RedAssedApe
Banned
Still seems expensive for the hardware but I guess it's ok since it's Nintendo. Funny if the base model for all three consoles are exactly the same.
too much for a handheld. Fine for a home console but this one is competing with other established consoles on the same price point.
Because the price for merely that kind of hardware is quite high. And a bit of wishful thinking.
It's a pretty good price for a home console, the Wii did great at this price, and the switch gimmick seems to be resonating with the public.
They can lower the price later depending on demand. They want to make some money off of it and if it sells at a loss at $200 and they sell Wii numbers then they'll lose quite a bit.Which is why $199 should be the price. That is total impulse buy territory for most people.
the fact that you think 50 to 70 bucks is just a couple is kind of insane, on top of making a big deal about buying a console at launch for a port and bragging about it
Because the price for merely that kind of hardware is quite high. And a bit of wishful thinking. Considering how uncomfortable the tablet and the side controllers look, having no game would mean one would have to pay a minimum of 350 for the console, a half decent controller and a game would be quite harsh.
Nobody will probably read this post but erm anyone fluent in Japanese can confirm that Nikkei isn't just speculating here?
I'm at N2 level so maybe I'm glancing over something but this doesn't read as a rumor or leak to me. It's more like "based on what Iwata said in the past, the pricing of competitors systems etc, we expect the price to be around 25000 yen"
It's just a forecast right?
Which is why I'm out. Different market pricing exists so you can price things irrespective of the literal exchange rate (usually so it's a stable price). Whether Nintendo values Canada or places like Australia enough to eat a bit to present it at a better price is anyone's guess, but I'd guess not. Otherwise why not just buy everything in USD?Damn.. looks like Canadians are paying $350-400 after taxes...
Jesus christ man
They can lower the price later depending on demand. They want to make some money off of it and if it sells at a loss at $200 and they sell Wii numbers then they'll lose quite a bit.
A system doesn't need to launch at impulse buy price
Maybe we should wait for Thursday before we start suggesting the Switch isn't launching with appealing titles, even though Zelda alone proves you wrong.Wii at 250 dollars was a console competing against 400 and 600 dollars systems. It also had appealing games announced and it basically had a dream gimmick, which was basically motion based controls.
Friday morning going to gamestop to give my Xbox 1 towards it. Get that paper weight out of here.
People buying the system or not is irrelevant. It's not a very good price.
Aren't gameseek normally terrible for preorders and have been known to cancel stuff and just generally have terrible service?
Might be thinking of someone else.
Sorry but can you remind me what happened to the 3ds price tag few months after its release in Japan?
And are Vita sales all that good over there?
Are you seriously expecting third parties and mass market to jump on 25000¥ boat?
Interesting...optimism rising. I have a lot of trade-in credit with Game though so I would pre-order with them.
The OP says "seems to be all but confirmed" so I think most of the people here think that Nikkei just posted a scoop or something. I mean they succesfully leaked stuff in the past about the 3DS XL and stuff but this just reads like speculation to me. There's nothing in the article that says "based on information obtained by Nikkei" or "sources have said" or whatever. Just "Iwata said this in the past" and "This Rakuten analyst expects this price" and "Sony's PS4 costs 30000 so we don't expect the Switch to be more expensive"I can't even read beyond ver basic Japanese but I just assumed that was the case (speculation).
Which is why $199 should be the price. That is total impulse buy territory for most people.
I know, and I expect $250. Just saying the math works differently, that's all.
I'll take at least 3. Maybe 4.I'll take 10
I don't think much will change wether it's 200 or 250$ in the market mindshare. At least, with that price, they have some room for a emergency price-cut move like they did with the 3DS. It's a good price for a compromise between handled and home console. It's not "too much for a handled", as it's barely above the New 3DS XL and it's much more powerful.
I expect it to be 200$ by next Black Friday.
Thank you Brexit for cheap Switches.
Wii at 250 dollars was a console competing against 400 and 600 dollars systems.
A console doesn't need to have an 'impulse buy' price point as soon as it launches.
I mean, in terms of price, it's fine. It is a gigantic upgrade over last gen handhelds.
probably by playing that wii u game I guess70 bucks over 4 months is 58 cents a day. How will i ever recover.
Of course it will. 199 dollars is a psychological barrier.
Being barely above 3DS XL just proved that 3DS XL is overpriced and why 3DS sales are slowing down this much.
Franz Brötchen;227883480 said:Yeah sorry, in a market economy this sequence of words doesn't make any sense, even out of context. It is precisely the question whether people buy it, if you want to know if it is a good price.
And yet, the 3DS XL sells like gangbusters when games are here. Proof that the market doesn't mind such a price for handled if the line-up is sufficient.
I know you're kidding but it'd be cheaper if Brexit hadn't tanked the pound...
Why are you trying to corner the switch into one market? Even though Nintendo says it's a home console, it's form factor, gimmick and entire marketing message is on its portability. This allows them to charge more for the home part, but also pull in developers and customers of handheld games. In a perfect world, the vita would've done this first. Though $200 would be great, and would obviously draw a bit more attention (not necessarily sales), the rumored price almost perfectly straddles that line of premium and impulse.People buying the system or not is irrelevant. It's not a very good price. It's expensive for a handheld and as a home console, it's competing with PS4 or One which are in the same range of price but twice to three times faster.
200 dollars is impulse buy territory. 250 dollars is too much for a handheld. Fine for a home console but this one is competing with other established consoles on the same price point.
Yes, 250 dollars is conservative. It's basically in the "Let's not try to be competitive" range. Then again, I dont see in what world 250 dollars will make Switch a success for now. Unless it sets the world on fire with crazy game announcements, it'll wish to do 3DS numbers when it was priced at 250 dollars. Which... Isn't the kind of target Nintendo wants.
It's not when the PS4 Slim is the same price and is vastly, vastly stronger than the Switch. And the amount of resonance the Wii's gimmick had with the general public and the time it came out on is not comparable to the current situation.
Well, it definitely looks good compared to the 3DS, which looked like shit compared to the Vita. So, I suppose that would skew things a bit.
The 3DS at $200 (which it still is) was/is super overpriced for what we got.
The $80 2DS is much closer to what the 3DS probably should have been, especially now.
$229 in the US would go a long way towards sales if they decided to go that route. price the deluxe sku at like $275 and make the pack in digital and that would help as well.
Eh I think there can be arguments made for a nintendo console it needs to be strong out the gate and an impulse buy price definitely helps with that.
I am, but not for me getting uk games from amazon
I mean, in terms of price, it's fine. It is a gigantic upgrade over last gen handhelds.
People buying the system or not is irrelevant. It's not a very good price. It's expensive for a handheld and as a home console, it's competing with PS4 or One which are in the same range of price but twice to three times faster.
200 dollars is impulse buy territory. 250 dollars is too much for a handheld. Fine for a home console but this one is competing with other established consoles on the same price point.
Yes, 250 dollars is conservative. It's basically in the "Let's not try to be competitive" range. Then again, I dont see in what world 250 dollars will make Switch a success for now. Unless it sets the world on fire with crazy game announcements, it'll wish to do 3DS numbers when it was priced at 250 dollars. Which... Isn't the kind of target Nintendo wants.