Boss Mog
Member
It's $499 for the 2070$600 for a 2070? This inflation is freaking nuts
It's $499 for the 2070$600 for a 2070? This inflation is freaking nuts
Seriously. 970 was what, $350? Maybe slightly less than that for the base card?$600 for a 2070? This inflation is freaking nuts
well at least a 2070 for $500 is alright.
It's $499 for the 2070
I see.Founders Edition pricing.
You're still contributing to the userbase that allows them to get away with murder.Cant wait.. to buy a used 1070 when people upgrade. Not really feeling like giving nVidia money.
As far as I know, it's a Polaris refresh for 2018 and the new Navi architecture for 2019 (1080 level performance for $250 rumored).I'm also wondering if AMD has a response to this - this is a whole new architecture that took years of work, and if they're going to have an RT response soon, they'd have had to have been working at it for years.
Wondering if the 2070 has a 1070 like memory situation with the last bit at a slower speed, since it has all the memory of the 2080 but less GPU functional units enabled.
Not that it ended up mattering all that much in the end for the 1070s price/performance, but I'm curious.
Seriously. 970 was what, $350? Maybe slightly less than that for the base card?
That's massive inflation for the "upper mid tier" level over three generations.
Where are you guys seeing this? Was it on the stream? I can't watch the stream, but was seeing multiple reports in tech/gaming media of $599 for the 2070.
Funny enough I was complaining about it being 400. So it still is pretty big inflation at 500. Still no good. Why are they being so greedy? Pre-Intel market cleanup?It's $499 for the 2070
As far as I know, it's a Polaris refresh for 2018 and the new Navi architecture for 2019 (1080 level performance for $250 rumored).
The 2070 is $732 in Europe. What a joke.
unless it's a third party selling. They take hit's on returns.you still give them your money you tit xD
Same. Hopefully the 1080ti takes a price tumble, too. If there's not a huge difference between it and the 2080 I'd go for it.The presentation was good and the RTX20 series seem impressive, however am holding off til i see real world results in games against the gtx10 series. If they are impressive ill bite.
You mean how they manned her up a bit for this game? Yeah it's stupid, but it not that bad.
Ya i mean i just checked overclockers uk and they have the 2080ti at £1,049,99 for the cheapest 2080ti. Silly money for graphics card.Same. Hopefully the 1080ti takes a price tumble, too. If there's not a huge difference between it and the 2080 I'd go for it.
from the livestream is where we are getting these prices of $500 for a RTX 2070It says right on NVidia’s website, 599.99 for the 2070. Are these other models that people are looking at?
ffs AMD get back in the game and provide some competition.
Jensen said the 2070 was more powerful that the Titan xP so the 2080 should blow the 1080 Ti out of the water so to speak.Was waiting for a 2080 (not TI), but it seems its weaker than a 1080TI by numbers?
Can you guys give me your thoughts please?
IN RAY TRACING dude, Jesus, nVidia FUD is so powerful...Jensen said the 2070 was more powerful that the Titan xP
To be fair though, they always, clearly stated that the jump is in Ray Tracing.1080ti performance at nearly the same price point as an architecture that was out for over 2 years.
But this time, with "ray tracing" of sorts. Chuckle.
IN RAY TRACING dude, Jesus, nVidia FUD is so powerful...
I mean, you did read post #80, didn't you?To be fair though, they always, clearly stated that the jump is in Ray Tracing.
1080ti performance at nearly the same price point as an architecture that was out for over 2 years.
But this time, with "ray tracing" of sorts. Chuckle.
IN RAY TRACING dude, Jesus, nVidia FUD is so powerful...
IN RAY TRACING dude, Jesus, nVidia FUD is so powerful...
Metro, BFV and Shadow of the Tomb Raider are the only ones I can think of and they're all using nvidia's implementation which as I said earlier in the thread I don't trust for a minute. I'm far more interested in the Vulkan-based GPUOpen tech AMD showed at GDC.The RTX thing has to be working some funny numbers. TFLops vs new flops? The 8gb card is 3gb smaller than a TI and so much more powerful? I can't wrap my head around a 1080ti being a 7th or so in power compared to a 2070? They shit all over the current line of cards on paper by the numbers in the presentation but I am waiting to see side by side comparisons. Are there many games out there using ray tracing or is it something that can be worked into existing games?
Much faster with RTX on, yes for sure......Boy, I knew this whole conference and the many references to the $68,000 DGX2 was just trying to warm folk up to a price hike probe "sans lube"....$500 RTX 2070 being faster than 1080 Ti, not bad at all. Now will be waiting for 2080 benches.
Nvidia just made xbox1x and ps4pro last gen. Now not just in performance, that happened 2 years ago, but now in visuals too. I hope next box and ps5 will have real time ray tracing and GI.
Also, some of the presentation looked really fake and exxagerated, like the balls in the cube demo, but more worrying are all those low framerate and stuttering demos with RTX on. Many of those demos were running at really low clips and there's still lots of blurriness and softness to many of their RTX scenes....
Could you include FE prices as well? Because they changed more drastically.Referring to wikipedia, the GTX 10-series cards were priced as follows at launch:
GTX 1060 - $249
GTX 1070 - $379
GTX 1080 - $549
GTX 1080ti - $699
RTX 20-series cards:
RTX 2060 - *Unknown. 33% increase will give a nice $329 msrp.
RTX 2070 - $499 +31.7%
RTX 2080 - $699 +27.3%
RTX 2080ti - $999 +42.9%
I'm priced into the 2060 tier, so I'll wait to see what those cards offer. To nitpick a bit, the name change from GTX to RTX sounds weaker to me.
The marketing hype around real-time ray tracing is feeling a bit "highest quality uncompressed pixels"-ly to me.
I did, hence the second part of my post (which you ignored).I mean, you did read post #80, didn't you?