• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

PlayStation 4 Pro Reviews

Wereroku

Member
People dissing Scott Baku... Jeff Bakalar.

If he wasn't able to spot any meaningful differences in the games, that's cool - not every consumer is a pixel-counter, so not every reviewer needs to be.

I value DF to be fascinated by the intricacies of checkerboarding and 52fps vs 56fps, but similarly, i value those that casually say "is it all that noticeable? ... nah"

beyond dissing cnet, does anyone really disagree with the verdict?
"If you don't have a PS4, buy the pro, if you have a PS4, you don't need a pro right now because the upgrade isn't worth 400$, right now"
Sounds reasonable.

(I'm still gonna buy one, because just like there's people upgrading from a gtx 980 to a 1080, there's people who want to "optimize" their console gaming experience.

I wasn't dissing him I just don't think he had a lot of research done on the system after listening to the beastcast. Also he has always been more focused on the content of games then the performance.
 

Kurdel

Banned
But we already know there can't be anything unique to the pro so the only thing devs can do is make it run or look better all things he doesn't really see.

I mean, if they are imperceptible and he was unimpressed, what does that intricate knowledge really bring to the table except confirmation bias?

I would rather read the Cnet review than have time magazine tell me they were "giddy" from the inky blacks in CoD.
 

jeffc919

Member
Don't get your hopes up. Still waiting on the HDR update on Xbox One and they announced that pre launch.

Didn't they release within the window where they are supposedly required to have a patch for launch? Or is it just that the patch is required but not necessarily before PS4 Pro launch?
 

GRaider81

Member
The Cnet Review is totally on point for me, even better with the video version.

Sorry its not what some of you want to hear but there will be plenty of "its amazing" reviews for you too.
 

Wereroku

Member
I mean, if they are imperceptible and he was unimpressed, what does that intricate knowledge really bring to the table except confirmation bias?

Looking at screens of TR or Titanfall I wouldn't say the IQ improvements are imperceptible.
 

DOWN

Banned
The Cnet Review is totally on point, even better with the video version.

Sorry its not what some of you want to hear but there will be plenty of "its amazing" reviews for you too.

It was never the only skeptical review in the OP so let's not act like it was about that and more than dumbness on my part seeing it in part after it and its author's tweet impressions were first out

uV8J3mX.png
 

Certinty

Member
Sounds like a decent enough upgrade.

I have a PS4 which I use as my main games console and the fan is beyond annoying now, so that alongside me having a 4KTV makes the purchase of the PS4 Pro seem alright I guess.
 

Loudninja

Member
The Cnet Review is totally on point, even better with the video version.

Sorry its not what some of you want to hear but there will be plenty of "its amazing" reviews for you too.
People can judge it for themselves plenty of vids out there now.

DF goes into detail of the differences.
 

Aaron

Member
I wouldn't say he was that informed going by the Beastcast. He seemed to have no clue about the games that had been announced or what they were even requiring devs to do. Hell someone posted a tweet where says he is looking forward to games developed with the pro in mind. But we already know there can't be anything unique to the pro so the only thing devs can do is make it run or look better all things he doesn't really see.
It's not about unique features. It's about building a separate branch of their game from the start or early in development, instead of having to graft it on with a patch later. This will make a significant difference what devs can do with the pro.
 
The Cnet Review is totally on point, even better with the video version.

Sorry its not what some of you want to hear but there will be plenty of "its amazing" reviews for you too.

It's their opinion. Just like the "it's amazing" reviews.
But somehow this review was TOTALLY on point for you.
It might be not completely on point for others.

As a gamer i thought they made some weird choices and i allready think the differences in some games are worth it for me.
People will have to make up their own minds.

We don't all see the same things. My girlfriend can't tell 480P from Mp3. (yeah, you read that correctly).

Op shouldn't have put a verdict on the review though.
 

Kurdel

Banned
Looking at screens of TR or Titanfall I wouldn't say the IQ improvements are imperceptible.

He wasn't blown away, take that information as you will, but I don't think holding his hand and showing him the better shadows is going to change his mind.
 
Y'all are just upset the Cnet review isn't saying "OMG buy a Pro it's so worth it."

I don't count framerates when I play games but I sure as hell can notice a difference in quality.

Bakalar's Cnet review seems well written and fair, he (and alot of other sites) are saying the difference in older games is tough to see. Wait til new games come out when those developers had PS4 Pro info during production.

GAFers just tryin to jump on the Cnet bandwagon hate, unreal. I love Beastcast, listen to Bakalar all the time, dude know's what's up
 

Wereroku

Member
He wasn't blown away, take that information as you will, but I don't think holding his hand and showing him the better shadows is going to change his mind.

What? I never said anything about shadows. Just from seeing the IQ improvements I don't see how you could say they are imperceptible. If he said not worth the money to him I could understand but you can tell the difference.
 

winstano

Member
Excellent! any high pitched noises during heavy games like uncharted or last of us?

I also have a launch ps4 right now

Nope, I've barely noticed it. I will say that it does vibrate a little with the disc drive, so I use some sorbothane pads under all of my systems (cheap furniture = echo central), but in terms of system noise it's super quiet

Appreciate the effort here. I think I'm keeping my preorder. Got cold feet about it last week. Haven't not played Uncharted 4 yet, I'm guessing this is worth the price of admission.

Thanks man, it's tricky to balance the site and a 9-5 but when people appreciate stuff it makes it worth it :)
 

64bitbros

Member
The IGN confirms what I was fearing. Lack of consistency and transparency with respect to the Pro's benefits. The idea that some games might even run worse in their Pro modes is troubling.

You mean this quote?

Not only is it hard to find any appreciable difference in visual quality, but the higher resolution seemed to cause deeper framerate dips than I remember from when I played Mankind Divided on a standard PS4.

Sorry, but i need a but more proof than "than i remember".
 
Who wants a score lol

I just noticed a lot of the reviews were giving PSVR a scoring rating when its embargo dropped a few weeks ago and to be honest there's that much information and misinformation around the Pro right now I'd just like to see an aggregate score of 8.5+ and then I know I'll be buying the Pro over the Slim next year :)
 
The Cnet Review is totally on point, even better with the video version.

Sorry its not what some of you want to hear but there will be plenty of "its amazing" reviews for you too.

Let me guess, you haven't go the system...Therefore, you are just projecting another example of confirmation bias...kind of weird to call others out by drawing attention to your own transparency...
 

Haines

Banned
I trust df. They know there shit. Thats enough for me.

Fact is with the pro and a 4k i will get a better visual experience the rest of this console gen on my sony device. Probably even more so on scorpio too.

Thats enough for me, i play a lot of games for it to be worth the change.
 

DOWN

Banned
It's not about unique features. It's about building a separate branch of their game from the start or early in development, instead of having to graft it on with a patch later. This will make a significant difference what devs can do with the pro.

This flies against what devs and Cerny say about Pro and how it is going to be utilized for games, particularly considering it is supposed to be quick to work on and will only play games that also work on base model
 

spwolf

Member
Y'all are just upset the Cnet review isn't saying "OMG buy a Pro it's so worth it."

I don't count framerates when I play games but I sure as hell can notice a difference in quality.

Bakalar's Cnet review seems well written and fair, he (and alot of other sites) are saying the difference in older games is tough to see. Wait til new games come out when those developers had PS4 Pro info during production.

GAFers just tryin to jump on the Cnet bandwagon hate, unreal. I love Beastcast, listen to Bakalar all the time, dude know's what's up

well I will have mine in 4 days, so I will see in RL then, but from videos posted by DF and others, difference is sometimes huge, sometimes less but in general, it is very easy to see even if you dont care about graphics.

So them saying that difference cant be seen is just false... now if people dont care about graphics, then it is something else.
 

pswii60

Member
Yeah, I saw it being played at a PSVR demo event a few weeks ago, and the difference with HDR on was very apparent. Admittedly that was being played on a 70" 4KTV - so like you say, maybe CNET's hardware wasn't good enough to take advantage of the improvements.

My C6 is only 55", but the streetlights, signs, neon lights and superpowers are mindblowingly beautiful. They pop out of the screen like crazy with HDR enabled - the colours are incredible too. It looks great either way, but amazing in HDR.

But then, it's the type of game that thoroughly takes advantage of OLED's strengths, with bright lights in a nighttime setting. LCD's will likely perform better with HDR in brighter daytime settings, if that's what they used to test.
 
I trust df. They know there shit. Thats enough for me.

Fact is with the pro and a 4k i will get a better visual experience the rest of this console gen on my sony device. Probably even more so on scorpio too.

Thats enough for me, i play a lot of games for it to be worth the change.

Exactly this.

The Pro is an enthusiasts upgrade, better frame rate, better resolution, better IQ.

Nothing really more to say.
 

mrback

Member
Really!? HDR on First Light just on my standard PS4 is jaw-dropping on my C6 OLED and comparing to HDR switched off is night and day. Perhaps they need a better TV to test their games on.

Massively agree with you there, I saw it a playstation event on a sony hdr tv & the difference between it being switched off & on was massive. especially with the neon powers, it looked amazing & defo sold me on hdr.
 
Y'all are just upset the Cnet review isn't saying "OMG buy a Pro it's so worth it."

I don't count framerates when I play games but I sure as hell can notice a difference in quality.

Bakalar's Cnet review seems well written and fair, he (and alot of other sites) are saying the difference in older games is tough to see. Wait til new games come out when those developers had PS4 Pro info during production.

GAFers just tryin to jump on the Cnet bandwagon hate, unreal. I love Beastcast, listen to Bakalar all the time, dude know's what's up

I don't know, this seems a pretty big difference to me in both detail and frame rate.

jBb9eIf.png


But everybody's mileage varies when it comes to things like frame rate, supersampling, better AA and so on.
 

JayEH

Junior Member
Let me guess, you haven't go the system...Therefore, you are just projecting another example of confirmation bias...kind of weird to call others out by drawing attention to your own transparency...

Nobody has the system now besides reviewers
 

Kurdel

Banned
What? I never said anything about shadows. Just from seeing the IQ improvements I don't see how you could say they are imperceptible. If he said not worth the money to him I could understand but you can tell the difference.

I also can see a formula to dictate whether it will be significant or not for you.

A screen size to distance from TV type of deaI.

I know I notice downsampling IQ on my TV, but I am also quite close to mine, to someone 3 feet further it could be imperceptible.
 

Logash

Member
What's the word on the noise level? My PS4 currently sounds like it's dying while running FF14 and other games that tax the shit out of it.
 
I'm not saying his review is poor or objectively wrong -- everyone's opinion is valid -- but in terms of technical knowledge and awareness, has Jeff Bakalar ever come off as extremely savvy or discerning?

If he says the difference is hard to see then the difference, to him, is hard to see. That could very well be the experience of thousands of consumers. You can't ignore his viewpoint. Just don't go expecting the depth of a Digital Foundry breakdown.

So let's keep the "clickbait" stuff to a minimum, okay?
 
Pro is simply slightly ahead of its time.

With some time, general public opinion will change dramatically, once all video reviews are from Pro version, once multiplayer gamers spread word of mouth how their games have fewer to no fps drops, once games are developed with Pro in mind are released.
 
Uncharted 4 not using checkerboarding, is that performance related then? Can't imagine why a Sony-owned studio wouldn't demonstrate a technique they invoked during the presentation of the console.
 
Top Bottom