cash_longfellow
Member
Does anyone really believe anything Ubisoft has to say about a games resolution prior to launch?
4K UHD is terminology used by all the movie distribution companies yes also Sony Home Entertainment, I was very surprised to read some members here didn't even have a clue that it's a normal thing in the scene.
And poorly optimized game after game after game.
I've seen him around as an insider, but after leaking the wrong date for the PS5 price reveal, and even having articles use his tweet as a source I'm skepticalAhhhh, here we go
Edit: does anybody know where I can find such statement from Ubisoft?? Who is this Serrano guy??
Yeah I'm expecting at least 4K 30 on PS5.
The thing though is we know Ubisoft console games traditionally don't have 60 FPS. Maybe that will change going forward?
Assuming they still lock to 30 FPS, that limits Performance Mode to 30 FPS. Maybe 4K 30 FPS and no RT? Meanwhile also having native 1440p 30 FPS with RT enabled? I'm going off assuming Performance equaling a focus off of graphical effects and more on fidelity, assuming RT would be a performance hit.
Meanwhile Series X could have 4K 30 with RT enabled which might explain the sticker. One X could be 4K 30 but obviously no RT and using lower-quality assets than PS5 and Series X. That could give option on PS5 for a 4K 30 FPS with RT too but maybe using those same lower-quality assets? Dunno how Ubisoft, Sony or gamers would feel about that though.
Them listing XBO though is ridiculous, everyone knows that and base PS4 can't handle this game in 4K regardless of how much you lower the asset quality and even with RT gone, unless you'd want 10-12 FPS or so (if not less than that).
Ubisoft said:4K on xbox One
So sensitive.If I were Sony, I would just stop them from publishing the game on any PlayStation platform... fuck em. This is ridiculous!
If you took time to read comments in this thread you'll notice that people already explained the confusion (TBH it was self explanatory) and didn't need any explanation since PS5>X One X, but hey guess there are some exeptions.So MS have the marketing deal and Ubisoft only mention mS products.
No mention of ps5 becasue of marketing deal
GAF Geniuses assume that means Ps5 will explode if it tries to run this game.
So MS have the marketing deal and Ubisoft only mention mS products.
No mention of ps5 becasue of marketing deal
GAF Geniuses assume that means Ps5 will explode if it tries to run this game.
There is no hope for humanity.
So sensitive.
If you took time to read comments in this thread you'll notice that people already explained the confusion (TBH it was self explanatory) and didn't need any explanation since PS5>X One X, but hey guess there are some exeptions.
Xbox One X will run Current Gen assets at 4K, and assuming that there was a Deal , that was Sweeney.
Don't worry PS5 wont explode if it runs the game.
Didn't expect any less of you, keep it coming
"BUT BUT XBOX ONE IS GOING TO HOLD XBOX SERIES X BACK"
It is. The reason why you're getting 4k on both gens is because the mandate from MS is res or frames at all costs. So it will be interesting to see the difference in visual fidelity.
Since the game is crossgen they couldn't take advantage of the SSD because of the lowest common denominator so they pulled a bunch of sliders down.
So the question is what will the Ps5 version look like? Looks like ubi engine is shit at scalability.
All this is moot anyway because the game is not an exclusive and therefore the PC version will be the superior.
Oh they have a marketing deal. Ok then.
Gears 5 runs at ultra with just one or two settings at very high on a GTX 1050ti, 1080p, and runs at over 45 FPS.
Gears 5 isn’t exactly a benchmark.
Wtf does 4k ultra HD mean?
See ! True to yourself, childish behavior.No its only 480P on ps5, call timdog.
Lol next-gen assets?
Do the PS5 and XSX have difference assets to PC now or something?
They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.
Does anybody really care if the PS5 version runs at 1800p but at a better framerate?
Far cry 5 ran at 1620p on Pro and True native 4K one XOX.
Why is anyone surprised at Farcry 6 doing the same?
Console optimizations which allow GPU’s to perform 100% better than they should!!!They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.
See ! True to yourself, childish behavior.
They said it runs at settings above PC Max settings (lets assume thats bullshit and its PC Ultra to be safe/unfair to XSX) at 4K at 120 fps. A 2080ti runs the Gears 5 benchmark at 4K + Max Settings at 60 fps average (lows 57, highs 63, so actually 60), so it seems pretty impressive to me.
There are settings on the PC version of Gears 5 that go past Ultra and are labeled "Insane"
This is what I assumed when I first saw it as well. But, the Tweet was in response to a question about the PS4/PS5.TBH I've read the whole banner and it goes like this:
First it talks about Ubisoft, then Far Cry, its original creator, then Cryengine.
The next row is about PS4 , PS5 and their trademarks.
At this point, they start talking about XBOX, and how the game is gonna be 4k Ultra Hd only on Xbox One X and Series X, and how HDR is only possible on XB1S consoles and newer ones.
Use your brains, have you ever seen someone advertising a platform specific resolution in announcement trailers??
Nope, they are only telling us we need X1X or XSX to get 4K with the Xbox version!!!!
Otherwise I'm sorry guys, we won't be able to use 4K on PC
Console optimizations which allow GPU’s to perform 100% better than they should!!!
Well reread my comment and change the word Ultra to Max then, it doesn't change what I said, just nomenclature.
So MS have the marketing deal and Ubisoft only mention mS products.
No mention of ps5 becasue of marketing deal
GAF Geniuses assume that means Ps5 will explode if it tries to run this game.
There is no hope for humanity.
If you took time to read comments in this thread you'll notice that people already explained the confusion (TBH it was self explanatory) and didn't need any explanation since PS5>X One X, but hey guess there are some exeptions.
Xbox One X will run Current Gen assets at 4K, and assuming that there was a Deal , that was Sweeney.
Don't worry PS5 wont explode if it runs the game.
Didn't expect any less of you, keep it coming
No its only 480P on ps5, call timdog.
No, 4K is patented by MS and only possible with teh most powerful console. /s
Clearly having a laugh.I was having a laugh, you going personal attacks....again.
You have nothing to say so I will ignore you from now on.
There’s been a lot of confusion regarding Gears 5 because gaming "journalists" just pounced on the story and wanted to be the first to get it out rather than give accurate details.It sounded unbelieveable to me when I heard it, but thats what MS devs said they had done, its in this video:
Haha I went to find the video and read it was 120hz for the MP, its 60hz for SP, makes more sense now! Sorry for confusion.
I refuse.I think if they were just running the current gen version, both next gen consoles have the gpu and cpu power to hit 4k/60. But if Ubisoft are pushing better effects and ray tracing into the next gen version, well framerate will be a problem.
People need to get used to the idea of 30fps still being the 'norm' next gen, especially in ray traced games.
Listen carefully.
Dude, c'mon. If the game they created simply can't run it at that level, it doesn't mean the game itself is crap. You shouldn't sacrifice your own pleasure and experience because a game has less "p's". That's a fanboy mentality. Don't be a fanboy.Just don't buy Ubisoft games.... easy solution. Very much considering not getting WD3 now...
Yeah, but a Twitter PR person usually knows nothing about those things.... He even mispelled Xbox One X!This is what I assumed when I first saw it as well. But, the Tweet was in response to a question about the PS4/PS5.
I get that... I was never big on Ubisoft though. The way they sold out to Stadia and are into the whole streaming scene pisses me off enough as it is.Dude, c'mon. If the game they created simply can't run it at that level, it doesn't mean the game itself is crap. You shouldn't sacrifice your own pleasure and experience because a game has less "p's". That's a fanboy mentality. Don't be a fanboy.
Aye I changed my post above, didn't realise it was 120hz for MP only and 60hz for SP.
I was just straight up wrong about the settings, sorry about that. Pretty disappointing now that I know that to be honest. It was pretty confusing since he said some of the settings are above Ultra at first then that actually it isn't after that.
Cheers for being civil.