Disagree Guy
Member
You may take our squirts, but you will never take our love for squirts!
also brit-gaf wtf is chavs?
This will do
You may take our squirts, but you will never take our love for squirts!
also brit-gaf wtf is chavs?
Also South Korea
http://media.gizmodo.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/pornhub-2016-620x349.jpg[/IG]
Squirt at #2[/QUOTE]
What da fuck @ Kim Kardashian being up there.
This will do
Should just make it a rule for porn sites to put that pic up when people from UK go on the site. 90% of people would just turn off their computers.
Not according to how many people search for Chav porn haha
I barely recognize my home country any more. Very sad.
That's just people wanting to get turned off before their partner gets home. Ha
Are you fucking kidding me?
You really need to look into the history of media censorship in this country, and how hardcore porn basically became decriminalized by the (pun intended) "back door".
Basically these changes just impose the same guidelines imposed by the BBFC for all-types of video, and thus prosecution under the OPA - which is I guess at least indicative of consistency of approach.
Bottom line is that regardless of these changes, under the law as it stands today if material of this type was found on our computer, you would risk being prosecuted for possession of indecent imagery.
I'm not pro-censorship, and I think proscription of harmless paraphiilias like urolagnia is dumb as shit, but it needs to be understood that this is a standing legal precedent, not a change.
Female ejaculation too?
Holy shit did Cromwell rise from his grave and start protecting England again?
It's happening isn't it.
America is turning into Ideocracy and UK is turning in to V for Vendetta.
No it is a change. It's an amendment to a pre-existing bill.
Finally a reason to go back out into the woods.
I wonder when the people who actually believe this argument will start publicly posting the username and passwords to all of their social media and email accounts because they have nothing to hide.
Damnit im gonna have to see what chav porn is now
thanks gaf
So how long before the first member of parliament gets arrested?
I'd watch Arnie pepper everyone with sexThis is funny.
Oh, it's happening in my country, it's not so funny anymore.
So, just to be clear, l can do it with my wife but not watch it? Fucking LOL.
Also: it's OK to see domestic violence on EastEnders, but not to see sex between consenting adults.
You can watch Arnie pepper everyone with bullets, but not sex.
Uh-huh.
Nestle haven't broke the news that Kit Kat's will be pared down to 3 fingers in the UK.So the four finger rule isn't about Kit-Kats?
You were saying our government officials are both scummy and kinky.Can someone please explain this conversation I was having with someone about this. It's left me really confused.
Them: Fucking people moralising about things that don't affect them.
Me: You know for a fact everyone involved in that bill has been pissed on at least once
Them: As is their right
Me: That's their true fetish though, taking away freedoms from other people that they themselves enjoy
Them: You chat is still making like between fetish/watersports/whatever and bad peeps so I cba anymore
Me: Eh? You know i'm in agreement with you right?
Them: I know but the implocit links I cba with
...what? What links was I making with 'bad peeps'?
You were saying our government officials are both scummy and kinky.
They were reading it as you either kinkshaming those people or thinking they were scummy in part because they were kinky.
Think of it this way - If you say "X has done Unpleasant Thing, so who are they to stop others who want to do it" you're still implying the Thing is Unpleasant in the first place. That's kind of what your first comment sounded like. That person probably has some kink of their own and felt a bit insecure and defensive about it and the fact you might also consider that Unpleasant, and so they read more into your comment than you probably intended.
The point was to ban urination. Calling it ejaculation is a misnomer.Banning female ejaculation??? I'm mean, that is fucking mysoginist as shit.
Given that all torrent sites have been blocked by the Government, every UK household must opt-in (essentially put themselves on a register) with their ISP to view adult content, and porn sites are set to have passport/credit card verification or be blocked by the Government, I have no doubt that personal VPNs will come under scrutiny sooner or later.Meh my VPN is ready for action!
Related... here are the government agencies that can make a request to see your internet history.
There's no hiding your porn viewing habits from the Food Standards Agency.
How would this even be enforced? Are they expecting every single porn site in existence to implement geo-blocking like Netflix? What if they don't? Are they expecting ISPs to start policing every single website on the internet to check if it has porn?
From a technical perspective I just can't see how they can hope to even start accomplishing this.
This will do