• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

NeoGAF Ban Review/Justice Project

Status
Not open for further replies.
S

SLoWMoTIoN

Unconfirmed Member
I'm not trying to come off as a Nazi or anything here but maybe if every country in the world agrees they want the Jews to leave it's time for some introspection.

EAIvN13.jpg

Yeah ok. :messenger_poop::messenger_poop::messenger_poop::messenger_poop::messenger_poop::messenger_poop::messenger_poop::messenger_poop:
 
I think Kadayi Kadayi 's ban for this post is totally undeserved:

I'm amused at some of the usual suspects piling in here with their outrage posts when it guaranteed they've never even played the game. Forum faggotry at its finest.

Kad is a good contributor and I've seen regular forum members make far worse comments and/or shitposts than this (only need to take a peek at the politics section). In the context of the discussion in that thread, I'd like to know exactly what's wrong with his statement. Seems to me it was nothing but on point.

Between Kad's comment and the massive amount of edgy jokes, fecal humor and sexual innuendos that are circulating in the off-topic section, I'd say his ban was far from justified. Come to speak of it, quality of discussion has gone down considerably these past few months. People used to value well-reasoned comments, but nowadays you're just shot down with a dumb 4chan wojak meme when you try to put some effort into your arguments.
 
Last edited:
H

hariseldon

Unconfirmed Member
I think Kadayi Kadayi 's ban for this post is totally undeserved:



Kad is a good contributor and I've seen regular forum members make far worse comments and/or shitposts than this (only need to take a peek at the politics section). In the context of the discussion in that thread, I'd like to know exactly what's wrong with his statement. Seems to me it was nothing but on point.

Between Kad's comment and the massive amount of edgy jokes, fecal humor and sexual innuendos that are circulating in the off-topic section, I'd say his ban was far from justified. Come to speak of it, quality of discussion has gone down considerably these past few months. People used to value well-reasoned comments, but nowadays you're just shot down with a dumb 4chan wojak meme when you try to put some effort into your arguments.

My gut feeling is the 'faggotry' which I suspect led to the ban may be a reference to the chap who got banned for consistently reporting extreme faggotry, I may be wrong.
 

Mista

Banned
I think Kadayi Kadayi 's ban for this post is totally undeserved:



Kad is a good contributor and I've seen regular forum members make far worse comments and/or shitposts than this (only need to take a peek at the politics section). In the context of the discussion in that thread, I'd like to know exactly what's wrong with his statement. Seems to me it was nothing but on point.

Between Kad's comment and the massive amount of edgy jokes, fecal humor and sexual innuendos that are circulating in the off-topic section, I'd say his ban was far from justified. Come to speak of it, quality of discussion has gone down considerably these past few months. People used to value well-reasoned comments, but nowadays you're just shot down with a dumb 4chan wojak meme when you try to put some effort into your arguments.
The use of faggotry might be the reason. I like Kad and being a good contributor has nothing to do with it honestly. I consider myself a good contributor too but if I did something wrong and got banned, I won’t take advantage of me being a good contributor. I don’t find what he said deserves a ban though
 

Whitesnake

Banned
I think Kadayi Kadayi 's ban for this post is totally undeserved:



Kad is a good contributor and I've seen regular forum members make far worse comments and/or shitposts than this (only need to take a peek at the politics section). In the context of the discussion in that thread, I'd like to know exactly what's wrong with his statement. Seems to me it was nothing but on point.

Between Kad's comment and the massive amount of edgy jokes, fecal humor and sexual innuendos that are circulating in the off-topic section, I'd say his ban was far from justified. Come to speak of it, quality of discussion has gone down considerably these past few months. People used to value well-reasoned comments, but nowadays you're just shot down with a dumb 4chan wojak meme when you try to put some effort into your arguments.

I would imagine its the use of “faggotry” plus in that comment he’s not doing anything but vaguely bitching about other members’ behavior instead of contributing to the thread.

Kad is a good contributor and I've seen regular forum members make far worse comments and/or shitposts than this (only need to take a peek at the politics section).

My impression from the moderation thusfar is that they’re more lax with word choice and tone in Politics because, by nature of being Politics, there’s going to be a lot of heated discussions and a lot of shitposts.

And even then I think expressing the sentiment of “all you people are dumb faggots” would probably be frowned upon.
 

plushyp

Member
The use of faggotry might be the reason. I like Kad and being a good contributor has nothing to do with it honestly. I consider myself a good contributor too but if I did something wrong and got banned, I won’t take advantage of me being a good contributor. I don’t find what he said deserves a ban though
Guessing it has to do with forum generalisation. Kadayi Kadayi blanket blames users without mentioning the offending ones with their posts. And like you @hariseldon said, ending it with "forum faggotry" didn't help given that one user was banned for reporting posts stating a similar reason.
 
And even then I think expressing the sentiment of “all you people are dumb faggots” would probably be frowned upon.

Guessing it has to do with forum generalisation. Kadayi Kadayi blanket blames users without mentioning the offending ones with their posts.

Honestly, I don't want to get into the semantics of his post, but nowhere did he make that blanket generalization. He was referring to people criticizing a game without even playing it, which in this day and age of social media infused outrage is a perfectly valid point. That behavior to hastily jump to conclusions and start screeching whenever a political issue is touched upon that users disagree with, is what he described as "forum faggotry".

I'm sure that if he would have singled out a specific user, he'd have been criticized for doing that too. Which is especially hilarious, since a lot of regulars here pride themselves on ganging up on certain users for merely expressing views that aren't to the majority's liking.

Apparently ridiculing somebody for promoting unpopular political and social views is totally fine, but criticizing the general attitude in a specific thread to prematurely sh*t on a game because it doesn't adhere to people's political views, when most of them don't even have a desire to play it, is too much.
 
Last edited:

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
I think Kadayi Kadayi 's ban for this post is totally undeserved:



Kad is a good contributor and I've seen regular forum members make far worse comments and/or shitposts than this (only need to take a peek at the politics section). In the context of the discussion in that thread, I'd like to know exactly what's wrong with his statement. Seems to me it was nothing but on point.

Between Kad's comment and the massive amount of edgy jokes, fecal humor and sexual innuendos that are circulating in the off-topic section, I'd say his ban was far from justified. Come to speak of it, quality of discussion has gone down considerably these past few months. People used to value well-reasoned comments, but nowadays you're just shot down with a dumb 4chan wojak meme when you try to put some effort into your arguments.

So, quality of discussion has declined, in your eyes, but the mods should have their hands tied when it comes to policing the boards?

You're upset because it's personal. That's fine. It's a very small slap on the wrist, though, for a type of comment we're not keen on here, particularly when directed at another user in a serious, negative tone.
 
So, quality of discussion has declined, in your eyes, but the mods should have their hands tied when it comes to policing the boards?

Policing the boards does not necessarily result in higher quality of discussion when said policing is wrongly applied. I think the implosion of this forum in the past would have clearly demonstrated this. If quality of discussion is your concern, then why do some regulars often get a free pass for their sh*tposting and edgy humor while others are undeservedly punished for a comment that's far less inflammatory?

You're upset because it's personal. That's fine. It's a very small slap on the wrist, though, for a type of comment we're not keen on here, particularly when directed at another user in a serious, negative tone.

I cannot deny that I hold Kad in high regard, so you have to excuse me if I feel obliged to bring this up. That being said, I would not have complained if I would have found his comment to be particularly banworthy, at least compared to what other stuff I regularly read on here. Also I'd like to know at which specific user you think his comment was directed at.
 
Last edited:

Whitesnake

Banned
Honestly, I don't want to get into the semantics of his post, but nowhere did he make that blanket generalization. He was referring to people criticizing a game without even playing it, which in this day and age of social media infused outrage is a perfectly valid point. That behavior to hastily jump to conclusions and start screeching whenever a political issue is touched upon that users disagree with, is what he described as "forum faggotry".

I'm sure that if he would have singled out a specific user, he'd have been criticized for doing that too. Which is especially hilarious, since a lot of regulars here pride themselves on ganging up on certain users for merely expressing views that aren't to the majority's liking.

Apparently ridiculing somebody for promoting unpopular political and social views is totally fine, but criticizing the general attitude in a specific thread to prematurely sh*t on a game because it doesn't adhere to people's political views, when most of them don't even have a desire to play it, is too much.

Whining about “outrage posts” and ”forum faggotry” while refusing to mention or address any particular argument or user isn’t the profound and intelligent criticism that you seem to believe it is.
 
Whining about “outrage posts” and ”forum faggotry” while refusing to mention or address any particular argument or user isn’t the profound and intelligent criticism that you seem to believe it is.

Did I say it was profound and intelligent? No, but that's not a prerequisite to not being banned either, otherwise the ban page would probably be a lot longer. My point was that his comment was not worthy of copping a ban.

Also, I'm getting some conflicting interpretations about Kad's comment. Some tell me it's a blanket generalization against this forum, others say it's a direct attack on another user. So which one is it then? Maybe it would have been in order to ask Kad himself before he got banned without a warning.
 

EviLore

Expansive Ellipses
Staff Member
It's a reasonable standard of conduct to enforce, which you'll see just about anywhere on the internet aside from the absolute dregs, and it was enforced with a light touch in consideration of Kad's regular positive contributions elsewhere on the boards.

There's nothing personal on our end. It's a justified moderation action and the matter is closed. Thanks for the feedback.
 
It's a reasonable standard of conduct to enforce, which you'll see just about anywhere on the internet aside from the absolute dregs, and it was enforced with a light touch in consideration of Kad's regular positive contributions elsewhere on the boards.

I know that his punishment isn't harsh, but for me it's also a matter of principle.

In light of "Kad's regular positive contributions" I feel like some of the questions that I've raised should have been clarified before his ban. I certainly did not expect this decision to be reversed merely because I complained and I do understand that such a reversal would have lead to some other undesired consequences, like undermining a mod's decision for example.

I'm well aware that it is an unfortunate situation and I hold no ill intentions against you, on the contrary.

It's a justified moderation action and the matter is closed. Thanks for the feedback.

Since unfortunately none of my questions have been answered, I respectfully disagree and request to be banned for as long as Kad.

Don't get me wrong, I still like this forum and I think that you and your team are doing good work despite my criticism, but I also feel obliged to a longtime forum member that I have only the highest respect for and who certainly helped make this place what it is today.
 
Last edited:

plushyp

Member
Someone gets banned for two days. Then someone else requests to be banned for two days.

strange headache :: Dec 6, 2019 :: Dec 8, 2019

Kadayi :: Dec 6, 2019 :: Dec 9, 2019

Actually strange headache will be back 1 day before Kadayi.
 
Last edited:

Ornlu

Banned
Why is it in the nature of politics that there are a lot of shitposts? If anything, politics is a less adequate place for shitposts.

Some people's politics are shitposts. It's legit impossible to tell the difference between political news and old Onion headlines today.
 

Whitesnake

Banned
Why is it in the nature of politics that there are a lot of shitposts? If anything, politics is a less adequate place for shitposts.

People like to make fun of people who disagree with them, especially if the other person gets heated easily.

Thus, Politics.
 

Helios

Member
I do agree with Strange and I guess with Kad to some extent. There are quite a lot of people that get away with multiple generalizations, drive-by comments and are clearly here just to hate on games and not actually have a discussion.
Maybe I'm not the one that should be criticizing such things but it has been something that has soured me too for the past few months.
As for "It's only a x day ban" . It's an argument that I've seen in the past (Squorin's ban is the one that comes to mind) and to me it genuinely reeks of the other side's "Is this really the hill you want to die on?"
Jeez, I wouldn’t have thought a video game forum’s policing of the usage of the word “faggot” was a ‘line in the sand’ drawing moment or a particularly worthwhile reason to go all “I AM SPARTACUS!”.
It's not. Let's not misrepresent people's argument. It has been done on this page quite enough already.
 
Last edited:

brap

Banned
I do agree with Strange and I guess with Kad to some extent. There are quite a lot of people that get away with multiple generalizations, drive-by comments and are clearly here just to hate on games and not actually have a discussion.
But have they called people faggots? Also that thread was fine. Out of all the shitposting on gaming he's gonna complain in a thread like that? What about all the normal threads that get derailed? Why is this one special? Cuz muh politics?
 

Helios

Member
Also that thread was fine. Out of all the shitposting on gaming he's gonna complain in a thread like that? What about all the normal threads that get derailed? Why is this one special? Cuz muh politics?
Probably the one that tipped him over? How should I know. Does it matter when you agree that there's a lot of shitposting and derailing in gaming?
 

brap

Banned
Probably the one that tipped him over? How should I know. Does it matter when you agree that there's a lot of shitposting and derailing in gaming?
Yes, because he was obviously talking about me. I'm one of the usual suspects. Pretty sure -Arcadia- -Arcadia- and Katsura Katsura are too. Sorry I think some mexican kids tearing down the mexico wall is cringey. I guess I just must be shitposting.

You do realise it’s low to talk about someone while they’re not around right?
Are you talking about me?
 

-Arcadia-

Banned
Normally I would agree, but when two posters can’t stop diving in front of each other in slow-motion, to catch more bullets, over a two-day ban, lols have been involved in the situation and it needs to be reassessed.
 

Mista

Banned
The two... people... we’re... talking about?
Kad and Strange? Kad has nothing to do with Strange. He was childish and requested a ban like Kad. It’s not like Kad told him to do it or they were licking each other’s ass. So saying “diving infront of each other” isn’t accurate and false :)
 
Last edited:

Fushitsusha

Banned
I would like to be banned for 10 minutes, gotta do some laundry.

While at it -- and after too much Clown World -- I also wish to remove the abillity to read.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom