No. There was an important survey a few months ago. About next gen, people care the most about:You should definitely hold out then. BC is likely going to be PS4. They could easily throw us an emulator for PS2 and PS1 games. They already have a working emulator on PS4, I can download PS2 games on my PS4 through PSNOW and play them.
There is an emulator called RPCS3 for PS3 but its very hit or miss. Im not sure Sony wants to deal with that situation since if they wrote one it would probably be the same.
The majority buys new systems for new games. Youre the exception and in a small percentage.
They have PSNOW for BC but its not all games. I would just pick up some cheap older systems and play them locally. I have working PS1, 2, 3, Vita, and even PSTV systems and can pretty much play anything I can get my hands on.
Don Mattrick's "We have a console for that" argument by Jim Ryan:Sony doesn't care about BC. They're stance on it is basically Don Mattrick's "We have a console for that" argument. But the biased games media give them a pass.
“We said that the PS5 has been designed to play PS4 games. We’re going through the process with the publishers and developers testing that rather exhaustive library of over 4,000 games. We’re happy with the progress that’s been made.”
No. There was an important survey a few months ago. About next gen, people care the most about:
- BC at first,
- 2nd the price,
- 3rd the power.
If you don't care about BC, you are the minority (it's ok to be in the minority but don't inverse facts).
I was wrong, sorry. I think it was this poll were gamers want at 1st a good price and then BC.Can I get a link to the exact poll? Its just not making sense to me.. If thats the case than it is what it is but of course im skeptical.
If its true neither company should bother with a powerful next gen machine. Just a all in one BC machine.
I was wrong, sorry. I think it was this poll were gamers want at 1st a good price and then BC.
You're kind of right. People by far want an affordable next gen and BC.
You make it sound like this happens with all games.One X can run previous 30 fps games in 60 fps, so it's only logical that people expect the same here.
Dude, ps pro also has an internal 4k upscaler... Wth!?Don't MS have some sort of specific native upscaler though? Thats why RDR upscales 1080 to 2160. Whereas the Playstation would pretty much rely on the TV upscaling the rendered 1080p? To be honest, I think the boost mode has been pretty poor overall on the Pro, given the power difference. It hasn't really made me think 'wow, boost really makes this game much better'. But then I tend to not play older games so.....might be a bias.
I think BC and upscaling has been part of the MS strategy which is why they have a more unified solution for it. I think PS4 games running on PS5 is more of a bonus as the architecture is so similar, but it looks because they've chosen this new appraoch with clockspeed it might create some compatibility issues with some games, whereas MS can pretty comfortably say 'tried and tested'.
Sony's strategy is obviously to sell the PS5 based on PS5 games, not PS4 games. It's not the same strategy as MS, and I get why someone who is interested in these things would want Sony to talk about it, but it's clearly not their focus. I don't think they need to be talking about this sort of thing because of that.
Eh, game by game basis, as they have said.
You make it sound like this happens with all games.
No, they have to be uncapped! If a game is capped at 30fps, devs have to make a patch.... and the exact same thing happens in ps4 pro when in boost mode.
Dude, ps pro also has an internal 4k upscaler... Wth!?
I'm so mad after Sony for no BC before PS4. At least, MS does it right.Thanks for finding it. Lol thats kind of an odd poll.
The categories were cheaper price which did win at 37%, plays last gen games at 30%(which is extremely important), better graphics at 19%, exclusive games at 13%.
He should have next gen games as an option. I guess his poll is just saying next gen games are assumed.
In my mind I was defining BC as full BC. I agree with the poll saying play previous gen games.
I couldnt imagine the bloodbath either would take if they tried to cut off previous gen BC.
Sony should drop an emulator for PS2. They already have one for PS4 because I can download PS2 games and play locally. That would also cover PS1. PS3 would be the only one left out and they can cover that with NOW.
Well, of course, but I still think I’m right on this.This seems like wishful thinking...
I'm so mad after Sony for no BC before PS4. At least, MS does it right.
Fingers crossed, that would be great. PS1 at least would be terrific... And seems like a no brainer.Well, of course, but I still think I’m right on this.
Go into settings and turn on boost mode. You’re welcome.I don't think sony can do this as easy as ms has. When you play a ps4 game on a ps4 pro, you dont get a benefit from the added hardware. Its literally running at the same speed. Part of the reason xbox can do this is due to abstraction. It lets ms not get locked into certain hardware specs in the same way.
Well....if the only thing console had going for is BC then agree with you, but is not a bad thing wanting play your favourite PS4 games on PS5.If you didn't make any inroads in to your backlog during Corona/furlough how much do you care about it really? BC is overrated. People want new shit.
If you didn't make any inroads in to your backlog during Corona/furlough how much do you care about it really? BC is overrated. People want new shit.
You are either trolling or dont understand computing hardware ...which is it ?
Ps3 is a different architecture, you do know that surely. Ps4 games will be compatible as x86.
Also you know about software API and abstraction layers of course, pros and cons I am sure, if not go and read up before making stupid statements.
BC for me is the one of the most important features. I have seen several people in this thread say Sony will have backwards compatibility for PS4. Has Sony said that BC is guaranteed on the PS5? I don't follow things that closely but the last I heard they had said they were trying to get the top 100 titles functioning, did they go beyond that.
According to this renowned expert on PS5, Sony will have perfect Backwards compatibility so I guess there is nothing to worry about, this was his response when I questioned whether Sony had their shit together on BC in another thread:
With the 36CU count of the PS5 mapping 1:1 to the PS4 and PS4Pro's CU Counts, and Cerny's description of the hardware having specific modes that reduce its processing power to match the legacy hardware for legacy titles, I would presume "enhanced BC" is a patch from the Developer to enable a specific PS5 mode to take advantage of the additional grunt.
I doubt many developers will bother, because if the title already works exactly as it does on PS4, there's little incentive from the developers perspective to make it run better at additional expense to themselves. Enhanced BC titles is a benefit to the platform holder, not the developer. That's why Microsoft is handing it's enhanced BC in-house without developer input.
You know, up until a few days ago, I thought the XBox Series X was BC with literally every Xbox game that's ever been made.
Turns out, that 100% claim is just clever wording in the marketing.
So, it's 100% compatible with all the Xbox One games, as well as 100% compatible with all the 360 and original Xbox as the Xbox One, therefore making it the most BC console every made. But it's not 100% compatible with the entire library. It's about 1/4 of 360 games and fewer than 50 original Xbox games.
This has made me change my perspective on console BC - it's clear that, while MS has done a good job with the BC (better than Sony), it's not exactly a major priority for them, either.
I can't see MS and Sony dedicating their own resources towards getting all these games working on the system, to be honest. I think it would be better if a 3rd party were to do the BC themselves, offering it was an app that can be bought. Even then, you'd expect to see constant updates to it, and it would take years and years to get it right.
And, to be fair, it might never be right. Even the best emulators for older systems are not 100% accurate and use various tricks to paper over the cracks.
No. There was an important survey a few months ago. About next gen, people care the most about:
- BC at first,
- 2nd the price,
- 3rd the power.
If you don't care about BC, you are the minority (it's ok to be in the minority but don't inverse facts).
You know, up until a few days ago, I thought the XBox Series X was BC with literally every Xbox game that's ever been made.
Turns out, that 100% claim is just clever wording in the marketing.
So, it's 100% compatible with all the Xbox One games, as well as 100% compatible with all the 360 and original Xbox as the Xbox One, therefore making it the most BC console every made. But it's not 100% compatible with the entire library. It's about 1/4 of 360 games and fewer than 50 original Xbox games.
This has made me change my perspective on console BC - it's clear that, while MS has done a good job with the BC (better than Sony), it's not exactly a major priority for them, either.
I can't see MS and Sony dedicating their own resources towards getting all these games working on the system, to be honest. I think it would be better if a 3rd party were to do the BC themselves, offering it was an app that can be bought. Even then, you'd expect to see constant updates to it, and it would take years and years to get it right.
And, to be fair, it might never be right. Even the best emulators for older systems are not 100% accurate and use various tricks to paper over the cracks.
What are you talking about?
Microsoft has a whole BC team working on Xbox One titles to be BC with the XSX. The only thing preventing them from saying it's 100% BC is because of a couple Kinect and license heavy games like most of the sports games.
Before they went for fully Xbox One BC they were working on Xbox 360 and OG BC for the One. New titles were added weekly or even twice a week. There's no doubt in my mind that the BC team will continue with Xbox 360 and OG games after the XSX release.
Talking about Xbox not being commited to BC like Sony (or as you say it not a priority either) is plain wrong. They are very commited to BC. Over the years I had over 150 previously bought digital XBOX games joining my library on my One and over 50 that I still had on disc, all for free! And better then ever some even 4K enhanced.
Downplay Sony's commitment to BC all you want but leave Xbox out of it as it has no place there!
Don Mattrick's "We have a console for that" argument by Jim Ryan:
Sony clarifies that PS5 will support ‘overwhelming majority’ of PS4 games
After the company hinted it might not support the broader library earlier this week.www.theverge.com
Oh look. Eerily similar to MS's stance on BC
Goddamn biased media and their basic comprehension of the English language!
As a person who is married with a baby I don't have time to finish my backlog as quick as some people here. Also during Corona I have been working from home.If you didn't make any inroads in to your backlog during Corona/furlough how much do you care about it really? BC is overrated. People want new shit.