• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

ResetEra Discussion -- Stay civil. Don't get personal. Keep it in here.

Status
Not open for further replies.
There's an extreme political ideology that's at the root of their major problem, but it's not really a traditional one, it's not "left" or "right" as most people, especially Americans, perceive it. The amusing aspect in that regard is how they consider themselves "left of left" while the rest of their forum is a centrist-Nazi hellpit and places that aren't lockstep in a dominant strain of self-proclaimed leftism are therefore right of right of Attila The Hun, all the while they spend most of their time posting about how women need to cover up, sexual expression is bad, people who don't abide by gender/racial/ethnic stereotypes are not to be trusted, and major corporations and elites can do no wrong even if the "people" disagree, etc.

But the main problem is that their self-humorless. It was the same way when they were here before they bolted and it led to the same problems here. Oh, sure, "we have fun" and "look how wacky and random us personalities are" and so on. But self-deprecation exists only in its passive aggressive, and shall I say, weaponized form that's actually insulting others. I could go on, but the greatest tell about the lack of self-humor is how endlessly they discuss what is and is not comedic.

There's a King of the Hill episode in which Bobby goes to clown class and learns the proper ways of clowning instead of his old fart jokes and crude humor. He learns TRUE comedy. The ha-guffaw-aw-haha formula.
YgB16Xp.gif


This fails, and he is booed by the students. Hank is there to save the day though and tosses him a whoopie cushion. He jokes about the principal farting and is carried off to cheers.

The clown professor yells at the audience "THIS LAUGHTER IS ILL-INFORMED!"

ResetERA.com is not as clever as that episode's satire, but they are nevertheless in the mindset of the clown professor. Thus the obsession with the demand that comedy must not "punch down" and every other endless thread debating comedy and its purpose being literally everything but laughter.

What they actually mean when they talk about how "everything has politics" is really that the only politics that matters is power politics and this is expressed in this analysis of comedy, gaming, big-boobed anime chicks and everything else they spend all their words on. And it best expresses in how the prominent members treat the very forum itself.

Everything is about power. And power relations. This view inherently demands that one must be above another. This demands an incessant need to determine who and what is above who and what else. The claims of safety, of marginalization, of discrimination, etc. especially on the forum itself is a perverse twisting of the state in which power is obtained by the willing forfeiture by others. A trans poster on an internet discussion forum is not inherently marginalized or discriminated against on the forum itself in a recognizable way. The power of their arguments, the quality of their character, everything else creates their "status" unless they can change this equation. To do so, they must move from the broadly anonymous into a very public persona. It's not enough that you recognize their username or their avatar, you must know actual "legitimate" details about them to place them properly within the power relation framework. And since you're a good liberal, and a good person, you're willing to grant leeway if they have some kind of disadvantage. Except this disadvantage does not manifest on the forum itself, them being an asshole with terrible arguments who does nothing but ruin threads is not and should not be explained away by the fact that they come from a real world power relation that leaves them marginalized, discriminated against, victimized, etc. This is clearly and utterly absurd.

Unless the state of everything is transformed into pure power relations. It's not enough for the moderators to do their jobs poorly or inconsistently or just be stupid like Slayven, no, instead it must be a war on a specific marginalized community that is being undeserved by the privileged staff like the trans community. Ignore that they wield purely dominant power from any objective metrics, that's not the point as we've already established. The "real world" is irrelevant to literally all of this. The only role it ever plays is to establish the particular details of the current battle over forum-based power relations.

On King of the Hill someone demanding "this laughter is ill-informed" is a comedic moment, someone to laugh at. On ResetERA.com it becomes a wielding of power that to challenge is "downplaying" real world concerns when the only actual stakes are stupid posts on a stupid forum. "This laughter is ill-informed" is a brutal broadside against the ignorant who watch South Park and think it's funny because fart jokes are funny. Those people display their ignorance, their acquiescence to the privileged status quo by refusing to stand up and declare "I agree, this laughter IS ill-informed!"

The entire thing is an endless display of social signaling within power relations that matter and exist only and entirely within the forum that sometimes gets picked up by other idiots elsewhere who don't realize they're doing the same thing within their same spheres and forums and instead believe that they are actually tangibly warring in true power politics of which they never will come close to sniffing, same as the other seven billion losers on the planet.

It angers them. To not play is betrayal. Not casting off your family is betrayal. Not giving your life to the cause that is posting on ResetERA.com is betrayal. Visiting other forums is betrayal or worse. Those are all steps outside of the forum's power relations, into others, into other support and community structures, into areas outside the watchful eyes of the forum activists, into places full of ill-informed existence.

They're right, it's an utterly toxic and corrosive ecosystem. But in their hunt for saboteurs (something that recent thread literally used multiple times to describe people who did not dedicate to ResetERA.com enough) and fighting of entirely internal wars they cannot even begin to consider that the true force is not solely their perceived enemies.
They're authoritarians / narcissists who've seized power in an ideology. It is why they keep attempting to hide behind the argument "if you oppose me personally, you oppose The Party. If you oppose my political bloc, then you oppose righteousness and true justice".

There are arguments to be made for socialism or universal welfare or hate speech laws, but they believe the argument is over and the subject is settled. They even hold (useless) degrees to show that the argument is over and the subject is settled. Asking questions can be taken as a sign of being disloyal. So now they are in the activist/fanatic phase where the true believers are purging out the impure members and grasping for final victory. This is a sign the movement is about to die, however, unless they can settle down and reevaluate their standpoints. That would require self-reflection, most of which has been chased out of the group by purity tests and self-purges.

The "NPC" meme sprung up for a reason. They are behaving like hivemind drones, just parroting their script. It is why conversation is so.... dull.. If you wanted to ask them about a sensitive topic but blundered into the wrong question, you wouldn't get an answer, you'd get ostracized. So outsiders (and insiders) don't even have a chance to learn the rules. The way to learn is to be in the movement, to perform your activism to show that you really are a part of the movement. This is why they shut out those who question the narrative. The narrative has been settled (even though it constantly shifts and slides) by our ESTEEMED REPRESENTATIVES of the intersectional dogma.

Issa cult.
 
Last edited:

nush

Gold Member
But the main problem is that their self-humorless. It was the same way when they were here before they bolted and it led to the same problems here. Oh, sure, "we have fun" and "look how wacky and random us personalities are" and so on. But self-deprecation exists only in its passive aggressive, and shall I say, weaponized form that's actually insulting others. I could go on, but the greatest tell about the lack of self-humor is how endlessly they discuss what is and is not comedic.

In two years they have created none of their own memes because topics that look like they are going to grow get culled "Not productive discussion". Those memes happen when things are allowed to grow and take on a life of their own so instead they are stuck with "Airplane in the sunset", "Italian meal" and of course naturally "No fun allowed". They can't even import memes from other places because EVERYTHING outside outside of their bubble is alt-right.
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
I'm one of the victims. No history of bans but I posted here and I got banned permanently for "advocating off-site drama". Previously I did not call out specific people there and only criticized how they handle things there via here. I can't say that there because I'll get banned so.

DMnxNgp.png

That “Offsite Activity“ rule is new and was only invented as an excuse to purge people on their shit list and not preferred users. For example, there’s a poster there named doinkies who is a notorious and super toxic Reddit troll who trolls both Reddit and the Reddit discord with shit that normally is bannable on Era, but since she tows the line on Era she’s protected. If that “Offsite Activity” “rule” was real she’d be banned long ago. Again, it’s just an excuse to permanently ban people they don’t want there.

Oh and that part about not posting stuff from social media about other members in order to harass them is 100% bullshit as well.
 
Last edited:

Kev Kev

Member
Again, it’s just an excuse to permanently ban people they don’t want there.

exactly

funniest part is it basically says exactly that just in a bunch more fluff words in that piece.

I swear to god, and i'm dead serious, the number of people with severe social and psychological problems on that site must be somewhere in the 70%+ range. Not to be mean, but it is really scary. There are probably many good people over there, that without any social, psychological or medical help suffer needlessly because they're living their life in a destructive echo chamber for all kind of depressions as well as social and/or anxiety disorders.

and they have no fucking idea. it's really sad. i was somewhat on board with all the sjw bullshit until i realized how far these people were taking it. not only that but they actually believe they are right and everyone else is wrong.

even as my most ignorant sjw self, i could at least step back from some situations and draw a line where the morally right stuff ended and the crack pot shit began. but some of those people are fucking lost. the many good people you're referring to, i believe will either be banned, come back here or go somewhere else, in due time. may takes months or years (if era even survives that long) but eventually it'll just be the crazy mf's left, cancelling each other, utill there so isolated they can't hurt anyone's little feelings.

it's not even that i was pushed away from it, but that i realized how insane it was to try and create this perfect bubble. and now, on the outside of that, seeing how many people are so stuck inside of that and have no fucking clue how crazy they've become... i mean... fuck, how do you get through to someone like that?
 

Saruhashi

Banned
I really hope that guy is just a troll, because damn, I feel sorry for him if he's not.

Either way, it should not be on society at large to accommodate his very specific needs and make him feel safe in whatever he does. If he realizes he has crippling communication disabilities, then perhaps a big discussion forum where things move fast is not the best place to insert himself into. Of course, instead of exercising that kind of common sense, he wants to make his problems everyone else's problems and get them to change according to his whims.

Just sad stuff...

Also, complaining that he only successfully got one person banned by using the report system, therefore is must be broken, is insanity.

Yeah, he sounds like a troubled person.

When you can't even enter the workforce because of your issues then that is rough.
Trying to do online dating etc is just going to be a bad time for someone like that.
Really, he has some big obstacles to overcome there.

This is exactly the kind of person who should stay away from ResetEra. He needs friends, actual friends, that he can relax with and express himself with and just generally have fun with. You think interacting with a bunch of strangers who will stomp you mercilessly or call you out for the most minuscule thing is going to be healthy when you are already having troubles? Come on now.

To compound this issue he admits that he is actively engaging in the same toxic behavior himself by calling people out and trying to get people banned etc. So it's just a feedback loop.

He'd be better off, at the very least, sticking to only gaming topics (or finding another forum that focuses on another hobby he might have) and not getting into these kind of "discussions" that are just so toxic.

If you are all backstabbing and sneaking about trying to "get" one another then OF COURSE it is going to cause anxiety. Fucksakes.
 

benjipwns

Banned
That‘s why before posting a reply on Era, you have to ask yourself “how long will my ban be for this innocent comment or opinion?”
I just regret that I'll never be able to experience this explosive posting rush, they said when they opened I wasn't allowed to register thanks to besada's wise counsel. :messenger_loudly_crying:

they even said they banned some pour soul they thought was me lol
 
Last edited:

Xaero Gravity

NEXT LEVEL lame™
I just regret that I'll never be able to experience this explosive posting rush, they said when they opened I wasn't allowed to register thanks to besada's wise counsel. :messenger_loudly_crying:

they even said they banned some pour soul they thought was me lol
You've got a kill count going
 

Ar¢tos

Member
That “Offsite Activity“ rule is new and was only invented as an excuse to purge people on their shit list and not preferred users. For example, there’s a poster there named doinkies who is a notorious and super toxic Reddit troll who trolls both Reddit and the Reddit discord with shit that normally is bannable on Era, but since she tows the line on Era she’s protected. If that “Offsite Activity” “rule” was real she’d be banned long ago. Again, it’s just an excuse to permanently ban people they don’t want there.

Oh and that part about not posting stuff from social media about other members in order to harass them is 100% bullshit as well.
That rule is super dumb.
Or people are dumb enough to use the same nickname in every forum?
I'm not in many media sites, but I have a different nickname for each.
Also, that rule allows someone to burn someone they don't like very easily, just create an account with the same Era nick of the person you don't like and start shitting on Era with their nickname on twitter /reddit/ whatever.
 

Saruhashi

Banned

Nice find.

The permanently banned user is correct. It makes no sense and is contradictory.

"I am trans, a woman, pansexual, a lesbian, demisexual."

Tran-woman - OK pretty self explanatory. Born as a male human but transitioned (or transitioning) to pass as female. Will refer to as woman out of politeness.

Lesbian - The definition is a homosexual woman and this would be categorized by being sexually attracted to other women. If we are letting the trans thing slide (which I am pretty sure MANY lesbians would not) then we are still OK here. A trans-woman who is attracted to other women (trans or otherwise).

So far so good. There's probably room for debate but it's not a big deal.

Pansexual - the sexual, romantic or emotional attraction towards people REGARDLESS of their sex or gender identity.

So they are trying to pull a little bit of a switcheroo here by saying that they are sexually attracted to men and woman and all points in between but romantically attracted to ONLY women.

So they'll fuck a guy, no worries, get fucked by a guy, no worries, but they can love ONLY women therefore they are a lesbian.

Hmmmm... smells like bullshit. There is a glaring contradiction there.
The lesbian descriptor is redundant since it is already covered under pansexual.

This is somehow FURTHER contradicted by the next big reveal.

Demisexual - a person who does not experience sexual attraction unless they form a strong emotional connection with someone.

Sounds like a fuckin virgin to me but whatever.

So... in summary.

Born a male.
Now a female.
Sexually attracted to both women and men, pansexual
BUUUUT only romantically attracted to women so also lesbian.
Bu-Bu-Buuuuuut also only sexually attracted to people who they have a strong emotional connection with (like as in romantic attraction?), demisexual.

So yeah, it's a mess of needless redundancies and contradictions that is probably designed specifically for moments like those seen in the quoted. A chance to get offended and get someone in trouble when they call you out for talking absolute shite.

Demisexual covers all of it and you don't even need to use that phrase at all to be honest.

Why not just say "I'm a trans woman but I would only have sex with someone I feel a close connection to"?
Simple and reasonably unambiguous.

It's a good example of what I said before about feeling pushed away by the near constant contradictions and mixed messages of the far left and if you try to untangle the knots you just get booted out.

"I'm a lesbian but I also like to fuck dudes".
Right, so you mean bisexual?
NO! I need to have an emotional connection first.
OK... *consults cheatsheet* so you are demi-sexual.
NO! I am a lesbian and pansexual and demisexual!
Right but you can't be a lesbian if you are also fucking me-USER BANNED! PERMANENT!

Imagine being so desperate to call yourself a lesbian that you need an entire system of jargon and logic to explain away the fact that you also claim to be sexually attracted to dudes.

Or being so desperate to not be defined as a mere bisexual that you have a whole mental routine that centers around describing the fact that you are attracted to both men and women in ANY way other than "I'm bisexual".

Amazing. It's like a human Rubik's Cube.

Or some crazy riddle.

I'd bang a dude, I'd bang a chick.
But I could only love a woman's dick.
I can't get laid, Incels are the worst,
So I need to "feel emotion" first.
What am I?
 

mr.dilya

Banned
How long before the black users there organize their own revolution on the site? Even though many of them are quiet right now it's only natural that they should feel slighted by the recent turn of events.

I recall a black user there named Lionpride who caught a ban and a lot of the black users petitioned for him to be brought back, but they were basically told to go fuck themselves. Meanwhile this ketkat person not only gets his account back, but gets a black/gay mod axed in the process. Yeesh.
 

jason10mm

Gold Member
I always like it when an era poster starts with "so how do WE feel about...." because they cant form an opinion on their own (or are too afraid to express it) and need to take a survey first. Probably a natural inclination of a young poster or someone lacking self-confidence, but WOW, it is a common phrase to read. Imagine not being able to express excitement about a game, movie, or artist without making sure they havent been deemed "cancelled" first.
 
I always like it when an era poster starts with "so how do WE feel about...." because they cant form an opinion on their own (or are too afraid to express it) and need to take a survey first. Probably a natural inclination of a young poster or someone lacking self-confidence, but WOW, it is a common phrase to read. Imagine not being able to express excitement about a game, movie, or artist without making sure they havent been deemed "cancelled" first.
It's their version of "So what is the GAF consensus on...?" which I used to see all the time years ago. Not so much anymore, which shows that people don't care as much about what the prevailing GAF opinion is, they're just here to talk. I take that as a good thing.
 

benjipwns

Banned
I see lots of people on the internet talk about a future "peak trans" event and while I'm not sure what that exactly means or would look like I know that when "I identify as an attack helicopter" goes from the worst kind of hate speech that ever appeared on the internet (thanks Sonic The Hedgehog) to a truly and fully accepted identity that YOU NEED TO RESPECT we've shattered all the looking glasses.

I could possibly see it coming out of some of these pluralgang systems/alters some kids are playing with where one of their headmates is a sentient building or a tree (Yggdrasil seems popular) or shit like all the crap among those hundred alters that Kevin Batman dude who works for Google claims to have. (That sentient building one is totally ripping off beloved comic book character Danny The Street imo.)
 
Last edited:

Ar¢tos

Member
Nice find.

The permanently banned user is correct. It makes no sense and is contradictory.

"I am trans, a woman, pansexual, a lesbian, demisexual."

Tran-woman - OK pretty self explanatory. Born as a male human but transitioned (or transitioning) to pass as female. Will refer to as woman out of politeness.

Lesbian - The definition is a homosexual woman and this would be categorized by being sexually attracted to other women. If we are letting the trans thing slide (which I am pretty sure MANY lesbians would not) then we are still OK here. A trans-woman who is attracted to other women (trans or otherwise).

So far so good. There's probably room for debate but it's not a big deal.

Pansexual - the sexual, romantic or emotional attraction towards people REGARDLESS of their sex or gender identity.

So they are trying to pull a little bit of a switcheroo here by saying that they are sexually attracted to men and woman and all points in between but romantically attracted to ONLY women.

So they'll fuck a guy, no worries, get fucked by a guy, no worries, but they can love ONLY women therefore they are a lesbian.

Hmmmm... smells like bullshit. There is a glaring contradiction there.
The lesbian descriptor is redundant since it is already covered under pansexual.

This is somehow FURTHER contradicted by the next big reveal.

Demisexual - a person who does not experience sexual attraction unless they form a strong emotional connection with someone.

Sounds like a fuckin virgin to me but whatever.

So... in summary.

Born a male.
Now a female.
Sexually attracted to both women and men, pansexual
BUUUUT only romantically attracted to women so also lesbian.
Bu-Bu-Buuuuuut also only sexually attracted to people who they have a strong emotional connection with (like as in romantic attraction?), demisexual.

So yeah, it's a mess of needless redundancies and contradictions that is probably designed specifically for moments like those seen in the quoted. A chance to get offended and get someone in trouble when they call you out for talking absolute shite.

Demisexual covers all of it and you don't even need to use that phrase at all to be honest.

Why not just say "I'm a trans woman but I would only have sex with someone I feel a close connection to"?
Simple and reasonably unambiguous.

It's a good example of what I said before about feeling pushed away by the near constant contradictions and mixed messages of the far left and if you try to untangle the knots you just get booted out.

"I'm a lesbian but I also like to fuck dudes".
Right, so you mean bisexual?
NO! I need to have an emotional connection first.
OK... *consults cheatsheet* so you are demi-sexual.
NO! I am a lesbian and pansexual and demisexual!
Right but you can't be a lesbian if you are also fucking me-USER BANNED! PERMANENT!

Imagine being so desperate to call yourself a lesbian that you need an entire system of jargon and logic to explain away the fact that you also claim to be sexually attracted to dudes.

Or being so desperate to not be defined as a mere bisexual that you have a whole mental routine that centers around describing the fact that you are attracted to both men and women in ANY way other than "I'm bisexual".

Amazing. It's like a human Rubik's Cube.

Or some crazy riddle.

I'd bang a dude, I'd bang a chick.
But I could only love a woman's dick.
I can't get laid, Incels are the worst,
So I need to "feel emotion" first.
What am I?
In the old days, they would just be called bisexuals.
Sex with both but love with just one, or sex and love with both.
I met both "subtypes" and they all just identified as plain bisexual.
But I guess that isn't descriptive or detailed enough for nowadays.
 
D

Deleted member 17706

Unconfirmed Member
exactly

funniest part is it basically says exactly that just in a bunch more fluff words in that piece.



and they have no fucking idea. it's really sad. i was somewhat on board with all the sjw bullshit until i realized how far these people were taking it. not only that but they actually believe they are right and everyone else is wrong.

even as my most ignorant sjw self, i could at least step back from some situations and draw a line where the morally right stuff ended and the crack pot shit began. but some of those people are fucking lost. the many good people you're referring to, i believe will either be banned, come back here or go somewhere else, in due time. may takes months or years (if era even survives that long) but eventually it'll just be the crazy mf's left, cancelling each other, utill there so isolated they can't hurt anyone's little feelings.

it's not even that i was pushed away from it, but that i realized how insane it was to try and create this perfect bubble. and now, on the outside of that, seeing how many people are so stuck inside of that and have no fucking clue how crazy they've become... i mean... fuck, how do you get through to someone like that?

Yeah, it's when you figure out that so many of them and their ideological allies are not looking to improve our society. They are only interested in problematizing, deconstructing, and ultimately tearing down any and every aspect of existing structures with the goal of building a new equitable utopia from the ashes. That, of course, will never happen, because these people have no idea how to build anything. They only know how to criticize and tear things down.

Era increasingly appears to be a micro experiment in putting this ideology to the test.
 

#Phonepunk#

Banned
jeangreyforever
Member


8 minutes ago
Cheebo said:
I really am beyond confused why so many here proclaim JJ was brought back because of TLJ's fan reaction.

Like are we seriously ok with people just blatantly lying now?

JJ was hired to write/direct TROS *months* before TLJ came out.
Not surprising that most of these people coming up with these blatant lies are also Trump supporters and buy into his revisionist trash.
LOL Cheebo has grown a sentient tumor!

it's not that the people making these films have fucked them up at every turn, firing people left and right, having the trilogy directed by baton passing marathon before deciding, no, we'll have the same guy again, leaving the audience confused. no, it's that you are BLATANTLY LYING because you are a TRUMP SUPPORTER

LOL these paranoid dipshits
 
Last edited:
Yeah, it's when you figure out that so many of them and their ideological allies are not looking to improve our society. They are only interested in problematizing, deconstructing, and ultimately tearing down any and every aspect of existing structures with the goal of building a new equitable utopia from the ashes. That, of course, will never happen, because these people have no idea how to build anything. They only know how to criticize and tear things down.

Era increasingly appears to be a micro experiment in putting this ideology to the test.
Folks were saying that about GAF, about Kotaku et al even before GameGate broke out.

Of course, those folks were shouted down as deplorable/vilifying journalists/alt-right/etc as the narrative trucked along.
 

ManaByte

Gold Member
LOL Cheebo has grown a sentient tumor!

it's not that the people making these films have fucked them up at every turn, firing people left and right, having the trilogy directed by baton passing marathon before deciding, no, we'll have the same guy again, leaving the audience confused. no, it's that you are BLATANTLY LYING because you are a TRUMP SUPPORTER

LOL these paranoid dipshits

But Cheebo is right. JJ was hired long before TLJ even finished editing.
 

Ron Mexico

Member
...and another gem:


Also some other quotes from the OP in other threads:

"Im just trying to say this is one of the best moderated and progressive places already"

and

"But era did make me realize that I was a bit naive "
 

crowbrow

Banned
Nice find.

The permanently banned user is correct. It makes no sense and is contradictory.

"I am trans, a woman, pansexual, a lesbian, demisexual."

Tran-woman - OK pretty self explanatory. Born as a male human but transitioned (or transitioning) to pass as female. Will refer to as woman out of politeness.

Lesbian - The definition is a homosexual woman and this would be categorized by being sexually attracted to other women. If we are letting the trans thing slide (which I am pretty sure MANY lesbians would not) then we are still OK here. A trans-woman who is attracted to other women (trans or otherwise).

So far so good. There's probably room for debate but it's not a big deal.

Pansexual - the sexual, romantic or emotional attraction towards people REGARDLESS of their sex or gender identity.

So they are trying to pull a little bit of a switcheroo here by saying that they are sexually attracted to men and woman and all points in between but romantically attracted to ONLY women.

So they'll fuck a guy, no worries, get fucked by a guy, no worries, but they can love ONLY women therefore they are a lesbian.

Hmmmm... smells like bullshit. There is a glaring contradiction there.
The lesbian descriptor is redundant since it is already covered under pansexual.

This is somehow FURTHER contradicted by the next big reveal.

Demisexual - a person who does not experience sexual attraction unless they form a strong emotional connection with someone.

Sounds like a fuckin virgin to me but whatever.

So... in summary.

Born a male.
Now a female.
Sexually attracted to both women and men, pansexual
BUUUUT only romantically attracted to women so also lesbian.
Bu-Bu-Buuuuuut also only sexually attracted to people who they have a strong emotional connection with (like as in romantic attraction?), demisexual.

So yeah, it's a mess of needless redundancies and contradictions that is probably designed specifically for moments like those seen in the quoted. A chance to get offended and get someone in trouble when they call you out for talking absolute shite.

Demisexual covers all of it and you don't even need to use that phrase at all to be honest.

Why not just say "I'm a trans woman but I would only have sex with someone I feel a close connection to"?
Simple and reasonably unambiguous.

It's a good example of what I said before about feeling pushed away by the near constant contradictions and mixed messages of the far left and if you try to untangle the knots you just get booted out.

"I'm a lesbian but I also like to fuck dudes".
Right, so you mean bisexual?
NO! I need to have an emotional connection first.
OK... *consults cheatsheet* so you are demi-sexual.
NO! I am a lesbian and pansexual and demisexual!
Right but you can't be a lesbian if you are also fucking me-USER BANNED! PERMANENT!

Imagine being so desperate to call yourself a lesbian that you need an entire system of jargon and logic to explain away the fact that you also claim to be sexually attracted to dudes.

Or being so desperate to not be defined as a mere bisexual that you have a whole mental routine that centers around describing the fact that you are attracted to both men and women in ANY way other than "I'm bisexual".

Amazing. It's like a human Rubik's Cube.

Or some crazy riddle.

I'd bang a dude, I'd bang a chick.
But I could only love a woman's dick.
I can't get laid, Incels are the worst,
So I need to "feel emotion" first.
What am I?
It's not so puzzling, the more labels you put on yourself the more victim points you potentially get and can play victim in more varied situations. It's an easy win to just stick victim lables to yourself even if contradictory. This is why these people hate South Park, they have exposed their labeling BS from the start lol

DplnyU6XUAAPOcE.jpg
 

Jezbollah

Member
...and another gem:


Also some other quotes from the OP in other threads:

"Im just trying to say this is one of the best moderated and progressive places already"

and

"But era did make me realize that I was a bit naive "

Democracy only fails for these guys when they don't get the result they want.

Their moderation stance and progressiveness is wholly dependent on you adhering to their political standards and alignment. If you are not far left, you are scum and that moderation shows a blatent preference when allowing anyone to treat you in ways that would normally see disciplinary measures followed.

Fuck that site.
 

pulga

Banned
Yeah, the mods are more unhinged than usual after the weekend debacle:

Capture.png


Both people quoted there are now banned.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom