• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Framing Snyder's Superman - Why people think he doesn't care

When the Senate blows up and everyone is encased by fire, Superman stands around looking sad:

GTTXsgA.jpg
Thus pretty much sums up how futile it feels every time there's a mass shooting and you know you can't do anything.
 

Bulzeeb

Member
I get that some people dont want to see a boy scout or whatever, but yeah, that superman feels uninterested on whatever its happening around here, he is superman because he can not because he wants to, its like finishing college and jumping on the first shitty job you can do because you haven't been able to get the job you want, so you spent part of your day wondering if you are going to end doing that for the rest of your life.

As someone who is not that much into reading comics, I dare to say that MCU Captain America feels more like superman that the usual Captain America in the comics, and now that I think about, All Might is the best Superman I've seen in media recently, it is your standard boy scout, he is basically worshiped in that world, the society is what it is now all thanks to him but at the same time they show you his most vulnerable state, yet, whenever he appears you now that he will do everything to save people because that is who he decided to be and the reason why he inspires so many people

68747470733a2f2f73332e616d617a6f6e6177732e636f6d2f776174747061642d6d656469612d736572766963652f53746f7279496d6167652f6168515f745f4655696449686d513d3d2d3237383130363839382e31346464346137376161653936616164333234373431303539382e676966
 
Snyder's Supes had a father who was an idiot and a mother who urges him to be selfish and as a result, wound up an unlikeable character. If you dont get the Kents right, you can't make Superman work.

Good point. With the other live action interpretations I've seen( the Reeve films and Lois and Clark), Superman had no choice but to be humble, relatable, morally and ethically above reproach. Current Superman's parents have given him some, at best, sketchy advice in certain spots so there's no wonder he views saving humans as an obligation and fulfillment of his powers, rather than just being a good fucking person at his core who simply does the right thing because the right thing is the only thing to do. Not saying Cavil's Supes is a bad person, obviously, but he's not one to really admire or inspire to be.
 

Bolivar687

Banned
Now I really have heard it all.

He's an alien. You want to know why he's physically separated from a lot of the people he's saving in those shots? Because he's literally, biologically separated from the human race. The look of confusion and anguish on his face is him understandably struggling with the unreality of being an extraterrestrial in such surreal situations, let alone the ensuing religious adulation. He is a farmer from Kansas who is emotionally unprepared for any of this, as anyone of us would be. Every action he takes has a metaphysical aftershock on mankind, which, obviously, is the entire point of the conversation with his surrogate father in the carpenter's shed. It's one thing to forfeit your humanity online in a discussion forum by saying you can't relate to his facial discomfort but to pretend these themes are entirely lost on you requires a willful disregard of the basic underlying premise of the Superman.

It was a very well written OP but you guys really are scraping the bottom of the barrel at this point.
 
God dammit you beat me to this so fast, It's the first thought I had when reading this and the last thought.

It's really clear that Snyder loves watchmen and the themes present in that book. And many of those themes are 100% worth exploring. The question of "are super heroes even a good thing for society" is endlessly fascinating and can be tackled in many different ways.

Problem is.... I'm not quite sure that's where you want to start when establishing not only Superman, but also an entire cinematic universe that has to be built on at least some premise that, yeah, superheroes need to be a good thing so we can keep having them around in these movies.

Exactly. I wrote on GAF a while ago that the main issue with the Snyder movies isn't the characters, so much as the environment that he puts those characters into. Goddam if the DCEU Earth isn't a bleak-as-hell place to live. Just like the "End is Nigh" world of Watchmen.
 

Sulik2

Member
When the Senate blows up and everyone is encased by fire, Superman stands around looking sad:

GTTXsgA.jpg

Fun fact in the directors cut there is a sequence of him rescuing people from the explosion and bringing them to EMT workers. Yet another very needed scene that was cut from the theatrical release.
 
Now I really have heard it all.

He's an alien. You want to know why he's physically separated from a lot of the people he's saving in those shots? Because he's literally, biologically separated from the human race. The look of confusion and anguish on his face is him understandably struggling with the unreality of being an extraterrestrial in such surreal situations, let alone the ensuing religious adulation. He is a farmer from Kansas who is emotionally unprepared for any of this, as anyone of us would be. Every action he takes has a metaphysical aftershock on mankind, which, obviously, is the entire point of the conversation with his surrogate father in the carpenter's shed. It's one thing to forfeit your humanity online in a discussion forum by saying you can't relate to his facial discomfort but to pretend these themes are entirely lost on you requires a willful disregard of the basic underlying premise of the Superman.

It was a very well written OP but you guys really are scraping the bottom of the barrel at this point.

This interpretation of the character is more or less defined by the environment and the story Zack Snyder wants to put him in. What's mostly being said in this thread is that as a result, the character doesn't resonate or inspire and there's been enough discussion on that topic( on this forum and in general social media) testifying to that. Superman at his core is a symbol of hope, not a symbol of pity due to reasons x, y and z as you've stated above. A montage of Superman saving people shouldn't be filmed in a way that we should feel sorry for his burden and internal conflict to be and do good. I want to feel good watching Superman do great things. Frankly, with how shitty life is unfolding before our very eyes, I could use a bit more MCU Captain America inspiration and less 'do I really have to save this person' DCU Superman moping. Life is depressing enough on its own merits.
 
Fun fact in the directors cut there is a sequence of him rescuing people from the explosion and bringing them to EMT workers. Yet another very needed scene that was cut from the theatrical release.

...wait, seriously? Why in the world would you cut that?
 
Superman is supposed to be about an alien who is brought up by good people, gains their morals and values. he uses his powers for good because that's the way he was raised. He has a certain innocence and charm to him.

Snyder's superman plays like an alien who's never seen actual humans before and has no idea what it's like to live on this planet. like he read someplace that people in burning buildings should probably be saved, but it never feels like something he's happy about.
 
Now I really have heard it all.

He's an alien. You want to know why he's physically separated from a lot of the people he's saving in those shots? Because he's literally, biologically separated from the human race. The look of confusion and anguish on his face is him understandably struggling with the unreality of being an extraterrestrial in such surreal situations, let alone the ensuing religious adulation. He is a farmer from Kansas who is emotionally unprepared for any of this, as anyone of us would be.

Do you see how you contradicted yourself from one sentence to another? Lol.

"He's an alien, of course he can't fucking relate to humans. He's a farmer from Kansas!"

He lived the majority of his list as a human. Diana comes to man's world and instantly knows that protecting innocent life is the right thing to do. Snyder is to blame.
 

night814

Member
Superman is supposed to be charming and generally pretty happy, Snyder made him moppy and emotionally unstable. I get what he's going for, it's in the tone of MoS and BvS. Snyder's idea was to try to make him more interesting by showing different emotions for supes than what has been shown before. So they had him be more emotional and less interested in being Superman and doing superhero things. He's supposed to be more vulnerable the way Snyder did him but it comes more across that he just doesn't care.

Also a lot of the shots of him destroying trucks and buildings were obviously done for effects shots for trailers and the like. I don't think they thought enough ahead about that because it just comes across as negligent in the final product. Not to mention the destruction at the end of the movie, that did not go over well at all. Especially when you think about the original Zod fight in Superman 2, supes goes out of his way to protect people and structures from harm, mostly at his own expense which to me is the Superman thing to do.
 

ElNarez

Banned
What is the appeal of Snyder's Superman?

In a world that is more cynical than ever, where people will shit on you for doing the right thing in the wrong way, and where the systems we build keep failing us, Snyder's Superman is innately good, and still strives to see the goodness in everyone.
 

mreddie

Member
What is the appeal of Snyder's Superman?

He's underappreciated.

In a world that he wants to protect but the world is scared of him.

Synder however has fucked things up, Man of Steel just gave him shit and stripped his morals and BvS, we know how that goes.

I fear if we get Black Suit Superman and what I fear might happen, it's over.
 
In a world that is more cynical than ever, where people will shit on you for doing the right thing in the wrong way, and where the systems we build keep failing us, Snyder's Superman is innately good, and still strives to see the goodness in everyone.

Was he trying to see the goodness in everyone when he wrecked that guy's truck? Or when he punted that African warlord through a wall and killed him? (and yes, he's dead. Don't you dare fucking tell me he survived that shit)
 

ElNarez

Banned
Was he trying to see the goodness in everyone when he wrecked that guy's truck? Or when he punted that African warlord through a wall and killed him? (and yes, he's dead. Don't you dare fucking tell me he survived that shit)

If you're against destroying the truck of a dirtbag asshole to teach him a lesson, your problem is as much with Superman as portrayed in the Snyder films as it is with Superman as portrayed by everyone else ever, and every vigilante superhero for that matter, because that is how the whole genre operates.

"trying to see the good in everyone" doesn't mean "never hurting anyone ever", because sometimes they're warlords, or they're loose in a big city doing as much damage as they can with no intention of ever stopping. There's a nuance there, and you'd have to argue in pretty bad faith not to see it.
 
I was so upset after B.V.S. that when I went home, I planned out my own verison of the movie that was set in the Donner-verse that ended in a fight with Composite SuperBatman. I'm that guy.
 
In a world that is more cynical than ever, where people will shit on you for doing the right thing in the wrong way, and where the systems we build keep failing us, Snyder's Superman is innately good, and still strives to see the goodness in everyone.

What separates him from WW, who is also in that same cynical world and manages to also be innately good?
 
The framing of superman was certainly lacking in being inspiring in man of steel. It only worked in like one scene at the oil tanker. I thought that was a great moment. Otherwise he rang pretty hollow as a superhero even if he was saving the world. Tbh I think marvel films have dropped the ball on this aspect too big time for me. Only really the Raimi Spider-Man got that feeling right imo.

In BvS' case I think they make it a point to portray superman as a reluctant hero though. Even the one big montage scene showing his world endeavors is narrated by a bunch of journalists and talking heads debating whether or not he even belongs on their planet and if they should accept his help. Whole time he looks burdened like he's literally atlas holding the world on his back

I totally understand the whole #notmysuperman camp, but I thought it was an interesting place to take the character and I liked it
 
What separates him from WW, who is also in that same cynical world and manages to also be innately good?

"She was seperated from it, and he was raised in it" would probabaly be the arguement given from synderverse fans. The whole movie of Wonder Woman is dealing with how cynical the world.

Doesn't mean I agree with the fact Superman has to be as depressing as the world he's in, in fact I'd say the whole point of his character is the opposite.
 

ElNarez

Banned
What separates him from WW, who is also in that same cynical world and manages to also be innately good?

At the very least in BvS, Wonder Woman has actually withdrawn from the world, having taken from her confrontation with Ares the idea that her intervention in mankind's affairs only made things worse. And then, seeing Superman fight, she's inspired to come back, because, and that's key to the worldview of Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice, "men are still good".
 
It's not that he doesn't seem to care, it's that he spends too much of his time in both films, kinda just sullying a lot Jor-El tells him to have people look up to him, and he kinda fails at that. Sure he does eventually come through in the end, but that's not enough to help the poor inconsistent characteriazation. Also I prefer my Superman to be a big boyscout, entirely inspiration, or a serious reporter when he's Clark Kent. I love that version of the character.

Wonder Woman in Wonder Woman or Captain America in the MCU is what Superman should have been. It's a crying shame, he wasn't.

What is the appeal of Snyder's Superman?

He's powerful, even though Batman kinda owned his ass, because he's Batman. Also he has a potentially interesting compelling arc, which Snyder and co never really took advantage because of "action".
 
"She was seperated from it, and he was raised in it" would probabaly be the arguement there. The whole movie of Wonder Woman is dealing with how cynical the world really is.

Doesn't mean I agree with the fact Superman has to be as depressing as the world he's in, in fact I'd say the whole point of his character is the opposite.


Right, maybe I'm asking the wrong question here.

Is he really a contrast? Or an effective one? MCU Cap acts as a similar contrast until Civil War. Hell he was still one in CW, but for a different, grayer reason.

But when he does, it is notable, highlightable, joked about, frames the world around him, as well as shown.

I argue that for Snyder Superman, that contrast is so watered it is barely noticeable compared to WW.
 
"She was seperated from it, and he was raised in it" would probabaly be the arguement given from synderverse fans. The whole movie of Wonder Woman is dealing with how cynical the world really is and coming to terms with it but not getting the better of her.

Doesn't mean I agree with the fact Superman has to be as depressing as the world he's in, in fact I'd say the whole point of his character is the opposite.

I'd argue that Clark has even more reason to protect the Earth. Having grown up in it, he's seen the good in the world.

Diana comes to the world and is immediately exposed to war, sexism, pollution, political cowardice, etc.
 
There is absolutely a story to tell about Superman existing in our world. Especially debuting in that world. I promise you, if Superman was portrayed as the Reeves in 2017 in Trump's America, it would look off as well. Snyder just wasn't the person to execute this story.

This is largely the problem. That's a story that could be told. I would enjoy seeing that story. That is not the story I felt while watching the film.

khurdqegzgrfzcp0dgishjszu.gif


ok henry it goes like this you grab him by the neck AND SNAP THE SHIT OUT OF IT LIKE THIS WHABOOOOSH YEAHHHH AWESOME

I mean, that just a director showing an actor what they're looking for in a scene.

I think people's previous perceptions of Superman have coloured how people view the character. Look at how often a complaint Superman not smiling is. It's why you have people jizzing over the dude in Supergirl because he apparently smiles so much even though(full disclosure I haven't watched Supergirl yet) from what I have heard he doesn't get put through many trials and tribulations. Hell Cap wasn't a bundle of joy when the couldn't save the people in the car in AoU; Reeves was so angry when Lois died he screamed and span so fast he traveled back in time and he felt a bit mopey when he wasn't allowed to play football.

In the Snyder films of the top of my head he is bullied as a kid, has random people pick a fight with him, criticised for saving people, forced to watch his father die because his father though cynical was principled, blamed for collateral damage that was 99% the other guy, forced to kill and end his connection to his home world, framed for causing an international incident, blamed for a guy being driven to suicide, has a teched out fascist want to kill him because he doesn't trust him cos he's so damn super, oh and dies cause the figurative troll that caused half the crazy shit that happened to him created a literal troll to kill him.

Also. I have said this before, people may have depictions in their head that don't truly exist. Superman killed in cold blood during the Donner films. Jonathan Kent was a cynical bastard who feared his son would be a lab rat for the govt in those movies too. Why people insist that Johnathan Kent was a bundle of hope and optimism may be because they are basing what they are seeing on one to many episodes of Lois and Clark, possibly the comic, or nostalgia. Listen to the Smodcast episode on MOS where Kevin Smith had to remind the die hard Superman fan that Superman killed in the Donner films, how he can empathise as a protective parent with Jonathan Kent etc

I am probably going of on a tangent but it's interesting to compare how Cap and Superman take criticism. Cap is presented with the Sokovia accords and says the safest hands are still the Avengers as the Avengers can't even present a united front and doesn't think it's worth signing. Superman when presented with criticism is not mopey, he's pensive. When he is presented with criticism by Lois, he knows he is innocent and initially rejects it. But when presented with more "evidence", he is pensive, reflective and he goes to the Senate hearing to defend himself. Why he is criticised for it by audiences whilst Cap is praised for ignoring criticism. I am not quite sure, tone I guess. But then again I am not sure why people can't understand why a regular bloke may not want to be worshiped like a God and the Mexico complaint confuses me

Finally: I find it weird OP is saying there is moodwhiplash with the murder of Zod in MOS, but you don't bring up Superman 2. Though to be fair it is played for laughs and a quippy postmortem one liner before another act of murder is played for laughs in the Donner films. Maybe cos coldblooded murder is played for laughs in those films makes them more consistent I guess.

I feel through all of this Bleepey, you refuse to engage with the idea that there is a hard disconnect between the text of MoS and BvS, and what many people took away from it. Veelk has offered that the disconnect is due to the way the film was shot. And perhaps that's it, given, as you point out that other interpretations fall to similar actions but are seen as more inspiring.

There's a gap between the script-- Superman wants to save people, is *compelled* to be a good guy even, even disobeying his father, even as it makes him an outcast (also asserted by the script)-- and how it's framed and shot. So we don't see Clark happy to be saving people, and we don't see him care, we just see him *do*. And further, in all the over the top destruction (what a horrible decision to make the damage so severe) him attempting to help people is often missed. And then there's that tone-deaf kiss at the end. And also, which we haven't even let the cement dry on "Clark is compelled to be a good guy, against some compelling reasons not to be" we push him past that and give him a no-win "Kill Zod or let innocents be killed" that doesn't play well because the movie hasn't stressed his no-kill stance before that.

So the basic beats are OK and he clearly does care, the movie muddles its own message with the visuals, the dilemma at the end, and the over-the-top destruction which overwhelms any nuanced take which the movie is already having a hard time selling.

Pretty much this.

What is the appeal of Snyder's Superman?

An immigrant with godlike power doing a thankless job in a world that actively hates him. I just feel there are far better executions of the idea in other media. I'm not getting anything particularly new from it.
 
I'd argue that Clark has even more reason to protect the Earth. Having grown up in it, he's seen the good in the world.

Diana comes to the world and is immediately exposed to war, sexism, pollution, political cowardice, etc.

This is my main point I missed in my post last page; why does Superman help the world? Is it because he knows it's the right thing to do? Out of guilt for his father? Without his family being a grounding point for his ethics, Clark has no reason to be Superman. The character's strength has always been how he is good because he knows it's right, but here it seems like he doubts that even.

I do enjoy the scenes at the start of MoS of vagabond Clark helping people, and even the trucker scene. They humanize and add to his character. But I still don't see a drive for helping others besides "well, cause".
 
At the very least in BvS, Wonder Woman has actually withdrawn from the world, having taken from her confrontation with Ares the idea that her intervention in mankind's affairs only made things worse. And then, seeing Superman fight, she's inspired to come back, because, and that's key to the worldview of Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice, "men are still good".

Good point.

I guess I feel like that appeal and theme was undermined hard by the script.

It felt like Superman was more into the idea of doing good and doing it because he can and at times only he can. It didn't feel like a Steve or a Diana where they make it clear it is in their core.
 
Good point.

I guess I feel like that appeal and theme was undermined hard by the script.

It felt like Superman was more into the idea of doing good and doing it because he can and at times only he can. It didn't feel like a Steve or a Diana where they make it clear it is in their core.

Exactly. This verison of Superman, and really most on screen ones so far, have failed at showing why Superman wants to help people, and showing the good hearted Kanas boy Clark is.
 
Top Bottom