• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Clinton aides blame loss on FBI, media, sexism, Bernie, everything but themselves

Status
Not open for further replies.

tbm24

Member
Van Jones? Angela Rye? Anna Navarro?

To act like Trump surrogates got to say whatever they wanted with out being called on their bullshit is....bullshit.

All three of them, repeatedly, were talked over and many times shouted down because Trump surrogates become unhinged in a second. CNN at no point made efforts, except for fact checking which was few and far between until the last 2 weeks I'd say, to repudiate anything Trump or his surrogates would say. It was always left open for interpretation. Jeffrey Lord in particular, in just about every time I saw him on a panel took 5 minutes to explain identity politics and then turn around and remind everything that the KKK started with democrats, which again happened just about every time I saw him and an off the cuff remark of saying that's not true while he's still speaking is NOT being called on their bullshit. He and the other surrogates, especially Corey L were active bullies who always got their last word in.
 
I struggle to put this on voters after SHE and the DNC left a great deal of them disenfranchised. Their mistreatment of the Bernie camp with the condescending demand hat they "fall in line" with no good reason other than "TRUMP BAD". In all that, they stupidly forgot to tell us why she's good. Why we should stomach our pride and vote for her. I don't give a fuck who the opponent is. If you abandon your base, they will not only abandon you, they'll flip on you. Trump courted the Bernie base 100% more than she did! She didn't after the demographic that we just assumed she'd have in the GE. The black vote for example. Look at how many times she mistreated BLM right to their faces. Stupid pandering platitudes like "she's like your Abuela!"

This isn't on the voters. You gotta fucking EARN that vote. Not demand it. People aren't going to buy what you're selling if the product has proven time after time as untrustworthy. Even if the competing product is shitty, buyers will try it at least once just to make sure.

I don't know when it started, but people on here seem to as of recently be misusing the word "disenfranchised", in the context of voting. No, having the ability to make the decision to vote or not, and choosing not to (out of apathy, dislike of the candidate, etc), does not mean you were disenfranchised. Yeah, it's nitpicking, but in an election where we literally had people have their right to vote lost or obstructed, we should get the terminology straight
 

Chumley

Banned
Van Jones? Angela Rye? Anna Navarro?

To act like Trump surrogates got to say whatever they wanted with out being called on their bullshit is....bullshit.

Van Jones and Angela Rye were shut down constantly in favor of Trump surrogates lying through their fucking teeth with every breath and becoming unhinged almost every night. Like with Trump at the debates, they just raise their voice and even Anderson Cooper usually didn't shut them down because they got so fucking loud. Jake Tapper is the only one who even for a moment was able to make Lewandowski shut up.

Pretty much the only way to combat that is to become as belligerent as they are, but then there won't even be a discussion since people like Van Jones are too classy for that. Thoughtful guys like him are being swept aside and it's depressing.
 
Van Jones? Angela Rye? Anna Navarro?

To act like Trump surrogates got to say whatever they wanted with out being called on their bullshit is....bullshit.

It's a disgrace CNN went down that road in the first place, they created a circus, and they hired the worst fucking people I've seen to spends hundreds of hours talking out of their asses about Trump. CNN became the circus that Trump started, for a ratings grab. I've never seen anything like it.

And again, besides the fucking insanity that were those surrogates, CNN did in fact spend an ridiculous amount of time dragging the fuck out of Clinton. I wouldn't be surprised if they mentioned emails more than Fox, especially during those finals couple of weeks. Disgrace.

The issue is not the extreme Bernie supporters being hit, but the moderate ones that were constantly hit with the insult just for being Bernie supporters too.

I mean, if chill avid Bernie supporters were getting lit up, then that sucks, but lets not act like both sides couldn't be incredible obnoxious. It got messy real fast, and that was exactly what I was afraid was gonna happen.
 

tbm24

Member
I struggle to put this on voters after SHE and the DNC left a great deal of them disenfranchised. Their mistreatment of the Bernie camp with the condescending demand hat they "fall in line" with no good reason other than "TRUMP BAD". In all that, they stupidly forgot to tell us why she's good. Why we should stomach our pride and vote for her. I don't give a fuck who the opponent is. If you abandon your base, they will not only abandon you, they'll flip on you. Trump courted the Bernie base 100% more than she did! She didn't after the demographic that we just assumed she'd have in the GE. The black vote for example. Look at how many times she mistreated BLM right to their faces. Stupid pandering platitudes like "she's like your Abuela!"

This isn't on the voters. You gotta fucking EARN that vote. Not demand it. People aren't going to buy what you're selling if the product has proven time after time as untrustworthy. Even if the competing product is shitty, buyers will try it at least once just to make sure.
If this is not enough for voters, nothing is. Quite frankly, Clinton was not a perfect candidate by any means. Everyone can agree on that front. However, this election(and all elections) are not about the individual person. They are about the collective group of Americans. You can't hand wave away what's going to happen to this country in the next four years let alone the Supreme Court. The bolded is the only reason any of those voters who overwhelming supported Bernie and were offended by the Clinton side needed. I do not see what else they needed aside TRUMP IS BAD. He is unequivocally bad for this country in every way that counts.
 

legacyzero

Banned
I don't know when it started, but people on here seem to as of recently be misusing the word "disenfranchised", in the context of voting. No, having the ability to make the decision to vote or not, and choosing not to (out of apathy, dislike of the candidate, etc), does not mean you were disenfranchised. Yeah, it's nitpicking, but in an election where we literally had people have their right to vote lost or obstructed, we should get the terminology straight
No, you're right. This is me trying to expand my vocabulary and sound intelligent, while failing lol
If this is not enough for voters, nothing is. Quite frankly, Clinton was not a perfect candidate by any means. Everyone can agree on that front. However, this election(and all elections) are not about the individual person. They are about the collective group of Americans. You can't hand wave away what's going to happen to this country in the next four years let alone the Supreme Court. The bolded is the only reason any of those voters who overwhelming supported Bernie and were offended by the Clinton side needed. I do not see what else they needed aside TRUMP IS BAD. He is unequivocally bad for this country in every way that counts.
Wishful thinking.

This is exactly why the populist vote was important this year. In desperation, people will even go to the dark side if it means some semblance of change from the status quo. It's just the reality of it.

And the dems had their own populist that would have provided a better fight. They blew it.
 
this would've pissed me off even if she had won. normalizing his ilk would still have been considered insanely destructive

and she didn't win. so she had a hand in sculpting this nightmare hellscape herself. I am so insanely angry at her right now.

It's like Doom without Doomguy.
 
We have the same problem that elected Reagan. These Blue Collar workers in the Rust Belt. These people voted for Obama but dident vote for Clinton why is that?
 

Bolivar687

Banned
I live in one of the urban centers of the swing states, where Clintons inability to drive up the votes cost her the election. I don't think I ever saw a single commercial here discussing her policies, every one leading up to the election was soundbites of Trump. They kept saying in speeches "when they go low, you go high," and how she's a candidate you can vote for rather than just against Trump but it did not correlate to their message at all. It just drove up the election fatigue that kept people away from the polls.

At this point they need to accept that they ran an overly negative campaign which backfired and not demonize everyone who didn't buy it. The Republicans are going to keep winning unless they let it go.
 

Deku Tree

Member
The problem with the emails is that a lot of people in this country have a long unpleasant memory of the corruption of the Clintons. A lot of it is fabricated but some of it is well documented fact. The constant reminder of the emails was just a way for Trump to remind people of all the percieved corruption. Hence the "Crooked Hillary" moniker.
 

MIMIC

Banned
It's clear to me that you barely watched this elections coverage on CNN through this entire year if you have to ask.

All three of them, repeatedly, were talked over and many times shouted down because Trump surrogates become unhinged in a second. CNN at no point made efforts, except for fact checking which was few and far between until the last 2 weeks I'd say, to repudiate anything Trump or his surrogates would say. It was always left open for interpretation. Jeffrey Lord in particular, in just about every time I saw him on a panel took 5 minutes to explain identity politics and then turn around and remind everything that the KKK started with democrats, which again happened just about every time I saw him and an off the cuff remark of saying that's not true while he's still speaking is NOT being called on their bullshit. He and the other surrogates, especially Corey L were active bullies who always got their last word in.

Oh, I'm sorry. It's clear that I didn't watch CNN and have no idea what I'm talking about.

Van Jones and Angela Rye were shut down constantly in favor of Trump surrogates lying through their fucking teeth with every breath and becoming unhinged almost every night. Like with Trump at the debates, they just raise their voice and even Anderson Cooper usually didn't shut them down because they got so fucking loud. Jake Tapper is the only one who even for a moment was able to make Lewandowski shut up.

Pretty much the only way to combat that is to become as belligerent as they are, but then there won't even be a discussion since people like Van Jones are too classy for that. Thoughtful guys like him are being swept aside and it's depressing.

You have by fart the most extreme opinion on this, because I don't agree with any of this. They were not silenced. In fact, Anna Navarro herself has silenced entire panels at times.

It's a disgrace CNN went down that road in the first place, they created a circus, and they hired the worst fucking people I've seen to spends hundreds of hours talking out of their asses about Trump. CNN became the circus that Trump started, for a ratings grab. I've never seen anything like it.

And again, besides the fucking insanity that were those surrogates, CNN did in fact spend an ridiculous amount of time dragging the fuck out of Clinton. I wouldn't be surprised if they mentioned emails more than Fox, especially during those finals couple of weeks. Disgrace.

CNN shouldn't have hired Lewendowski, but seriously: who is an "acceptable" Trump surrogate that would staunchly advocate for him? They had to have someone, but therein lies the problem: people don't think anyone should be staunchly advocating for Trump.

That's not how it works.

This election WAS a circus, and how the discussions unfolded on certain networks was just a microcosm of that.
 

Odrion

Banned
how could you look at the normalization of fascist white nationalism and think "yeah sure let's elevate that it could hurt a few people but who cares I bet I'll win!"

I hope Hillary knows that the blood of minorities and gay people are on her fucking hands.
 
I struggle to put this on voters after SHE and the DNC left a great deal of them disenfranchised. Their mistreatment of the Bernie camp with the condescending demand hat they "fall in line" with no good reason other than "TRUMP BAD". In all that, they stupidly forgot to tell us why she's good. Why we should stomach our pride and vote for her. I don't give a fuck who the opponent is. If you abandon your base, they will not only abandon you, they'll flip on you. Trump courted the Bernie base 100% more than she did! She didn't after the demographic that we just assumed she'd have in the GE. The black vote for example. Look at how many times she mistreated BLM right to their faces. Stupid pandering platitudes like "she's like your Abuela!"

This isn't on the voters. You gotta fucking EARN that vote. Not demand it. People aren't going to buy what you're selling if the product has proven time after time as untrustworthy. Even if the competing product is shitty, buyers will try it at least once just to make sure.

Get out of here with this. Democrats would never lose a fucking election if they fell in line against people that they SHOULD consider a disaster for America, and Progressiveness. I've voted plenty of times while lukewarm about it, because doing nothing and hoping everyone else(mostly minorities) pick up the slack to prevent a diet fascist and his conservative knuckledraggers from getting power is something I consider unnaceptable This gloating should fall on deaf ears, because it's childish, and now look at what we're dealing with. This is really gonna set us back, fuck.

I supported Bernie for the most part, but when it was clear that shit was over, I fell in line and supported fully the only option we had, because it's the responsible thing to do. I didn't try and divide democrats, or splinter the party, or peddle right-wing talking points or opportunists hackers and foreign entities, or apparently salivate at the thought of Clinton getting charged with something.

I appreciate those that did nothing whatsoever to prevent just how fucked up these next 4 years will be, or from preventing the shittiest the most abhorrent subset of Americans across the country. Much appreciated on letting them get that win, and for another generation of an conservative majority in the supreme court. (probably worse then before if some of these republicans have their way)
 
T

thepotatoman

Unconfirmed Member
I live in one of the urban centers of the swing states, where Clintons inability to drive up the votes cost her the election. I don't think I ever saw a single commercial here discussing her policies, every one leading up to the election was soundbites of Trump. They kept saying in speeches "when they go low, you go high," and how she's a candidate you can vote for rather than just against Trump but it did not correlate to their message at all. It just drove up the election fatigue that kept people away from the polls.

At this point they need to accept that they ran an overly negative campaign which backfired and not demonize everyone who didn't buy it. The Republicans are going to keep winning unless they let it go.

I did see this one on TV:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NdKsA4q-FFA

It seems pretty solidly aimed at older republican moderates though.
 

LCGeek

formerly sane
It's cool that voters can't share in the blame of getting the cheeto monster elected though, because Clinton made the mistake of listening to the blowout narrative, or not thinking she was about to get blindsided by the FBI a couple weeks before election day, while early voting was going on, and then dropped when early voting finished. Gosh, Clinton, how come you did see that coming?

Voting isn't hard(unless you're being suppressed, but lets not talk about that!), but boo hoo, she didn't visit certain states, or she was charismatic, or wasn't a man. CHILDISH SHIT. She was the only fucking option, and now we have what can be one of the most conservative government for the next 4 years. I mean, 45% of voters essentially said, "fuck it", both are just as bad as each other, so lets be apathetic and help plunge this country into a potential horror show. Beautiful.

What childish is your side acting fucking entitled in a democracy after that literally happened. You wanted to go alone, so suck it up.
 

SL128

Member
Everything the Clinton campaign is blaming (except implying BoBers would have voted Hillary) is correct, but doesn't absolve them of incompetence.

The Clinton campaign's incompetence is also a major factor, but it doesn't mean the external bullshit didn't contribute.

This isn't one or the other; they're all important to focus on and learn from.
 
And another thing, even if all these voters didn't wanna vote for Clinton against a diet fascist because she doesn't pass the bullshit purity tests, at least show up and vote down-ballot, DO SOMETHING.

I'm also not letting off anyone that voted for Trump of the hook. Deplorable, the lot of them. It would be so sweet if they voted for him and then on Nov. 28 he taken to task in court for his Trump U case, but I expect nothing much to come from it, other than Trump being able to settle, because that's his privilege..

What childish is your side acting fucking entitled in a democracy after that literally happened. You wanted to go alone, so suck it up.

that's rich, calling someone that actually gets involved in the process no matter what, "entitled". GOOD LUCK.
 

Juken

Member
The lesson is you have to earn votes rather than expect people to pick the responsible choice. Internet logic doesn't win elections and it turns out that excitement is actually important.

Shaming people and condescending to them didn't help. And if you feel they are a lost cause and aren't going to try, you better be prepared to go without them.
 

Easy_D

never left the stone age
Stop this shit, tearing it all down and starting from scratch would take even longer to rebuild. Just get people like Podesta out of there.

Fineee. I agree that rebuilding would take longer than the 4 years ya got until the next try. But there needs to be some serious changes. Though there definitely should be some serious alternatives to people who are both right and left leaning. There should be an actual left party and a conservative party that isn't comprised out of supervillains for the conservative crowd as well. Granted, over here, our biggest conservative party's pretty close to your democrats last I checked.
 
It's cool that voters can't share in the blame of getting the cheeto monster elected though, because Clinton made the mistake of listening to the blowout narrative, or not thinking she was about to get blindsided by the FBI a couple weeks before election day, while early voting was going on, and then dropped when early voting finished. Gosh, Clinton, how come you did see that coming?

Voting isn't hard(unless you're being suppressed, but lets not talk about that!), but boo hoo, she didn't visit certain states, or she was charismatic, or wasn't a man. CHILDISH SHIT. She was the only fucking option, and now we have what can be one of the most conservative government for the next 4 years. I mean, 45% of voters essentially said, "fuck it", both are just as bad as each other, so lets be apathetic and help plunge this country into a potential horror show. Beautiful.

First, DontBeThatGuy
Second, the campaign should have been focused on she was going to help the common man. instead, it focused on how Donald Trump would be disastrous( he certainly will ). That was the major mistake.
 
19% for Clinton, 51% for Obama in 2008.

Lol, dude what
http://www.cnn.com/2016/11/11/politics/popular-vote-turnout-2016/

DUDHHyH.png

Edit: Ah, I must've missed the "millennial" part. My bad
 
The lesson is you have to earn votes rather than expect people to pick the responsible choice. Internet logic doesn't win elections and it turns out that excitement is actually important.

Shaming people and condescending to them didn't help. And if you feel they are a lost cause and aren't going to try, you better be prepared to go without them.

See, that attitude is why Republicans win. They fall in line, because that's the only way you're ever gonna get what you want. You think the majority of them liked Trump? Fuck no, but they won, and that's all that matters. Purity tests are for suckers.
 

Violet_0

Banned
Voting isn't hard(unless you're being suppressed, but lets not talk about that!), but boo hoo, she didn't visit certain states, or she was charismatic, or wasn't a man. CHILDISH SHIT. She was the only fucking option, and now we have what can be one of the most conservative government for the next 4 years. I mean, 45% of voters essentially said, "fuck it", both are just as bad as each other, so lets be apathetic and help plunge this country into a potential horror show. Beautiful.

the job of the candidate is to mobilze the party and get them to vote for them. If they can't, they failed. No one has any obligation to give their vote to whoever is currently spearheading the party . Sure, you can continue to complain about and marginalize the so-called dumb masses for however long you want, but they'll just keep voting for whoever they think is listening to their plight. It isn't constructive or helpful in any way. This isn't a "America failed Hillary" scenario, it's all on her
 

Juken

Member
See, that attitude is why Republicans win. They fall in line, because that's the only way you're ever gonna get what you want. You think the majority of them liked Trump? Fuck no, but they won, and that's all that matters. Purity tests are for suckers.

Yes, but we're having different arguments. You're arguing for how it should be and I'm saying arguing that knowing how it is, you have to adapt.
 
First, DontBeThatGuy
Second, the campaign should have been focused on she was going to help the common man. instead, it focused on how Donald Trump would be disastrous( he certainly will ). That was the major mistake.

It's your fault and your fault alone if you were unaware or where she stands, what her policies are, and what she wanted to do to change things. The fact of the matter is that what swayed this election wasn't about ideas, it was about feelings and muckraking. You could win 3 debates handily, the other guy can look like an unhinged fool way over his head, and that still meant jackshit. Republicans fell in line, and millions of liberals took their ball and went home
 
It's your fault and your fault alone if you were unaware or where she stands, what her policies are, and what she wanted to do to change things. The fact of the matter is that what swayed this election wasn't about ideas, it was about feelings and muckraking. You could win 3 debates handily, the other guy can look like an unhinged fool way over his head, and that still meant jackshit. Republicans fell in line, and millions of liberals took their ball and went home
If this were true, there would be no point to political campaigns.

And yet they are necessary things.

Gee, I wonder why.
 

badb0y

Member
I am in a professional program in University in NYC and it's mind-boggling the amount of people here that say "both are terrible." When I push them on what policies they support of Trump and they can't name a single one. This is really disheartening man, if college educated students are acting like this I can't blame the uneducated white voters. Something has gone completely wrong..
 
You know what helps the common man? A Supreme Court stacked with empathetic liberals. But I guess Clinton mentioning that dozens of times just wasn't enough to get people to give a shit.

If this were true, there would be no point to political campaigns.

And yet they are necessary things.

Gee, I wonder why.

So, you're saying Clinton didn't discuss her ideas, her polices, it wasn't out in the open where she stood? I mean, I know the media gave Trump all the damn publicity, but Clinton wasn't running around saying sweet nothings.
 

MIMIC

Banned
So all the political cartoons that showed GoP mad scientists creating a Frankenstein Trump were wrong.

It was CLINTON that created this monster!

Jesus, and I voted for and adamantly defended this woman...

This needs to be a thread.

So much for blaming the media. They did exactly what she wanted.
 

Juken

Member
It's your fault and your fault alone if you were unaware or where she stands, what her policies are, and what she wanted to do to change things. The fact of the matter is that what swayed this election wasn't about ideas, it was about feelings and muckraking. You could win 3 debates handily, the other guy can look like an unhinged fool way over his head, and that still meant jackshit. Republicans fell in line, and millions of liberals took their ball and went home

Well we're still in the aftermath and emotions run high. I hope that eventually people take a different approach than this type of posting. I feel posts and articles with a similar tone towards "Bernie Bros" just entrenched/depressed them.
 

Makonero

Member
It's your fault and your fault alone if you were unaware or where she stands, what her policies are, and what she wanted to do to change things. The fact of the matter is that what swayed this election wasn't about ideas, it was about feelings and muckraking. You could win 3 debates handily, the other guy can look like an unhinged fool way over his head, and that still meant jackshit. Republicans fell in line, and millions of liberals took their ball and went home

Being right about things doesn't win elections. If you have no power to implement your righteous policies, what good is saying "at least I was right!"?

Win first.
 
Well we're still in the aftermath and emotions run high. I hope that eventually people take a different approach than this type of posting. I feel posts and articles with a similar tone towards "Bernie Bros" just entrenched/depressed them.

"berniebros" hated Hillary with every fiber of their being, and made sure you knew about it. (Bernie supporter here). They can stop playing the victim.
 
So, you're saying Clinton didn't discuss her ideas, her polices, it wasn't out in the open where she stood? I mean, I know the media gave Trump all the damn publicity, but Clinton wasn't running around saying sweet nothings.
I'm saying her messaging and approach to spreading those ideas and policies was piss poor.
 

Chariot

Member
"berniebros" hated Hillary with every fiber of their being, and made sure you knew about it. (Bernie supporter here). They can stop playing the victim.
The issue is not the extreme Bernie supporters being hit, but the moderate ones that were constantly hit with the insult just for being Bernie supporters too.
 

E92 M3

Member
I am in a professional program in University in NYC and it's mind-boggling the amount of people here that say "both are terrible." When I push them on what policies they support of Trump and they can't name a single one. This is really disheartening man, if college educated students are acting like this I can't blame the uneducated white voters. Something has gone completely wrong..

This election wasn't about policies, it was about connecting with the people and change from the status quo. Trump connected and Hillary generated 0 excitement and then she chose Tim Kaine.

DNC fucked up.
 
this would've pissed me off even if she had won. normalizing his ilk would still have been considered insanely destructive

and she didn't win. so she had a hand in sculpting this nightmare hellscape herself. I am so insanely angry at her right now.

It's amazing and horrifying when you think about it. She was billed as the candidate that would essentially protect minorities, women and the LGBT community, and now we find out that she gambled with their lives just so that she could try to get an easy out in the general election.
 

Chariot

Member
It's amazing and horrifying when you think about it. She was billed as the candidate that would essentially protect minorities, women and the LGBT community, and now we find out that she gambled with their lives just so that she could try to get an easy out in the general election.
And then she continued gambling as she was rather fundraising with the rich people than going out to talk to the dirty rurals. Never forget that she is a millionaire.
 
I'm saying her messaging and approach to spreading those ideas and policies was piss poor.

I'm not about to call her a great campaigner by any means, but that didn't stop me from paying attention, or from watching a few of her rallies, or from watching her easily win 3 all 3 debates, and knowing exactly what her ideas and policies were. (and regardless, that wouldn't have stopped me from voting against Donald Trump because that's the right thing to do)

I guess I'm more willing to do the work to understand a candidate, and think about the future then many others. I'm convinced a great many people just didn't wanna hear it, because feelings.
 
I'm not about to call her a great campaigner by any means, but that didn't stop me from paying attention, or from watching a few of her rallies, or from watching her easily win 3 all 3 debates, and knowing exactly what her ideas and policies were. (and regardless, that wouldn't have stopped me from voting against Donald Trump because that's the right thing to do)

I guess I'm more willing to do the work to understand a candidate, and think about the future then many others. I'm convinced a great many people just didn't wanna hear it, because feelings.
You obviously aren't most people.

Most people are not even remotely that engaged in the process until you as a candidate get them engaged. That is literally what a candidate is supposed to be doing. Providing a central figure for people to rally around and invest their time in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom