Majority went in expecting 13TF. As noted by our recent poll.
Instead they got 9-10TF boost clock (theoretical boost peak of 10.28tf @ 2.23ghz) .
Up to 3.5ghz CPU (if able to use full boost)
16GB of ram (10GB of it slower than Series X)
Inept BC
Faster SSD
I think the worst part about it was all the hype leading up to the presentation the past day or so, especially that hype train. Instead we got those specs & 30 min of SSD talk.
Why are people still trying to justify their original 9tf predictions?
Goodness, I'm not excited for the system but the console warring is getting too obvious. It's 10.2 flops. It's RDNA 2. So-called insiders were wrong about half of it and right about the other half.
Are some of you really having meltdowns over a 1.7 tf difference? I doubt you know what a tf does even... (me neither)
Multiplatforms will look better on XSeX.
It's RDNA 2, so yes.I am confused, is there RT hardware or not? Where are the raytracing computations done?
Why are people still trying to justify their original 9tf predictions?
Goodness, I'm not excited for the system but the console warring is getting too obvious. It's 10.2 flops. It's RDNA 2. So-called insiders were wrong about half of it and right about the other half.
Source?
Or is it from your ass 'son'?
He is completely right:
- Tetris 8K 120fps edition will run on 10.2TF GPU
- Uncharted 5 will make GPU run in 9.something TF
Wow, so now you're not holding up to your end of the bargain.
It ain't exactly 12, but it ain't bad either
It's just hardware, software is all that matters.36CU was right. 9Tflops was right
Sony had to overclocked it to get 10Tflops
Mark failed.
I hereby apologize to everyone I mocked. The PS5 is indeed a piece of trash. A true generational leap would have required 12.88TF. A 10.3TF PS5 is a total joke. It's not even twice the TF of the XBox One X. There is no reason whatsoever to purchase a PS5. I thought that the PS5 would be a true generational leap with at least 7 times the TFLOPS of the previous console. But it turns out that Sony no longer cares about generational leaps. I was an idiot for belittling individuals who believed in GitHub. You were right. Repeatedly, I stated that people were morons for believing that Sony would launch a console that wasn't at least 12 TF or at least twice the power of the XBox One X. But I am the moron. As a lifelong fan of Sony, I owe everyone a huge apology. I now will be leaving gaming all together. The PS5 is not a true generational leap and the new XBox will likely require it to be connected to the internet at least once.
Too bad you didn't go for my bet then. Could've had at least that. BTW I think Sony is just calling it RDNA2 but it's actually RDNA1 plus RT. They did not talk at all about VRS, which should have been a given at a tech talk to devs.You saw rdna2 right ?
I see a lot of bans incoming in the next week or so.
Playstation custom banning chip confirmed
Not seeing any meltdowns, but it's actually a 1.7 tf difference in a best case scenario. That's just the GPU tho. The Series X is running at locked clock speeds across the board. PS5 is not.Are some of you really having meltdowns over a 1.7 tf difference? I doubt you know what a tf does even... (me neither)
But it's on the CU's, not a separate RT core like NVIDIA?It's RDNA 2, so yes.
Really surprised at AMDs approach to ray-tracing. I would have made separate cores for the RT like Nvidia did. The RT in a game will quickly overload the SMUs doing other things. I don't like that design at all. I would call it software RT for sure for both consoles.
It's also a perma-ban bet. So I guess we'll let the mods decide if the bet should be carried out.
Because they were true. Even Cerny acknowledges a potential 10% drop from the peak clock speeds, and you know that he is sugarcoating things, that would bring the gpu basically at 9. something TFs.Why are people still trying to justify their original 9tf predictions?
Goodness, I'm not excited for the system but the console warring is getting too obvious. It's 10.2 flops. It's RDNA 2. So-called insiders were wrong about half of it and right about the other half.
It's actually 1.8 TF difference (10.28 to 12.155) in a best case scenario.Not seeing any meltdowns, but it's actually 1.7 tf difference in a best case scenario. That's just the GPU tho. The Series X is running at locked clock speeds across the board. PS5 is not.
No, it's probably bound to CUs. So less that XSX....possibly.But it's on the CU's, not a separate RT core like NVIDIA?
PS5 raw power is actually just over 9 teraflops, the over-clocked to get to 10. The better have a good cooling system.
Going with the approach they have means only first party titles (or any exclusives) will take advantage of the extra data transfer speeds.
It will be the PS3 generation all over again.
Those variable clocks are worrying. To be honest .
No it wasn't, we bet a console. You lost and now you're trying to weasel your way out of it. You're a god damn loser like I suspected.
Looks well balanced to me.
Why is this assumption being taken at face value?First impression is it seems like they really fumbled on the whole design. The extreme high clocks was obviously done to try and keep up with XSX. Will have to see the DF comparos to see the full damage.
Nice username.I'm not excited for the system either. It turns out that the people who were predicting 9TF were correct in that the GPU in GitHub was the GPU of the PS5. RDNA2 cannot make up for the fact that this system doesn't have enough TF to be a true generational leap. Every console generation has a massive improvement in efficiency. For example, the PS4 had unified shaders.