Thanks. I can apparently chew and walk at the same time, but I can't walk my dog and write a post on GAF on my cell phone at the same time, lol.
Not exactly the Winston Churchill of our times are ya
You mean
this guy:
In 1937,
he told the Palestine Royal Commission: "I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place."
There are few things more admirable than to strive to be unlike Churchill.
Thanks. I can apparently chew and walk at the same time, but I can't walk my dog and write a post on GAF on my cell phone at the same time, lol.
Not exactly the Winston Churchill of our times are ya
You mean
this guy:
In 1937,
he told the Palestine Royal Commission: "I do not admit for instance, that a great wrong has been done to the Red Indians of America or the black people of Australia. I do not admit that a wrong has been done to these people by the fact that a stronger race, a higher-grade race, a more worldly wise race to put it that way, has come in and taken their place."
There are few things more admirable than to strive to be unlike Churchill.
Busy threads are an indication of debate, and their position on the front page is due to regularly being bumped. Controversial topics will outlast more mundane ones. In that threads lifetime, how many gaming posts have been made across many other game related topics? I'm assuming you have this data from the database? This is where all the arguments put forward by people with the only intention to disrupt fall apart. Under any sort of scrutiny. I think you have a case of positive discrimination given the threads that you are drawn to. 36/40 threads on the main page are about games. 3 are about political implications of press/developers, and I'll even give you the Kingdom Come one as a favour
So that's 90%.
The example was to prove the illogical stance of the original post. I'm glad you took that from it, it was intended.
Again like Shiki_ you talk about enemies and revolutions. Yet, you sit on a videogame messageboard - to what effect? You think this community is here to serve you. The community serves itself. If people aren't coming round to your point of view, your arguments are weak, your points lack substance (i.e. actual data and content) or you are failing at articulating your viewpoint.
I could go on gaming and create or bump year(s)-old threads on gaming side to make it 40/40 but that would not impact the site's impetus. Busy threads are an indication of
interest, not necessarily of debate. As others have indicated, they are relieved that GAF no longer dog-piles, and the reduction of users has resulted in a reduction of speed, so that the first 2-3 pages of a thread comprises of posts that are more than drive-by posts like "Good," or "I agree" or "**** 'em."
If it's quantitative arguments that rocks your boat rather than qualitative, if one page is 50 posts, and it's four pages long, well, that far exceeds the
interest of a thread created this week that did not get enough replies to even be two pages, and is now on the third page of the board. But the threads I mentioned garnered
hundreds of replies in just a few days, in contrast to a thread about the GTX 1100 series being created in March to reach its 200 posts.
So no, simply pointing to how many "new" threads on gaming isn't indicative of much more than minority participation. But the
heart of a message board like this one can be measured with a thread like this with thirteen pages; or, behold the contrast of the "Rational Left" thread, which includes Jordan Peterson and has been around for awhile, and the recently-created thread about "Jordan Peterson Debunks White Privilege," that is multiple pages.
If this community served me
no purpose, I would abandon it. But there are some folks here that make it worth sticking around.
As far as "winning" people over to my view, there's no argument that I can provide that would convince [_________] that brown people aren't boogeymen, or for [___________] the irrationality of their love for guns.
As I know Phoenix is a conservative individual. So I don't know what you call him far-left.
Everywhere I go, folks ascribe me as the antithesis of whatever that place's dominant political ideology is.