Lokimaru
Member
Yeah, Banks is retarded.
Blame Sony's marketing team if anything.
Sony: "Marketing? What's that."
Yeah, Banks is retarded.
Blame Sony's marketing team if anything.
Here we go
Of course it's men fault, and not the obsession of pushing female protagonists like if there was no tomorrow.
Get woke, go broke. Will somebody learn....
I mean, there's a difference between pushing female for protagonists, and suddently convert all new movie protagonists into females.Nothing wrong with pushing female protagonists, many great protagonists in entertainment have been female. However, in the case of Charlie's Angels, you have a reboot no one asked for, a director no one cares about, an insipid main cast, with the icing on the cake being an IP that died long before it's target audience was even born.
Nothing wrong with pushing female protagonists, many great protagonists in entertainment have been female. However, in the case of Charlie's Angels, you have a reboot no one asked for, a director no one cares about, an insipid main cast, with the icing on the cake being an IP that died long before it's target audience was even born.
It's not a remake.
It's not a reboot.
Wasn't there very little action in this movie?
Atomic Blonde is great, highly recommended. Some great fight scenes, one in particular towards the end that has the appearance of one long take. Charlize Theron is amazing and she gets naked!
its in my backlog of movies that I’m slowly catching up on now
you MUST see Atomic Blonde, it has one of the best fight scenes ever
The stairwell fight?
This doesn't seem like another case of get woke go broke to me, rather just a movie most people weren't intrested to see...
Just like ocean's 8 before it, it doesn't sound like it was a bad movie per-se, just nothing new or that interesting for most people, And despite Banks BS excuse for why the movie didn't do well (just like the ocean's 8 director whined about might I point out) At the end of The day it didn't perform well, not because of "evil men" but rather general disinterest lol
Who's willing to bet that the woman directed Birds of Prey will make $$$ and Banks will go "pffff its a comic book movie, of course it has appeal !!!!!"
Well ..... Joker isn't really Joker and it made a billion dollars.
not the point tho ?
I love Elizabeth Banks in every role she played in, since she is cutest cutie pie ever for me, but damn, don't defend that turd of a movie you created, girl.
Nothing wrong with defending it but insulting people and claiming that the movie is entitled to an audience is where she's screwing up. Of course, you have asshats like Paul Feig egging her on which isn't helping. She did seem to cool off a bit with some of her more recent comments though.
Here we go
Why are men to blame, this is on women. They make up 50% of the world why didn't they go see this movie?
What kind of idiot makes a feminist action movie starring 3 women and think its going to sell to men? I'll make a movie about how great Hitler is and Nazi values and then blame Jews when they don't go see it.
If she wanted to get men to see it then you need to make the stars hot sexy badasses, and add a cool male character that the men can live through. Wonder Woman had Chris Pine in it who was a cool guy that guys could want to be, and Gal Gadot was hot and sexy as shit as WW.
You made a movie for women, and they didn't want to see your movie, blame them.
No one is going to go see a movie about hot chicks kicking ass if Kristen Stewart is supposed to be the main "hot" chick. Know your audience.
that was almost 10 years ago.
And that I did with fervor.Her face is still very pretty, it's just her hair that I hate.
You chose a God awful photo btw.
Her face is still very pretty, it's just her hair that I hate.
You chose a God awful photo btw.
*EDIT*
Hot & bland.Only thing they got right was hot babes