• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Next-Gen PS5 & XSX |OT| Console tEch threaD

Status
Not open for further replies.

keram

Member
Good fucking lord MS! How hard is it for you to show some stuff for Next gen!?

065.gif


Btw. they showed Halo Infinite :messenger_beaming:
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
At least they're managing expectations, I guess.

Could be some proper game playing going on now. Another interpretation of that Tweet could be that at TGS (not until the end of the month) they'll be no new news which can be the truth at that time.

Its not to say there can't be new news between now and then, just not any new news in addition to whatever may come between now and then!
 
Because most Xbox owners are American and therefore more prone to shooting each other and/or defending their right to do so.

While that sounds like a joke, it could be partly true. ( the part about most xbox gamers are US folks)

On US xbox vs playstation war is kind of balanced, which shows up on forums/internet when US xbox gamers talk about next gen and they are clueless how brutally more popular playstation is outside of US, like it is not even a competition between them. So in their perspective anything minor can turn the scale and make xbox "winner", while from outside perspective it is just illogical as playstation would have to do _everything_ wrong and they would still have a chance to "win".

That alone have given me the image of typical xbox fan being kind of aggressive and not too informed about global situation, when looking all these threads I rarely have seen PS-fanboys being so stubborn/angry/mean to others or bashing other products so aggressively.

And we all (at least outsiders) know how different US culture is vs. hundreds of other cultures, mainly their patriotism, violence, gun culture, lack of caring about poor people (there are no homeless people in many countries as everyone gets an apartment rent paid if they want to).

But difficult to say how xbox gamers are outside of US, as I dont know anyone whom is "xbox gamer", that is how popular that brand is here.

Most aggressive gamers I know are NHL / FIFA gamers + COD etc shooters. Those idiots scream in the middle of the night when they lose, throw their controllers into a wall, rape their controller in rage instead of using it normally (gently but precise).

Maybe they should study them.

But if this study is made from US xbox vs US playstation gamers, then it is more interesting thing as cultural variables are removed from the equation
 
Last edited:

Lunatic_Gamer

Gold Member
Dead by Daylight Is Going Next-Gen Later This Year, Will Run at 4K@60

On these next-generation consoles, the 4v1 asymmetrical multiplayer horror game will run at 4K resolution and 60 frames per second; the good news is that existing players will be able to upgrade for free to a next-gen version of their choosing.

Mathieu Côté, Game Director of Dead by Daylight, said:
The game you know and love is stepping into the future. The team has been focused on this plan for an entire year and we’re so excited to bring you Dead by Daylight as you’ve never seen it before, while still offering new Chapters and Archives. This is ambitious, and we’re ready.


 

Jaxx_377

Neo Member
So September 17 is already taken by another Sony event. September 9 has to be the date we've been looking for... hopefully.


So Sony can tell us about an event showcasing a product nobody wants 15 days from now, but they can't tell us about news of an event concerning a product that millions of people want supposedly 7 days from now. Im starting to think they hate us.
 

FunkMiller

Gold Member
Oh sorry, are you both gaming on Linux? Windows money doesn't stay at Windows... Does Playstation money stay at Playstation?

I see this chestnut is being rolled out again to mitigate XBox’s problems...

Once and for all, for everyone, including those in the cheap seats:

Microsoft is not some giant monolithic company that just sloshes money around willy nilly between its departments. Each department must remain successful, because if they aren’t, the shareholders will have something to say about it.

XBox isn’t safe just because lots of people buy PC software. If XBox isn’t profitable, the shareholders will not be happy. Goodbye XBox.

If you genuinely think major corporations don’t dissolve unsuccessful departments or satellite operations, then you have no idea how the business world functions.

TL dR: Microsoft being successful doesn’t mean XBox is always going to be safe. If it isn’t a success, it goes.
 
Last edited:

TJC

Member
Lol playsta
So Sony can tell us about an event showcasing a product nobody wants 15 days from now, but they can't tell us about news of an event concerning a product that millions of people want supposedly 7 days from now. Im starting to think they hate us.
Lol playstation division does WTF it wants. Seriously I'm hoping we hear something decent today, I'm fed up of hearing about dual sense and SSD now.
 
I see this chestnut is being rolled out again to mitigate XBox’s problems...

Once and for all, for everyone, including those in the cheap seats:

Microsoft is not some giant monolithic company that just sloshes money around willy nilly between its departments. Each department must remain successful, because if they aren’t, the shareholders will have something to say about it.

XBox isn’t safe just because lots of people buy PC software. If XBox isn’t profitable, the shareholders will not be happy. Goodbye XBox.

If you genuinely think major corporations don’t dissolve unsuccessful departments or satellite operations, then you have no idea how the business world functions.

TL dR: Microsoft being successful doesn’t mean XBox is always going to be safe. If it isn’t a success, it goes.
Exactly, Microsoft has a lot more money than Sony, and that's a fact but it seems some people gets mad if Sony earns and maybe even invests more money on PlayStation than Microsoft does on Xbox.
 

DrDamn

Member
In reality, I think Thegreatwhiteshark's video is actually generous to Ratchet & Clank. It seems to take longer to load than suggested in his video.

The counting in the original video is correct, odd format to use in this instance, but Bo_Hazem Bo_Hazem I think you do actually need to fess up and admit you were wrong on that part. It's isn't set to deceive, it's just an odd format to use.

On the flip side I disagree with the overall assessment TheGreatWhiteShark TheGreatWhiteShark is trying to make - I'm not even clear what their point is to be fair. When the transition actually starts loading in the new world, when it's done, what is added for transitional effect is simply not clear enough to be making any sort of definitive judgement on the performance of the underlying architecture. The whole thing seems to have been a massively pointless argument about stuff we have no where near the full information to analyse.
 

azertydu91

Hard to Kill
The counting in the original video is correct, odd format to use in this instance, but Bo_Hazem Bo_Hazem I think you do actually need to fess up and admit you were wrong on that part. It's isn't set to deceive, it's just an odd format to use.

On the flip side I disagree with the overall assessment TheGreatWhiteShark TheGreatWhiteShark is trying to make - I'm not even clear what their point is to be fair. When the transition actually starts loading in the new world, when it's done, what is added for transitional effect is simply not clear enough to be making any sort of definitive judgement on the performance of the underlying architecture. The whole thing seems to have been a massively pointless argument about stuff we have no where near the full information to analyse.
Yeah the whole debate was pointless wa can all agree tha the game take around 2 secs to load a whole new world while still being playable.
It's way better than the minute it take post death in bloodborne for example or to load anything in state of decay 2.
 

azertydu91

Hard to Kill

sircaw

Banned
The counting in the original video is correct, odd format to use in this instance, but Bo_Hazem Bo_Hazem I think you do actually need to fess up and admit you were wrong on that part. It's isn't set to deceive, it's just an odd format to use.

On the flip side I disagree with the overall assessment TheGreatWhiteShark TheGreatWhiteShark is trying to make - I'm not even clear what their point is to be fair. When the transition actually starts loading in the new world, when it's done, what is added for transitional effect is simply not clear enough to be making any sort of definitive judgement on the performance of the underlying architecture. The whole thing seems to have been a massively pointless argument about stuff we have no where near the full information to analyse.

At the end of the day its just more bullshit, it's another attempt to try to make something seem worse than it is.

This kinda shit needs to stop.
 

kyliethicc

Member
I wonder if AMD asked Sony & Microsoft to wait to announce PS5 & XSX prices until after Nvidia RTX 3000 prices were shown?

AMD might have wanted all RDNA2 prices to remain unknown to put pressure on Nvidia.

If the consoles announced low prices in June, that would have indicated how low/high AMD was going to price their RX 6000 GPUs.
 

SaucyJack

Member
The counting in the original video is correct, odd format to use in this instance, but Bo_Hazem Bo_Hazem I think you do actually need to fess up and admit you were wrong on that part. It's isn't set to deceive, it's just an odd format to use.

On the flip side I disagree with the overall assessment TheGreatWhiteShark TheGreatWhiteShark is trying to make - I'm not even clear what their point is to be fair. When the transition actually starts loading in the new world, when it's done, what is added for transitional effect is simply not clear enough to be making any sort of definitive judgement on the performance of the underlying architecture. The whole thing seems to have been a massively pointless argument about stuff we have no where near the full information to analyse.

Hear hear.

It was an entirely pointless exercise in shitting up the last couple of days of this thread. Arguing about nothing, proving nothing.

The only thing that is clear is that the whole transition, end to end, is sub-2 seconds, which is pretty fucking awesome. It’s fairly academic how much of that 2 seconds is the load, and it really doesn’t matter if people call it a “loading screen”, call it an animation or call it Craig.
 
Last edited:

sircaw

Banned
Sony and MS really want to undercut each other, don't they?

I think Microsoft are desperate for sonys price.
It's like the tflop thing, they know the public likes numbers

sony has the games for launch, Microsoft doesn't.

If Microsoft concedes on the price too, that is a double blow.
they need to have something big to wave at the consumer.


What is Microsofts angle if Sony beats them on price and has the best games.

We have the world's most powerful console, we have a carbon-neutral console. buy our console to play your old games. Our exclusives are 2-3 years out. Our load times are 6 seconds longer that Sony's. We have an extra blade of grass at 800% zoom in mode.

they lose the price war, they are fucked.

judging by that 75% poll to sony They might already be fucked
 
Last edited:

THE:MILKMAN

Member
I think Microsoft are desperate for sonys price.
It's like the tflop thing, they know the public likes numbers

sony has the games for launch, Microsoft doesn't.

If Microsoft concedes on the price too, that is a double blow.
they need to have something big to wave at the consumer.


What is Microsofts angle if Sony beats them on price and has the best games.

We have the world's most powerful console, we have a carbon-neutral console. buy our console to play your old games. Our exclusives are 2-3 years out. Our load times are 6 seconds longer that Sony's. We have an extra blade of grass at 800% zoom in mode.

they lose the price war, they are fucked.

judging by that 75% poll to sony They might already be fucked

What annoys me is Microsoft know damn well the absolute bottom line Sony could possibly do is $399 for the disc version with a decent loss. So why not go first at that price seeing as they are already prepared for it? All Sony can do then is match it and Microsoft get the satisfaction of having the balls to go first.
 
Last edited:

sircaw

Banned
What annoys me is Microsoft know damn well the absolute bottom line Sony could possibly do is $399 for the disc version with a decent loss. So why not go first at that price seeing as they are already prepared for it? All Sony can do then is match it and Microsoft get the satisfaction of having the balls to go first.

I think somewhere it's about loses. I really don't know how profitable Microsoft is with there gaming division. Is game pass making a loss, is it making them money? Is it making as much as they want it to make.

They have had some big loses of late, mixer comes to mind. How much did they have to pay those streamers of etc.

Microsoft might have billions but shareholders hate to see losses. Their console might cost a lot more to make than sony's i don't know. If they are already losing the console war, that they are not apparently in, it's not a good look bleeding out money too, in a war you can not win.


All right, it’s time to have this shit stuck in your head all day (also : *you’re)(Stick it where the sun don't Shine) :messenger_grinning:


Been watching Kobra Kai on netflix it's awesome.
 
Last edited:

FunkMiller

Gold Member
I think somewhere it's about loses. I really don't know how profitable Microsoft is with there gaming division. Is game pass making a loss, is it making them money? Is it making as much as they want it to make.

They have had some big loses of late, mixer comes to mind. How much did they have to pay those streamers of etc.

Microsoft might have billions but shareholders hate to see losses. Their console might cost a lot more to make than sony's i don't know. If they are already losing the console war, that they are not apparently in, it's not a good look bleeding out money too, in a war you can not win.

Yup. XBox division simply cannot just bung out the Series X at a big loss per console - not like Sony did with the Ps3. The XBox One was, by all relevant metrics, a failure. They don't have the finances or the standing within the larger Microsoft family to lose a ton of cash on this console as well.

That's why they haven't released a price for it yet. They know it's going to be expensive, but my guess is they're hoping the Ps5 will be equally, or more expensive. Not so sure they're right about that.

It's pretty damned obvious BOTH consoles are going to be bloody pricey though. If the Ps5 was 399 again, they'd be singing it from the rooftops by now, as would XBox. I think Sony are waiting for an event when they can announce new games to soften the blow a bit. I have no idea whether XBox has the same intention, or whether they're just terrified of the market response to an expensive console with no exclusive games anyone wants to play.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom