No, no it isnt. You and Negotiator can harp all you want about it, bring your conspiracy theories, but fucking Gonzalo code leak was a reason for this video that you linked, and it contains "Navi10" reference in its code.
Jaguar sucks compared to PCMR CPUs (i5/i7, not i3). But saying that it sucks compared to PS360 CPUs is highly ignorant. So yes, DF (as the biggest tech-focused channel) is responsible for spreading ignorance.
Are both going to embrace gyroscope next gen?
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
/* ... */
/* the graph */
vertex_t * G;
/* number of vertices in the graph */
unsigned card_V;
/* root vertex (where the visit starts) */
unsigned root;
void parse_input( int argc, char** argv );
int main(int argc, char ** argv)
{
unsigned *Q, *Q_next, *marked;
unsigned Q_size=0, Q_next_size=0;
unsigned level = 0;
parse_input(argc, argv);
graph_load();
Q =
(unsigned *) calloc(card_V, sizeof(unsigned));
Q_next =
(unsigned *) calloc(card_V, sizeof(unsigned));
marked =
(unsigned *) calloc(card_V, sizeof(unsigned));
Q[0] = root;
Q_size = 1;
while (Q_size != 0)
{
/* scanning all vertices in queue Q */
unsigned Q_index;
for ( Q_index=0; Q_index<Q_size; Q_index++ )
{
const unsigned vertex = Q[Q_index];
const unsigned length = G[vertex].length;
/* scanning each neighbor of each vertex */
unsigned i;
for ( i=0; i<length; i++)
{
const unsigned neighbor =
G[vertex].neighbors[i];
if( !marked[neighbor] ) {
/* mark the neighbor */
marked[neighbor] = TRUE;
/* enqueue it to Q_next */
Q_next[Q_next_size++] = neighbor;
}
}
}
level++;
unsigned * swap_tmp;
swap_tmp = Q;
Q = Q_next;
Q_next = swap_tmp;
Q_size = Q_next_size;
Q_next_size = 0;
}
return 0;
}This doesn't make much sense to me (a comparison is necessary in technical discussions, you can't just vaguely say it sucks because it sucks, you need a relative point of reference), or perhaps there's a language barrier, otherwise you would get the gist of my posts.
I was going off by what 2 others have side in this thread. But since you 2 are so inclined for the video, I had to look it up to confirm it since nobody bothered to link it before whenSonGoku asked for it. Your RECEIPTS RIGHT HERE. You can watch it and Richard does try to imply the PS5 will use the same compute units as the Pro for compatibility. And yes, DF are butthurt
. They're not getting the scoop from Sony, mark my words they will get the scoop from MS.
DF is not "butthurt" you are.
2x 5700 is 19.5tf, so 5800 is defenitely not that, might be 56CU which is 13.6tf (i think).14TF for launch unit definitely not
he said :"the ps4 pro shipped with 36CU which maybe a good match for Sony BC that would give us 8.3tf"I was going off by what 2 others have side in this thread. But since you 2 are so inclined for the video, I had to look it up to confirm it since nobody bothered to link it before when
we know fool still you got it wrong.
this one is so ridiculous that i'm not gonna comment on it.And yes, DF are butthurt
i know its GCN, he presented multiple scenario's and clearly said that 10tf to 12tf is what he's expecting, you'r the one talking about DF is lowballing the PS5 to be 8tf because Sony snubbed them and went with Wired, hilarious.
There is no difference in teraflop calculation between gcn and navi. They are calculated the same way. That's how you calculate TFs for AMD cards. He was listing different CU counts with the according TF number. And in his calculations he used the Gonzalo leaked frequency of 1.8ghz. He didn't imply that PS5 will use gcn CUs.
But PS4 5000 firestrike score really make sense, because it's almost right in the middle between 7850, and 7870. So to my surprise it looks like PS4 windows drivers were optimised well enough and it should be also the case with PS5 gonzalo score.
With leaked 500$ price on top of that I just cant see PS5 reaching 12TF barier anymore, but more like 9TF (Gonzalo score equivalent). That's also probably why resetera user who explained his PS5 tech demo impressions implied people should not base ther expectations on hardware specs because they will be disappointed.
I know hope dies last, but I dont want to lie myself anymore. The war is over, my 12TF team has no chance to win
Just remember the RDNA/GCN and other differences. If it was GCN 9tf I would've been disappointed. RDNA is rivalling NVIDIA TFs, which previously GCN couldn't.I know, compared to current consoles RX5700 is still big improvement, because before Navi launch the most optimistic scenario was vega64 like performance and it looks like we will get it. With HW RT on top of that and 500$ price point we should be happy I guess.
12TF team good luck in your last struggles before the end, it was a pleasure fighting along your side for so many months. We still have one general left, but I bet even Negotiatior himself started doubting 12TF dream at this point. So it's official, I'm abandoning the sinking ship before it's too late.
I was going off by what 2 others have side in this thread. But since you 2 are so inclined for the video, I had to look it up to confirm it since nobody bothered to link it before when
Not from crashing thoughsonomamashine Of course not it's a hype train and doesn't get nowhere near the sea so, we're pretty much safe from sinking
Of course I don't need to make comparison. You rather to obssesion with that dude.
I'm obsessed with what exactly? I'm not a PCMR elitist. I always see consoles as a whole, something more than the sum of their individual parts (unlike PCs). Maybe you're confusing me with someone else? Maybe with... DF?
That would be unusually petty of them just because they went to Wired with a couple of sit downs. The people at DF probably can appreciate what Sony is trying to accomplish with those Wired articles better than we can. Which is a good go to that keeps everyone interested and engaged in a year when they've been skipping conferences and being very lowkey.
Eh, it was all so easy last time. Everything got dumped on VGLeaks with fully drawn out diagrams of the architecture for both platforms. And as I recall, when Xbox gamers couldn't except it, they rejected it and went on the warpath against all sources they didn't agree with.
It's a miserable way to start a new generation. Just saying
Look whatever happens, happens. But put it out of your mind that DF is being adversarial over Wired interviews.
Sony initially wanted to use a quad-core AMD FX CPU @ 3.2 GHz. Better ST, roughly the same aggregate performance, higher TDP.
It's very much possible too that developers were so confident in saying the PS5 is more powerful because even Scarlett GPU/CPU upclocks wouldn't make up the difference
That would be even lesser noticable than 900p and 1080p though
That would be even lesser noticable than 900p and 1080p though
Especially since most games will be 4K
That very well could happen. It all depends on how beneficial this hardware accelerated raytracing is and how many developers jump on the RT bandwagon.
