For a machine weaker than a WiiU?
good lord, do some basic researchFor a machine weaker than a WiiU?
they've got to. EB definitely does and it's owned by GamestopYeah, that was the point I didn't get: does Gamestop really not let you preorder online in 2016?
With so many configuration of control they are trying to put in the Switch, I can't believe they take out the most important of all (and one that Nintendo started with in the market) : THE TOUCH SCREEN.
I really love the DS era with the innovation they brought to touch screen gaming. Now they back out of that. Same with motion control.
Isn't this the same specs as a Shield TV? I had one, is the WiiU really weaker than the ShieldTV? Shield wasnt as good as I was expecting. Plus why are people saying this is running games in 504p? MK8 was 720/60 no?It's absolutely not weaker than the Wii U
It's running Zelda? That should at least tell you that it's comparable smh
There's totally going to be touch and gyro. That stuff's cheap as dirt now; no reason to waste time on it in such a short trailer.With so many configuration of control they are trying to put in the Switch, I can't believe they take out the most important of all (and one that Nintendo started with in the market) : THE TOUCH SCREEN.
I really love the DS era with the innovation they brought to touch screen gaming. Now they back out of that. Same with motion control.
I think they have to. If you have two kids, they'll each want one and you wouldn't need two docks.
Isn't this the same specs as a Shield TV? I had one, is the WiiU really weaker than the ShieldTV? Shield wasnt as good as I was expecting
Oh shit, really? Why is this thing so different?With so many configuration of control they are trying to put in the Switch, I can't believe they take out the most important of all (and one that Nintendo started with in the market) : THE TOUCH SCREEN.
I really love the DS era with the innovation they brought to touch screen gaming. Now they back out of that. Same with motion control.
NS is closer to an Xbox One than Wii U.Isn't this the same specs as a Shield TV? I had one, is the WiiU really weaker than the ShieldTV? Shield wasnt as good as I was expecting. Plus why are people saying this is running games in 504p?
I'd think so since that market could just not use the dock and play all games as a portable. Maybe they put out a smaller portable only sku down the road though.
Plus a big part of the idea is to have all their games on one platform and not split between a dedicated console and a dedicated portable.
NS is closer to an Xbox One than Wii U.
I'm not saying there is zero people that will, on this forum I'm sure alot would. But the general public? Nah.
Will this be capable of native 1080p games? It better be lol
I am just dumbfounded at the controller. They killed the DPad. They changed the analog stick orientation for the fifth generation in a row. Almost no room between buttons and analog stick in sideways mode.
I think they have to. If you have two kids, they'll each want one and you wouldn't need two docks.
Yea the only thing I hope is all games don't become $60.
Isn't this the same specs as a Shield TV? I had one, is the WiiU really weaker than the ShieldTV? Shield wasnt as good as I was expecting. Plus why are people saying this is running games in 504p? MK8 was 720/60 no?
With so many configuration of control they are trying to put in the Switch, I can't believe they take out the most important of all (and one that Nintendo started with in the market) : THE TOUCH SCREEN.
I really love the DS era with the innovation they brought to touch screen gaming. Now they back out of that. Same with motion control.
Why do you need to "walk around with this thing"? You have the option of doing so and if you're too goddamn hardcore to do it, you can just game at home as you would normally.
I thought the Wii U orientation was really the best ever since it meant you could play shooters without moving your thumb off the sticks.On the bright side we are back to a good stick configuration. Could never get used to right analog over the buttons.
Price it at $199 and they will be printing money all over again. That's exactly why they won't do it.
With so many configuration of control they are trying to put in the Switch, I can't believe they take out the most important of all (and one that Nintendo started with in the market) : THE TOUCH SCREEN.
I really love the DS era with the innovation they brought to touch screen gaming. Now they back out of that. Same with motion control.
idk, it's all speculative. all we really know is that it's a custom nvidia chip. i would place money on it being significantly more powerful than a wii u, thoughIsn't this the same specs as a Shield TV? I had one, is the WiiU really weaker than the ShieldTV? Shield wasnt as good as I was expecting. Plus why are people saying this is running games in 504p? MK8 was 720/60 no?
Have seen enough of Switch to be confident that Nintendo will get its mojo back. I am hopeful price is right and that specs compare to PS4
Umm, No. That's not the reason
This thing has to be cheap if it's just a standard screen with some cheap controllers and a docking station. $200
Isn't this the same specs as a Shield TV? I had one, is the WiiU really weaker than the ShieldTV? Shield wasnt as good as I was expecting. Plus why are people saying this is running games in 504p? MK8 was 720/60 no?
I'm not saying there is zero people that will, on this forum I'm sure alot would. But the general public? Nah.
Will this be capable of native 1080p games? It better be lol
I think it's great because it's portable. But you tried to eliminate the obvious answer by setting up an arbitrary condition. Still, even if I didn't take it out of my house, I still really like portability inside of it for all the same reasons off-tv play was nice. And yes even in terms of Nintendo games, if hybrid is really the focus means you potentially get even more of those than standard. I also look forward to what else they haven't said, about the software and services and about what other plans they could have for alternate controllers and such. We don't have full picture, hell there might be some crazy gotcha that turns everyone off. What you are doing is a classic pattern of setting up hard goals and then failing things because they didn't meet them. That's fine for personal preferences but just remember that it's disingenuous to push those as the public opinion, at least without better backing.
I know everyone on GAF ridicules the guy, but this reveal clearly shows how much their past gen's marketing was bungled with the overwhelmingly positive response from the general media now as opposed to then. We'll just have to see if it can live up to the trailer's promise.
It's absolutely not weaker than the Wii U
It's running Zelda? That should at least tell you that it's comparable smh
Price it at $199 and they will be printing money all over again. That's exactly why they won't do it.
You're wrong.It's running Zelda at substantially poorer framerates in portable mode. That raises a lot of questions about how powerful the system is. The dock has no processing power, but it will provide a wall outlet, so the system will almost certainly be able to run at higher clocks when docked. But whether that'll be enough to make a leap over Wii U when it's running so much worse in portable mode is hard to say.
Nothing we saw in the trailer looked better than a Wii U title... we saw MK8, Splatoon, and BotW looking identical to the Wii U versions. The new Mario also could have easily been a Wii U game. Even if the system is capable of doing better than Wii U, developers may be held back by the handheld performance. If BotW runs at 15fps without the dock, which is looked like it was in the trailer, then clearly they can't ever do much more than Wii U level visuals without causing portable play to struggle. And if it can run better than that, why did they show that footage? You kind of have to assume that will be typical if Nintendo couldn't find something less janky to show.
I would love to be proven wrong, but it seems like we're getting a weaker system than Wii U when playing portably and a system that's equal to Wii U in console mode.
I mean, like a lot of things in this thread, that's all speculative/presumptiveIt's running Zelda at substantially poorer framerates in portable mode. That raises a lot of questions about how powerful the system is. The dock has no processing power, but it will provide a wall outlet, so the system will almost certainly be able to run at higher clocks when docked. But whether that'll be enough to make a leap over Wii U when it's running so much worse in portable mode is hard to say.
Nothing we saw in the trailer looked better than a Wii U title... we saw MK8, Splatoon, and BotW looking identical to the Wii U versions. The new Mario also could have easily been a Wii U game. Even if the system is capable of doing better than Wii U, developers may be held back by the handheld performance. If BotW runs at 15fps without the dock, which is looked like it was in the trailer, then clearly they can't ever do much more than Wii U level visuals without causing portable play to struggle. And if it can run better than that, why did they show that footage? You kind of have to assume that will be typical if Nintendo couldn't find something less janky to show.
I would love to be proven wrong, but it seems like we're getting a weaker system than Wii U when playing portably and a system that's equal to Wii U in console mode.
also yeah i wouldn't take the footage in that video as what your experience is going to be like.You realize everything on-screen in that trailer was done in post-processing right? None of it was running on a Switch, it was just target renders.