Weilthain
Banned
That’s the official stance apparently.You should look into it
That’s the official stance apparently.You should look into it
You should look into it.That’s the official stance apparently.
Religion is a belief. Science is not.I’ve said already it’s a belief thing not an understanding issue.
And don’t talk to me about space maths.
I’m Obi-Wan you are the old lady
Perhaps much of what you believe to be fact is actually just faith based.Religion is a belief. Science is not.
The reason why the illusion is happening isn’t even agreed on according to what I can find.
I think there may be more to it.
i could be swayed either way. Maybe what we think we are seeing isn’t really what we are seeingThe disagreement comes from the physiological cause of the optical illusion - the reality that the moon (and sun) are not changing their size as they go down the horizon is universally accepted. Do you dispute that reality?
You should look into it.i could be swayed either way. Maybe what we think we are seeing isn’t really what we are seeing
I went on YouTube to look for more info but I found was dinosaurs aren’t real and Earth is flat.But did you look into it?
you are getting a theme song for this tauntingYou should look into it.
Maybe you should look more into it.I went on YouTube to look for more info but I found was dinosaurs aren’t real and Earth is flat.
It’s not faith if it can be proven.Perhaps much of what you believe to be fact is actually just faith based.
i could be swayed either way. Maybe what we think we are seeing isn’t really what we are seeing
Ah but what about space maths though.It’s not faith if it can be proven.
I went on YouTube to look for more info but I found was dinosaurs aren’t real and Earth is flat.
What does that picture have to do with what we’re talking about?
sorry I meant to post this one
It’s the same math. Do you understand how variables work?Ah but what about space maths though.
Sometimes a picture says more than anything I could type out.Is there a reason why you don’t want to answer my question?
It’s not the same it’s space math completely differentIt’s the same math. Do you understand how variables work?
Sometimes a picture says more than anything I could type out.
I’ll find the right picture don’t worry
I said space math because that’s the term you used. But the math doesn’t change on earth as it does in space, the variables change the further you get out into space, not the equations. Do you know the difference between the two?It’s not the same it’s space math completely different
How do you not know the difference between space math and normal math?I said space math because that’s the term you used. But the math doesn’t change on earth as it does in space, the variables change the further you get out into space, not the equations. Do you know the difference between the two?
There isn’t a difference.How do you not know the difference between space math and normal math?
At no point have I argued in favor of a flat earth, all I've done is explain the why of the theory and explain that I don't think there's anything wrong with people questioning. On a side note, the horizon thing has been tested many times and that's not the strongest globe earth argument. With binoculars or a telescope you can see the items that disappeared magically reappear. If you want to argue a globe you should try stronger facts which there are plenty of.You constantly argue in favor of flat earth but haven't provided any proof of your claims. Saying that NASA and government lies isn't proof that the earth is not a globe. You don't need to go down the retarded conspiracy rabbit hole. Maybe start with simple observations of how sun moves throughout the day and how objects "sink" behind the horizon. That alone completely crashes the possibility of flat earth. Flatbrains only know how to parrot "It's perspective, It's perspective" but they struggle to address the huge holes in THEIR inconsistant "law of perspective". For some reason the sun doesn't become smaller and smaller the closer it gets to the horizon while ship do. But for some reason they both "sink" behind the horizon because muh perspective.
I’m going home from work I will recharge and possibly record an accordion song for madanon, do some more research and be back for more.So is this just a straight up troll? Do you have any interest in a real conversation?
What is the difference then?How do you not know the difference between space math and normal math?
Sorry but this is one of the strongest argument for a globe because it is one of the easiest test you can do and it is very easy to understand. You don't need any kind of scientific equipment, you don't need to understand space math. You just simply need to sit on a beach and watch ships sailing.the horizon thing has been tested many times and that's not the strongest globe earth argument
Where do they magically reappear? Show me a video how someone zooms the Sun back out from behind the horizon. What a load of bullshit. Flatties use all kinds of shitty videos with refraction, mirror effects that make ships look like they float in the air. But not a single one of them has the guts to use their telescopes to show how they make the objects gradually resurface as they zoom in. Guess what? Because it crashes their whole flat earth and perspective explenation.At no point have I argued in favor of a flat earth, all I've done is explain the why of the theory and explain that I don't think there's anything wrong with people questioning. On a side note, the horizon thing has been tested many times and that's not the strongest globe earth argument. With binoculars or a telescope you can see the items that disappeared magically reappear. If you want to argue a globe you should try stronger facts which there are plenty of.
I’m going home from work I will recharge and possibly record an accordion song for madanon, do some more research and be back for more.
just stop asking me stuff if you feel like you are being trolled! I’m giving my opinion.
I’m about to post a musical number give me some more timeThat’s the thing - I would love to hear your opinions. Instead I’m getting a constant wave of deflection and evasion to simple, direct questions. Are you interested in sharing your opinions or are you just trying to rile people up?
Space maths is maths what got a satellite to Jupiter and Saturn to get this footage in the 1970’s.What is the difference then?
The great taste and full flavor of regular cock, but now with less guilt!
my views are that I do understand and accept allMost of the things you say as factually correct when it comes to flat earth and your space maths etc.That’s the thing - I would love to hear your opinions. Instead I’m getting a constant wave of deflection and evasion to simple, direct questions. Are you interested in sharing your opinions or are you just trying to rile people up?
my views are that I do understand and accept allMost of the things you say as factually correct when it comes to flat earth and your space maths etc.
I genuinely am fascinated looking at things differently and don’t mind talking about it as it makes for a fun thread.
I’m not trying to disprove science on NeoGAF
BUT I don’t believe the Apollo missions happened and love posting official space footage because it looks so fake and space technology seems to have gone backwards unless you believe in the cgi
Yea but scientists had reflected lasers off the moon in 1962 before the Apollo missions.we didn't fake it
the retroreflector array remains
How would planes fly in this scenario?My favourite flat Earth argument is that there is no gravity. Instead the Earth is constantly moving upwards at the rate of 10 metres per second. That's not gravity causing you to fall back to Earth it's the Earth itself rising up to meet you. You can't make this shit up... well, obviously you can. I just love how much thought and effort they've put into it. It's adorable.
Gravity isn't real eitherHow would planes fly in this scenario?
Apparently neither are satellitesGravity isn't real either