GarciaHotspur
Member
No Switch No PC "currently" until SEGA say port it.
Hope is The most beautiful thing in The World
No Switch No PC "currently" until SEGA say port it.
To be frank, I always think "why is it always called PC Master Race when majority do port begging".
Maybe it's better to think "oh if my favorite developers are announcing for <platform>, maybe I should get <platform>" rather than "oh I should buy <favorite platform because I like this brand> then hope my favorite developer will support <favorite platform because I like this brand>"
It makes more sense for you to port Persona 5 to the Vita, where they would have to do major work to downgrade to it, than to another x86 like the PC? Where at the very least it could just be a 1:1 port?
I mean, it's not like we can use Persona 4 Golden's sales as a justification, that game only came out on 1 system, and that system was still alive back then.
I agree that random port begging in threads can be annoying (Obviously not this one since it's the main topic at hand) but I don't agree that because Atlus hasn't ported a PC game in a loooong time, we should give up.
Hope is The most beautiful thing in The World
Hope is The most beautiful thing in The World
P5 is a cross-platform game. Would the Vita not be able to handle that? (This isn't meant to be a snide rebuttal or anything like that. Just genuinely curious.)
I'm saying that it's more /plausible/ that Atlus would port it over to the Vita given that that is what they've been doing for the past 18 years or so. Thus, it's not something as far-reaching as a PC port. i.e. Situation A: (Asking for a Vita port) =/= Situation B: (Asking for a PC port). They're not situations that are equal/have equivalent stakes/have equal merit with one another.
Heck. They might even just release an enhanced PS4 version of the game like what they did with P3: FES on the PS2. It's Atlus.
Honestly, I don't mind people tweeting Atlus JP about their disappointment at the lack of a PC port or requesting that they bring it over to the platform. (Hardin mentioned that he did try to bring it up to the higher-ups but they just weren't interested.) It's the dismissive posts of "I'll just wait for the PC port" (despite Atlus saying otherwise) that tend to derail threads that irk me.
Maybe it's better to think "oh if my favorite developers are announcing for <platform>, maybe I should get <platform>" rather than "oh I should buy <favorite platform because I like this brand> then hope my favorite developer will support <favorite platform because I like this brand>"
I understand the concept of buying a platform to play certain games but I'm not a passionate fan of Atlus because they've never given me the opportunity to be. I am interested in their games but I will never buy a new platform just to play them. It's not worth it to me, so the only way they'll reach me is by releasing their games on PC. It's fine if they don't but they should know that they are leaving money on the table.
Uh. This isn't my post though. Did you mixed the quotes by mistake ?
I understand the concept of buying a platform to play certain games but I'm not a passionate fan of Atlus because they've never given me the opportunity to be. I am interested in their games but I will never buy a new platform just to play them. It's not worth it to me, so the only way they'll reach me is by releasing their games on PC. It's fine if they don't but they should know that they are leaving money on the table.
As usual Sega hates money.
No harm to me personally since I would buy P5 on PS4 anyway but I feel like PC version would do really well.
Nobody is disputing that Altus is very conservative or that P5 is unlikely to show up on PC. The main point being that P5 would have likely done very well on Steam and evidence was provided on how well some of the better know Japanese games have done on Steam (like Tales for example).I get what your saying, but i think their viewpoint is, if you werent going to bother buying their game on the system it originally came out on, then they don't need your money.
Generally speaking, Atlus JP are very traditionally conservative. They rarely(i dont think they have) done multiplats for specific games and rarely port years later to platforms even in the same family.
I would not count Persona 5 bucking that trend. Their new studio might have that in mind, but its super far off
I get what your saying, but i think their viewpoint is, if you werent going to bother buying their game on the system it originally came out on, then they don't need your money.
The Vita is a great machine but Atlus would have zero reason to put the game there considering Vita's current standing. You can get some amazing visuals on the Vita if you try (Killzone) but that takes work, money, and time. And the end result still isn't as good as the PS3 so it's not just a simple porting job. It's just not worth it to them.
But you're right, it is more plausible that they'd spend more time and money doing that, than putting it on PC. Some Japanese developers are very stubborn when it comes to looking at the big picture.
If there was ever a platform for weird, non-conformist niche titles, it's the PC.
Yakuza was never going to do COD numbers, but I'm confused as to why it couldn't find the same sustainable niche audience on PC as it did on PlayStation, especially in light of PC sales culture.
I'll use Binary Domain as a case example. I'll try and address the arguments brought up earlier in this thread about why Binary Domain and Yakuza are supposedly apples and oranges.
Binary Domain sold like... 700,000 on PC. It may have failed to do over 100K on consoles worldwide. Now I'm sure cries of "genre!" are coming, but... it's not like third person shooters are unpopular on consoles. Kind of the opposite, really. The argument doesn't really hold water. If genre alone made Binary Domain sell so much on PC, why did it do so little on consoles where the genre is much stronger?
Maybe it's because there are so many of them on console, and so few on PC by comparison? Could be, but that would imply PC gamers were in any way excited en mass by Binary Domain coming to the platform.
"Marketing!" Binary Domain got shafted in the marketing department on console. The PC version also came out of nowhere with zero fanfare and got by on word of mouth alone. That's how I ended up buying it. That's how I got my friends to buy it.
"Sales!" Sure. The game probably got those numbers through sales, but that's still money trickling in for SEGA. More importantly, money for doing nothing. They didn't update the game, add new content, anything. Year on year it'll still make a little bit of money because it went on sale. Sure Valve take their 30%, but it sure fuckin' beats getting nothing from a sale like you would on a pre-owned console version. When you've got a nice little catalogue of older games that still generate revenue when they go on sale a few times a year, it's not an insignificant amount of money.
Let's run some numbers, taken from SteamSpy.
Binary Domain had approximately 676,000 owners before the price recently dropped to $3.99 for the Winter sale. During that time it sold around 35,000 (which seems the recent peak sales figure, that stuff fluctuates but we'll just use the number anyway). Multiply that $3.99 by the 35,000 and take away Valve's 30%, and SEGA are left with around $97,000.
$97,000, on a years old niche game, being sold at $3.99, over a week and a half. Jet Set Radio sold around 49,000 during the same period and made around $135,000. Sonic Lost World sold like 15,000 and made around $155,000 thanks to its higher price-point.
Yakuza does not need to be an immediate success on PC out of the gate the same way it does on consoles.
From an economic perspective, SEGA can milk the title year on year through sales and the more titles they have on the PC platform, the more money they're going to be bringing in on the whole per sale season.
From a series sustainability perspective, players who pick it up in the sales and actually play the game may quite enjoy it to the point they'll be there day one at full price for the next release.
Which really makes it even weirder SEGA haven't put the series on PC if they were interested in any kind of long-term sustainability to spread the risk.
Really, despite how cool it is 0, Kiwami, and 6 are coming in the next year/year and a half alone, it does kind of read as a "you've got your thing, now fuck off" in this context.
And to top it of i just laugh at the people who have a PS4 but refuse to buy it for the system because it's "not used enough" or "collecting dust".
I wish I could say that's Yakuza...
of the two games in the thread title I would much rather have Yakuza 0, or any Yakuza even for that matter on PC. I would even take Dead Souls...
As for Persona, I'll stick with actual SMT games..
Or perhaps who mainly enjoys third party games. PS4 is the system with the best third party support without a doubt: pretty much all Western games and a good majority of Japanese third party games are on the PS4. Library wise, no other platform this gen matches.
That doesn't change why Sony is calling it a console exclusive when it's also coming to PS3.
Alright, I'll pass then. I don't play my PS4 enough.
To be frank, I always think "why is it always called PC Master Race when majority do port begging".
That sounds anti consumer. Buying games at full price? wut. Multiple platforms wut???/s
lol
this thread is full of silly things.
Is it really that hard for some people to get the concept of "if you want to play exclusive games, go buy the console"?
So why is this thread so much longer than the other thread regarding no mass effect on the switch. Same principle and idea for both threads, rumor of a game appearing on x console.
If you don't count PC then sure.
I'd say consoles (in this case, PS4) have the edge when it comes to the exclusivity console oriented games indeed, but PC has been getting better and better about it, so it's no wonder so many people don't need a console anymore. So of course some of the people transitioning from consoles to PC are going to miss some exclusives, but in my case at least, it's been absolutely worth it (especially since I'm now also playing PC exclusives). As for PS4 games, I only want KOFXIV, so it's the only game I'd port begIf PC was such a haven of wanted third party games then you wouldn't have threads full of PC portbegging: RDR2, KH3, P5, Bloodborne, NioH, Ni No Kuni 2, AC7, DQ11, etc (there will be more to come). PS4 gets both desired Western and Japanese games.
This isn't the first time a thread has been created on this topic (specifically Yakuza). The threads will always be pointless. John is the only person who would actually comment on this topic because he is the mouth for Atlus USA, yet when he does we always get the same responses, "PR being PR", "like he would be able to say anything anyway" although these statements may carry some weight I find that insulting to him especially when we know he browses GAF.
I understand some would like too see Yakuza on PC, but considering none have gone to PC in the first place the expectation shouldn't be there. Believe it or not, not all of your favourite games are going to be on your favourite platform. Shocking I know.
And to top it of i just laugh at the people who have a PS4 but refuse to buy it for the system because it's "not used enough" or "collecting dust".
If PC was such a haven of wanted third party games then you wouldn't have threads full of PC portbegging: RDR2, KH3, P5, Bloodborne, NioH, Ni No Kuni 2, AC7, DQ11, etc (there will be more to come). PS4 gets both desired Western and Japanese games.
Most of them are coming to PC, people are just tired of some companies not being honest about platforms from the beginning.
Now of course there are obvious games that will never come to PC, I mean everyone who thinks Bloodborne or Uncharted will eventually come to Steam is delusional, but it's not unreasonable to hope that third-party games get ported over.
Wish more companies would say things like this instead of fucking around with non-answers.
I know it's been talked about to death but I still for the life of me can't get over those people who want 5 or 6 console games but refuse to buy one. Any of the 3 can be found for $200 or less now(in the US at least). I've never met anyone in real life(literally hundreds of gaming enthusiasts) that was so seemingly petty. Now it's understandable if someone doesn't spend much on games at all or only has a small passing interest, but a lot of these threads are filled with the same people.
I don't think it is that hard to grasp that some people would rather spend those $200 on games or other stuff instead of buying a device that they have no other use for. I want to give that money to the developers whose product I want, not Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo whose product I don't want. It may be how things are done but things change, as is evident by the amount of japanese former console exclusives being released on PC.
It's not hard to grasp that people don't WANT to spend money on a console, but it is ridiculous that some REFUSE to. There's always the argument of there being plenty of other games to play, and if that's the case, why be all hot and bothered by these console exclusives anyway?
Wish more companies would say things like this instead of fucking around with non-answers.
This thread is not doing very well.
I think it is because there is no good reason for these games to be exclusive. I understand why first-party games and third party stuff like Bloodborne are exclusive. Console makers pay for them. No such reason exists here.
Amazing stuff... and something we would just couple years ago laught off as ridiculous nonsense and we even got such niche and weird titles like Koei Tekmo,Compile Heart/IFFY or Spike Chunsoft production (and lets not forget another smaller ones with titles like EDF or lots of anime games ) which would be unthinkable not that long ago... pretty much last one who resists this trend is Altus !This isn't really a direct response to your post, but I'd like to use it to point out how the 'it was never on PC, why would it come to PC?'-talking point doesn't really mean much.
Games are never on PC... until they are.
Dark Souls wasn't on PC until it was, and now you have Dark Souls 3 being one of the 12 best-selling games of 2016 on Steam.
There was no Tales of-game on Steam before Zestiria, but it did well enough that Berseria is a simultaneous release as well.
There was a time where people laughed at the notion of a Disgaea game ever coming to Steam. Now NISA is busy putting their entire backlog on Steam one at a time, while at the same time bringing their new releases as well. They already have 9 games announced for Steam in 2017, of which at least half are new releases launching simultaneously with consoles.
Heck, we went from 'GUST games will never be on PC' to suddenly 3 games coming this year, 1 of which isn't even out yet for consoles.
Square-Enix was busy filling their Steam-catalogue with Final Fantasy games the last years. Now you currently have every mainline FF game except 1, 2, 12, and 15 on one platform.
And the list goes on..
This is gonna be a super useful thread in 8 days.
This thread is not doing very well.
Persona 5 is also (and thank god runs fine and is launched in the West) on PS3
Why are people saying "Just buy a console".
It's entirely possible to own a range of consoles but also prefer for a game to be available on PC.
People do it to themselves, these games were always PS4 exclusive. It was never alluded otherwise by Atlus or Sega. Your fault for getting your imaginary hopes up.
I've never seen such a need for another platforms library. This happens every time. Not surprised by the outcome of the thread at all.