Sub_Level
wants to fuck an Asian grill.
Trailer 2
Not gonna lie I would watch this by myself on an early saturday matinee and go day drink afterwards.
Trailer 2
Trailer 2
Kinda ironic he calls these movies trash yet without them he would exist as he is now.Obligatory
This time around, The Hollywood Reporter's Beandrea July seemed to enjoy the "fresh, feminist spin" on the story, which also highlights environmental issues.
"Banks brings Charlie's Angels into the modern age with flair, all while unapologetically raising a feminist flag, championing female friendships and subtly making a point about the urgency of the ongoing climate crisis."
Three pages of dorks shitting on a movie they haven't seen for dumbass political reasons.
Kek.
Most of the reviews are positive, moron.Bad reviews, bad trailer, an awful director, and the film's obvious agenda will have that effect.
Charlie's Angels: What did the critics think?
The verdict is in for Elizabeth Banks's latest action film in the Charlie's Angels franchise.www.bbc.co.uk
BBC website makes a point of starting with the most negative reviews so that they can close out with the theme of it getting a positive reception.
In spite of guff like this:
Ok NOW I'm looking forward to this
My wife's boyfriend took her to see it and she loved it.I forgot this was coming out.
Naomi Scott is super-duper-hot so I will probably see this at some point, but man.. the trailers make it look ridiculously terrible. Anyone here seen it yet to give a real opinion? I tend to enjoy shit movies as long as they're entertaining/fun to watch.
There's no reason that it couldn't make $0. There's no guarantee it makes its money back.Honesty my first thought once the trailer finished was “this is gonna make zero dollars,” not literally but you know what I mean. Definitely doesn’t feel like a box office smash hit but we’ll see.
Elizabeth Banks is pretty hot.what's the point of going to the movies to see real sexy dominant girls playing james bond when there's no sexy girls?
Actress, producer, and director Elizabeth Banks has one simple reason for making a new version of Charlie’s Angels. “I wanted to show women at work Growing up, I didn't see many portrayals of working women onscreen"
When it comes to inclusivity in Hollywood, Banks believes that paying attention to it ultimately makes good business sense. “When you think about what has been put out in the media, it’s mostly from a cisgendered white male perspective. Everything that’s not that feels a little bit fresher and so it feels like pretty good business. I’m the audience, I want things that I haven’t seen before. My real plea is for men to have enough empathy to go see movies starring women because I’ve been asked to go see movies starring men my entire life, and I’ve happily done so. I don’t know why men don’t return that fucking favor.”
More men are better at directing than woman. You don't get a free pass because you have a vagina. Women can make great films too it just seems like there's less of them out there.Elizabeth Banks made ‘Charlie’s Angels’ to celebrate women at work
No Ms. Banks. I don't owe you jack shit. I'll decide when to part with my hard earned money to watch your film once you make it interesting for me to watch. And before you excuse me of being a sexist pig, you should know I've watched numerous movies starring and directed by women. Such as Wonder Woman, Zero Dark Thirty, Something's Gotta Give, When Harry Met Sally, and even crap like Frozen.
Asking for empathy from us men to go see your stupid movie strikes me as begging because you don't think you have what it takes to make a film that could catch an audience's interest. We watch movies for entertainment and as an escape, not as an apology to women. Like I said, we owe you jack shit.
Slumber Party Massacre was hella lit bro. Directed by a feminist too.And before you excuse me of being a sexist pig, you should know I've watched numerous movies starring and directed by women. Such as Wonder Woman, Zero Dark Thirty, Something's Gotta Give, When Harry Met Sally, and even crap like Frozen.
Never seen this. Not much of a slasher movie fan to be honest.More men are better at directing than woman. You don't get a free pass because you have a vagina. Women can make great films too it just seems like there's less of them out there.
Slumber Party Massacre was hella lit bro. Directed by a feminist too.
It's pretty over the top and kinda funny. Not an amazing movie or anything but tons of nudity and dumb stuff. Would definitely get called sexist, misogynistic, etc today but back then it was feminist.Never seen this. Not much of a slasher movie fan to be honest.
Actress, producer, and director Elizabeth Banks has one simple reason for making a new version of Charlie’s Angels. “I wanted to show women at work Growing up, I didn't see many portrayals of working women onscreen"
When it comes to inclusivity in Hollywood, Banks believes that paying attention to it ultimately makes good business sense. “When you think about what has been put out in the media, it’s mostly from a cisgendered white male perspective. Everything that’s not that feels a little bit fresher and so it feels like pretty good business. I’m the audience, I want things that I haven’t seen before. My real plea is for men to have enough empathy to go see movies starring women because I’ve been asked to go see movies starring men my entire life, and I’ve happily done so. I don’t know why men don’t return that fucking favor.”
Apparently Friday turned out even worse than expected and now the estimate is 8 million for weekend.
The film arrived on tracking with a $12M-$13M start, and really never budged, but sank. That means marketing didn’t work. I heard that a $100M global P&A was first planned on Charlie’s Angels, with the studio now reducing that overall cost greatly to around $50M and pulling back on expensive ads
super blew it with those castings