Nice to hear but in what scenario? Either way, hoping for the best.
Is that riki choshu on your avatar?
Nice to hear but in what scenario? Either way, hoping for the best.
Are people seriously expecting a tablet to run Skyrim or Dark Souls 3 for more than 3 hours?
Mods aren't above having no earthly clue what's going on or what they're talking about. Look at Y2Kev during the election.I thought gaf had a policy of rumors being vetted by mods or else the threads get closed. At least that's what I understood from the MvCI stuff.
It's a good thing Nate didn't make the thread or even make a big deal about it in his very short video then.
what does that have to do with anything, thread is about the Switch
It's a good thing Nate didn't make the thread or even make a big deal about it in his very short video then.
Right?
5-8hrs is the range I've heard they are targeting. Hearing final dev kits went out in mid-November was an interesting detail and I thought people would want to hear about the battery range they are targeting. Lock the thread. I didn't post the video on the forums.
Right?
5-8hrs is the range I've heard they are targeting. Hearing final dev kits went out in mid-November was an interesting detail and I thought people would want to hear about the battery range they are targeting. Lock the thread. I didn't post the video on the forums.
Don't you communicate with other mods? Is this how mods carry themselves on this website?I don't have a clue who NateDrake is besides a character from Uncharted and apparently a Youtuber?
I want those magical 3DS that had 5 to 8 hours of battery.
Don't you communicate with other mods? Is this how mods carry themselves on this website?
What 3DS is 5-8 hours? I am lucky to get three with my New 3DS XL.
How is your question about talking to other mods (Stump is an admin) relevant?
not really tho
but you know that
Why are you questioning me? Did I blow up on Nate?How is your question about talking to other mods (Stump is an admin) relevant?
I'm really looking forward to you explaining how Switch isn't a tablet.
He's an admin that just took a shit on a member of this forum who has proven himself to have reliable info in the past. It's out of line.How is your question about talking to other mods (Stump is an admin) relevant?
not really tho
but you know that
The Switch is a tablet with tiny detachable controllers and a TV doc.
Better?
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device and so on and so forth?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
That was supermetaldave.Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device and so on and so forth?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
No.Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device and so on and so forth?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device and so on and so forth?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device and so on and so forth?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
is the vita a tablet?
that should help you out here. just because something has a touch screen doesn't make it a tablet.
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device even after we knew it wasn't true?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
See this is what I'm talking about. You ask a question, then assume it's true then you say he's talking crap. Grow up and get your facts straight.Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device even after we knew it wasn't true?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device and so on and so forth?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device even after we knew it wasn't true?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
Oh damn, disregard me then, I'm sorry.That was supermetaldave.
Dude, chill, everyone makes mistakes.Embarrassing. But at least you're not an admin.
Thanks for clearing that up. Maybe his rare input (paired with the fact that I'm not good with juggling internet names) is what made me think of SMD instead of NateDrake.He most certainly did not. That was Supermetaldave (who posts as Treveleyan9999 or here) and people like PlayerEssence.
NateDrake was one of the people who was adamantly against that being the case. He committed to Switch being a hybrid and Pascal-powered in July. He's very frequently in touch with Emily Rogers, Laura Kate Dale and people like that, and gathers/investigates independent information of his own. I can get being skeptical of people who have shakier track records or rumour handling, but Nate has done nothing to warrant that kind of type of thing.
Didn't NateDrake also claim that Switch would be an AMD powered x86 device even after we knew it wasn't true?
Yeah, I won't believe anything what that guy's pushing out of his pie hole.
In before "cause they downgraded it" comments.
(edit: honestly, I think it sounds too good to be true, especially considering the "console quality" gaming Switch is going for[and from games we know are in the works]. But kudos to them if they pull off even 5 hrs average.)
Too reasonable. Please readjust for GAF.My take is:
We'll see.
This whole thing has actually made me more curious of the supposed "vetting" process mods have on NeoGAF. I'm guessing this is a weird case because NateDrake himself is not creating the thread, but still. I would love if we could somehow lockdown on unsubstantiated Switch rumor threads.