Bloodborne is very, very good (artistically some levels are borderline masterpiece). Horizon Zero Dawn was hideous, though, i.e....
It's my own champion of the 'overhyped' title this gen. As for Red Dead not coming to PC, I repeat what I've already said before: it was designed for consoles & it's a console game. Any PC "port" would be exactly that, a port which might look prettier & run at higher framerate, but that's about it.
I finished Bloodborne and it's good but the environement just become boring after few hours... Dark Soul III is imo better in almost everyway and is multi-platform.
Played Horizon Zero Dawn for few hours before droping it... The game got some cool action combat, but his open world is pointless, the story is dull as the main character and all the NPC that live in that fancy emptyshell.
Tried Marvel Spiderman 30min then I let my GF play it... The game is just about showcase while the gameplay is extremly repetitive, heavily scripted, very easy or dificult for the bad reason(sudden QTE, fail infiltration)... The game play like a movie, but a 15 hours movie where you have to listen endless cutscene, and travel from building to building to set up antena or to recover backpacks...
I didn't played GOW yet...
Btw your point of view about game potential on PC is biased, seems you are just trying to convince yourself. PC gamers don't care you know... If they choosed to invest in a rig that cost 5 times a console it mean they could also afford to play on those console, but they didn't want it.
Take my case for example, I have PS4 pro my(gf console) and I have a gaming PC(pluged to my 4KTV)... First I won't buy RDR2 because I will not pay for a lesser version. And since I discovered modding in 2012
I just can't play open world game without mods.
So for me RDR2 will be PC only or nothing, I'll sleep well anyway since I'm not a big fan of Rockstar.