game with sex but this is the one department where CDPR hasn't really improved at all. Again, you get no cards anymore but Mottle gives you a shortcut key that saves a fair bit of backtracking if you sleep with her (which you don't get if you refuse). ShockingAlberto actually wrote a really good article recently regarding this phenomenon which is very well worth reading.

This is a good post that everyone seems to be ignoring.
 

QaaQer

Member
Shit does that mean that all sexual images of man and woman, in atypical poses and dress is sexist? like when that conversations starts and ends. What's considered all right and not all right given the context being portrayed, plus that will butt heads with creativity in general.

People do seem to need others to think and behave the way they do: liberals, conservatives, Christians, Atheists, marvel fans, DC fans, climate change enthsiatist, skeptics, etc etc. I don't really understand it myself.
 

Ratrat

Member
Complaining that the Witcher is sexist is like complaining Game of Thrones is sexist. They're based on books that try to depict medieval times ffs.
lol. No.
The Witcher books are incredibly pulpy novels with a lot of wish fulfilment. Unless you are comparing it to the HBO show, then they might be on a similar level.
 

Audioboxer

Member
Because exploitation of women is totally not a thing, right? As long as everyone agrees, yeah?



Narrative and story do not exist in a vacuum. Considering all the bullshit women put up with, in this industry especially but also in general, it's a bit sad that CDPR would go with an image like that to promote their game.

Of course it is, but if it's a women who wants to do modelling and genuinely does (hasn't been forced) then no its not exploitation. I'm guessing the whole porn industry is simply exploitation to you, not accepting that some women and men want to work in porn. Yes others may well be forced or misguided but the whole scenario cannot be painted with the one brush hence how I say consensual.

Like your last part, let's not paint all women as delicate flowers who cannot stand up for themselves or make their own decisions. That is offensive.
 
Because exploitation of women is totally not a thing, right? As long as nobody complains, yeah?



Narrative and story do not exist in a vacuum. Considering all the bullshit women put up with, in this industry especially but also in general, it's a bit sad that CDPR would go with an image like that to promote their game.

They certainly do if they're completely ignored out right. Anyone can take anything out of context and run with it to fit their agenda. On principal alone.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom