iPads aren’t cutting edge?
Just adjusting the thinking here. Portable consoles will never be a competitor to anchored consoles, but there’s no reason they can’t be cutting-edge in their own right, for the portable segment.
Not really cutting edge in the tablet world, is it...
They never really done that. nes,gb,ds,gcn,wii etc all capable for Nintendo’s needs but mostly old tech compared to Sony / MS. Bit like NASA always using proven tech.
But they make amazing games and experiences regardless of the tech, so who cares? Gameplay is king.
Nintendo focussing on portability and accessibility and Sony focussing on home consoles was very smart. Both are playing to their strengths.Nintendo learned decades ago they can't compete directly with Sony.
"Low price"?
You still have to pay $300 for those very outdated specs...
Nintendo has more money than Playstation and Xbox division combined.You know what it sounds like?
Wii: low cost, broad appeal, yay!
Wii U: let's allow success to get to our heads, power, price, fuck yeah bitches. Wii U and 3DS am now!
As per my post yesterday, this company is always just 1 step away from the pitts: https://www.neogaf.com/threads/bett...l-be-a-success.1333545/page-96#post-260145541
man, i would absolutely love to see a nintendo console competing for power over MS/Sony. I would eat that up so fast its not even funny.
As far as I know Jetson Nano is 0.5x Nintendo Switch and that can run easily on Battery pack for a long time. And that with all the extras which is sold with does not exceed 10W full load in my experience. My frist Ai device, did not last me long because for actual learning was slow as fuck, however for running models it was fine.You... you know that's one of nVidia's current big interest right? One of their reasons for buying ARM was their tegra line (along with AI). I mean, it's nVidia themselves making the claim, so a grain of salt, but the Tegra Xavier NX, an SBC the size of laptop RAM, supposedly can get 3TFs
Power is nice and all, but I'd give priority to different issues first, if you catch my drift.
Sounds like they're gonna pile on the giimmicks. I prefer when Nintendo is restrained by cost considerations but it looks like we'll be getting another glasses-free 3D experience or something like that.
Why would they change strategy so much?
Wii and Switch have been accepted by the market greatly.
Just pc master race with 120fps, ray tracing etc remains out of reach. That too not fully as many pc gamers enjoy some Nintendo stuff too.
They're not. Wii was a considerably different strategy aimed to be as affordable as possible. They've adapted that strategy over the years. Wii U was not cheap. Switch is not cheap. Wii heavily emphasized motion controls. Wii U heavily emphasized the gamepad. Switch has been about a very modern portable gaming package. If anything, pursuing better hardware using the latest technology should enable them to do even more with less TFLOPs while remaining power and (hopefully) cost efficient.
As far as I know Jetson Nano is 0.5x Nintendo Switch and that can run easily on Battery pack for a long time. And that with all the extras which is sold with does not exceed 10W full load in my experience. My frist Ai device, did not last me long because for actual learning was slow as fuck, however for running models it was fine.
N64 and GC were more powerful than Sony's systems in those eras.They never really done that. nes,gb,ds,gcn,wii etc all capable for Nintendo’s needs but mostly old tech compared to Sony / MS. Bit like NASA always using proven tech.
It's slightly smaller than RPi 3 type, by the looks of it, don't have ruller tho, I would say it's like 5mm less height. I don't have switch, but I would say without an issue. I don't have Xavier NX, but it looks pretty small, cooling however is the issue I would say.Is the Nano about the same size as the Switch's current motherboard? Seems like the miracle solution would be to get the Xavier NX (or whatever reasonable successor) down to a smaller size.
They could build a new dock that enhances performance in docked mode similar to the SegaCD type stuff that used to be done. Treat the base switch as the portable and find a way to increase power/graphical fidelity when in docked.
The Wii launched at $303 2017 dollars.
The Switch launched at $299 2017 dollars.
How was the Wii affordable and the Switch not?
Impossible to get excited when we all know Nintendo doesn't give their games million dollar budgets.
Remember when they had PS3/360 level hardware? This is what the Wii U launched with.
Far from being a looker, even back in 2012.
Now look at where the competition is today. The gap is still too big for them to catch up.
They aren't even sure the next console will be released before 2030...
Wii also had a pack-in game (value $50). What's the 2017 dollar price adjustment without $50 game?
They aren't even sure the next console will be released before 2030...
Fair enough - though I don't think Wii Sports was packed in everywhere.
We are in the beginning of the greatest economic depression ever.