• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Zero707

If I carry on trolling, report me.
147972.jpg


By the way, it's funny, you do it the other way around see what happens:

147973.jpg


So it's better to stick to simple math: 12.1 - 10.3 = 1.8TF

That's with The Tempest Engine = 12.4TF vs 12.1TF or 10.3TF vs 9.6TF

easy-as-pi.jpg
Now do it with the real numbers 12.155TF for XSX and 10.28TF for PS5

qnerd1gayaiyq8q4g6u5.gif
 

thelastword

Banned
The game won’t release to PS5 he didn’t have DevKit.

I understand his ideia... he is a nobody so he wants to release day one where there is not that much games and get sales.... indies profits a lot in the first year of a console before the heavy hits come.

As his game is exclusive to Xbox he is trashing PS5 and praising Xbox with the goal to get Xbox user attention and sales.

He posted a water video he made for his game using that powerful Xbox and I though wow that is trash level and didn’t look even like water... he wanted to shows how devs can use the Xbox power to made pretty graphics at same time that water can’t run on PS5 because uses compute and not SSDs speeds.
He said he is going to show his game at 4K 120fps and lo and behold, his tier of game is some fragglerock tetris jumbaloo....

So he said.....
I don't understand Sony's PS5 hardware. The CPU is going to bottleneck the SSD. In complicated games, load times will be faster on the XBSX. I'll be posting a video that details this soon.

So that statement makes little sense especially for someone developing the game he has......There is no way loadtimes are ever faster on XSX, when the CPU on Series X is pretty much the same with much less SSD speeds and nothing in the way of all the special controllers in the Custom IO Unit....

The whole purpose of the PS5 design is to move CPU and GPU bottlenecks.....So I guess people will go on until they results for themselves in realtime…..
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Yes, Kraken, and 77% compression percentage

147974.jpg


72%

147975.jpg


The least, 61%

147976.jpg


"We like to think the only way to get your image files smaller after optimizing them with Kraken.io is to delete them."

:lollipop_tears_of_joy: :lollipop_tears_of_joy:

Directly from their official website:

 
Last edited:

ABnormal

Member
Also some asked me about Multiplat games. Do not worry about the Multiplat. In my opinion I think Microsoft has more to fear than Sony in that regard. I think Microsoft will have to loosen the wallet enough so that you can see the difference between one Multi and another.

Thanks to the more quantity of custom chips used to offload specific calculations from cpu and gpu, I'm more or less convinced that multiplatforms will be even closer than the simple difference in GPU's TFs. But about ray tracing, being based on CUs, I think that in that regard the next XboX will definitely have around 20% advantage per frame. Can you say something about it?
 

The Unforeseen

Neo Member
I am definitely seeing a lot of bias towards Sony here. Now, I should point out I am no Xbox fanatic, in fact, I have had a PS4 since near launch and haven’t touched the Xbox One in all that time. I mean, quite honestly the original was a heap of junk next to the PS4, and it had almost zero exclusives that I was interested in. However, I've been watching them closely of late; they clearly put a lot of effort into the X and the S and have started to make moves to amend the first-party studio/games problem. The Series X looks to be the progression of that. I should also note that I am very pleased with the PS5 specs and it does seem to be incredibly well engineered from what we know thus far.

The thing is though, from the get-go we saw the twisting of flops and other specs. What’s that, Series X is 12.15 floppies, I will round that down to 12, 12.1 if I’m feeling generous, and what’s that PS5 is 10.28 variable, might as well say 10.3, what’s 20gflops between friends. Same with the CPU and the numbers there and everywhere else. And I know all this is pixie dust differences a lot of the time, but it so often seems to be in favour of one rather than the other, especially as the exact variability of the PS5 is still somewhat up in the air. That of course evolves into saying well the SSD is so vastly superior there’s no contest. And that looks to be true to a certain extent, but some of the comments here make it seem like Microsoft just used the regular hard drive from the Xbox One and called it a day, let alone the fact we don’t fully know how much the difference will be in real terms. I am told teraflops don’t matter now, well how much does the difference in the SSD matter? Is it really as significant as the numbers suggest … perhaps, but we need to wait and see. And this of course leads into the narrative that the Series X is just a big ol’ brute, an inelegant amalgamation of slapping this in ‘ere and sticky-tapping that on there. Like, c’mon, the X was better engineered than the Pro for the most part, perhaps when the playing field wasn’t even, granted, but it’s not like Microsoft are a bunch of clumsy-handed booboos. Oh and the sound chip is going to make the Series X perform 20 per cent worse, so it’s real teraflopiees are less …. Not that they matter or anything …

And talk here at times seems to be going back to the whole idea of well, what you xbots going to be playing anyway, Gears and Gears again? Some Forza when you’re bored? Again, i'm not saying all this to necessarily call out Sony fans in particular, we all have our biases even if we don't know it or admit it, and it would be at least as bad if the roles were reversed. I just felt compelled to say what I see, and compulsion is a dangerous thing.

To me, next gen is going to be better than the one we just had, even in relative terms. Microsoft are pushing harder, their console is at least on near-equal footing with Sony’s unlike last time, and they are making an active effort to increase and improve the output of their first-party titles. They are at war in that regard. How well they achieve this is yet to be seen, but it can only be a good thing that it’s happening. And as for Sony, they have clearly produced a very exciting console to a lot of devs and potential consumers alike, which is innovative in many ways, albeit perhaps at the expense of some raw power. But as a whole I don’t think I’ve been as excited for the future of gaming for a long while, and that is brilliant.
 

B_Boss

Member
what comment did Osiris make?

I believe this is the quote:

On the hardware side not even upset it puts them in a pretty shit position for the entire generation though. They will be playing catch up and their is no sauce created that can span that gulf. XSeX is definitely more powerful. Also clearing up a bunch of bullshit Ive read PSV does constantly run in boost mode but I don't think that is a good thing. (Own Opinion) Cant imagine sustaining that high a clock speed is going to be quiet after hours of playing anything. Never cared who won will still be getting both systems for exclusives but XSeX should be the multiplat king.

Given what we are constantly learning, Osiris’ quote is odd or....quick/knee jerk? (with all due respect of course!) Not sure, especially considering all of the relative insider knowledge he was exposed to (one would think that the PS5 is, at the very least, a decent console to develop for). I think it’s best to wait and see official results (and maturely debate/discuss technical facts in the interim of course!) before responding in like manner about either consoles.
 
Last edited:

ethomaz

Banned

thelastword

Banned
So PS5's key feature isn't SSD at 5.5g or 9 gb/s speed, but Kraken decompressing techniques. Got it.
I like how you guys try to boost MS figures but always downplay Sony's figures.....Some of you are still talking about 9.2TF when official figures have been given.....In your case decompression through Kraken can go up to 22GB/s, you know SWWS will get there, like ND, GG, PD, Santa Monica...…


As for our friend over at "Dynamic Voltage Games", getting all that free marketing...."Was his intention I imagine" He said this..




Now I cant wait to see his video showing how the PS5's CPU is going to bottleneck it's SSD......Waiting with baited breath....He said it's later this week right?
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Good question, absolutely massive. Check out this video:



4K beats 8K, but it's OLED vs QLED


All respect to you, but those are people with eye sight problems, 8K is noticeably better and sharper than 4K.:messenger_grinning_sweat: Plus 4K would look much better in an 8K TV.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CJY

saintjules

Member

Bit of a side note, I was wondering about the selective installs when installing a game. Most articles talk about games with multi-player components and you can opt-out on installing those during an installation. For single-player games, some (or most) don't have multi-player components in them. So I wonder if it's just a regular install time on the PS5? I guess with the SSD, things should move a lot quicker.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I like how you guys try to boost MS figures but always downplay Sony's figures.....Some of you are still talking about 9.2TF when official figures have been given.....In your case decompression through Kraken can go up to 22GB/s, you know SWWS will get there, like ND, GG, PD, Santa Monica...…


As for our friend over at "Dynamic Voltage Games", getting all that free marketing...."Was his intention I imagine" He said this..




Now I cant wait to see his video showing how the PS5's CPU is going to bottleneck it's SSD......Waiting with baited breath....He said it's later this week right?


Few days back he was talking in a better, rational way, then seems he returned to this troll mode. Anyway, Kraken proven to compress up to 77%, the compression solution is marginally better than Xbox, adds up to its slow speeds.
 
I like how you guys try to boost MS figures but always downplay Sony's figures.....Some of you are still talking about 9.2TF when official figures have been given.....In your case decompression through Kraken can go up to 22GB/s, you know SWWS will get there, like ND, GG, PD, Santa Monica...…


As for our friend over at "Dynamic Voltage Games", getting all that free marketing...."Was his intention I imagine" He said this..




Now I cant wait to see his video showing how the PS5's CPU is going to bottleneck it's SSD......Waiting with baited breath....He said it's later this week right?

This is for me the same than heard someone of SIE tell me PS5 is more powerfull.


Before the launch I only will believe about this kind of predictions or analysis from third parties.
 

saintjules

Member
I like how you guys try to boost MS figures but always downplay Sony's figures.....Some of you are still talking about 9.2TF when official figures have been given.....In your case decompression through Kraken can go up to 22GB/s, you know SWWS will get there, like ND, GG, PD, Santa Monica...…


As for our friend over at "Dynamic Voltage Games", getting all that free marketing...."Was his intention I imagine" He said this..




Now I cant wait to see his video showing how the PS5's CPU is going to bottleneck it's SSD......Waiting with baited breath....He said it's later this week right?

That guy's first tweet was this and just joined Twitter. ehhh
 
I believe this is the quote:



Given what we are constantly learning, Osiris’ quote is odd or....quick/knee jerk? (with all due respect of course!) Not sure, especially considering all of the relative insider knowledge he was exposed to (one would think that the PS5 is, at the very least, a decent console to develop for). I think it’s best to wait and see official results (and maturely debate/discuss technical facts in the interim of course!) before responding in like manner about either consoles.

Just spoken by someone who doesn't have a clue about anything. 16% diff is not a big deal.

I don't know why he continues to parade around as an insider. Fooled me once (PS4 Pro), shame on you. Fool me twice (PS5) shame on me.

He's utterly clueless.
 

CJY

Banned
All respect to you, but those are people with eye sight problems, 8K is noticeably better and sharper than 4K.:messenger_grinning_sweat: Plus 4K would look much better in an 8K TV.

I'm really not sure at the distances they are looking at them from. Contrast is vastly better on an OLED vs. an LED as well, so that would factor into the qualitative (subjective) judgement of which looks better.

I actually haven't seen an 8K TV in person, but hand on heart, I couldn't tell the difference between God of War (2018) in resolution mode vs framerate mode on my Sony 4K LED, sitting from my couch. I took screenshots of both and looked at them on my Mac though and difference detail is vast.

My point is that I wouldn't be that surprised if a lot of normal people would think OLED 4K looks as good/better than the 8K.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Controllers aint cheap. 60 bucks a pop unless u find a sell. I'd rather buy 6 rechargeable batteries for like 12 bucks, swap them out and you're good for at least a yr depending on play time. And swapping takes seconds. I don't care if they've been around 100 yrs.:)

I'm still using mine since late 2013. You probably paid the price of 5 controllers at this point. Enjoy it, I guess.
 

thelastword

Banned
Few days back he was talking in a better, rational way, then seems he returned to this troll mode. Anyway, Kraken proven to compress up to 77%, the compression solution is marginally better than Xbox, adds up to its slow speeds.
This is for me the same than heard someone of SIE tell me PS5 is more powerfull.


Before the launch I only will believe about this kind of predictions or analysis from third parties.

That guy's first tweet was this and just joined Twitter. ehhh
I know Guerilla Games is very fourthcoming with the technology and numbers in their games.....They provided lots of info on Killzone Shadow Fall and Horizon Zero Dawn......So I'm looking forward to seeing how high they hit the decompression ceiling with Kraken, I imagine it would be very close to peak.....One thing's for sure next gen will be very interesting from a Dev's perspective...….There was so much talk about years later about PS2 relative to Vector unit use and so many neat things devs did with the hardware...….PS5 looks like it will revive such longevity in console hardware discussions.....Feels good....
 

B_Boss

Member
Also makes the console run loud as butt. How am I supposed to dream like that?

Well why don’t you start with the tons of gamers who find it as one of their best played video games ever regardless of the PS4’s fan lol? So far no reports of it consistently killing the console. You’ll be fine, give it a shot.
 

Gamernyc78

Banned
To detail my post :

1) "Gamers comparing Xbox Series X vs. PS5 aren't factoring in Microsoft's dark horse: BCPack. We don't have any real details yet, but it's possible that BCPack will be stronger than RDO BCx encoding+Kraken compression."

2) "In comes a new tweet from a former PlayStation developer, who says to have heard from several developers that Microsoft’s console is the superior console and that the power difference between the Xbox Series X and PS5 is quite shocking. These developers have also said, however, that this doesn’t mean the PS5 won’t be getting great games."

So basically the only advantage Sony had (SSD speed) might be for nothing...

Whatever your biased views tell you but guess what? The world knows better 😂😂😂😂

 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I'm really not sure at the distances they are looking at them from. Contrast is vastly better on an OLED vs. an LED as well, so that would factor into the qualitative (subjective) judgement of which looks better.

I actually haven't seen an 8K TV in person, but hand on heart, I couldn't tell the difference between God of War (2018) in resolution mode vs framerate mode on my Sony 4K LED, sitting from my couch. I took screenshots of both and looked at them on my Mac though and difference detail is vast.

My point is that I wouldn't be that surprised if a lot of normal people would think OLED 4K looks as good/better than the 8K.

I doubt that I'm kinda eagle or something, but I've noticed how insanely sharp the Samsung 8K Q900R from at least 10-15 meters away! And from a 5 meters distance, comparing it to a 4K tv as well, it's pretty obvious, not as staggering as 1080p vs 4K anyway, but still cleaner and sharper.

OLED as a picture quality is still the best, but it's fragile and its existing years are shrinking up to 2023-2024 when microLED hit the market. Plus OLED's are weaker in HDR due to capped 600-nits. Even at that some AI shit tone down the brightness to protect the pixels.

The matter was 4K vs 8K. But throwing OLED there then yes it will look better overall, but good luck if you use it for long periods. My TV is open now since 18 hours, and that's actually not rare. I would stick with LCD's myself, OLED's are too fragile for me.
 
Last edited:

Audiophile

Gold Member
Following on from my prior post about the PS5 power system, it's always good to have different people convey things in different ways, this guy on reddit frames it pretty well:

jasonj2232 said:
The Series X uses a tried and tested design. They set a specific Frequency target for both the CPU and the GPU and supply the chip with increasing amounts of power till the chip hits those frequencies. However, this power draw is not uniform i.e it is a variable range. In certain game scenarios, more power is required to hit that frequency while in others less power is required (to be noted here: increase in power doesn't correspond to an equal increase in frequency i.e it does not scale linearly. To hit higher frequencies you need to input more and more amounts of power to the point where it becomes a case of diminishing results). Power consumed=Temperature outputted. As such, the temperature outputted by the chip is also a variable range like the amount of power consumed (you can actually see the variance in power consumed in real time by the amount of noise the fan is generating. If its spinning faster and louder it means that more power is being consumed).

So the design team and engineering team have to design a cooling system that is sufficient and works well for a range of temperatures/power consumed. The catch here is that they're making a prediction about the amount of power that might be drawn by a game and this prediction might end up not being good enough for certain games i.e the cooling system might not be sufficient enough for certain games which means when this game is being played the console is gonna run hot and loud. The Series X designers have clearly taken note of this because the entire design of the console is based around this. I think its fair to say that the Series X has one of the most unique designs out there, and that is to accommodate the cooling system. How well it'll run remains to be seen but the design team seem very confident and I think we can trust them.

Now onto the PS5. The PS5 eschews years of traditional console design and goes for variable frequencies or boost clocks. However there is a huge misconception among people because of the word 'boost clocks'. To understand further, lets take a look at something that has boost clocks in the traditional sense - a PC processor (GPU or CPU, both will do). A PC processor usually has two clockspeed targets - a base clock (lower frequency) and a boost clock (higher frequency). Variable power will be supplied to the processor so that it consistently hits that base clock (so basically what the Series X is doing). However, if there is thermal headroom (i.e more power can be supplied to the chip without it overheating) the processor will be supplied with more power so that it hits the boost clock. However at this boost clock, the temperatures will start to rise and eventually the processor will have to come back to the base clock to prevent overheating. In this type of configuration, both the power and the frequency are variable.

The PS5's boost clock is not the same as this. Lots of people have been talking about how the teraflop number is a sham because the PS5 won't be able to run at this 'boost clock' most of the time. That is simply false and here's why:

The PS5 has a specific power limit i.e it's power consumption is not variable and is a consistent figure at all times. Thus the temperature that the chip outputs is the same at all times. This allows the designers to design a cooling system around the exact temperature that it outputs. What this means is that the PS5's fan is not gonna spin much faster or much slower depending on the how big or small power consumption is. Its going to spin based on ambient temps, as the thermal output of the processor is already know and they only need to account for the variance in ambient temps (which makes the temperature range that the cooling system has to be designed for much more predictable and exact i.e a one degree rise in ambient temperature can be more accurately accounted for than the rise in power consumption). So all the people who suffer through the obnoxiously loud and hot PS4s and PS4 Pros, rejoice for you have to suffer no longer (that is, if you're getting a PS5)!

How is Sony achieving this though? Well here is where the variable frequency part comes in. The PS5's processor will be able to see what the games are actually doing i.e what activity is going on in-game, and when those game scenarios occur where power consumption spikes up, it'll downclock. Game developers will be able to tell exactly when it is that this power consumption goes up and as such, be able to account for the reduced frequency then (so in a way, you have the predictability and reliability that comes with setting a specific frequency target, but it also mean that devs will have to work a bit harder to fine tune and optimise things). The crucial thing here is that it doesn't have to downclock by a lot. Remember when I said this a couple of paragraphs above:

Increase in power doesn't correspond to an equal increase in frequency i.e it does not scale linearly. To hit higher frequencies you need to input more and more amounts of power to the point where it becomes a case of diminishing results
Well the opposite is happening here. Decrease in Frequency leads to an exponential decrease in Power consumption. So a 2-3% decrease in frequency (that's about 40-70 MHz in the PS5's case) can deliver at least a 10% decrease in power consumption. So what this basically means is that the PS5 is going to be hitting the targeted clockspeed of 2.23 GHz most of the time (unlike a PC processor with boost clocks), when it downclocks it's not going to be by a significant amount (again, unlike a PC processor) and while doing all this it is going to remain cool and quiet. Quite an innovative and novel concept huh? This is why the PS5's variable frequency is unlike that of the boost clocks found on PC and shouldn't be compared.

So the summary for this section:

- Xbox Series X: Variable power/temps but constant frequency

- PC: Variable power/temps and variable frequency (unless you overclock it, in which case it'll perform like the Series X processor)

- PS5: Constant power/temps but variable frequency.

The exciting thing for me and maybe others who are interested in hardware and engineering is that these are three different ways to achieve the same general target. Just goes to show that these companies are putting lots of effort into the design and engineering and not just copying things and definitely not skimping on anything.

LINK TO FULL REDDIT POST
 
Last edited:

CJY

Banned
I doubt that I'm kinda eagle or something, but I've noticed how insanely sharp the Samsung 8K Q900R from at least 10-15 meters away! And from a 5 meters distance, comparing it to a 4K tv as well, it's pretty obvious, not as staggering as 1080p vs 4K anyway, but still cleaner and sharper.

OLED as a picture quality is still the best, but it's fragile and it's existing years are shrinking up to 2023-2024 when microLED hit the market. Plus OLED's are weaker in HDR due to capped 600-nits. Even at that some AI shit tone down the brightness to protect the pixels.

The matter was 4K vs 8K. But throwing OLED there then yes it will look better overall, but good luck of you use it for long periods. My TV is open now since 18 hours, and that's actually not rare. I would stick with LCD's myself, OLED's are too fragile for me.
I'm worried about the longevity of OLED too. I really want one, particularly the new 48-incher that was announced for desktop use, but I'm definitely having reservations based similarly on the concerns that you've shared.

On my post: the question I was responding to originally about the importance of screen quality in achieving the best image quality. I guess I should have just answered with words... basically, the quality of display most certainly does have an affect on getting the "best game visuals", and there are other factors to take into consideration as well such as display type, TN vs IPS and screen lag which can also seriously really hamper the experience.
 

B_Boss

Member
Not sure if this has been posted yet. Dev talking next gen.

qZcaO77.jpg

Wow....now take a gooood look at that dev’s excitement: doesn’t he/she seem like a dev Cerny had in mind as he spoke to many of them lol? I mean hell, that dev may as well had been one of the devs Cerny made the rounds to. They seem genuinely excited, not by GPU power but by speed, speed, speed which is exactly what the PS5 seeks to achieve because it is exactly what the developers wished to see for a nextgen Sony console.

It all adds up perfectly now. I’ve said it once and I’ll say it again, if the devs said “we want at least a 11-12TF GPU” then I’m extremely confident Cerny & his team would’ve engineered such a console. What we’re seeing now seems far more elegant, complex and with (for now, theoretically) immense benefits that we’ve only begun to conceptually realize and appreciate 🍻.

With Cerny, the key step in his engineering a console is probably the first: what do you developers want in a game console this generation? Everything follows from there.
 
Last edited:

CJY

Banned
Following on from my prior post about the PS5 power system, it's always good to have different people convey things in different ways, this guy on reddit frames it pretty well:



LINK TO FULL REDDIT POST
This is really well done man. Informative, clear and concise. Thank for posting.

Edit: Just finished reading the Reddit post... HYPE!! PS5 sounds amazing. Both consoles sound amazing in their own way.
 
Last edited:

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I'm worried about the longevity of OLED too. I really want one, particularly the new 48-incher that was announced for desktop use, but I'm definitely having reservations based similarly on the concerns that you've shared.

On my post: the question I was responding to originally about the importance of screen quality in achieving the best image quality. I guess I should have just answered with words... basically, the quality of display most certainly does have an affect on getting the "best game visuals", and there are other factors to take into consideration as well such as display type, TN vs IPS and screen lag which can also seriously really hamper the experience.

I would buy Sony XH90 (X900H) 65", then another one with the mid-gen refreshes as at that time we'll get microLED that's superior to any TV with great longevity. They are LCD's as well. Sony is the pinnacle of color accuracy, their reference monitor that is used to calibrate all TV's from all brands has just dropped OLED and went with double layer LCD, 31" priced at around $35,000:




From all, our Sony TV's retain their quality even 10+ years later. That XH90 is full array LED so you should see improved blacks. Make up your mind but I personally will never throw big cash on OLED's.
 
Last edited:
  • Praise the Sun
Reactions: CJY
This comparison is very curious. It is in full Spanish that if you are interested you can translate it with google translator. Leaving aside the capabilities that we already know about the SSD.


Basically they comment that AMD and SONY have worked very hard and hand in hand to offer optimization and performance technology in their CPU and GPU: SmartShift, which can make a difference.

Smartshift is in RDNA2 so is in XSX as well
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
To detail my post :

1) "Gamers comparing Xbox Series X vs. PS5 aren't factoring in Microsoft's dark horse: BCPack. We don't have any real details yet, but it's possible that BCPack will be stronger than RDO BCx encoding+Kraken compression."

2) "In comes a new tweet from a former PlayStation developer, who says to have heard from several developers that Microsoft’s console is the superior console and that the power difference between the Xbox Series X and PS5 is quite shocking. These developers have also said, however, that this doesn’t mean the PS5 won’t be getting great games."

So basically the only advantage Sony had (SSD speed) might be for nothing...

3tsstl.jpg
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
seeing as a lot of people here are concerned with superior graphics.. I have a serious question (sorry if off topic).
How much does a quality TV play in getting the best gaming visuals?

From what I've seen, any 4K HDR TV will give you at least 70%. Even the cheapest of the cheapest. Plugging next gen consoles to a 1080p is insulting at this point. Monitors are shit as well and tiny, only good for competitive online shooters.
 
Say that to Xbox fanboys too my friend, many are spreading misinformtion & I didn't see you quote them (or maybe I'm hallucinating)

I haven't seen them in this thread today (was gone from the thread for a while anyway, not really gonna search dozens of pages for that kind of stuff), but overall I do the same thing. If there's someone trying to say PS5 TF drops to sub-10 TF (without some hard data as evidence, which doesn't exist yet because we haven't seen any games running on the system yet developed for it besides teasers like Godfall), I correct them. If someone tries saying XSX has no optimization/customization to its hardware, I correct them.

I just see them all as either misinformed posters or trolling, what side they fall on doesn't really matter to me when wrong information is wrong information.

No the internal SSD is not removable. PS5 and XSX will be like the Switch. Internal storage plus expansion. The M2 expansion bay on PS5 is a 2nd storage option, hence expansion not replacement. XSX has the expansion card slot. The PS5 has a 12 channel interface and therefore 12 individual flash chips soldered onto the board and will not be removed by the user (I mean I guess you could but that’s highly risky and just modding the console at that point; probably just end up breaking it.)

Speaking of which, I stand corrected. I think I got the replacement part from a Eurogamer article :S. So there must be some kind of mux/demux then for the internal drive and optional expandable drive to interface to the same memory controller, cool.
 

CJY

Banned
I would buy Sony XH90 (X900H) 65", then another one with the mid-gen refreshes as at that time we'll get microLED that's superior to any TV with great longevity. They are LCD's as well. Sony is the pinnacle of color accuracy, their reference monitor that is used to calibrate all TV's from all brands has just dropped OLED and went with double layer LCD, 31" priced at around $35,000:




From all, our Sony TV's retain their quality even 10+ years later. That XH90 is full array LED so you should see improved blacks. Make up your mind but I personally will never throw big cash on OLED's.

Thanks for the vid, will take a look. I think I might have seen it before.

All my TVs are Sony and have been for 2 decades now, but I'm not a fan of the Android TV which my 4K has and LG WebOS is really great... but I actually don't care about smart TV features at all. HAHA Tough decisions to be made for sure. Whenever microLED comes out, my decision will be made for me cos I'll definitely invest in one of those. I think you're definitely convincing me not to get an OLED. I was on the fence anyway, but reading what you're saying, I'll probably stay away. cheers!
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I haven't seen them in this thread today (was gone from the thread for a while anyway, not really gonna search dozens of pages for that kind of stuff), but overall I do the same thing. If there's someone trying to say PS5 TF drops to sub-10 TF (without some hard data as evidence, which doesn't exist yet because we haven't seen any games running on the system yet developed for it besides teasers like Godfall), I correct them. If someone tries saying XSX has no optimization/customization to its hardware, I correct them.

I just see them all as either misinformed posters or trolling, what side they fall on doesn't really matter to me when wrong information is wrong information.



Speaking of which, I stand corrected. I think I got the replacement part from a Eurogamer article :S. So there must be some kind of mux/demux then for the internal drive and optional expandable drive to interface to the same memory controller, cool.

They're not replaceable. And you need at least 7GB/s RAW to match the internal one in performance, what's used is superior to NVME m.2 at this point. It's pretty clear:

BLA7jBoXYtjsKZCEuaUJMo-1024-80.jpg.webp


3644821-6047572129-8oFsY.jpg


Is there anything saying "changeable" or "replaceable"? No.
 

devilNprada

Member
From what I've seen, any 4K HDR TV will give you at least 70%. Even the cheapest of the cheapest. Plugging next gen consoles to a 1080p is insulting at this point. Monitors are shit as well and tiny, only good for competitive online shooters.

I am more referring to a high end oled 4k vs the cheapest of the cheap 4k. Could it conceivably make as much of a visual difference as much as say a 2tf console?
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
I am more referring to a high end oled 4k vs the cheapest of the cheap 4k. Could it conceivably make as much of a visual difference as much as say a 2tf console?

No, but color accuracy and clarity will differ. You should visit a TV shop and check them out up close. You can be satisfied with budget 4K HDR but the more you pay the more you get, but like 2080 vs 2080Ti which the difference is not worth double the price but if you afford it then go ahead.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom