lock2k
Banned
After paying for it.Or at least start crying after having sex.
After paying for it.Or at least start crying after having sex.
The thing is, most women in general don't find this shit attractive or admirable at all. I'm not talking about the blue hairs who are on Twitter every waking moment bitching about something. I'm talking about women who actually have shit to do. If this dude went out on a date with a chick and they saw what he posted on Twitter, they would cuck him for a free dinner and never call him back.
The art is in bad taste.
The fact there are no shirtless men on the box is a non-issue.
The art is in bad taste.
This can't be real.There's not really any need to have boobs in our media at this point. It's 2019.
I'm not woke ... I'm the opposite of woke. I been married for the past 41 years and got more miles on my "scepter" than a 1952 Kenworth. So maybe me and this guy have totally different reasons, but I agree with him. I get tired of every woman in a video game being portrayed sexually. Which I think is what the guy was reaching for with the "no shirt" thing. Yeah, guys with no shirts are in plenty of stuff, but guys don't carry secondary sexual organs on their chests.
For those of us who've actually had long, healthy sex lives that sort of portrayal comes across the same way as high-school toilet humor. It's an insult to my intelligence, and I really think the gaming community needs to move away from the whole quasi-porn thing.
but wont someone think of the ugly women and fatties
This idiot simply don’t understand that many female gamers are actually hoping for a lot more sexualized female characters so the can gain fame by cosplaying them, male gamers aren’t the only group who like physically attractive girl characters.
Guys like him think they can get laid by being all pro-women and stuff, while in reality they're just sexually frustrated incels and will stay that way.
The most reasonable thing that has ever been said on Twitter.
Would motor boatShe is indeed fine as hell. Very much my taste.
I am astonished that no gaming urinalist has criticized Battletech for not having a female-shaped Mech.
I never really get this "outrage" and why it seems so specific to gaming.
This is a mainstream music video from 2014. Over 875 MILLION views. 4 million likes. Over half a million comments with people still commenting to this day.
It's not age-restricted. It's just there and people seem fine with it.
So what the hell is up with gaming where any content like this, or similar to this, causes people to freak the fuck out?
Mainstream TV shows like Game of Thrones, Westworld etc are fine with putting hot women front and center and audiences are eating that shit up because who the hell doesn't appreciate some hot as fuck ladies?
Yet, you try to do this in the gaming sphere and people lose their damn minds.
It's especially weird because consumption of music videos and mainstream TV and movies are far more "mixed" in term of gender participation than RPG style tabletop and video gaming. These lads are literally offended on behalf of women who are not into their hobby anyway.
Is there something specific about some of the dudes in these communities that makes them absolutely terrified of admitting "yeah, I like looking at hot women"?
I always have a chuckle at that image of Klepek covering his eyes so he won't see that Japanese lady in her lingerie. Who the fuck is he kidding?
I can only imagine that they do this to defend the "honor" not of the women in the images (and in this case it's a fucking drawing for fucksakes) but rather the women who they personally know who are maybe just regular women?
So when I am watching TV with the wife and a hot woman appears I don't say "holy fuck put me in a room with her and I'd need an ice bucket for my cock and a hip replacement" cos that's a bit shitty. Similarly though I don't go over the top the other way. "Oh my god! Cover my eyes! This is so disrespectful to women. I will complain vigorously online."
Why can these dudes not just do what you are supposed to do? Think "nnnnnniiiiiiiiccccceeee" and have a right good look while also remaining composed and calm. Fuckin hell.
Imagine going on Twitter to let the world know how much you disprove of artwork depicting a hot lady. So pathetic.
Sour grapes becuse they'll never get a sniff of a hot woman, so they defend M'ladys honour of the women they could possibly maybe get that are not hot. It's slut shaming masked by virtue signaling. In fact it's basically in the same ball park as women hating mysoginists getting boobie streamer E girls accounts banned.
I've seen this happen in real life a few times, they either downplay her looks and say things like "She's actually really smart, stands up for herself and gives as good as she gets" or the guys turn into total bragghard fuckbois.Thing is you know for a fact they would fall head over heels if a "traditionally attractive" woman showed up and gave them even a passing whiff of interest.
Personally I find that cover embarrassing. The medium and the Shadowrun franchise deserves something cooler and more creative. Fantasy cyberpunk is a practically limitless canvas and that cover is trite and eyeroll inducing at best. It's also a very flat and poorly produced illustration. Did the Shadowrun franchise get farmed out to another development studio?
Hmm this didn't post right before let me try again.
Why lie in the title of the thread? The word 'tempted' directly implies he didn't refuse anything, or am I missing something? He also said it's 'not his job' to choose to bypass this title's review, also making the thread title fake news. Also that chick who replied to him needs to learn to read too, he expressly said no shirtless men ON THIS box, not on any videogame covers in existence.
Personally I find that cover embarrassing. The medium and the Shadowrun franchise deserves something cooler and more creative. Fantasy cyberpunk is a practically limitless canvas and that cover is trite and eyeroll inducing at best. It's also a very flat and poorly produced illustration. Did the Shadowrun franchise get farmed out to another development studio?
To be fair that cover seems to have been around since 2011?
Shadowrun Attitude *OP: 9781934857229: Amazon.com: Books
Shadowrun Attitude *OP on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Shadowrun Attitude *OPwww.amazon.com
A bit late in the day to decide to be embarrassed about it.
As I said in previous posts, coming out with "it's embarrassing" or "eyeroll inducing" is just a bit too try-hard for me.
It's a fairly standard and inoffensive illustration.
Why should it have a shirtless man?
The artist has the freedom to draw whatever she wants.
Hmm this didn't post right before let me try again.
Why lie in the title of the thread? The word 'tempted' directly implies he didn't refuse anything, or am I missing something? He also said it's 'not his job' to choose to bypass this title's review, also making the thread title fake news. Also that chick who replied to him needs to learn to read too, he expressly said no shirtless men ON THIS box, not on any videogame covers in existence.
Personally I find that cover embarrassing. The medium and the Shadowrun franchise deserves something cooler and more creative. Fantasy cyberpunk is a practically limitless canvas and that cover is trite and eyeroll inducing at best. It's also a very flat and poorly produced illustration. Did the Shadowrun franchise get farmed out to another development studio?
... but it's my first time seeing it. I don't understand your logic.
The eyeroll was automatic, I assure you I didn't have to try hard.
I don't know what to say to your statement that you find this cover 'standard' and therefore reflective of most covers. It really isn't. Not only is it not reflective of most gaming covers developed in the west, you never see similar covers in bookstores or cinema posters either.
Don't think anyone actually requested that. What an odd request to make. Do give me some badass fantasy cyberpunk on the cover though. Like, y'know, literally all other recent Shadowrun covers.
Nah, the artist is an employee, he or she 'draws' whatever he or she is told to. By non-creative suit-n-tie types who look at analytics and focus group results. No persecuted artists here...
The eyeroll was automatic, I assure you I didn't have to try hard.
Joined Today at 12:45 AM
Resetera SJW trolls are so obvious.
Actually it's the need to tell everyone how much you eyerolled that's try hard.
I don't have an accepted email for that website, nor do I appreciate the moderator sanctioned racism that is prevalent on there.
So, why did you lie in the thread title? Can you answer that question?
I really wonder how prude one has to be to be offended by a woman in a typical "attitude" posture (hence it fits on the cover so well), having a moderate V-Neck.
Dude, next time try to wait a few day after joining before spewing your Resetera SJW narrative to be less obvious.
Did he review it? if he didn't after his public virtue signal then yes he refused to review it.
... but it's my first time seeing it. I don't understand your logic.
The eyeroll was automatic, I assure you I didn't have to try hard.
I don't know what to say to your statement that you find this cover 'standard' and therefore reflective of most covers. It really isn't. Not only is it not reflective of most gaming covers developed in the west, you never see similar covers in bookstores or cinema posters either.
Don't think anyone actually requested that. What an odd request to make. Do give me some badass fantasy cyberpunk on the cover though. Like, y'know, literally all other recent Shadowrun covers.
Nah, the artist is an employee, he or she 'draws' whatever he or she is told to. By non-creative suit-n-tie types who look at analytics and focus group results. No persecuted artists here...
I think you're misunderstanding the argument. It negatively affects how the medium is perceived. Games deserve better than suits deciding 'young males buy the most games, and young males are sexually inexperienced, blue balled and thirsty so this is what's happening with the cover'. The medium deserves better. Artists working on incredible game universes are being stiffled by this analytics shit.
Also I don't know what to tell you if you think 'damn I'm so busty my shirt is torn and stretched' passes for 'moderate v-neck' in the real world.
Why don't you go and check, do some research before making a thread? He specifically said he was only 'tempted' and not able to make a managerial decision like that so no, he didn't 'refuse' anything, because he literally couldn't, and therefore this thread is fake news.
Hmm this didn't post right before let me try again.
Why lie in the title of the thread? The word 'tempted' directly implies he didn't refuse anything, or am I missing something? He also said it's 'not his job' to choose to bypass this title's review, also making the thread title fake news. Also that chick who replied to him needs to learn to read too, he expressly said no shirtless men ON THIS box, not on any videogame covers in existence.
Personally I find that cover embarrassing. The medium and the Shadowrun franchise deserves something cooler and more creative. Fantasy cyberpunk is a practically limitless canvas and that cover is trite and eyeroll inducing at best. It's also a very flat and poorly produced illustration. Did the Shadowrun franchise get farmed out to another development studio?
It's a symptom of them being in the bubble, everyone agrees "Bad thing is bad" those that disagree are just banned and it makes them desperate to actually flex on someone. Even more so when the bubble has told them GAF is full of stupid bad people, it's and easy target in thier mind to argue with faux intellectualising and when they get banned becuse it's so transparent what they are doing they can run back to the bubble and get validated that "GAF is bad".Dude, next time try to wait a few days after joining before spewing your Resetera SJW narrative to be less obvious.
I think you're misunderstanding the argument. It negatively affects how the medium is perceived. Games deserve better than suits deciding 'young males buy the most games, and young males are sexually inexperienced, blue balled and thirsty so this is what's happening with the cover'. The medium deserves better. Artists working on incredible game universes are being stiffled by this analytics shit.
Haha this is amazing, is there a link to watch the video?
Games don't "deserve better", it's all made up bullshit. The medium deserves to be free for people to express themselves however they wish.
Not sure of the time stamp.
But they're not, I've already made that point.
Also learn to discuss better than projecting your own life on to others; it weakens your argument. Ad hominem is lazy; projecting ad hominem is just sad.
Not surprised that video is from waypoint. Like at all.
In the 90's we had Chun Li
Guess you didn't grow up in the 80's. Ah, the 80's back when life was simpler, there was no Social Media or Internet and this sort of thing didn't exist. Pop me back in my time capsule.
Reeeee*Simpler for you, while entire other demographics were unhappy with their treatment in society. GenX here btw. And I'm not triggered by discussions about where our society should go from here.
Really don't what your stance here. Game deserves 'better'? Better for whom?Very thoughtful contribution mush, I shall need to ponder on that one, you have opened my eyes this day.
EDIT: I should edit that spelling mistake but I shan't.