Source?
$400 Series X confirmed
They're going right for Sony's jugular
If found please stop doing drugs.None. If Series S is 300 though, then X being 400 seems reasonable. I'm just being an asshat.
I'm guessing the PS5 price will determine what the SeS costs. I could easily see it coming in $100 cheaper stand alone or $50 less with a year of gamepass. I am a very skeptical person when it comes to corporate puffery, but MS has been consistent in their messaging for a while now. And with respect to next gen, Phil said they don't expect to be beat on price or performance. I've sometimes wondered if they will east a major loss to match PS5 and SeX pricing, but I'm now suspecting they tackle performance and price via the two systems. They already have performance, and I bet the SeS is priced to win on price.A $299 machine with an 8 core zen 2 cpu and a rdna2 graphics card at 4TF? That’s beefier than it sounds. Easily outclasses the current One X.... I don’t know.. I’ll believe it when I see it.
But the game is made specifically for which card? That game you're playing on 2080ti wasn't made for it. In fact no game is made for it. It's just a brute force card.You guys have completely stopped trying.
If I have a 2080 Ti in my PC and I run a game at 4K 60 FPS with Ultra settings, what will happen if I put an RTX 2060 in that same PC?
I'll be able to run at the same 60 FPS, and at the same Ultra settings at a lower resolution. This isn't hard to understand, the bait around here is really weak.
Lokhart is a mistake
But the game is made specifically for which card? That game you're playing on 2080ti wasn't made for it. In fact no game is made for it. It's just a brute force card.
I'm guessing the PS5 price will determine what the SeS costs. I could easily see it coming in $100 cheaper stand alone or $50 less with a year of gamepass. I am a very skeptical person when it comes to corporate puffery, but MS has been consistent in their messaging for a while now. And with respect to next gen, Phil said they don't expect to be beat on price or performance. I've sometimes wondered if they will east a major loss to match PS5 and SeX pricing, but I'm now suspecting they tackle performance and price via the two systems. They already have performance, and I bet the SeS is priced to win on price.
I won't be at all surprised by 299 or 349 (SeS), 399 (PS5), and 499 (SeX) for the final prices. The $ that comes in from the eco-systems, and the likelihood that neither company will pay close to wholesale prices for parts, is why it seems rather likely to me. Adding in a worldwide recession makes it even more likely IMO.You might be more right than you think. I can easily see the PS5 priced at $499. Especially when I take a quick look at what the cutting edge of 1TB SSD's look like (I actually think that the PS5 does have 1TB of SSD storage but that they need to leave some of it empty to ensure consistent performance - I know my SSD needs a certain percentage of free space to be consistently fast).
Don't be at all surprised if Series X is $599 (only meant to sell to the top 20% - 30% of Xbox users). PS5 is $499. Series S is $399.
I cannot for the life of me see a ' next gen console ' launching at $299 from anyone. Even the 'light' version of a next gen console. This more than anything makes me think the Playstation will be $500 USD.
I won't be surprised if its all digital, but I really doubt streaming only. Way too much money lost on sales, and they probably wouldn't need anything close to what has been rumored for specs for streaming only.Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......
- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
Imagine shackling xsx down with 4tf weak machine and making xsx a up resolution /higher fps machine rather than actually taking advantage of the machineLockhart will be cheaper by doing......
- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
Can be played on any card, less details, lower resolution.But the game is made specifically for which card? That game you're playing on 2080ti wasn't made for it. In fact no game is made for it. It's just a brute force card.
I can see a 7TF (series S) if they decide to go without RT.Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......
- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
Sadly, as a general rule I believe it will be XsX games getting ported up, and not the other way around.I think Lockhart should come with a 6 TF RDNA GPU.
This way if Devs choose to make games on XSX at 1440P with full path Ray Tracing that game can be ported down to 1080P on Lockhart without any drastic reduction in quality.
Assets scale but not past ultra. And the rx 580 4GB can run games at ultra in 1080p and 1440p.The game is made for multiple cards. Assets scale.
I hope this thing will be able to produce 1080p@60fps when XSX actually produces 4K@60fps or whatever@60fps.Sounds likely. So about the XB1X in terms of TF... buuuuut with a much faster CPU and an SSD. I hope they can pull it off and get it to a level where it will match the XSX on most levels outside resolution.
I hope this thing will be able to produce 1080p@60fps when XSX actually produces 4K@60fps or whatever@60fps.
Assets scale but not past ultra. And the rx 580 4GB can run games at ultra in 1080p and 1440p.
The problem is if a next gen game uses 8+GB of high quality assets at once. You better have not cut either ram quantity or ssd speed.
I don't know how close we are to the limits of texture usage for a given resolution. I expect next gen games to use 1440p to 1800p with ai reconstruction to 4k. How many GBs of texture and geometry data is optimal for those resolutions?From a ram POV, a drop from 4K to 1080p will probably allow a drop of a mip level in your textures. Even with very aggressive texture streaming you could probably reduce your texture pool in ram by up to 75%, and with the number of buffers used in games now being crazy high (up to something like 50 in Doom) you can realistically claw back at least a couple of GB and probably more without too much effort.
I expect SSD would be the same model for cost saving and consistency reasons.
Why exactly would you need 4TF Series X for streaming? That it would solve Folding@Home on the background? 4k video feed decode is probably doable on the cell phone SoCs...Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......
- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
It might kill the PS5This kills the series X ☠
Not likely. Room for both options.This kills the series X ☠
Apparently, the TF number for this gen (4 vs 6) don't translate. It's not like comparing apples to apples. That's what people have been saying anyway, I have no idea. So supposedly the 4TF on this guy is better than the 6TF on the One X. It would be interesting to know exactly why.Would make sense if Lock Hart was 6TF and not 4TF.... Gotta wait and see if MS would release some info where it would stand out next to Series X.
Apparently, the TF number for this gen (4 vs 6) don't translate. It's not like comparing apples to apples. That's what people have been saying anyway, I have no idea. So supposedly the 4TF on this guy is better than the 6TF on the One X. It would be interesting to know exactly why.
Sony is already doing a fine enough job killing their own hype. We’re in May and know next to nothing about Ps5 besides specs and Microsoft is out here about to show games this week.It might kill the PS5
Sony is already doing a fine enough job killing their own hype. We’re in May and know next to nothing about Ps5 besides specs and Microsoft is out here about to show games this week.
They have the most liked gaming picture ever on Instagram so they must be doing something right.Sony is already doing a fine enough job killing their own hype. We’re in May and know next to nothing about Ps5 besides specs and Microsoft is out here about to show games this week.
If it could actually kill both PS5 and Series X, maybe the debate would be centered again around games, not specs. Could be pretty interesting !This kills the series X ☠
If it could actually kill both PS5 and Series X, maybe the debate would be centered again around games, not specs. Could be pretty interesting !
Depends.This kills the series X ☠
Apparently, the TF number for this gen (4 vs 6) don't translate. It's not like comparing apples to apples. That's what people have been saying anyway, I have no idea. So supposedly the 4TF on this guy is better than the 6TF on the One X. It would be interesting to know exactly why.
TF differences only matter when you compare 10.2 and 12. When you compare 4 vs 6 it suddenly doesn't matter.
Series X:
4K / 60fps / RT - £499.90
PS5:
4K / 1800p / 60fps / RT - £399.00
Series S:
1440p / 1080p / 30fps / 60fps - £349.00
I’m sorry, but that makes no sense.
Well, all 3 machines will offer different price points and specs?
Absolutely. I was talking about the price points you presented. There needs to be a much bigger difference between XSS and the PS5 - otherwise, you'll see next to no people buying one.