• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Bernie Sanders To Announce Single-Payer Healthcare Medicare For All Legislation

Status
Not open for further replies.

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
Ok, why does it matters?
Fighting for a good cause matters.

The last time Democrats proposed major health reform, it passed - probably for the first time since Medicare/Medicaid itself was created. Then they promptly got thrown out of office before it could even be fully rolled out. It's been relatively toxic to address for the most part until the shitshow that just happened.
There's not a direct cause and effect consequence between those two events.


Now with this opening, moves can be made. Even if symbolic.
That's not a rebuttal to what I said.
 
Any chance the Dems pick this up as a rallying point for 2018? The prospect of single payer gives people something to vote for.
No. Because support for it plummets if and when people find out they (1) may have to pay more taxes for it, and (2) can't keep their current plans.

But I think it's fine for those that have the electoral luxury to do so, to keep it in the public eye.
 
If enough people hear about it, learn what this would mean for them, and contact their congress/senators, then it will just help the future when we CAN do it.
 
Something people miss I think is that Ryan's bill wasn't what trump ran on. Shockingly, he ran on universal coverage for the most part, and he won saying "We will insure everyone". The public wants it, the motivation is there. The expectation that the ACA is the minimum acceptable level of coverage is there. That's what makes the ACA such a staying factor. It's become the entitlement republicans feared it would be. That's why the "24 million" uninsured was such a death knell. Now I don't think running all the way to the left is the answer but these things are about taking as big a step as you can each time and then weathering the blowback. If next time that's medicare for all, great. If it's single payer, great.

This is the most important point in this discussion. Through some bizarre twist of fate, the election of Trump and the Republican dominance over Congress has lead to a greater chance of single payer succeeding than before. It's a window of opportunity that should not be missed.
 

sonicmj1

Member
I don't see how when only 16% of Republicans favor keeping the ACA, while 41% favor medicare for all.

xYuCSW2.png

25% of Democrats in favor of repealing the ACA.

79% of Democrats in favor of keeping the ACA.

25 + 79 = 104.

At least 4% of the Democrats polled wanted to both keep and repeal the ACA.
 
Fam, why?

Single payer would be great but the timing is off here.

The ACA and the Republican option could not have lower credibility than they do now. It's the perfect time, while the exact details of coverage for both plans are fresh in everyone's minds, to introduce option C.

25% of Democrats in favor of repealing the ACA.

79% of Democrats in favor of keeping the ACA.

25 + 79 = 104.

At least 4% of the Democrats polled wanted to both keep and repeal the ACA.

That's not how that works.
 
25% of Democrats in favor of repealing the ACA.

79% of Democrats in favor of keeping the ACA.

25 + 79 = 104.

At least 4% of the Democrats polled wanted to both keep and repeal the ACA.
edit: nvm I'm bad at reading, but difference is that people who want to expand the ACA (more subsidies, public option) probably answered different in some accounts.
 

RCSI

Member
Fam, why?

Single payer would be great but the timing is off here.

The timing is always off, the goal here is to keep talking about it, especially with everyone's minds focused on the boondoggle that occurred last week. The next step is hosting these discussions over a larger swath of the public, but you don't get there without bringing it up until enough people are aware.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
I appreciate the effort.
I'm torn on how much effort I want put into actually writing this. On the one hand, there's not much point in putting a ton of development work into something that's never going to pass. On the other hand this is Bernie's chance to show me that there's literally anything of substance inside him
 
I appreciate the effort.
I'm torn on how much effort I want put into actually writing this. On the one hand, there's not much point in putting a ton of development work into something that's never going to pass. On the other hand this is Bernie's chance to show me that there's literally anything of substance inside him

He probably wrote this two years ago when he was getting serious about his presidential run.
 
It's so awesome seeing serious momentum behind this.

I remember a decade ago when John Conyers would submit a Medicare for All bill in the House every year, and not a single other member of Congress would support it. Times are changing.
 

Rentahamster

Rodent Whores
I appreciate the effort.
I'm torn on how much effort I want put into actually writing this. On the one hand, there's not much point in putting a ton of development work into something that's never going to pass.

Advancing the narrative and swaying the electorate has a point.

On the other hand this is Bernie's chance to show me that there's literally anything of substance inside him

The other things he's done in the past showed you nothing?
 

Ether_Snake

安安安安安安安安安安安安安安安
People saying it can't pass: The Republicans had started to make it sound reasonable that Obamacare should be repealed, which shifted the narrative to the right. They fucked up, so proposing Single-Payer now is a great opportunity. Will it pass? Probably not, will it shift the narrative leftward, effectively opening a breach to progress on healthcare instead of regressing? Yes.
 

The Technomancer

card-carrying scientician
This moment pissed me off so much when it happened.

Saying it's unlikely? It'd be a challenge? Sure. That's reality. Closing the door on it entirely for political bullshit? Fuck you.

In the 90s Clinton was a wide eyed optimist who believed that single payer was inevitable
I wonder what could possibly have happened to that person in the 20 years since to convince them that America rejects single payer...
 
1) Kick out Ryan.
2) Bernie switches parties.
3) Make Bernie Sanders Speaker of the House.
4) Darkest timeline redeemed.

You missed the step where Bernie goes back to being a Representative rather than a Senator.

The other things he's done in the past showed you nothing?

I mean, in the sense that the image his supporters put forth is frequently at odds with his actual record as a legislator.

Fam, why?

Single payer would be great but the timing is off here.

He wants to keep people motivated and engaged. As director of outreach for the Democratic party and also a person who wants to hold off the Apocalypse, he wants to keep The Youth tuned into political happenings so they'll actually show up to vote in the midterms.
 
1) Kick out Ryan.
2) Bernie switches parties.
3) Make Bernie Sanders Speaker of the House.
4) Darkest timeline redeemed.

The fact that this isn't internally consistent with the facts of it's preceding story (Sanders is a senator), makes this excellent fan fiction.
 

A Human Becoming

More than a Member
I want this to succeed more than anything, but I'll wait for the CBO score before saying if it's viable or not.
CBO score could make this possible to sell after the disastrous Ryancare bill. It's still a longshot but if Trump really wants to be a different Republican he would at least listen.
 
Fighting for a good cause matters.


There's not a direct cause and effect consequence between those two events.



That's not a rebuttal to what I said.

Well I addressed the "Bernie is the only person pushing liberal liberal legislation" line. ACA was subject to a long-term sustained negative marketing campaign which made it toxic. It was a major item which allowed the GOP to make so many gains in 2010 - an item so much on the forefront that it was attempted to be repealed over 60 times and was a constant item in campaign attack ads against Democrats. President Obama, as it was being debated, admitted that there would likely be many political causalities for passing this. And there was. Obamacare wasn't exactly supposed to be and isn't an endearing name for the legislation.

So I do think that is a major reason that once it passed, you didn't hear lot from Democrats on further improvements - hell, it wasn't even fully rolled out at that point. My point was Dems pulled off a monumental feat even getting it passed. And just now in this particular window, can there be a larger push for more liberal policies. It's great Bernie introduced something - even if he historically was not a Democrat. I just don't see the point in calling out Democrats because he was the first this time.

The other reality is that this country is largely center to center right. Liberal policies overall seem to do poorly across the country. So of course, Democrats understanding their base, may not champion liberal policies because the fact is they'd stand a good chance of getting destroyed over it.

The Democratic party isn't a pure progressive party. It can't be if it wants to remain viable in the US.
 

pigeon

Banned
In the 90s Clinton was a wide eyed optimist who believed that single payer was inevitable

I wonder what could possibly have happened to that person in the 20 years since to convince them that America rejects single payer...

Hillary is the president America needed, but not the one it deserved.
 

Trouble

Banned
CBO score could make this possible to sell after the disastrous Ryancare bill. It's still a longshot but if Trump really wants to be a different Republican he would at least listen.

Republicans will stamp their feet and scream socialism regardless of the fact that SP is the most fiscally conservative option.
 

A Human Becoming

More than a Member
Republicans will stamp their feet and scream socialism regardless of the fact that SP is the most fiscally conservative option.
Of course, but Trump wants to be a hero and is transforming the Republican Party. Stroke his ego and sell it to moderate Republicans.

Even though it's a pipedream, a CBO score showing millions more getting insurance and it reduces the deficit would at least make the Republicans look very bad. More people nowadays think healthcare should be a right.
 
I want this to succeed more than anything, but I'll wait for the CBO score before saying if it's viable or not.
I highly doubt that's happening.
I could be wrong, but I don't think they analyse every piece of legislation proposed. And I doubt that Sanders wants this scrutinized under an economic lens anyway, since it's just symbolic.
 
In the 90s Clinton was a wide eyed optimist who believed that single payer was inevitable

I wonder what could possibly have happened to that person in the 20 years since to convince them that America rejects single payer...

But in that quote, she's using the threat of single-payer (way off in the yeeeaar two thooousaaaand) to convince republicans to vote for her private insurance plan.

That sounds like the exact same asshole who ran in 2016.
 

guek

Banned
I highly doubt that's happening.

What's required to obtain a CBO score?

It would be an amazing political move if the dems could actually push forward an alternative legislation, even one that is destined to fail to pass, but garner enough attention around such a vote to show that they did try to pass sensible legislation with the polar opposite national reception compared to the AHCA. TBH though, I don't think the dems are capable of that kind of unity either.
 
If moderate Republicans in Congress were smart they would jump at this. And team up with Democrats to oust Ryan from leadership in order to install one of their own.

Instead nearly every GOP member of the House and Senate will oppose this because they hate government and other people.

Even if it came to a vote, you wouldn't get all Democrats to vote for it... let alone moderate Republicans.
 
What's required to obtain a CBO score?

It would be an amazing political move if the dems could actually push forward an alternative legislation, even one that is destined to fail to pass, but garner enough attention around such a vote to show that they did try to pass sensible legislation with the polar opposite national reception compared to the AHCA. TBH though, I don't think the dems are capable of that kind of unity either.
I'm not sure.
But it's never going to come to a vote at all anyway.
Unity is irrelevant. They're the minority.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom