• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Atlus USA kills rumors | no PC & Switch versions of Persona 5 & Yakuza 0

Jimrpg

Member
I could sort of understand if these were graphically intense games that ran at 720p/20fps on PS4. But these are both PS3/Ps4 cross gen games that run great on PS4.
 
To be frank, I always think "why is it always called PC Master Race when majority do port begging".



Maybe it's better to think "oh if my favorite developers are announcing for <platform>, maybe I should get <platform>" rather than "oh I should buy <favorite platform because I like this brand> then hope my favorite developer will support <favorite platform because I like this brand>"



To be frank, the only persons I seen on GAF using the PC Master Race crap are usually the same kind of person who gets "physically ill" or gets their "stomach hurt" when "their games" gets ported elsewhere. People arent port begging in here. I dont see many, if any people, investing Persona or Yakuza threads with "not on my fave platform = no buy".

Let's not mix facts. People didnt start wonder "Hey, let's ask about Yakuza 0 for no reason !" That thing started with Sony's way of labeling games.
 

Rozart

Member
It makes more sense for you to port Persona 5 to the Vita, where they would have to do major work to downgrade to it, than to another x86 like the PC? Where at the very least it could just be a 1:1 port?

I mean, it's not like we can use Persona 4 Golden's sales as a justification, that game only came out on 1 system, and that system was still alive back then.

I agree that random port begging in threads can be annoying (Obviously not this one since it's the main topic at hand) but I don't agree that because Atlus hasn't ported a PC game in a loooong time, we should give up.

P5 is a cross-platform game. Would the Vita not be able to handle that? (This isn't meant to be a snide rebuttal or anything like that. Just genuinely curious.)

I'm saying that it's more /plausible/ that Atlus would port it over to the Vita given that that is what they've been doing for the past 18 years or so. Thus, it's not something as far-reaching as a PC port. i.e. Situation A: (Asking for a Vita port) =/= Situation B: (Asking for a PC port). They're not situations that are equal/have equivalent stakes/have equal merit with one another.

Heck. They might even just release an enhanced PS4 version of the game like what they did with P3: FES on the PS2. It's Atlus.

Honestly, I don't mind people tweeting Atlus JP about their disappointment at the lack of a PC port or requesting that they bring it over to the platform. (Hardin mentioned that he did try to bring it up to the higher-ups but they just weren't interested.) It's the dismissive posts of "I'll just wait for the PC port" (despite Atlus saying otherwise) that tend to derail threads that irk me.
 

hemo memo

Gold Member
Hope is The most beautiful thing in The World

I'm just saying that's not his decision. You read it like a port will never happen because like this is Atlus JP CEO tweet. with all due respect to John ofcource.

Fyi I play primarily on PS4 and my interest in a PC port is 0.
 

Tagyhag

Member
P5 is a cross-platform game. Would the Vita not be able to handle that? (This isn't meant to be a snide rebuttal or anything like that. Just genuinely curious.)

I'm saying that it's more /plausible/ that Atlus would port it over to the Vita given that that is what they've been doing for the past 18 years or so. Thus, it's not something as far-reaching as a PC port. i.e. Situation A: (Asking for a Vita port) =/= Situation B: (Asking for a PC port). They're not situations that are equal/have equivalent stakes/have equal merit with one another.

Heck. They might even just release an enhanced PS4 version of the game like what they did with P3: FES on the PS2. It's Atlus.

Honestly, I don't mind people tweeting Atlus JP about their disappointment at the lack of a PC port or requesting that they bring it over to the platform. (Hardin mentioned that he did try to bring it up to the higher-ups but they just weren't interested.) It's the dismissive posts of "I'll just wait for the PC port" (despite Atlus saying otherwise) that tend to derail threads that irk me.

The Vita is a great machine but Atlus would have zero reason to put the game there considering Vita's current standing. You can get some amazing visuals on the Vita if you try (Killzone) but that takes work, money, and time. And the end result still isn't as good as the PS3 so it's not just a simple porting job. It's just not worth it to them.

But you're right, it is more plausible that they'd spend more time and money doing that, than putting it on PC. Some Japanese developers are very stubborn when it comes to looking at the big picture. :p
 
Maybe it's better to think "oh if my favorite developers are announcing for <platform>, maybe I should get <platform>" rather than "oh I should buy <favorite platform because I like this brand> then hope my favorite developer will support <favorite platform because I like this brand>"

I understand the concept of buying a platform to play certain games but I'm not a passionate fan of Atlus because they've never given me the opportunity to be. I am interested in their games but I will never buy a new platform just to play them. It's not worth it to me, so the only way they'll reach me is by releasing their games on PC. It's fine if they don't but they should know that they are leaving money on the table.
 
I understand the concept of buying a platform to play certain games but I'm not a passionate fan of Atlus because they've never given me the opportunity to be. I am interested in their games but I will never buy a new platform just to play them. It's not worth it to me, so the only way they'll reach me is by releasing their games on PC. It's fine if they don't but they should know that they are leaving money on the table.



Uh. This isn't my post though. Did you mixed the quotes by mistake ?
 
Uh. This isn't my post though. Did you mixed the quotes by mistake ?

No, but it could be that I misread it. I thought you meant that instead of asking for a port I should buy the platform the game is being released on.

Edit: Oh crap, now I see it. Sorry!
Edit 2: Fixed.
 

Inuhanyou

Believes Dragon Quest is a franchise managed by Sony
I understand the concept of buying a platform to play certain games but I'm not a passionate fan of Atlus because they've never given me the opportunity to be. I am interested in their games but I will never buy a new platform just to play them. It's not worth it to me, so the only way they'll reach me is by releasing their games on PC. It's fine if they don't but they should know that they are leaving money on the table.

I get what your saying, but i think their viewpoint is, if you werent going to bother buying their game on the system it originally came out on, then they don't need your money.

Generally speaking, Atlus JP are very traditionally conservative. They rarely(i dont think they have) done multiplats for specific games and rarely port years later to platforms even in the same family.

I would not count Persona 5 bucking that trend. Their new studio might have that in mind, but its super far off

As usual Sega hates money.

No harm to me personally since I would buy P5 on PS4 anyway but I feel like PC version would do really well.

Atlus JP have full control, Sega has no ability to force them to do anything they don't want to, unlike Valkyria team for example, which is probably going to port Valkyria Revolution to every platform under the sun
 

StereoVsn

Member
I get what your saying, but i think their viewpoint is, if you werent going to bother buying their game on the system it originally came out on, then they don't need your money.

Generally speaking, Atlus JP are very traditionally conservative. They rarely(i dont think they have) done multiplats for specific games and rarely port years later to platforms even in the same family.

I would not count Persona 5 bucking that trend. Their new studio might have that in mind, but its super far off
Nobody is disputing that Altus is very conservative or that P5 is unlikely to show up on PC. The main point being that P5 would have likely done very well on Steam and evidence was provided on how well some of the better know Japanese games have done on Steam (like Tales for example).

For P5, 200-300K of extra sales is significant considering they did 550K in Japan so far (might include Asia Japanese release). Porting a PS4 game to PC is not likely to be a difficult or an expensive task. So they are leaving a chunk of cash on the table and it is puzzling why that is so. Even Gust games are coming to Steam now.
 
I get what your saying, but i think their viewpoint is, if you werent going to bother buying their game on the system it originally came out on, then they don't need your money.

That's fine. They are completely wrong of course, we've had several japanese releases on PC in the last few years that prove how backwards that kind of thinking is, but if they don't want or need more customers it is absolutely their choice and I respect it.
 

Rozart

Member
The Vita is a great machine but Atlus would have zero reason to put the game there considering Vita's current standing. You can get some amazing visuals on the Vita if you try (Killzone) but that takes work, money, and time. And the end result still isn't as good as the PS3 so it's not just a simple porting job. It's just not worth it to them.

But you're right, it is more plausible that they'd spend more time and money doing that, than putting it on PC. Some Japanese developers are very stubborn when it comes to looking at the big picture. :p

Sometimes, I wish I could take a peek at their internal reasonings or calculated financial reports. It's not like they're solely loyal to just Sony because SMT (Persona's sister series) is more or less a Nintendo franchise. I mean, they even collaborated with Nintendo to make a crossover game. And I doubt that it's some exclusive contractual agreement because boy, would that be one incredibly lengthy exclusive contract. And surely, Sony would lavish more attention onto the series if that were the case.

Oh well. Who knows.
 

Steel

Banned
On the one hand, this is not at all surprising. On the other hand, I would have much rather get P5 on PC so that I wouldn't have to worry about future compatibility. Day one nonetheless.
 

Ascheroth

Member
If there was ever a platform for weird, non-conformist niche titles, it's the PC.


Yakuza was never going to do COD numbers, but I'm confused as to why it couldn't find the same sustainable niche audience on PC as it did on PlayStation, especially in light of PC sales culture.

I'll use Binary Domain as a case example. I'll try and address the arguments brought up earlier in this thread about why Binary Domain and Yakuza are supposedly apples and oranges.

Binary Domain sold like... 700,000 on PC. It may have failed to do over 100K on consoles worldwide. Now I'm sure cries of "genre!" are coming, but... it's not like third person shooters are unpopular on consoles. Kind of the opposite, really. The argument doesn't really hold water. If genre alone made Binary Domain sell so much on PC, why did it do so little on consoles where the genre is much stronger?

Maybe it's because there are so many of them on console, and so few on PC by comparison? Could be, but that would imply PC gamers were in any way excited en mass by Binary Domain coming to the platform.

"Marketing!" Binary Domain got shafted in the marketing department on console. The PC version also came out of nowhere with zero fanfare and got by on word of mouth alone. That's how I ended up buying it. That's how I got my friends to buy it.

"Sales!" Sure. The game probably got those numbers through sales, but that's still money trickling in for SEGA. More importantly, money for doing nothing. They didn't update the game, add new content, anything. Year on year it'll still make a little bit of money because it went on sale. Sure Valve take their 30%, but it sure fuckin' beats getting nothing from a sale like you would on a pre-owned console version. When you've got a nice little catalogue of older games that still generate revenue when they go on sale a few times a year, it's not an insignificant amount of money.

Let's run some numbers, taken from SteamSpy.

Binary Domain had approximately 676,000 owners before the price recently dropped to $3.99 for the Winter sale. During that time it sold around 35,000 (which seems the recent peak sales figure, that stuff fluctuates but we'll just use the number anyway). Multiply that $3.99 by the 35,000 and take away Valve's 30%, and SEGA are left with around $97,000.

$97,000, on a years old niche game, being sold at $3.99, over a week and a half. Jet Set Radio sold around 49,000 during the same period and made around $135,000. Sonic Lost World sold like 15,000 and made around $155,000 thanks to its higher price-point.

Yakuza does not need to be an immediate success on PC out of the gate the same way it does on consoles.

From an economic perspective, SEGA can milk the title year on year through sales and the more titles they have on the PC platform, the more money they're going to be bringing in on the whole per sale season.

From a series sustainability perspective, players who pick it up in the sales and actually play the game may quite enjoy it to the point they'll be there day one at full price for the next release.

Which really makes it even weirder SEGA haven't put the series on PC if they were interested in any kind of long-term sustainability to spread the risk.

Really, despite how cool it is 0, Kiwami, and 6 are coming in the next year/year and a half alone, it does kind of read as a "you've got your thing, now fuck off" in this context.

I like how this post was completely ignored.
Maybe because it makes a reasonable point?
 

Frostman

Member
This isn't the first time a thread has been created on this topic (specifically Yakuza). The threads will always be pointless. John is the only person who would actually comment on this topic because he is the mouth for Atlus USA, yet when he does we always get the same responses, "PR being PR", "like he would be able to say anything anyway" although these statements may carry some weight I find that insulting to him especially when we know he browses GAF.

I understand some would like too see Yakuza on PC, but considering none have gone to PC in the first place the expectation shouldn't be there. Believe it or not, not all of your favourite games are going to be on your favourite platform. Shocking I know.

And to top it of i just laugh at the people who have a PS4 but refuse to buy it for the system because it's "not used enough" or "collecting dust".
 

barybll

Banned
of the two games in the thread title I would much rather have Yakuza 0, or any Yakuza even for that matter on PC. I would even take Dead Souls...

As for Persona, I'll stick with actual SMT games..

Playing real shun megoomey tensay games right?

Just kidding, I couldnt resist
 

Zemm

Member
Or perhaps who mainly enjoys third party games. PS4 is the system with the best third party support without a doubt: pretty much all Western games and a good majority of Japanese third party games are on the PS4. Library wise, no other platform this gen matches.

If you don't count PC then sure.
 
Never even knew there were rumors about this releasing on the PC. Oh well, hope people can give it a rest now.

Also...

Alright, I'll pass then. I don't play my PS4 enough.

I know that post was on the first page, but what the actual fuck? Early contender for the stupidest post of the year. The mental gymnastics needed to make sense of what the flying fuck that means are beyond me. You deserve a tag for this for sure.
 
The preservation stance was always the most hilarious veil to portbeg in my eyes. The game is on a physical disc, and can be played on a physical system. The only problem is the user not willing to buy said things.

To be frank, I always think "why is it always called PC Master Race when majority do port begging".

Hahahahaha lmao

That sounds anti consumer. Buying games at full price? wut. Multiple platforms wut???
/s

Supporting exclusives......disgusting.

lol



this thread is full of silly things.



Is it really that hard for some people to get the concept of "if you want to play exclusive games, go buy the console"?

Having to buy a console is apparently a hard to pill to swallow for some. Leads to question what they did previous generation. Choosing a device to play games always came down to what library of games the system would have and does, and even if there were games on other systems that interested me, a holistic decision was made. At the end of the day, the easiest way is to simply go out and buy the system if you want to play the game so badly rather than wait for a hypothetical port. It will most likely lead to you discovering even more games.

So why is this thread so much longer than the other thread regarding no mass effect on the switch. Same principle and idea for both threads, rumor of a game appearing on x console.

Persona 5 is effectively a PS4 exclusive. MEA is PS4/XB1/PC.

If you don't count PC then sure.

If PC was such a haven of wanted third party games then you wouldn't have threads full of PC portbegging: RDR2, KH3, P5, Bloodborne, NioH, Ni No Kuni 2, AC7, DQ11, etc (there will be more to come). PS4 gets both desired Western and Japanese games.
 

RM8

Member
If PC was such a haven of wanted third party games then you wouldn't have threads full of PC portbegging: RDR2, KH3, P5, Bloodborne, NioH, Ni No Kuni 2, AC7, DQ11, etc (there will be more to come). PS4 gets both desired Western and Japanese games.
I'd say consoles (in this case, PS4) have the edge when it comes to the exclusivity console oriented games indeed, but PC has been getting better and better about it, so it's no wonder so many people don't need a console anymore. So of course some of the people transitioning from consoles to PC are going to miss some exclusives, but in my case at least, it's been absolutely worth it (especially since I'm now also playing PC exclusives). As for PS4 games, I only want KOFXIV, so it's the only game I'd port beg :p
 

Ascheroth

Member
This isn't the first time a thread has been created on this topic (specifically Yakuza). The threads will always be pointless. John is the only person who would actually comment on this topic because he is the mouth for Atlus USA, yet when he does we always get the same responses, "PR being PR", "like he would be able to say anything anyway" although these statements may carry some weight I find that insulting to him especially when we know he browses GAF.

I understand some would like too see Yakuza on PC, but considering none have gone to PC in the first place the expectation shouldn't be there. Believe it or not, not all of your favourite games are going to be on your favourite platform. Shocking I know.

And to top it of i just laugh at the people who have a PS4 but refuse to buy it for the system because it's "not used enough" or "collecting dust".

This isn't really a direct response to your post, but I'd like to use it to point out how the 'it was never on PC, why would it come to PC?'-talking point doesn't really mean much.
Games are never on PC... until they are.

Dark Souls wasn't on PC until it was, and now you have Dark Souls 3 being one of the 12 best-selling games of 2016 on Steam.
There was no Tales of-game on Steam before Zestiria, but it did well enough that Berseria is a simultaneous release as well.
There was a time where people laughed at the notion of a Disgaea game ever coming to Steam. Now NISA is busy putting their entire backlog on Steam one at a time, while at the same time bringing their new releases as well. They already have 9 games announced for Steam in 2017, of which at least half are new releases launching simultaneously with consoles.
Heck, we went from 'GUST games will never be on PC' to suddenly 3 games coming this year, 1 of which isn't even out yet for consoles.
Square-Enix was busy filling their Steam-catalogue with Final Fantasy games the last years. Now you currently have every mainline FF game except 1, 2, 12, and 15 on one platform.

And the list goes on.

Now of course there are obvious games that will never come to PC, I mean everyone who thinks Bloodborne or Uncharted will eventually come to Steam is delusional, but it's not unreasonable to hope that third-party games get ported over.
 

jmga

Member
If PC was such a haven of wanted third party games then you wouldn't have threads full of PC portbegging: RDR2, KH3, P5, Bloodborne, NioH, Ni No Kuni 2, AC7, DQ11, etc (there will be more to come). PS4 gets both desired Western and Japanese games.

Most of them are coming to PC, people are just tired of some companies not being honest about platforms from the beginning.
 

oSoLucky

Member
I know it's been talked about to death but I still for the life of me can't get over those people who want 5 or 6 console games but refuse to buy one. Any of the 3 can be found for $200 or less now(in the US at least). I've never met anyone in real life(literally hundreds of gaming enthusiasts) that was so seemingly petty. Now it's understandable if someone doesn't spend much on games at all or only has a small passing interest, but a lot of these threads are filled with the same people.


Most of them are coming to PC, people are just tired of some companies not being honest about platforms from the beginning.

Quite a few people were adamant that Destiny was going to be on PC also. I say we just wait. Also, just because a game ends up on PC doesn't mean that it's some nefarious scheme to try to get everyone to double dip. It may very well be not decided until the game is receive certain way on console.


Edit: If somehow P5 were to ever get a PC port, I would be first in line to double dip on that shit.
 

Rozart

Member
Now of course there are obvious games that will never come to PC, I mean everyone who thinks Bloodborne or Uncharted will eventually come to Steam is delusional, but it's not unreasonable to hope that third-party games get ported over.

Hoping is one thing but expecting it as though it's already a given? It makes my head spin. @_@ Atlus says 'no' but it obviously means 'yes'. Atlus has never done this before or shown any inclination of doing so but trust me. It's happening.

Why do people do that to themselves? If it happens, it happens.
 
I know it's been talked about to death but I still for the life of me can't get over those people who want 5 or 6 console games but refuse to buy one. Any of the 3 can be found for $200 or less now(in the US at least). I've never met anyone in real life(literally hundreds of gaming enthusiasts) that was so seemingly petty. Now it's understandable if someone doesn't spend much on games at all or only has a small passing interest, but a lot of these threads are filled with the same people.

I don't think it is that hard to grasp that some people would rather spend those $200 on games or other stuff instead of buying a device that they have no other use for. I want to give that money to the developers whose product I want, not Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo whose product I don't want. It may be how things are done but things change, as is evident by the amount of japanese former console exclusives being released on PC.
 

oSoLucky

Member
I don't think it is that hard to grasp that some people would rather spend those $200 on games or other stuff instead of buying a device that they have no other use for. I want to give that money to the developers whose product I want, not Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo whose product I don't want. It may be how things are done but things change, as is evident by the amount of japanese former console exclusives being released on PC.

You already stated that you only have a passing interest in the game to start with. There are some here and a couple other forums that I frequent who go nuts about a lot of 3rd party games with no PC version. I understand not wanting to spend that money on a console, but it's not like it's a waste. It will give access to a good amount of games that a person wouldn't otherwise, including the few that are apparently worth posting multiple times in various threads on the topic.

It's not hard to grasp that people don't WANT to spend money on a console, but it is ridiculous that some REFUSE to. There's always the argument of there being plenty of other games to play, and if that's the case, why be all hot and bothered by these console exclusives anyway?
 
Great the port begging vs console warriors has started.

I'm checking out but fwiw I would have bought this on Switch day one Altus.

Day fucking One.

Still have my Amazon pre order tho :)
 
It's not hard to grasp that people don't WANT to spend money on a console, but it is ridiculous that some REFUSE to. There's always the argument of there being plenty of other games to play, and if that's the case, why be all hot and bothered by these console exclusives anyway?

I think it is because there is no good reason for these games to be exclusive. I understand why first-party games and third party stuff like Bloodborne are exclusive. Console makers pay for them. No such reason exists here.
 

Waji

Member
I wasn't expecting P5 on Switch but at the same time it doesn't seem like conclusive evidence... at all.
They're selling their game now, on the platform it is, that's it.

As a friend made me remember. Another guy like him was saying Gravity 2 was coming on Vita before the fated announcement.
 

oSoLucky

Member
I think it is because there is no good reason for these games to be exclusive. I understand why first-party games and third party stuff like Bloodborne are exclusive. Console makers pay for them. No such reason exists here.

There are a lot of PC exclusives(that are low on CPU usage) that don't come to console either. PS4/XB1 both support M/KB if built into the game. Most games don't get an absolute ton of patches, so the patching certification/fee shouldn't be a big deal overall. Even then there are still games like Torchlight 2 that are exclusive with the very similar Diablo 3 multiplat.

Etrian Odyssey could have done well on PS3/Vita and Persona 4 Golden on 3DS. All 5 mainline Disgaea games could run on Nintendo consoles, along with all the Neptunia games. Same with Senran Kagura Shinovi/Estival Versus(and Burst/2 on Vita). Final Fantasy 9/13 and Dragon's Dogma got late PC ports but not PS4. This shit happens with all platforms for various reasons. It seems a bit silly to me to be upset that one platform misses a few games, especially in light of it getting more games than all others combined(not sure about mobile).
 

prudislav

Member
This isn't really a direct response to your post, but I'd like to use it to point out how the 'it was never on PC, why would it come to PC?'-talking point doesn't really mean much.
Games are never on PC... until they are.

Dark Souls wasn't on PC until it was, and now you have Dark Souls 3 being one of the 12 best-selling games of 2016 on Steam.
There was no Tales of-game on Steam before Zestiria, but it did well enough that Berseria is a simultaneous release as well.
There was a time where people laughed at the notion of a Disgaea game ever coming to Steam. Now NISA is busy putting their entire backlog on Steam one at a time, while at the same time bringing their new releases as well. They already have 9 games announced for Steam in 2017, of which at least half are new releases launching simultaneously with consoles.
Heck, we went from 'GUST games will never be on PC' to suddenly 3 games coming this year, 1 of which isn't even out yet for consoles.
Square-Enix was busy filling their Steam-catalogue with Final Fantasy games the last years. Now you currently have every mainline FF game except 1, 2, 12, and 15 on one platform.

And the list goes on..
Amazing stuff... and something we would just couple years ago laught off as ridiculous nonsense and we even got such niche and weird titles like Koei Tekmo,Compile Heart/IFFY or Spike Chunsoft production (and lets not forget another smaller ones with titles like EDF or lots of anime games ) which would be unthinkable not that long ago... pretty much last one who resists this trend is Altus !
What a wonderfull times we're are living now... really curious what happens in upcoming years ;-)
 

LewieP

Member
Why are people saying "Just buy a console".

It's entirely possible to own a range of consoles but also prefer for a game to be available on PC.
 

On Demand

Banned
This is gonna be a super useful thread in 8 days.

This thread is not doing very well.

People do it to themselves, these games were always PS4 exclusive. It was never alluded otherwise by Atlus or Sega. Your fault for getting your imaginary hopes up.

I've never seen such a need for another platforms library. This happens every time. Not surprised by the outcome of the thread at all.

Persona 5 is also (and thank god runs fine and is launched in the West) on PS3 :p

Eh. Same point.
 

oSoLucky

Member
Why are people saying "Just buy a console".

It's entirely possible to own a range of consoles but also prefer for a game to be available on PC.

This thread is 13+ pages long on 100ppp when it was definitively stated by the company's PR that the games would only be on PS4/3.
 

asagami_

Banned
People do it to themselves, these games were always PS4 exclusive. It was never alluded otherwise by Atlus or Sega. Your fault for getting your imaginary hopes up.

I've never seen such a need for another platforms library. This happens every time. Not surprised by the outcome of the thread at all.

Persona 5 is also (and thank god runs fine and is launched in the West) on PS3 :p
 
Top Bottom