mckmas8808
Mckmaster uses MasterCard to buy Slave drives
YouTube has pulled down videos that I've liked before. I just know and understand the rules and move on.
-
Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.
[YouTube] Shirrako's account reinstated after killing feminist NPC in RDR2 [Restored: Read OP]
- Thread starter Michele
- Start date
YouTube has pulled down videos that I've liked before. I just know and understand the rules and move on.
Schrödinger's cat
Banned
This would be satire if it wasn't real.
I know, but the videos in question were.
There's thousands of videos of female NPCs being killed in Skyrim, why haven't they been banned by the the SJW conspiracy?
Something tells me he would be cool with cop killing in a game
Oddvintagechap
Member
Female NPCs couldn’t b killed since when?
Plus this guy was posting some weirdo revenge porn.
Last edited:
Lort
Banned
Domestic violence kills more people than car accidents .. and almost all are women.
Conspiracy means secret agenda..
Is the conspiracy to reduce domestic violence?
Because the guardian never wrote nonsense articles about them. Because Skyrim came out at a time when leftists were less fucking insufferable, and understood videogames aren't reality.
Last edited:
iconmaster
Banned
I don't think he got banned for just one video:
I'm not surprised YouTube took action.
Whether terminating the whole account is justified is another question but this is some real poking the bear here.
nkarafo
Member
goldrush80
Neo Member
he went to far by killing pixels? really now?
Lort
Banned
Look how many people are ignoring my posts ...
Noone wants to admit the real issues
Our whole society including government system is based on “community expectations” .. get over it.
The “conspiracy” if it exists is to reduce domestic violence.
The right wing claiming the left is for censorship is the pot calling the kettle black.
Noone wants to admit the real issues
Our whole society including government system is based on “community expectations” .. get over it.
The “conspiracy” if it exists is to reduce domestic violence.
The right wing claiming the left is for censorship is the pot calling the kettle black.
goldrush80
Neo Member
well the bear can go fuck itself
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Are you equating actions in a video game to real world domestic violence?
Are you saying video games correlate to real world domestic violence? Jack Thompson, where you at?
I guess they need to pull all the police/civilian killing videos as well, no? For the sake of equated consistency.
Soleil rouge
Member
I don't think he got banned for just one video:
I was ready to rage with the rest of you, but judging by this pic, this idiot deserved it. He was definitely asking for it.
goldrush80
Neo Member
This is America, if we dont like sopmething we dont get over it. We protest it.We attack it. We fund against it. We lawyer up.
RedVIper
Banned
I'm really confused on how you got to domestic violence in the first place, I guess that thats why people are "ignoring" your posts.
Lort
Banned
Im saying the agenda that everyone keeps talking about is undefined. If it exists which is debatable is to reduce domestic violence .. and other people have argued that we shouldnt kill police or anyone in video games .. i actually believe in limited free speech .. i think killing anyone in games and movies is fine.. but i dont think we should allow groups of people to advocate to incite violence against others.
Killing someone in a game is fine.. a video of someone dying by accident on yourube is fine.. a video of someone claiming we should kill someone else is not.
Dosent matter if that other is a woman, the police, a politician a christian or a muslim.
Wow did i just write out the terms of service of almost every multinational company ... funny that.
iconmaster
Banned
Clearly the solution is for Rockstar to patch in a self-defense routine for the poor lady.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
I don't think he got banned for just one video:
Except he clearly says that his channel was taken down for promoting violence.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
How many liveral viewpoint videos and channels have been deleted from YT?
How many conservative ones?
Silent Viper
Banned
Insane, youtube abusing their power
DeepEnigma
Gold Member
Only "violence" it is inciting is that of virtual characters (NPCs), nothing more. Funny that.
Last edited:
Silent Viper
Banned
These type of videos common. But he being little more popular got Mass report from all swj crowd
Lort
Banned
The posts of most people here are like oh i cant download my video of someone enjoying killing a woman .. this sucks .. somehow i dont see any of you claiming we should reupload videos of ISIS inciting violence of Americans.. all in the name of free speech.
You all believe in limited 1 sided free speech. I believe in even handed limited free speech as is worded in the terms of service of facebook and youtube. Also there is the consitution and the anti descrimination laws that were written into democracies around the world.
Descrimination based on religion or other forms is what America was based on .. at least it used to be .... now its juts a bunch of winging kids who want to laugh at punching women in the face for free speech but want all ISIS and muslim free speech banned.
You all believe in limited 1 sided free speech. I believe in even handed limited free speech as is worded in the terms of service of facebook and youtube. Also there is the consitution and the anti descrimination laws that were written into democracies around the world.
Descrimination based on religion or other forms is what America was based on .. at least it used to be .... now its juts a bunch of winging kids who want to laugh at punching women in the face for free speech but want all ISIS and muslim free speech banned.
At the end of the day this will hurt the people who advocate for this kind of deplatforming more than they can imagine or ever would like to believe. Their voices are loud on twitter, but wallets speak louder, and several years of this nonsense has gotten them killed politically. Sure, their ilk can issue subpoenas in a short time frame from now. What a wonderful consolation prize.
RoboFu
One of the green rats
No the multiple video titles are clearly the main thing here.
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
Yoshi
Headmaster of Console Warrior Jugendstrafanstalt
Going out of your way to kill npcs for having political opinions you do not like and to make provocative videos of that to piss of a good share of humans is incomparable to the "normal" murders in games. The intention is clearly bad and I find it OK that Youtube bans for that.
Lort
Banned
Rockstar will not be patching it out of the game.. the problem with the videos is not that it shows someone killing a woman ( which is fine in games).. the problem is they show killing her because she IS a woman.
Isnt killing a woman in a game for shouting our her beliefs a form attempting to kill free speech?!?
Lol that got you thinking.
Isnt killing a woman in a game for shouting our her beliefs a form attempting to kill free speech?!?
Lol that got you thinking.
JimmyJones
Banned
Are you really comparing this to ISIS?
Tripolygon
Banned
I saw this coming and he totally deserved it.
Last edited:
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
And your argument was? Explain it to us, I insist.
nkarafo
Member
I see.
How about these titles?
GTA 5 Killing civilians,Getting into IAA Building & Having fun!
GTA 5 Kills First Person, Killing Police and Civilians, Fun/Brutal Kill
GTA 5 Funny/Brutal Kills Cop Killing (mostly) Episode 21
Youtube is filled to the brim with clickbait titles and content like this. So, either ban everyone or let everyone do it. Enough with the double standards, the cherry picking and the special treatment.
Last edited:
Lort
Banned
So your saying we SHOULD allow one type of free speech but not another? Please explain your suggested terms of service like i did.
I did .. pls read back you obviously just joined.
GribbleGrunger
Dreams in Digital
Are you watching this, George?
Last edited:
Redneckerz
Those long posts don't cover that red neck boy
No need to be hostile.
Hence why i say seem, which i usually do on things i am either not 100% certain about or that don't have 100% my interest. You can discard that part of my opinion then and uphold the rest.
If it isnt a pattern then its a combination of manual reports and the algorithm doing its wrongful work.
Lort
Banned
Yes these should be banned as they are counter to the terms of service.
If you all want to see change you should write to youtube and insist they follow their terms of service evenly.
Then start your own site that allows all inciting violence videos .. or only viodes that incite violence for your prefered target. Which one would you choose?
Enygger_Tzu
Banned
You can present them one more time, here. And feel free to post specific refutations to the "agendas" I and other people have.
Pallas
Member
So if the videos were named differently, and the content stayed the same, you believe they wouldn’t be targeted?
Another question
He’s done several videos displaying creative ways to kill individuals from different demographics and YouTube apparently had no problem with this, but these videos they do? What if someone modded President Trump into GTA5 just to display creative ways to kill him, would that be ok?
Also, if this gets creators in trouble then should all the videos displaying creative ways to kill other groups should be removed(there are a lot of cop killing videos on YouTube from GTA5)
I’m not saying the videos were done in good taste, but I thought the reasoning of the ban “promoting violence” was bullshit when one of the entire premise of the game is to cause violence and disorder.
Back to the original point of the bolded part of your comment, if it’s truly because of what he named the videos in question, then YouTube at the very least should have warned him and tell him to edit the names. I agree that he should have named them a bit better, that goes with all of those videos that have him showing ways of killing fictional NPC’s in RDR2.
You had me until you compared the YouTuber’s videos to Hitler’s regime. Could you not think of a better analogy?
Last edited:
nkarafo
Member
Youtube will never apply those rules evenly. If they ban all the game channels that "promote violence",a large part of the site content would be lost, along with the views. Whatever the consequences that comes with it.
So all they do is cherry pick. This is actually pretty consistent with what the left does. Double standards is their game.
Last edited:
ILLtown
Member
LOL @ people comparing this guy to Hitler or ISIS.
When you "incite" something, it means that you're urging or persuading someone to do something. You have to be literally batshit crazy to think that these videos are urging people to go out and tie real feminists to train tracks or to feed them to crocodiles or to harm them in any way.
It's blatantly obvious what the issue is here for the identity politics peddling SJWs. It's that the NPC is a feminist. That's literally all it is. They got all offended and played their usual game of "let's make a mountain out of a molehill to try and turn a silly video into an incitement of real life violence that puts real women in danger!", but all that does is make you look like you've lost your fucking minds.
People comparing this guy to ISIS or Hitler shouldn't be allowed near sharp objects.
When you "incite" something, it means that you're urging or persuading someone to do something. You have to be literally batshit crazy to think that these videos are urging people to go out and tie real feminists to train tracks or to feed them to crocodiles or to harm them in any way.
It's blatantly obvious what the issue is here for the identity politics peddling SJWs. It's that the NPC is a feminist. That's literally all it is. They got all offended and played their usual game of "let's make a mountain out of a molehill to try and turn a silly video into an incitement of real life violence that puts real women in danger!", but all that does is make you look like you've lost your fucking minds.
People comparing this guy to ISIS or Hitler shouldn't be allowed near sharp objects.
RoboFu
One of the green rats
Yeah those are awful to and make it very hypocritical of you tube. Still doesn’t make his titles any less horrible.
Last edited:
AquaticSquirrel
Member
I don't often post much, especially in contentious topics but I'm honestly having trouble believing this is a real post.
It's not often that I genuinely wish for a "dislike" button.
nkarafo
Member
Horrible or not, if the other channels are allowed to stay, his channel should too.
Last edited:
LostDonkey
Member
This is fucking ridiculous.
off duty ninja
Member
#NPClivesmatter
bilderberg
Member
The difference being ISIS's goal is specifically to incite violence and fear. To make the comparison you're making you would need to outline how violence in games incites real world violence, which from decades of research is bullshit. Even the most fervent free speech people aren't going to advocate it's okay to scream 'bomb' on an airplane or 'fire' in a crowded place.
Similar threads
- Locked