• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Far Cry 6 is running 4k on One X & Series X, No Information on other consoles at this time

Kuranghi

Member
4K UHD is terminology used by all the movie distribution companies yes also Sony Home Entertainment, I was very surprised to read some members here didn't even have a clue that it's a normal thing in the scene.


04-4k-ultra-hd-blu-ray.jpg

Yes people should pay attention to the ™ after the logo.

For instance I could trademark "2160 UHD" (I'm sure someone already did it haha) and then put it on my 1080p bluray player and trick people into buying it because they think it output 2160p and my defense would be, "oh no that just means it accepts a 2160p signal from a disc, but it can't actually output it", like early "UltraHD-ready" TVs.
 
Last edited:

SleepDoctor

Banned
And poorly optimized game after game after game.


Just look how bad watch dogs ran on the 2080. I couldn't care less about anything ubisoft besides R6 or Splinter Cell.

But the meltdowns are glorious considering how long the "fud" campaign has been going on in the spec thread.

I wouldn't care about resolution. Now if we see 4k/60fps vs 4k/30fps , that'd be something to be upset over imo.
 

K.N.W.

Member
TBH I've read the whole banner and it goes like this:

First it talks about Ubisoft, then Far Cry, its original creator, then Cryengine.
The next row is about PS4 , PS5 and their trademarks.
At this point, they start talking about XBOX, and how the game is gonna be 4k Ultra Hd only on Xbox One X and Series X, and how HDR is only possible on XB1S consoles and newer ones.

Use your brains, have you ever seen someone advertising a platform specific resolution in announcement trailers??
Nope, they are only telling us we need X1X or XSX to get 4K with the Xbox version!!!!
Otherwise I'm sorry guys, we won't be able to use 4K on PC :(
 
Last edited:

Dolomite

Member
Ahhhh, here we go 😜

Edit: does anybody know where I can find such statement from Ubisoft?? Who is this Serrano guy??
I've seen him around as an insider, but after leaking the wrong date for the PS5 price reveal, and even having articles use his tweet as a source I'm skeptical
 
This place will be glorious when the consoles hit the shelves. Camp Xbox pounced on the piece of meat and are wolfing it down like a tasty carcass.

And that’s just for a game that may or may not be 4K on PS5(hint; it will be 4K).

Imagine when the real war begins.
 
Yeah I'm expecting at least 4K 30 on PS5.

The thing though is we know Ubisoft console games traditionally don't have 60 FPS. Maybe that will change going forward?

Assuming they still lock to 30 FPS, that limits Performance Mode to 30 FPS. Maybe 4K 30 FPS and no RT? Meanwhile also having native 1440p 30 FPS with RT enabled? I'm going off assuming Performance equaling a focus off of graphical effects and more on fidelity, assuming RT would be a performance hit.

Meanwhile Series X could have 4K 30 with RT enabled which might explain the sticker. One X could be 4K 30 but obviously no RT and using lower-quality assets than PS5 and Series X. That could give option on PS5 for a 4K 30 FPS with RT too but maybe using those same lower-quality assets? Dunno how Ubisoft, Sony or gamers would feel about that though.

Them listing XBO though is ridiculous, everyone knows that and base PS4 can't handle this game in 4K regardless of how much you lower the asset quality and even with RT gone, unless you'd want 10-12 FPS or so (if not less than that).

The PS5 hardware does have dedicated ray tracing cores in it so I don't see why it wouldn't have limited ray tracing.

I agree that they fudged up the marketing for the game. And I have a feeling other publishers are going to confuse the different Xboxs with each other.
 
If I were Sony, I would just stop them from publishing the game on any PlayStation platform... fuck em. This is ridiculous!
So sensitive.
So MS have the marketing deal and Ubisoft only mention mS products.

No mention of ps5 becasue of marketing deal

GAF Geniuses assume that means Ps5 will explode if it tries to run this game.
If you took time to read comments in this thread you'll notice that people already explained the confusion (TBH it was self explanatory) and didn't need any explanation since PS5>X One X, but hey guess there are some exeptions.
Xbox One X will run Current Gen assets at 4K, and assuming that there was a Deal :messenger_tears_of_joy:, that was Sweeney.
Don't worry PS5 wont explode if it runs the game.
Didn't expect any less of you, keep it coming (y)
 

Thirty7ven

Banned
So MS have the marketing deal and Ubisoft only mention mS products.

No mention of ps5 becasue of marketing deal

GAF Geniuses assume that means Ps5 will explode if it tries to run this game.

There is no hope for humanity.

Oh they have a marketing deal. Ok then.
 

geordiemp

Member
So sensitive.

If you took time to read comments in this thread you'll notice that people already explained the confusion (TBH it was self explanatory) and didn't need any explanation since PS5>X One X, but hey guess there are some exeptions.
Xbox One X will run Current Gen assets at 4K, and assuming that there was a Deal :messenger_tears_of_joy:, that was Sweeney.
Don't worry PS5 wont explode if it runs the game.
Didn't expect any less of you, keep it coming (y)

No its only 480P on ps5, call timdog.
 

Jokerevo

Banned
"BUT BUT XBOX ONE IS GOING TO HOLD XBOX SERIES X BACK"

It is. The reason why you're getting 4k on both gens is because the mandate from MS is res or frames at all costs. So it will be interesting to see the difference in visual fidelity.

Since the game is crossgen they couldn't take advantage of the SSD because of the lowest common denominator so they pulled a bunch of sliders down.

So the question is what will the Ps5 version look like? Looks like ubi engine is shit at scalability.

All this is moot anyway because the game is not an exclusive and therefore the PC version will be the superior.
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
It is. The reason why you're getting 4k on both gens is because the mandate from MS is res or frames at all costs. So it will be interesting to see the difference in visual fidelity.

Since the game is crossgen they couldn't take advantage of the SSD because of the lowest common denominator so they pulled a bunch of sliders down.

So the question is what will the Ps5 version look like? Looks like ubi engine is shit at scalability.

All this is moot anyway because the game is not an exclusive and therefore the PC version will be the superior.

Actually this brings up a good point. Did you honestly think that Far Cry 6 was going to deliver some unbelievable, groundbreaking, revolutionary gameplay experience were it not for Ubi's desire to put it on last gen? Come on. We all know exactly how this game is going to look and play and it would look and play the exact same way if it was a PS5/XSX exclusive. This series has been stuck in the mud since 2012. The most advanced title came out in 2008 and played well on the damn Xbox 360.

The vast, vast, vast majority of games are not revolutionary, not groundbreaking, and do not need some high end hardware.
 

Kuranghi

Member
Gears 5 runs at ultra with just one or two settings at very high on a GTX 1050ti, 1080p, and runs at over 45 FPS.

Gears 5 isn’t exactly a benchmark.

They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.

EDIT - Just found out thats for MP, SP will probably be 60hz or lower settings. Sorry for confusion.
 
Last edited:

Mister Wolf

Gold Member
They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.

There are settings on the PC version of Gears 5 that go past Ultra and are labeled "Insane"
 

ZywyPL

Banned
Man, this thread is just a few pages long, but some SSD fanatics here....

Truck-for-header-of-bulk-page-1.jpg



Everyone warned you that you're bending/denying the reality, and at the end of the day you'll hurt no one but yourself, and now look how far it got you. I said some time ago that whenever PS5 will perform worse than XBX (which was so obvious by just looking at the specs) that you will use the "lazy devs" argument, but I admit, I heavily underestimate you, I'd never though you'll came up with a conspiracy theory that MS paid the devs to purposely cripple the PS5 version. This is so low and pathetic. Well who knows, maybe MS also paid Epic so the UE5 demo also didn't run at 4K?


Does anybody really care if the PS5 version runs at 1800p but at a better framerate?

Please, stop doing it to yourself, you know you don't believe that.

Far cry 5 ran at 1620p on Pro and True native 4K one XOX.

Why is anyone surprised at Farcry 6 doing the same?

Because the PS5 was suppose to be the most "efficient", "balanced", "no bottleneck" designed console ever created, no? It's not obvious if your in denial, it's sort of like being in love, you neglect all the negative things you don't want to hear, and no one can convince you until you get back in touch with reality again. It was expected/given since March 18th, but some just didn't want to believe it.
 
They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.
Console optimizations which allow GPU’s to perform 100% better than they should!!!
 

diffusionx

Gold Member
They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.

They said they are adding 120fps to multiplayer, not that the game runs twice as fast as the highest end PC hardware available. The game should be running at 4K/60fps with those additional settings on Series X, and those settings will hopefully come to PC.
 

Hendrick's

If only my penis was as big as my GamerScore!
TBH I've read the whole banner and it goes like this:

First it talks about Ubisoft, then Far Cry, its original creator, then Cryengine.
The next row is about PS4 , PS5 and their trademarks.
At this point, they start talking about XBOX, and how the game is gonna be 4k Ultra Hd only on Xbox One X and Series X, and how HDR is only possible on XB1S consoles and newer ones.

Use your brains, have you ever seen someone advertising a platform specific resolution in announcement trailers??
Nope, they are only telling us we need X1X or XSX to get 4K with the Xbox version!!!!
Otherwise I'm sorry guys, we won't be able to use 4K on PC :(
This is what I assumed when I first saw it as well. But, the Tweet was in response to a question about the PS4/PS5.
 

Kuranghi

Member
Console optimizations which allow GPU’s to perform 100% better than they should!!!

It sounded unbelieveable to me when I heard it, but thats what MS devs said they had done, its in this video:

Haha I went to find the video and read it was 120hz for the MP, its 60hz for SP, makes more sense now! Sorry for confusion.

Whoops, here is the vid:

 
Last edited:
So MS have the marketing deal and Ubisoft only mention mS products.

No mention of ps5 becasue of marketing deal

GAF Geniuses assume that means Ps5 will explode if it tries to run this game.

There is no hope for humanity.
If you took time to read comments in this thread you'll notice that people already explained the confusion (TBH it was self explanatory) and didn't need any explanation since PS5>X One X, but hey guess there are some exeptions.
Xbox One X will run Current Gen assets at 4K, and assuming that there was a Deal :messenger_tears_of_joy:, that was Sweeney.
Don't worry PS5 wont explode if it runs the game.
Didn't expect any less of you, keep it coming (y)
No its only 480P on ps5, call timdog.
No, 4K is patented by MS and only possible with teh most powerful console. /s
I was having a laugh, you going personal attacks....again.

You have nothing to say so I will ignore you from now on.
Clearly having a laugh.
 

tryDEATH

Member
This was always going to happen, all that spinning on the hidden SSD power was going to be exposed the closer we get to release.

I have maintained that Ray Tracing is next generations big feature and the Series X is built with that in mind. The difference between the PS5/Series X to current generation is Ray-tracing and this is where the scalability will be in full effect and why past generations aren't going to hold back games.

We already had close to 3 years of Xbox One X > PS4 Pro and that will continue for the foreseeable future only at an even large gap due to Series X CU that will push Ray tracing easier than on the PS5.

The sooner people come to terms with that the better, because there isn't going to be some magic sauce to make that up, unless we get mid-generation refreshes again and Sony addresses its obvious short comings when it comes to CPU and GPU that drive the system.
 

TheContact

Member
There are so many more variables to factor in than solely saying X console can run Y game at 4k and the other Z console does not. Really need to see a tech analysis before people start with knee-jerk reactions.
 
It sounded unbelieveable to me when I heard it, but thats what MS devs said they had done, its in this video:

Haha I went to find the video and read it was 120hz for the MP, its 60hz for SP, makes more sense now! Sorry for confusion.
There’s been a lot of confusion regarding Gears 5 because gaming "journalists" just pounced on the story and wanted to be the first to get it out rather than give accurate details.

They benhcmarked the XSX against a PC sporting a 2080. Both at Ultra settings(no extra Ultra+ settings on XSX) and the XSX was reportedly a tiny bit behind the 2080 making it essentially on par.

Have to specify the port was jumbled up in two weeks.

My guess is those Ultra+ settings will be possible but the XSX will have to use dynamic res to maintain 60 with them enabled.
 

Jigsaah

Gold Member
I think if they were just running the current gen version, both next gen consoles have the gpu and cpu power to hit 4k/60. But if Ubisoft are pushing better effects and ray tracing into the next gen version, well framerate will be a problem.
People need to get used to the idea of 30fps still being the 'norm' next gen, especially in ray traced games.
I refuse.

Give us options. Fuck RTX.
 
"Guys this is the absolute proof we were right all along! We warned you not to get your hopes up!" - Let me just sit in this corner eating popcorn waiting for the clarification that PS5 also runs it at 4K, if that clarification never comes, you guys have this one I guess but man... it feels more than obvious this is PR speak, they don't even accurately name the other Xbox console capable of 4K gaming.
 

Kuranghi

Member


Listen carefully.


Aye I changed my post above, didn't realise it was 120hz for MP only and 60hz for SP.

I was just straight up wrong about the settings, sorry about that. Pretty disappointing now that I know that to be honest. It was pretty confusing since he said some of the settings are above Ultra at first then that actually it isn't after that.

Cheers for being civil.
 
Last edited:

K.N.W.

Member
This is what I assumed when I first saw it as well. But, the Tweet was in response to a question about the PS4/PS5.
Yeah, but a Twitter PR person usually knows nothing about those things.... He even mispelled Xbox One X!
And again, no one has ever announced platforms' resolutions in trailers!!!!
Sony would never allow that.
The text was a bit misleading, and the Twitter guy fell into it :(
 
Last edited:

Bryank75

Banned
Dude, c'mon. If the game they created simply can't run it at that level, it doesn't mean the game itself is crap. You shouldn't sacrifice your own pleasure and experience because a game has less "p's". That's a fanboy mentality. Don't be a fanboy.
I get that... I was never big on Ubisoft though. The way they sold out to Stadia and are into the whole streaming scene pisses me off enough as it is.
 

Mister Wolf

Gold Member
Aye I changed my post above, didn't realise it was 120hz for MP only and 60hz for SP.

I was just straight up wrong about the settings, sorry about that. Pretty disappointing now that I know that to be honest. It was pretty confusing since he said some of the settings are above Ultra at first then that actually it isn't after that.

Cheers for being civil.

They're above Ultra for some settings, but they plan to keep using that dynamic resolution scaler like the did in the current gen versions instead of locking the resolution to 4K.
 
Last edited:

DryvBy

Member
This is just some confusing marketing I hope but they don't really clear it up with



Who is responsible for this choice?
 
Top Bottom