• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

Bo_Hazem

Banned
It's pretty shocking that they didn't have a single 8 minute area with more polish.

There's pretty much no way it's any better at launch, if the game has any sort of scale.. if that's the best they could show graphically.

I feel bad for you graphics whores lol.. I do enjoy stopping and enjoying beautiful games, but it honestly doesn't bother me that much what I saw from Halo. But it is sort of objectively embarrassing compared to competition. Still think that in motion a lot of what is being pointed out wasn't super noticable.. it's to some extent people taking screenshots and looking at backgrounds you wouldn't be paying attention to during gameplay.

Bro, graphics help with immersion, that's part of TLOU2, HZD, Uncharted 4 magic.

favwit5163a41.jpg


image_uncharted_4_a_thief_s_end-31383-2995_0001.jpg



gBGciPHnAc4G6ynEuz8pCn.jpg


hzd_tfw_screens_005-1.png


And it's a major part of the magic of games like The Division that makes you wanna explore that map and every corner of it. Games are art, only soul-less people don't care about art and the beauty of it. Yes some games are played just for fun, but those games are played for like 15-100 hours but stick with you for eternity.
 
Last edited:

BGs

Industry Professional
Yes and to be honest its obvious from the trailer as I have said myself. You can see when the camera is behind the character underwater and a bit later on top of a mountain with the rocks in the foreground.

Probably more times with camera moved round.

Can I ask about your comment a while back about PS5 data management being at least 5x better than SX worst case and upto 9 best case.

Can you clarify about this? Does this mean 5 x better io performance like sony said 100 times faster ssd = 100 times faster, wheres xbox aprox 40 x faster ssd equals 20 times faster?

Is this still the case as we had the whole SFS debate and claims. Can you add anything more to this area? Thanks.
Sorry, but after the unsuccessful conversations with the staff that have finally been left in the "air" with no response and no practical solution, I am not going to make any more statements of this type about any hardware until things change.

If they want serious information, the informant must be protected. If the messenger is not adequately protected, the messenger will not deal more cards. And sorry, it's nothing personal. So I will not delve into past topics or add new information (which on the other hand is obvious information for everyone who wants to "see").

In any case, out of respect for all those who have supported me and by way of summary, my thinking today about efficiency remains the same as always. Nothing has changed in general.

Of course, I will take the opportunity to add a personal opinion. It would be better if people were not naive thinking that Halo faithfully represents the capabilities of the XSX. Nope. The possible technical / artistic disappointments of Halo are not the fault of the hardware. XSX can do things like HB2. The problem is "other". Few studios can afford to invest in the best story, the best technical section, the best gameplay, the best advertising, ... all in the same pack. That is a privilege only available to a few.

The only failure is to sell an expectation and go out to an event with a material that you know does not meet those generated expectations. That is the MS error. It is not the fault of the hardware capabilities. I think everything MS has gained over the past presentations has been lost in this last presentation. You know that I have been very critical of Sony's presentations, but this time they have put Sony on a tray. MS is making the mistakes that Sony made with PS3.

And Sony still has three "big" events left (not two).

Take this long message as an exception. I start vacation. Happy holidays everyone.

Sorry, before I leave today...

giphy.gif

giphy.gif
 
Last edited:
Amusing thing is, we know current gen Xbox market share is about 50% of Playstation. So if that translates to half of revenue, it could mean we can predict the next generation revenue difference via hardware sales alone.


I am reminded of one of our threads, "Gamepass is not for everyone". I find that title ironic, because it is outright admitting Gamepass is not able to target certain demographics at all. if Gamepass is not for everyone, then that means it has a smaller demographic than the total combined gamers available.

Still, one can't blame fans for acting like fans. Those who are still sticking with Xbox is clearly going down with the ship, if they were willing to leave they would have left by now. If being lied to is not enough reason to jump overboard, then they are happy being lied to.

Yes if you look ps5 digital revenue tops ms entire gaming division revenue (12 billion ps5 against 11 billion Xbox).

And then sony make another 11 millions trough physical including hardware and games.

According to some this seems to be a good place for ms to be.. I really don’t think so.. neither from a gamer or business perspective..
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Member
I'm playing since months with PS Now, Gamepass is not as unique as it was in the first period.
Plus all Sony IP got bigger in terms of length. Uncharted 4 is double the others, TLOU2 is double that, and you don't beat GoW, Horizon, Days Gone, Persona 5, DS, Spiderman, Ghost of Tsushima and not even "b-rate" exclusives like EDF or Alienation in few hours. Short ones like The Order or The Last Guardian are by far the minority. It's incredible how Internet sometimes tries to negate established realities.

GamePass does nothing to tempt PlayStation gamers over to Microsoft. It’s as simple as that.

A great service for existing Microsoft gamers, but it’s not the way to increase your consumer base.

The only thing that increases a gaming user base: great news games.
 

J_Gamer.exe

Member
Oh and one more thing in DF video, Alex's own comparison showed death stranding in the shadow light he referred to and still looked a gen ahead of Halo. So quite cleary a hell of a lot more to it than just that. Of course lighting has a big impact but the way the console was hyped up, even though this was on PC which is worrying for the SX, people were touting this to look photo realistic or along those lines.

What we got falls short of next gen expectations in almost every way bar res and framerate.

Lightning, models, materials, effects, lod, pop in, how alive the world felt, assets, poly count? , animations..

The showing was so far off next gen its not even funny, OK maybe slighty...
 

Gediminas

Banned
Okay so I made this brief list about the first/second party games presented at both events with their possible release dates:

PlayStation (In this case, I believe most of the games presented were targeting a 2020/2021 release date):
Spider-Man Miles Morales (Holiday 2020/ Launch game)
Destruction All Stars (I was thinking this one could be a launch game, but probably an early 2021 release)
Returnal (Probably 2021)
Demon's Souls Remake (Probably 2021)
Sackboy (I've got a feeling this one could be a launch day title too)
Astro's Playroom (Holiday 2020/ Free game installed on every console)
Ratchet and Clank: Rift Apart (Probably 2021)
Horizon II: Forbidden West (Probably mid 2021)

Xbox:
Halo Infinite (Holiday 2020, Launch game)
Forza Motorsport (most likely a 2022 release, Phil Spencer said it's "early in develpment")
State of Decay 3 (probably a 2022/2023 release)
Avowed (probably a 2023 release)
Grounded (Launching next week! and obviously it will be playable at launch too)
Phychonauts 2 (Recently delayed to 2021)
Hellblade 2 (most likely a 2022/2023 release date)
Fable (it seems this one is still an early in development trailer, 2023 is the most likely scenario)
Everwild (I'd say this one is targeting a 2022 release)
Tell Me Why (Launching on August 27, also available at launch)

PlayStation announced 9 games, Xbox announced 10, PlayStation has 2 confirmed games available at launch (Spider-Man Miles Morales and Astro's Playroom) while so far Xbox has 3 (Grounded, Tell Me Why and Halo Infinite). But on the PlayStation side I think we have some games that could be easily be launch titles (such as Destruction All Stars and Sackboy) and this could be confirmed (or not) on the next event and the other titles are probably releasing throughout the next year. While on the Xbox side we only have Psychonauts 2 throughout the entire 2021 while the other games are 2022 releases at the earliest. This makes me wonder if Xbox Series X can live only from Console Launch Exclusives.
how you calculate 10 for xbox? i see just 4. people need to stop making shit up. everwild, tell me why, hellblade, phychonauts, grounded, halo infinite were announced before, it nothing new at all.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
Sorry, but after the unsuccessful conversations with the staff that have finally been left in the "air" with no response and no practical solution, I am not going to make any more statements of this type about any hardware until things change.

If they want serious information, the informant must be protected. If the messenger is not adequately protected, the messenger will not deal more cards. And sorry, it's nothing personal. So I will not delve into past topics or add new information (which on the other hand is obvious information for everyone who wants to "see").

In any case, out of respect for all those who have supported me and by way of summary, my thinking today about efficiency remains the same as always. Nothing has changed in general.

Of course, I will take the opportunity to add a personal opinion. It would be better if people were not naive thinking that Halo faithfully represents the capabilities of the XSX. Nope. The possible technical / artistic disappointments of Halo are not the fault of the hardware. XSX can do things like HB2. The problem is "other". Few studios can afford to invest in the best story, the best technical section, the best gameplay, the best advertising, ... all in the same pack. That is a privilege only available to a few.

The only failure is to sell an expectation and go out to an event with a material that you know does not meet those generated expectations. That is the MS error. It is not the fault of the hardware capabilities. I think everything MS has gained over the past presentations has been lost in this last presentation. You know that I have been very critical of Sony's presentations, but this time they have put Sony on a tray. MS is making the mistakes that Sony made with PS3.

And Sony still has three "big" events left (not two).

Take this long message as an exception. I start vacation. Happy holidays everyone.
I started my vacation as well since yesterday! One month at home! Happy holidays, man!

I 100% agree (and stated in the forums here) that Halo Infinite ISN'T what the XSX is capable of. It's just a shame that in their rush to have a Halo game for the XSX at launch, they will release it in such a barebones state.
 

DrDamn

Member
I don’t understand that doom and gloom posts about ms, yes, halo infinite presentation was a disgrace (but I am hoping it was alpha build), but ms just presented 22 games that will be console exclusives for xbox (some timed, but still something too look forward to), not all first party studios shown what they are working on so there is still something to wait for.

I agree it's not all doom and gloom, but they are rightfully catching some shit for the 12TF / Velocity Architecture stuff they've used to build up the machine when the presentation didn't show it at all.

I think there are two parts to this. First off there are clearly some issues with showing stuff on the XSX hardware currently. We've come to expect that somewhat at an E3 before launch, but here we are later than E3 and we haven't seen games running properly on XSX hardware. That's a concern and shows on that side they are well behind Sony. Because of this what we've seen isn't indicative of the sort of performance we will eventually see on XSX. Things should get a lot better.

Secondly it is taking a long time to get their studios to produce the next gen games. It could be the issue of control, completing what was previously started etc. This idea of a pro-consumer approach to keep supporting X1 for the first two years is more about not having the titles ready and switching early not supporting the GP model they've set up. Lots of people pay for GP for the first party titles, if it all shifts to next gen that's a much small pool of people you are concentrating on and could seriously affect subs revenue.

All that said things will get better, and any Xbox fan is going to get a lot of benefit in being an early adopter because the general experience of these new machines is going to be much nicer. Load times, interaction, speed of interface etc. Plus there will be decent amounts of third party stuff that should play great on XSX. GP is going to remain great value for money.
 
Sorry, but after the unsuccessful conversations with the staff that have finally been left in the "air" with no response and no practical solution, I am not going to make any more statements of this type about any hardware until things change.

If they want serious information, the informant must be protected. If the messenger is not adequately protected, the messenger will not deal more cards. And sorry, it's nothing personal. So I will not delve into past topics or add new information (which on the other hand is obvious information for everyone who wants to "see").

In any case, out of respect for all those who have supported me and by way of summary, my thinking today about efficiency remains the same as always. Nothing has changed in general.

Of course, I will take the opportunity to add a personal opinion. It would be better if people were not naive thinking that Halo faithfully represents the capabilities of the XSX. Nope. The possible technical / artistic disappointments of Halo are not the fault of the hardware. XSX can do things like HB2. The problem is "other". Few studios can afford to invest in the best story, the best technical section, the best gameplay, the best advertising, ... all in the same pack. That is a privilege only available to a few.

The only failure is to sell an expectation and go out to an event with a material that you know does not meet those generated expectations. That is the MS error. It is not the fault of the hardware capabilities. I think everything MS has gained over the past presentations has been lost in this last presentation. You know that I have been very critical of Sony's presentations, but this time they have put Sony on a tray. MS is making the mistakes that Sony made with PS3.

And Sony still has three "big" events left (not two).

Take this long message as an exception. I start vacation. Happy holidays everyone.
It wouldn't be the first time that a piece of gaming hardware was unable to reach its full potential. However, that assumes this was exclusively the fault of the studio. There is an opposing theory suggesting hardware/software bugs is stopping MS from showcasing games using actual Series X hardware. Series X is a powerful machine on paper, but theories don't sell games. If there is actual hardware problems that weaken what Series X could do, it would be a lethal blow.

Going back in time, there were hardware that theoretically were more powerful but never delivered. Most infamously the Atari Jaguar. A machine that decided being 64bit before anyone else is what matters. It ended up being two 32bit console hardware linked together, and the resulting programing headache gave advanced hints to what happened with PS3's Cell.

i really don't see the point of feeling sorry for Series X. If its creators could not show its power, then the consumer has the right to doubt if that power is there at all. PS3 was in that position early on with far worse 3rd party games, but late gen PS3 1st party games showed what the Cell could do if you really pushed it.

In the end, there are certain responsibilities that a platform holder carries. Xbox just decided they don't really care about doing those essential things, because they don't really care about selling consoles anymore. If they want to bet on Gamepass, that is their choice.
 
GamePass does nothing to tempt PlayStation gamers over to Microsoft. It’s as simple as that.

A great service for existing Microsoft gamers, but it’s not the way to increase your consumer base.

The only thing that increases a gaming user base: great news games.
Netflix of videogames do not exists.
Aside from the fact that Netflix has exclusive content, they are winning over theaters because theaters demand you to go out of your home and at certain fixed times. While you watch things on Netflix on your couch when you want.
This do not apply for videogames of this era, you may find a better analogy in arcade games vs consoles (which in fact killed cabinets).
To be THAT impactful Gamepass is forty years late.
 
Last edited:
T

Three Jackdaws

Unconfirmed Member
This is interesting... no matter what's posted in this tread Xbox is positivity is up.


Unfair representation of the data, Sony has four times the viewership compared to the Xbox event.

Also look at the trending words with the PS5 event, mainly GTA 5, it was most likely angry Rockstar fans that gave a lot of negative feedback which is not surprising.
 

zaitsu

Banned
Sorry, but after the unsuccessful conversations with the staff that have finally been left in the "air" with no response and no practical solution, I am not going to make any more statements of this type about any hardware until things change.

If they want serious information, the informant must be protected. If the messenger is not adequately protected, the messenger will not deal more cards. And sorry, it's nothing personal. So I will not delve into past topics or add new information (which on the other hand is obvious information for everyone who wants to "see").

In any case, out of respect for all those who have supported me and by way of summary, my thinking today about efficiency remains the same as always. Nothing has changed in general.

Of course, I will take the opportunity to add a personal opinion. It would be better if people were not naive thinking that Halo faithfully represents the capabilities of the XSX. Nope. The possible technical / artistic disappointments of Halo are not the fault of the hardware. XSX can do things like HB2. The problem is "other". Few studios can afford to invest in the best story, the best technical section, the best gameplay, the best advertising, ... all in the same pack. That is a privilege only available to a few.

The only failure is to sell an expectation and go out to an event with a material that you know does not meet those generated expectations. That is the MS error. It is not the fault of the hardware capabilities. I think everything MS has gained over the past presentations has been lost in this last presentation. You know that I have been very critical of Sony's presentations, but this time they have put Sony on a tray. MS is making the mistakes that Sony made with PS3.

And Sony still has three "big" events left (not two).

Take this long message as an exception. I start vacation. Happy holidays everyone.
XSX is clearly capable of more than Halo has to shown. The funny part is Dictator talking about how Halo is GPU demanding game being 4k 60 fps which is why we saw popin. The truth is Halo shouldn't be demanding game with it's image quality. Thats engine fault not XSX.
And Im sure XSX i capable of much more better graphic in right hands.
Personally I still think PS5 is better hardware overall, and even if i would give an edge to XSX in multiplatform titles I'm almost sure that Sony first party studios is place to look for truly nextgen graphic. Because they have talent, resources vision and hardware more than capable to show it .
 

J_Gamer.exe

Member
Sorry, but after the unsuccessful conversations with the staff that have finally been left in the "air" with no response and no practical solution, I am not going to make any more statements of this type about any hardware until things change.

If they want serious information, the informant must be protected. If the messenger is not adequately protected, the messenger will not deal more cards. And sorry, it's nothing personal. So I will not delve into past topics or add new information (which on the other hand is obvious information for everyone who wants to "see").

In any case, out of respect for all those who have supported me and by way of summary, my thinking today about efficiency remains the same as always. Nothing has changed in general.

Of course, I will take the opportunity to add a personal opinion. It would be better if people were not naive thinking that Halo faithfully represents the capabilities of the XSX. Nope. The possible technical / artistic disappointments of Halo are not the fault of the hardware. XSX can do things like HB2. The problem is "other". Few studios can afford to invest in the best story, the best technical section, the best gameplay, the best advertising, ... all in the same pack. That is a privilege only available to a few.

The only failure is to sell an expectation and go out to an event with a material that you know does not meet those generated expectations. That is the MS error. It is not the fault of the hardware capabilities. I think everything MS has gained over the past presentations has been lost in this last presentation. You know that I have been very critical of Sony's presentations, but this time they have put Sony on a tray. MS is making the mistakes that Sony made with PS3.

And Sony still has three "big" events left (not two).

Take this long message as an exception. I start vacation. Happy holidays everyone.

Interesting stuff all round.

Thanks and so all basically remains the same is interesting.

This efficiency is what other dev opinions have mentioned and Sony seem to have really gone for it this time around.

3 events 😲

Thanks for your input and insight 👍

Edit and what do those pics mean? 🤔
 
Last edited:

zaitsu

Banned
Unfair representation of the data, Sony has four times the viewership compared to the Xbox event.

Also look at the trending words with the PS5 event, mainly GTA 5, it was most likely angry Rockstar fans that gave a lot of negative feedback which is not surprising.
exactly
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
He said he busy with GoT. It is a good game. I played it 10 straight hours yesterday and today I feel motion sickness :messenger_tears_of_joy:

You're weak bro, 10 hours straight for a good game is the bare minimum. :lollipop_tears_of_joy: First day was 12 hours straight then next day around 20-30 hours, I don't remember. Thanks to COVID, too much spare time.

I've spent a lot of time collecting flowers and killing randos, the sword combat is so rewarding!
 
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
Gameplay looked fun ?
Borderlands 3, Doom eternal looks better, probably plays better and are available right now.
Yeah it looked fun. Also you can't compare those games with Halo simply because it's not only gameplay, it's also the story and lore behind the game. And the fact that this will be open world which Doom is not.

Their total gaming division, because they don’t give game pass revenue alone, (why is that?) is roughly half of PlayStation and you think that is good enough for ms?

This year will be even tougher and with the coming generation as it seems the gap will further increase..
Phil Spencer is reviewed on how well the whole division is doing, not based on one service of a devision... Microsoft never gives revenue numbers for each separate subscription. It's not like you can ask them for the specific revenue figures of their Power BI subscriptions...
 
I don’t understand that doom and gloom posts about ms, yes, halo infinite presentation was a disgrace (but I am hoping it was alpha build), but ms just presented 22 games that will be console exclusives for xbox (some timed, but still something too look forward to), not all first party studios shown what they are working on so there is still something to wait for. I would say that before next gen launches we will have a list of 30-40 Xbox exclusives that will launch in the next 1-3 years, roughly 1 a month, all will be game pass day one, there is nice mix of various genres and everything from indie to AA and AAA titles. So what we know is that xbsex will be 12tf powerhouse, and that “there are no games on Xbox“ narrative can go away. One Halo Infinite should not define the console, event though it is a flagship franchise.

for me;
  • sony event didnt convince me to buy ps5 day one (I will wait and buy it mid gen when there are enough Sony exclusives released, like I do every gen)
  • ms event didn’t change my mind and I will get xbsex day one when it launches
also;
  • game pass value will be hard to ignore for casual gamers to dip into ms ecosystem and this seems to be the main objective for ms this coming generation

We‘ve also learned that 343i are not the greatest marketers.

Ms can have that many timed exclusives they want.. is like sub a cable tv service with more than 500 channels but in the end you just tune to a handful of them..

Is quality over quantity that maters..

In my opinion they showed nothing to bring ps5 players to their ecosystem. But I have a feeling lots of Xbox players are considering to buy ps5 at this moment.. and I think is going to get worst as Sony will start to show more gameplay and footage of the games they showed..
 
Yeah it looked fun. Also you can't compare those games with Halo simply because it's not only gameplay, it's also the story and lore behind the game. And the fact that this will be open world which Doom is not.


Phil Spencer is reviewed on how well the whole division is doing, not based on one service of a devision... Microsoft never gives revenue numbers for each separate subscription. It's not like you can ask them for the specific revenue figures of their Power BI subscriptions...

Yes very transparent..
 

yewles1

Member
That's what they should have done with TLOU after the PS4 remaster. They always SAID they hadn't planned on that being a series- it was designed as a one off. Should have stayed that way. Unlike TLOU, I can see there being room and STORY room for another GoT game or even 2. Yeah, wouldn't have the same impact as it would be more of the same for the most part but still. With the art style and flow of the game, I think I'd be ok with that.

Like you, I agree that this may well be the last custom hardware generation for Microsoft. I just think it will be dictated by how the Lockhart box does. I think it has the potential to severely cannibalize the sales of XSX. If that happen, I think MS will just go the gamepass and software route. Maybe continue offering a "low end" low cost box like Lockhart in the future. But if they sell a ton of lockhart and it kills their XSX sales... either they will stick with the low end or it might force them out of the hardware market altogether.

It's pretty obvious they've been schizophrenic with their strategy...getting rid of most of their development houses including Bungie before suddenly starting to acquire them again. As a result, they won't have many title until another couple of years have passed and that's going to hurt them sales wise as well. I just don't think they care overall so much. Their focus is on the platform, so gamers can run games on multiple systems and even their mobile devices. The XSX is going to be a higher margin product for them, so they NEED it to sell very well in order to stay in the hardware game, IMHO.
Okay, I'm gonna risk it by saying this may be worse than early PS3 era Sony if this is the case. Because the Social Media exploits haven't done MS any favors.
 
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
Yes very transparent..
Go ask Apple for specific revenue figures of Apple Music, and Google for specific revenue figures of Youtube RED, and while you're at it go ask Facebook if they can tell you those figures for Facebook Gaming.

That's how business works, they are not obliged to tell you every small detail purely because you want them to. Has nothing to do with transparency.
 

Bo_Hazem

Banned
Bo liked one of my posts in another channel yesterday but none i had written in this, he is normally super active in this thread, maybe he is on a time out or something.

I see sleep doctor got banned below, something to do with mods. After today its probably lucky he did, can you imagine how many trigger warning he would of issued to peoples posts today

Actually I thought that this thread was closed, so been checking the PS5 thread. Didn't know it was only closed for 1 day. And if you have a wonderful game like GOT it's hard to let the controller down, nearly slept in one session while playing it for too long with no sleep. :lollipop_tears_of_joy:
 
Last edited:

zaitsu

Banned
Go ask Apple for specific revenue figures of Apple Music, and Google for specific revenue figures of Youtube RED, and while you're at it go ask Facebook if they can tell you those figures for Facebook Gaming.

That's how business works, they are not obliged to tell you every small detail purely because you want them to. Has nothing to do with transparency.
I want to see your face using game pass on PS6 or smart TV. Because it's clearly the way MS is trying to pursuit.
 

zaitsu

Banned
Actually I thought that this thread was closed, so been checking the PS5 thread. Didn't know it was only closed for 1 day. And if you have a wonderful game like GOT it's hard to let the controller down, nearly slept in one session while playing it for too long with no sleep. :lollipop_tears_of_joy:
Bo youre still far away, so much more fun content awaits in this thread.
 

Neo Blaster

Member
I want to see your face using game pass on PS6 or smart TV. Because it's clearly the way MS is trying to pursuit.
it makes sense that MS is trying to chase GaaS if that is the case. Because as a console platform holder MS had no reason to compete with existing 3rd party developers, who are all chasing GaaS and making far more money. And these third parties pay MS 30% revenue on Xbox machines.

However, if the Xbox console goes away, Ms would have to pay rent on whatever platform they run Gamepass on. That would be 30% rent to Sony or Nintendo. And all the 3rd party GaaS games would become competitors, fighting for gamer's time and dollars.

PC? Good luck trying to get money out of PC gamers with cheap games. PC gamers have more unplayed cheap games than they have lifetime left to finish them.
 
D

Deleted member 775630

Unconfirmed Member
Damn it went fast. From XSX being better console to Gamepass being console seller.
It's just both at the moment... XSX is the most powerful console so all 3rd party games will play best on it. Game Pass is a system seller that increases the value of the XSX even more.

But if I have to choose between XSX that plays 3rd party games a bit better or PS5 that has their own exclusives AND the Xbox games with Game Pass then the choice is easily made.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

sircaw

Banned
We really need a games watch dog in the world. Some sort of independent body that has zero spin to it.

I am finding it harder and harder to trust people these days.

These last few days, i have seen Digital foundry come out and try to explain why Halo looks like it does. It feels so strange for a company that is meant to critique things, give reasons and excuses why the game is bad. Get some like King trash, yes he uses the n word to much and plays GOD AWFUL Music, but that does not detract from the fact he found all those problems. He has no studio just his ps4, wtf are digital foundry doing.

Alanah pierce or what ever her name is, the other day making a video explaining why xbox gamepass is such a good thing bla bla bla, she said she just needed to make that video, late at night, while she was about to go to bed. I smell a rat.

IGN, i mean, i don't even go there anymore, i did a long time ago.

It feels wrong that companies have their claws so deep into review sites.

nvm just a rant.
 

Nickolaidas

Member
Halo Infinite's gameplay is pure Halo. Which is awesome.

It's the visual department which is weak as fuck. And it hurts when you know the capabilities of the Series X.
 

Mista

Banned
Halo Infinite's gameplay is pure Halo. Which is awesome.

It's the visual department which is weak as fuck. And it hurts when you know the capabilities of the Series X.
Lets be real here, Halo was never known for its good looks but known for its fluid gameplay

The thing is this time even the looks so bad. Especially when a Halo from 10 years ago looks better

Which is not acceptable to anyone
 

Rudius

Member
I've finished TLOU2 and I liked it a lot and have no problem with the story and such. I'm currently about 60-75% through GoT.

TLOU2 is a hell of an emotional ride. It's way more of a cerebral experience than almost any game I've played. It's extremely good looking and beautiful in a melancholic way. Combat is very fun and you there is a lot of creativity in how you can approach each encounter.

GoT is distractingly beautiful, you'll spend time just gawking at sunsets and the densely vegetated landscapes, every where you look is another post card to send and around each hill is something new to discover. Combat is extremely fun once you get a hang of it. Stealth is good but nothing special. Story is serviceable, absolutely not bad but as all the main lines are broken up in parts and you travel all over the open world, doing many smaller side quests which are actually quite good and fun in their own right, you kind of loose the narrative focus compared to more linearly paced games. So for me the stories are there for game play opportunities and variation while a game such as TLOU2 is the main source to elicit emotions.

TLDR: TLOU2 = story and insane graphics, GoT = game plays and beautiful vistas.

So if I had to pick one game of the year it would have to be TLOU2 out of sheer production quality and emotional impact. And I think I prefer HZD over GoT a little bit.

But I have to give GoT some outstanding credits in the quality of life things it does: Navigating the menus are extremely fast and you can exit from any level by just pressing start again, fuck I hate games forcing me to tap back back back back to get out. Also fast traveling and re-spawn on death is unbelievably fast compared to other titles, this is very close to how it's going to feel on a next gen SSD. One minor caveat is that the mid tones of the HDR are a bit under exposed and shadows are way contrasty, I had to raise in-game brightness to 70-80 and then add some saturation on my TV to compensate for the loss of colors but now it looks quite good.
I hope this two games have great PS5 updates in the works. They are pushing the PS4 to the limit and will still be fresh when next gen launches.

I will replay The Last of Us 2 for platinum and play Ghost for the first time on PS5.
 

kittoo

Cretinously credulous
I am all for singleplayer games, and while there is no doubt that gamepass has tremendous value, I would still get a PS5 first and foremost because that's where story driven single player games are.
I still have gamepass on PC, but I am not going to get an Xbox because of it. This Games as a service, 10 year plan , MMO shared universe. It's all bullshit to me. The day there aren't these amazing singleplayer games, gaming will be dead to me.
If Xbox starts making amazing single player games, I will be there too. But for now, its Playstation, gamepass or not. And I have no qualms in paying 60 for them if it means more of those will keep coming.
 
Last edited:

Neo Blaster

Member
Alanah pierce or what ever her name is, the other day making a video explaining why xbox gamepass is such a good thing bla bla bla, she said she just needed to make that video, late at night, while she was about to go to bed. I smell a rat.
Gamepass' value for consumers excuse can never give MS a free pass for poor quality games. It's funny how we went this week from '12TF, Smart Delivery, Velocity Architecture!!' to 'Gamepass!!!!'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom