• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Xbox Series S / Lockhart Details To Be Revealed Soon; Console Will Be Priced At Around $300 – Rumor

Xyphie

Member
16CU @ ~2GHz, 18CU @ 1.7GHz or 20CU @ ~1.6GHz seems likely for Lockhart assuming the rumored 4Tflops holds true. You can do that with just one Shader Engine on RDNA.
 
Last edited:

AGRacing

Member
A $299 machine with an 8 core zen 2 cpu and a rdna2 graphics card at 4TF? That’s beefier than it sounds. Easily outclasses the current One X.... I don’t know.. I’ll believe it when I see it.
 

NickFire

Member
A $299 machine with an 8 core zen 2 cpu and a rdna2 graphics card at 4TF? That’s beefier than it sounds. Easily outclasses the current One X.... I don’t know.. I’ll believe it when I see it.
I'm guessing the PS5 price will determine what the SeS costs. I could easily see it coming in $100 cheaper stand alone or $50 less with a year of gamepass. I am a very skeptical person when it comes to corporate puffery, but MS has been consistent in their messaging for a while now. And with respect to next gen, Phil said they don't expect to be beat on price or performance. I've sometimes wondered if they will east a major loss to match PS5 and SeX pricing, but I'm now suspecting they tackle performance and price via the two systems. They already have performance, and I bet the SeS is priced to win on price.
 
Last edited:

TLZ

Banned
You guys have completely stopped trying.

If I have a 2080 Ti in my PC and I run a game at 4K 60 FPS with Ultra settings, what will happen if I put an RTX 2060 in that same PC?

I'll be able to run at the same 60 FPS, and at the same Ultra settings at a lower resolution. This isn't hard to understand, the bait around here is really weak.
But the game is made specifically for which card? That game you're playing on 2080ti wasn't made for it. In fact no game is made for it. It's just a brute force card.
 

AGRacing

Member
I'm guessing the PS5 price will determine what the SeS costs. I could easily see it coming in $100 cheaper stand alone or $50 less with a year of gamepass. I am a very skeptical person when it comes to corporate puffery, but MS has been consistent in their messaging for a while now. And with respect to next gen, Phil said they don't expect to be beat on price or performance. I've sometimes wondered if they will east a major loss to match PS5 and SeX pricing, but I'm now suspecting they tackle performance and price via the two systems. They already have performance, and I bet the SeS is priced to win on price.

You might be more right than you think. I can easily see the PS5 priced at $499. Especially when I take a quick look at what the cutting edge of 1TB SSD's look like (I actually think that the PS5 does have 1TB of SSD storage but that they need to leave some of it empty to ensure consistent performance - I know my SSD needs a certain percentage of free space to be consistently fast).

Don't be at all surprised if Series X is $599 (only meant to sell to the top 20% - 30% of Xbox users). PS5 is $499. Series S is $399.

I cannot for the life of me see a ' next gen console ' launching at $299 from anyone. Even the 'light' version of a next gen console. This more than anything makes me think the Playstation will be $500 USD.
 
Last edited:

NickFire

Member
You might be more right than you think. I can easily see the PS5 priced at $499. Especially when I take a quick look at what the cutting edge of 1TB SSD's look like (I actually think that the PS5 does have 1TB of SSD storage but that they need to leave some of it empty to ensure consistent performance - I know my SSD needs a certain percentage of free space to be consistently fast).

Don't be at all surprised if Series X is $599 (only meant to sell to the top 20% - 30% of Xbox users). PS5 is $499. Series S is $399.

I cannot for the life of me see a ' next gen console ' launching at $299 from anyone. Even the 'light' version of a next gen console. This more than anything makes me think the Playstation will be $500 USD.
I won't be at all surprised by 299 or 349 (SeS), 399 (PS5), and 499 (SeX) for the final prices. The $ that comes in from the eco-systems, and the likelihood that neither company will pay close to wholesale prices for parts, is why it seems rather likely to me. Adding in a worldwide recession makes it even more likely IMO.

Regarding the SSD, I really hope you are right. But if Sony is going with 1Tb and calling it 825 because of the OS, why wouldn't Cerny have made that clear? Most of the people watching the stream probably would have found that refreshingly honest when calling the sizes identical.

One thing I have also wondered is whether SSD's have yield issues like processors? I've heard about the chips having more cores than listed in spec sheets to increase yields. I'm wondering if SSD's have comparable yield issues. If they do, maybe Sony is getting a huge bargain by taking SSD's that would otherwise be rejected for not getting to a full 1 TB???
 

StreetsofBeige

Gold Member
Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......

- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
 

NickFire

Member
Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......

- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
I won't be surprised if its all digital, but I really doubt streaming only. Way too much money lost on sales, and they probably wouldn't need anything close to what has been rumored for specs for streaming only.
 
Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......

- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
Imagine shackling xsx down with 4tf weak machine and making xsx a up resolution /higher fps machine rather than actually taking advantage of the machine
 
Last edited:

Genx3

Member
I think Lockhart should come with a 6 TF RDNA GPU.
This way if Devs choose to make games on XSX at 1440P with full path Ray Tracing that game can be ported down to 1080P on Lockhart without any drastic reduction in quality.
 
But the game is made specifically for which card? That game you're playing on 2080ti wasn't made for it. In fact no game is made for it. It's just a brute force card.
Can be played on any card, less details, lower resolution.
Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......

- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
I can see a 7TF (series S) if they decide to go without RT.
 

NickFire

Member
I think Lockhart should come with a 6 TF RDNA GPU.
This way if Devs choose to make games on XSX at 1440P with full path Ray Tracing that game can be ported down to 1080P on Lockhart without any drastic reduction in quality.
Sadly, as a general rule I believe it will be XsX games getting ported up, and not the other way around.
 

cireza

Member
Sounds likely. So about the XB1X in terms of TF... buuuuut with a much faster CPU and an SSD. I hope they can pull it off and get it to a level where it will match the XSX on most levels outside resolution.
I hope this thing will be able to produce 1080p@60fps when XSX actually produces 4K@60fps or whatever@60fps.
 
Last edited:

Arkam

Member
Super interesting that MS is moving forward with this sku. Wonder what their angle is, must be good. Cuz seems if they do have a box that has more grunt and can do things your comp cant do... that you would want to set the narrative that is the new baseline and point how the comp is below. But with this much lower sku they cant so bluntly do that. Looking forward to the reveal to understand.
 
Assets scale but not past ultra. And the rx 580 4GB can run games at ultra in 1080p and 1440p.

The problem is if a next gen game uses 8+GB of high quality assets at once. You better have not cut either ram quantity or ssd speed.

From a ram POV, a drop from 4K to 1080p will probably allow a drop of a mip level in your textures. Even with very aggressive texture streaming you could probably reduce your texture pool in ram by up to 75%, and with the number of buffers used in games now being crazy high (up to something like 50 in Doom) you can realistically claw back at least a couple of GB and probably more without too much effort.

I expect SSD would be the same model for cost saving and consistency reasons.
 
From a ram POV, a drop from 4K to 1080p will probably allow a drop of a mip level in your textures. Even with very aggressive texture streaming you could probably reduce your texture pool in ram by up to 75%, and with the number of buffers used in games now being crazy high (up to something like 50 in Doom) you can realistically claw back at least a couple of GB and probably more without too much effort.

I expect SSD would be the same model for cost saving and consistency reasons.
I don't know how close we are to the limits of texture usage for a given resolution. I expect next gen games to use 1440p to 1800p with ai reconstruction to 4k. How many GBs of texture and geometry data is optimal for those resolutions?

I know that in 4k at least some movies can use more than 32GB of memory for a single character, if I recall correctly.
 

M1chl

Currently Gif and Meme Champion
Lockhart will be cheaper by doing......

- Weaker specs (given)
- Does it even bother having RT?
- All digital? (no UHD)
- Streaming/XCloud only? (only a tiny HDD to save games)
Why exactly would you need 4TF Series X for streaming? That it would solve Folding@Home on the background? 4k video feed decode is probably doable on the cell phone SoCs...
 

Windows-PC

Banned
The only difference in the end between the XBox Series X and the XBox Series S will be resolution:

XBox Series X -> 4K 60FPS
XBox Series S -> 1080p 60FPS

All future XBox Series X games will be the exact same game on the XBox Series S, no compromises, except the resolution will be lower.

This is Microsoft's target with the XBox Series S :)
 
Last edited:

The Alien

Banned
This kills the series X ☠
Not likely. Room for both options.

Sure myself and most on gaming sites will shell out the money for an enthusiast console (X, Pro). But the majority of consumers dont care that much. Nor do they care about 4k - they're fine with 1080. They want to play 1 or 2 specific games or what's cheap for their kid.

Couple a $300 price with GamePass and you have a winner. I expect the S to outsell the X.
 
Would make sense if Lock Hart was 6TF and not 4TF.... Gotta wait and see if MS would release some info where it would stand out next to Series X.
Apparently, the TF number for this gen (4 vs 6) don't translate. It's not like comparing apples to apples. That's what people have been saying anyway, I have no idea. So supposedly the 4TF on this guy is better than the 6TF on the One X. It would be interesting to know exactly why.
 

Vawn

Banned
Apparently, the TF number for this gen (4 vs 6) don't translate. It's not like comparing apples to apples. That's what people have been saying anyway, I have no idea. So supposedly the 4TF on this guy is better than the 6TF on the One X. It would be interesting to know exactly why.

TF differences only matter when you compare 10.2 and 12. When you compare 4 vs 6 it suddenly doesn't matter.
 

Vawn

Banned
Sony is already doing a fine enough job killing their own hype. We’re in May and know next to nothing about Ps5 besides specs and Microsoft is out here about to show games this week.

Look at how people react when Sony reveals even the tiniest details about PS5. The hype is there.

It is strange how differently they've handled the pre-launch year of PS5 compared to PS4 though.
 
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
Sony is already doing a fine enough job killing their own hype. We’re in May and know next to nothing about Ps5 besides specs and Microsoft is out here about to show games this week.
They have the most liked gaming picture ever on Instagram so they must be doing something right.
 

Vawn

Banned
If it could actually kill both PS5 and Series X, maybe the debate would be centered again around games, not specs. Could be pretty interesting !

Well this is a video game forum where the nerds of nerds argue about things like Teraflops and SSD speeds. For the other 95% of gamers it comes down to Games and Price.
 

SleepDoctor

Banned
Apparently, the TF number for this gen (4 vs 6) don't translate. It's not like comparing apples to apples. That's what people have been saying anyway, I have no idea. So supposedly the 4TF on this guy is better than the 6TF on the One X. It would be interesting to know exactly why.


If I remember correctly, someone stated The x is 6 gcn tf and series s is 4 rdna tf which are stronger.
 
Series X:

4K / 60fps / RT - £499.90

PS5:

4K / 1800p / 60fps / RT - £399.00

Series S:

1440p / 1080p / 30fps / 60fps - £349.00
 
Why are people saying "this kills the X1X" like it's a bad thing? It should take the place of (kill) the X1X. This is a new generation of machines and the X1X's cpu is still the old jag so it needs to go away. I'm saying this and I own one and am quite fond of it. Not like it's gonna magically stop working or anything.
 
Last edited:

Vawn

Banned
Absolutely. I was talking about the price points you presented. There needs to be a much bigger difference between XSS and the PS5 - otherwise, you'll see next to no people buying one.

Not unless Xbox actually has games people want to play that you can't play on PS5.
 
Top Bottom