It's free to play and runs on a toaster. If it would be a Xbox exclusive game costing 60 bucks the numbers would look very different.So I guess quarter of billion of people out there are forced to play that terrible game?
t's a F2P multiplayer game with microtransactions. What in the hell are you talking about? The amount of players doesn't necessarily speak to the quality of a game. If that's how you're measuring this, you're looking at it completely wrong.
It's free to play and runs on a toaster. If it would be a Xbox exclusive game costing 60 bucks the numbers would look very different.
Statistically, the most people find it to be better than everything out there. I know that GOTG, GOTY, GOAT et.c are subjective matter for each peron, but putting sentiments aside and using purely objective statistics, that's just how it is..
Bloodborne is 5 years old in three weeks.
Imo it is the best game released this generation. The atmosphere is great, the blood upgrade system is intriuging and the weapons are the best and most fun I ever had with a game.
Pizza cutter in action
I mean dark souls 3 is solid and sekiro enjoyable, but bloodborne reigns surpreme. The random generated catacombs were also a brilliant idea when you were tired of the main map.
Some old youtube clips i found of me playing it.
It does. If it wasn't any good, people would quickly abandon it, and they don't, instead they keep playing more and more, attracting more and more friends. The same way GTA5 wouldn't sell so much if it wasn't that good, Witcher 3 wouldn't sell like it did, CoD wouldn't get those crazy high numbers each year, and Minecraft wouldn't be close to half a billion. You can deny facts but you'll only hurt yourself in the process. Good games sell, a ton, or speaking even more generally - good products and services sell, always, this rule applies to every single business out there whether you like it or not (you obviously cannot swallow it).
And I don't even want to talk about how Fortnite (and Minecraft as well) is a worldwide phenomenon that reached much broader audience that gaming nerds, just like Pac-Man, Marion or Tomb Raider did years ago, an average Joe knows what a Fortnite is, or at very least heard of it, whereas while asked about Bloodborne people will think you're talking about some rock band or Jason's Bourne sequel... Maybe for YOU Bloodborne is the best thing to come to this planed, but that's just you vs the rest of the world, stop being an ignorant and deal with it.
Thought he was referring to BloodborneYou going to tell me Sekiro has build variety now...?
oh cmon, dark souls 1 is multy and i'ts one of the best game of the last 2 gen, being exclusive doens't mean shit in these cases.this. If it would have been multiplatform people wouldn’t even give a shit about this game. Seriously.
it's ok to have opinion but you really should play more games before saying that.Greatest game of all time for me, nothing comes close to Bloodborne.
Thats fine but all of fromsoft games at there core are hack n slash/character action games that limit movement. There extremely light jrpgs most people run the same 2 or 3 builds and thats it the combat around those games is hit,dodge,collect/level up the end. Iv played every fromsoft souls game from demon souls on and what they bring to the table is just that I would say Nier automta is the final form of what souls games should be difficulty can be hard with tons of rewarding combo options and weapons to switch in and out plus a leveling system that builds on top of creating a faster and more option base game play. You arent limited by a stupid stamina bar most people dislike souls games because of the fast combo heavy bosses that can throw out a 10 hit stun lock combo and the only thing you can do block,dodge or is eat the damage. In nier I can run around,parry,dodge set up a frame perfect starting combo ect.I really disagree here. no one makes games like fromsoftware. I only played BB and sekiro and they are gaming perfection for me.
I could not get into this game at all. The setting is awesome, though.
Thats fine but all of fromsoft games at there core are hack n slash/character action games that limit movement. There extremely light jrpgs most people run the same 2 or 3 builds and thats it the combat around those games is hit,dodge,collect/level up the end. Iv played every fromsoft souls game from demon souls on and what they bring to the table is just that I would say Nier automta is the final form of what souls games should be difficulty can be hard with tons of rewarding combo options and weapons to switch in and out plus a leveling system that builds on top of creating a faster and more option base game play. You arent limited by a stupid stamina bar most people dislike souls games because of the fast combo heavy bosses that can throw out a 10 hit stun lock combo and the only thing you can do block,dodge or is eat the damage. In nier I can run around,parry,dodge set up a frame perfect starting combo ect.
Sekiro was objectively and subjectively not as good as Bloodborne.
- better visuals
- better lore
- better gameplay (im no ninja)
- better soundtrack
- muuuuch better levels
- better fights
- better bosses
- didn´t die within first few months of release due no
- has PVP
- better enemies
- Bloodborne Theme >>> Sekiro "Feudal Nippon"
- no requirement to parry 99.999999% to succeed
- youtube bloodborne content shits on sekiro (3x Platforms)
I LOOOOVE NiER Automata (My personal GOTG) but I agree with you, Automata going for a very different gameplay style compare to Bloodborne and even Sekiro. Its like comparing Vanquish to Uncharted, yes both are third person shooters but its very, very different gameplay styles.What a stupid post.
Comparing 2 very different games as if they were the exact same genre.
Where's the objective reasons?
I like both equally, but there are things in Bloodborne I enjoyed more and there are things I like in Sekiro more. For example I like the combat in Sekiro much more but I like exploration in Bloodborne waaay more.I´m to some extent trolling, still though BB is much better in every aspect.
If you like walking simulators and prefer mediocre cover shooters, sure. The environments in TLoU are very detailed, but never impressed me in the way Bloodborne did fin terms of level design and atmosphere....technically The Last of Us Remastered in the best game of the generation. How do you like them apples?