• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

The 22 Unwritten Rules of TV Spoilers You're Probably Breaking

kswiston

Member
I have no time for videogame spoilerphobes, outside of story related stuff.

Fighting game rosters are not spoilers. Platformer levels are not spoilers (unless someone is literally telling you how to beat a boss or something without being asked). Acheivement names that dont spoil story points are not spoilers.
 

Glass Rebel

Member
#1 - Don't intentionally spoil.
#2 - It's your job to avoid getting spoiled.
#3 - Don't act like a baby when you get spoiled.

das it
 
Spoilers are evergreen? What about for spoilers so old and so famous they're a part of the cultural lexicon?

Expecting people not be casual about spoiling something like The Empire Strikes Back and asking in advance if everyone in the room has seen it seems ridiculously excessive.

It's nice to experience something for the first time unspoiled. That's all, it's just nice. It's not outright obligated to anybody, and that obligation decreases rapidly with time.
I typed that out thinking explicitly about Empire Strikes Back.
 
I was born in 1988, should I be expected to watch Star Wars with a completely uninformed brain?

There is absolutely a time limitation on when things can be "spoiled".
Yeah, accidentally and through commonplace talk.

But if someone miraculously did start watching Star Wars today, completely ignorant of the story, does that make it justifiable to go "Darth Vader is Luke's father haha!"? Why do that?
 

Plum

Member
The literal point is that "talking too loudly" is such an arbitrary threshold that it is unfit to complain about. What if they talked so "loudly" because one of them had a hearing problem, what if they were talking at an "appropriate" volume but the ambient noise went down all of a sudden, etc., etc.

And the people have right to complain about the people complaining who have a right to..., like I said, circular argument.

btw, I'm currently reading Good-bye to all That, and um like the introduction (written by someone else) is literally accounting for what happens in the novel, explaining certain things in their context, and adding some other context for events in the book. Does the introduction count as a spoiler according to you?

Let me spell it out for you in the form of a play:

Person 1 (talking loudly): Hey did you see Game of Thrones last night? I can't believe Jon Snow is now a werewolf vampire hybrid!

(Few minutes later)

Person 2: Hey, can you quieten it down a tad when talking about GoT? I'm not able to watch the episodes live and I can hear you talking from way over the room.

Person 1: Ah, sorry, yeah I'll be more considerate in the future.

That's all I'm saying people should do. Person 1 should be a bit empathetic if called out and Person 2 shouldn't be barging into other people's conversations shouting and raving.

The free speech argument isn't circular because everyone has the right to say anything. Person 1 had the right to talk loudly and Person 2 had the right to call him out on it, trying to police one or the other is pointless as everything is taken on a case by case basis.

As for you reading the book, of course it's not a spoiler. If the author decides that their story isn't one that really needs that surprise then that's on them. However, not every piece of media is Good-bye to all That, most pieces of media don't start out with a Shakespeare-style sonnet saying exactly what'll happen (Shakespeare never really did that either, he just gave the general plot summary and didn't go into details). Applying one example to the entirety of media is not an argument. That and you can't say you care about people spoiling you intentionally and then use arguments like this to discredit people's feelings on all spoilers, it's trying to have your cake and eat it too.

That simply isn't true. Not caring about spoilers is not only perfectly possible, historically it's the norm. We talk of Jekyll and Hyde personalities even though this is a major spoiler for Robert Louis Stephenson's novel, we'll call a trap disguised as a gift a Trojan horse, a problem that is so costly to deal with you'll wish you had just ignored it is a tar baby, and in case you think this is restricted to old material I'll remind you of Luke's parentage and a dozen other plot features that have entered common folklore.

Spoiler sensitivity as a powerful force is a new and, as far as I'm concerned, unwelcome feature of popular culture. We had this discussion on Wikipedia a while back and, believe me, it took a serious effort to get all those spoiler tags removed. People were even slapping spoiler tags on the likes of the Three Little Pigs.

See above, you can't apply what some spoilers have become to the entire lexicon of media. Knowing Vader is Luke's father or that Jekyll is Hyde does not mean you're liable to shout out who dies in the latest episode of GoT or who the killer is in the latest murder mystery, they're nothing alike. However, if you time travelled back to 1886 or 1980 and told someone who cared about those things you'd get rightfully criticised for it.

Who have you been talking to that people are consistently, openly lying to your face about something as low-stakes as "I don't care about spoilers?"

Like, what?

"I don't care about spoilers."

"OK, that must mean you're fine being spoiled on the latest pieces of media."

"Oh no no I care about those spoilers."

That's what I'm talking about, and it's happened multiple times in this thread. People saying they don't care about spoilers when, in reality, they either don't care about others being spoiled or don't care about being spoiled in a certain way. Essentially, in my eyes, if you're going to say you don't care about spoilers you're lying if you then pick and choose what spoilers you care about.
 
Yeah, accidentally and through commonplace talk.

But if someone miraculously did start watching Star Wars today, completely ignorant of the story, does that make it justifiable to go "Darth Vader is Luke's father haha!"? Why do that?

If somebody says "hey I haven't seen any of the Star Wars films yet and I don't know anything about them but I'm super excited to watch them" and another responds with "guess what darth vader is luke's father lolololololol" - yes, that would be kinda jerkish.

But if the scene happens to arise organically in conversation - as it often does, being one of the most famous, most quoted, and most parodied scenes in film - it isn't jerk behavior. Not every conversation about classic film is going to come with a disclaimer and a questionnaire for everyone in earshot about whether they've seen the movie. Just imagine a wide-ranging conversation about film studies where you stop every fifteen seconds to poll everyone to make sure they've seen each individual movie.
 

ExVicis

Member
"I don't care about spoilers."

"OK, that must mean you're fine being spoiled on the latest pieces of media."

"Oh no no I care about those spoilers."

That's what I'm talking about, and it's happened multiple times in this thread. People saying they don't care about spoilers when, in reality, they either don't care about others being spoiled or don't care about being spoiled in a certain way. Essentially, in my eyes, if you're going to say you don't care about spoilers you're lying if you then pick and choose what spoilers you care about.
Hm? Oh no I actually completely don't. I find tip-toeing around spoilers and the desire to not want to be spoiled cripples discussion about media and renders it completely boring.

"Hey man did you watch the latest pieces of media yesterday!"

"No I didn't, don't spoil anything though"

"Oh okay, well you should watch it because it's awesome"

"Sure, I'll eventually get around to it"

-Conversation ends-

Out of all my friends there's really only one other person who feels similarly about spoilers and he's pretty much the only one I talk to about any kind of Media because at least the discussion will feel like a discussion. With everyone else I respect that they don't want to be spoiled but then it really deflates any conversation about something new I've watched or read that they haven't.
 
The reality tv one is nonsense. If someone spoils the winner of Great British Bake Off or Masterchef Australia for me if I don't get to see the episode live, shit is going down.
 

PillarEN

Member
Rule 23. Don't watch Game of Thrones unless you can at the moment it is released because the spoilers are gonna find you. I say this because I don't watch the show and yet I seem to know some twists here and there anyway.
 

TheOfficeMut

Unconfirmed Member
(this can also apply to games, movies, comics... pretty much everything)

...

5. Wait a minimum of 10 days after "binge" shows drop to casually discuss spoilers

Your less marathon-inclined friends deserve time to sample the all-at-once series at their leisure. More specifically, they deserve two weekends: from that debut Friday to the following Sunday.
[/B]

...
https://www.thrillist.com/entertainment/nation/tv-spoilers-rules-etiquette

The bolded, underlined, italicized part is going to KILL some people on this forum bwuahahahahahahaaaaaa
 

Veedot

Member
This. There's people on gaf who think that Pablo Escobar's death on Narco's is a spolier.

It's not a spoiler dum dums.
My gf was legit mad when I said "Sucks that he dies" while she was watching American Sniper and she claims I ruined the movie for her. I had no clue she didn't know Chris Kyle was dead irl. I still stand by the fact that it doesn't count as a spoiler.
 
Let me spell it out for you in the form of a play:

Person 1 (talking loudly): Hey did you see Game of Thrones last night? I can't believe Jon Snow is now a werewolf vampire hybrid!

(Few minutes later)

Person 2: Hey, can you quieten it down a tad when talking about GoT? I'm not able to watch the episodes live and I can hear you talking from way over the room.

Person 1: Ah, sorry, yeah I'll be more considerate in the future.

That's all I'm saying people should do. Person 1 should be a bit empathetic if called out and Person 2 shouldn't be barging into other people's conversations shouting and raving.
Or person 2 moves if he doesn't want to hear stuff, instead of whining that someone is talking about a subject he doesn't want to hear about. Seems pretty simple.

"Oh, fuck, these guys are discussing Game of Thrones episodes and I haven't seen them, better move a few seats away."

I just don't like it when people say one thing and mean another thing entirely; if that's a problem with me then so be it, I'm already insane.
Things aren't always black and white. Something that is perfectly acceptable in one situation, is not in another. This is not people saying one thing and meaning another, this is people understanding context.
 
I'm a bitter book reader who kept my mouth shut about all the twists in GOT while we were still in book neck of the woods but has a haaard time avoiding the spoilers now. I know it's senseless to ask people not to talk about GOT spoilers but when the list wags it's finger at me for talking about spoilers for literal years and then puts a three to ten hour pin in spoiler talk on the other side I have to roll my eyes. Just try to be respectful of other people's show watching or book reading or whatever. Hard to talk hard and fast rules like this. Come off it.
 

berzeli

Banned
Let me spell it out for you in the form of a play:

Person 1 (talking loudly): Hey did you see Game of Thrones last night? I can't believe Jon Snow is now a werewolf vampire hybrid!

(Few minutes later)

Person 2: Hey, can you quieten it down a tad when talking about GoT? I'm not able to watch the episodes live and I can hear you talking from way over the room.

Person 1: Ah, sorry, yeah I'll be more considerate in the future.

That's all I'm saying people should do. Person 1 should be a bit empathetic if called out and Person 2 shouldn't be barging into other people's conversations shouting and raving.

The free speech argument isn't circular because everyone has the right to say anything. Person 1 had the right to talk loudly and Person 2 had the right to call him out on it, trying to police one or the other is pointless as everything is taken on a case by case basis.

As for you reading the book, of course it's not a spoiler. If the author decides that their story isn't one that really needs that surprise then that's on them. However, not every piece of media is Good-bye to all That, most pieces of media don't start out with a Shakespeare-style sonnet saying exactly what'll happen (Shakespeare never really did that either, he just gave the general plot summary and didn't go into details). Applying one example to the entirety of media is not an argument. That and you can't say you care about people spoiling you intentionally and then use arguments like this to discredit people's feelings on all spoilers, it's trying to have your cake and eat it too.
a) I'm not sure that's a play.
b) That's still treating "talking loudly" as this objective thing that totally isn't completely arbitrary.
c) No, you're not owed that empathy. Nor does person 1 need to be "called out". It is possible for person 2 to "just take the L" of being spoiled and not say anything further.

The circular argument arises since person 1 has the right to criticise person 2 for calling them out because person 1 might see that as a ridiculous overreaction, and then person 2 has the right to call out person 1 for calling them out for... and on it goes. Like bringing up free speech is just an odd non sequitur, if we're going by what is simply allowed then person 1 has the right to shout spoilers all he wants because free speech.
This discussion has nothing to do with whether someone has the fundamental right to say something.

As I wrote, the introduction was written by someone who wasn't the author. So uh.

Also, you keep going on about me apparently saying one thing and meaning another thing altogether. Or at least I think that's me you're talking about? And I think you're not actually reading what I've written in that case (well I also think you're not really reading what I've written since you missed the point entirely of that book example).
 

PSqueak

Banned
Let me spell it out for you in the form of a play:

Person 1 (talking loudly): Hey did you see Game of Thrones last night? I can't believe Jon Snow is now a werewolf vampire hybrid!

(Few minutes later)

Person 2: Hey, can you quieten it down a tad when talking about GoT? I'm not able to watch the episodes live and I can hear you talking from way over the room.

Person 1: Ah, sorry, yeah I'll be more considerate in the future.

That's all I'm saying people should do. Person 1 should be a bit empathetic if called out and Person 2 shouldn't be barging into other people's conversations shouting and raving.

Oh yeah, that's totally how it works IRL

"Hello there, i couldn't help but over hear your conversation that should absolutely not concern me and probably i shouldn't be snooping on other peoples conversations, but you see, even tho you don't know me and don't care for me, i demand that you stop talking about this because i havent caught up with the show so it would really be swell that you talked about something else as i over hear your conversation.

I am not a creep."
 

iammeiam

Member
Where I live, the Sherlock special The Abominable Bride was shown about five hours before it was shown on PBS. There was no legitimate way for somebody living in America to watch the show on BBC One. So do you imagine people in Britain were going to sit twiddling their thumbs for fear of "spoiling" viewers in North America? This was one of the most eagerly awaited television shows of the year. It was all over Twitter from the start.

I'm not taking a good/bad side here, just explaining how they came up with three hours. It's not arbitrary, it's literally how long it takes for the average network show in America to go from 'not a spoiler for the east coast' to 'not a spoiler for anyone.'

It's also less about general Twitter from my perspective and more about when you insert the information into unrelated discussions. Live watching is very much a thing on Twitter and something people should be proactively careful about shielding themselves from. And international stuff is complicated. I'm not arguing any of that, I'm just pointing out that three hours makes sense if you're going to try to establish a viewing bubble timeframe for a US audience.
 

mnannola

Member
Buddy: "Hey man did you see that new GoT episode"

Me: "Hold the fuck on, lets bust out the 22 rules before we say another word"
 

Oriel

Member
8. Discussing the historical event on which a show is based does not count as a spoiler

True dat. If someone is watching Downfall I'm soooo telling them
Hitler dies at the end.
 
Similarly, if you're talking too loud and someone calls you out on it take the L and don't complain. You even said that yelling "X DIED LAST NIGHT," is not fine, well that's exactly what I'm talking about. If you're talking loud enough that someone ten feet away who isn't listening in can hear you then you're talking too loud and, again, should take the L if someone complains.

It's just like free speech, no-one can stop you doing something, but that doesn't make you exempt from any and all criticism. In your efforts to stop the "policing" of volume levels you've started policing what people can and can't complain about.

Oh, and thanks for calling me insane.

If I'm talking to friends and someone overhears what they feel is a spoiler and calls me out on having been spoiled in a public place, I'd just laugh my ass off.
 

7Th

Member
The only real rule about spoilers is that if you care about spoilers you are a passive consumer of media and have already lost.
 

RedStep

Member
I think "baby" needs to be defined. If someone breaks rule 1, am I allowed to bitch at them about it? Like a quick 10-20 second shakedown?

No, because everybody has different rules on that (Darth Vader is Luke's Dad!). I don't care if you have a "6-month rule" and somebody else has a "12-month rule". Rules 2 and 3 supersede 1, for the most part.

Also, this all makes me glad that I REALLY don't care about spoilers. Hell, I love 'em. Let's get the plot details from the next 3 Star Wars movies, Season 8 of GOT, and both Infinity Wars movies going. I don't have all day!
 
No, because everybody has different rules on that (Darth Vader is Luke's Dad!). I don't care if you have a "6-month rule" and somebody else has a "12-month rule". Rules 2 and 3 supersede 1, for the most part.

Also, this all makes me glad that I REALLY don't care about spoilers. Hell, I love 'em. Let's get the plot details from the next 3 Star Wars movies, Season 8 of GOT, and both Infinity Wars movies going. I don't have all day!
I can't bitch even a LITTLE bit?! Come on! I gotta get something! Spoilers are my kryptonite.

How about this. I'm allowed to bitch a bit, and rule #4 is that people can tell me to go fuck myself.
 

shadowkat

Unconfirmed Member
Most of that list is ridiculous. I don't generally watch reality tv but it can difinitely have spoilers.

I'm usually not overly concerned with spoilers but the times that I am, I usually avoid social media/threads etc until I can see the thing. And if I happen to get spoiled, I may be a little annoyed but it's not the end of the world and it doesn't ruin what I'm watching.


#1 - Don't intentionally spoil.
#2 - It's your job to avoid getting spoiled.
#3 - Don't act like a baby when you get spoiled.

das it

This is a far better list.
 

Glix

Member
I was on the train the other day and two unbearable super loud asshats were LOUDLY discussing Jon Snow lineage on the train.

I already know, but man, that shit was soooooo fucked up.
 

Cipherr

Member
I don't understand people who get all dramatic/edgy and post shit like "spoiler culture is so fucking stupid, people are so over dramatic, this is so exhausting".

Is it that hard to simply not spoil stuff for others? What a challenge.

a87c852995e2310bf7416a7e3d64ec28fcb9ccb2a3da03a4a09fa93021d6fc6e.jpg


People are just dicks thats all. And dicks ironically tend to dislike being seen as dicks; so I assume that verbal diarrhea about "people shouldn't care about spoilers" is just a weak defense mechanism.
 
2. Don't confuse the premise of a show with a spoiler[/B]

If you ask, "What's Breaking Bad about?" and someone says, "It's about a high school science teacher who becomes a meth kingpin," that doesn't count as a spoiler. That's literally what the show is about. You're going to need some information about a series before you decide it's worth investing your time in.

What about the (TV Tropes warning) First Episode Spoiler?
 
The only real rule about spoilers is that if you care about spoilers you are a passive consumer of media and have already lost.

Not applicable when it comes to novels. There are enough books written before you learned to read to keep you occupied for the rest of your life. And Film and TV will be like that with enough decades on their backs. Unless one takes the stance that media is disposable when it reaches a certain age, one can't blame consumers for their age.

Important note: Story details in general are not spoilers. Only some story details are spoilers.
 

G-Fex

Member
I don't understand people who get all dramatic/edgy and post shit like "spoiler culture is so fucking stupid, people are so over dramatic, this is so exhausting".

Is it that hard to simply not spoil stuff for others? What a challenge.

hahahaha yes dramatic and edgy.

What isn't a spoiler. What won't people flip the fuck out over now a days.
 
See above, you can't apply what some spoilers have become to the entire lexicon of media. Knowing Vader is Luke's father or that Jekyll is Hyde does not mean you're liable to shout out who dies in the latest episode of GoT or who the killer is in the latest murder mystery, they're nothing alike.

What's this obsession with shouting? .

However, if you time travelled back to 1886 or 1980 and told someone who cared about those things you'd get rightfully criticised for it.

Now neither of us is old enough to remember the publication of Stephenson's novel, but I at least was an adult in 1980 and the relevant scene was widely discussed without restraint. Similarly, contemporary discussion of Hal's killing spree in Space Odyssey was as common as discussions of the innovative Star Gate sequence. Charlton Heston was on Earth and we all knew it. Rosemary's Baby was the result of a satanic conspiracy in which her husband was complicit. Norman Bates' mother was dead. None of these widely known facts diminished our enjoyment of the films, nor should they have.

There may have been people who wanted to be excluded from such discussions, and they would have quietly ducked out. But the idea that talking about the films we've seen is subject to some kind of purdah rule is relatively new. And it's very unwelcome.
 

Lkr

Member
Buddy: "Hey man did you see that new GoT episode"

Me: "Hold the fuck on, lets bust out the 22 rules before we say another word"
LOL
No, because everybody has different rules on that (Darth Vader is Luke's Dad!). I don't care if you have a "6-month rule" and somebody else has a "12-month rule". Rules 2 and 3 supersede 1, for the most part.

Also, this all makes me glad that I REALLY don't care about spoilers. Hell, I love 'em. Let's get the plot details from the next 3 Star Wars movies, Season 8 of GOT, and both Infinity Wars movies going. I don't have all day!
When I found out the details of the GoT season 7 finale were available to read, you bet your ass I went and read it. I didn't want to wait a week for resolution.
 

Raptomex

Member
I'd also like someone who says they don't care about spoilers to actually mean it for once. As I said, the end result is the same so you either care about said end result or you don't.
I mean it. I knew how Breaking Bad, The Sopranos, and Sons of Anarchy ended way before I finished them because I looked it up. I just wanted to know. I know how the X-Files ends and I'm only up to season 5. But I won't ever spoil a show for others unless they give me the green light when discussing it.

This list is silly. Just don't be a dick and spoil shit. It shouldn't even be a rule. Just common sense.
 
I mean it. I knew how Breaking Bad, The Sopranos, and Sons of Anarchy ended way before I finished them because I looked it up. I just wanted to know. I know how the X-Files ends and I'm only up to season 5. But I won't ever spoil a show for others unless they give me the green light when discussing it.

Yeah. Everyone is different. And I get that some things rely on suspense more than others. But still it's always just a bit surprising to me just how much emphasis people put into not wanting to know plot points in advance. And I say that as someone who isn't even really a student of the craft. I'm not someone who watches a movie and can eloquently explain what the themes of the film were or what I liked/didn't like about the cinematography. My ability to articulate what I like/don't like about films/television barely gets deeper than the surface level -- the kind of thing that might net me an A in a 100 level college course on the subject matter. But still, I feel like just knowing the plot is hardly the same as actually seeing it (or reading it). And I feel like even in suspenseful works being spoiled in advance can sometimes just lead to a sense of foreshadowing that can aid you in different ways in terms of enjoying the work despite being robbed of that first-viewing suspense.

Mind you, I'm not the arbiter of the proper way to enjoy things. People should absolutely do their own thing and if you don't like spoilers I'll try to avoid spoiling things for you.
 
I'm not saying the answer is to force yourself become completely immune to spoilers. I avoid spoilers at times if it's something I'm very invested in, such as this past weekend's Twin Peaks I was unable to watch due to being out of town.

I just think if you're at the point where you're attacking people for innocently revealing a spoiler for something extremely dated, or it coming up innocuously, or for revealing something as trivial as a powerup being in a videogame or an album track listing getting revealed (I have seen this one), it's probably a sign that you should try dialing things back to a more relaxed level.
 

smokeymicpot

Beat EviLore at pool.
Some shows though I would never want to spoil for some. Mostly the Wire. Some moments in that show should be watched without knowing it hurts more.
 
I agree some of the points in the OP are a bit of a stretch. But I feel like a lot of the "Omg when will this spoiler trend end" crowd are just "fuck you, I've got mine" sorta people.

Some people care about not being spoiled, others don't give a shit. Just don't be a dick about it.
 
Top Bottom