The opposite is happening in the BoTW vs MGSV thread though.........Platform exclusive vs. huge 3rd party game, kinda expected. Glad it was close though.
On a forum with a more representative sampling of the gaming population, it never would've been so close.Well even though bloodborne lost it was a win in some ways. A multiplat game vs an exclusive niche type game, it gave w3 a run for its money.
My English is better than your sense of humor, no need to get upset.
Grammar nazi is in the building, I think you need to loosen up a little.Doubtful and I'm not upset. Looser is how you'd describe a slipped knot. Loser is how'd you describe someone who lost a competition.
Grammar nazi is in the building, I think you need to loosen up a little.
If you are going to call someone a loser, it's best to spell loser correctly so you don't look like a loser. And bless your heart, it looks like you are learning.
You taking it too seriously go work on your sense of humor instead of being a grammar police.
Bloodborne defeating less popular multiplatform games doesn't refute the argument that TW3 won because it's multiplat - TW3 is way more popular thatn DS3 or Sekiro. Same goes for the other argument.Looks like some people here are missing the point, these excuses about Witcher 3 winning because of it being Multi-Platform or because its for Casuals are simply coping mechanism, lets be honest, and i will give points as to why i think that.
1- The first point as for Witcher 3 being casual therefore it won is not true, because there are other games that are casual friendly and still Bloodborne won over them, like for example God of War, its a popular casual game and still lost by a good margin against Bloodborne, so that proves that its not about casuals. Same goes for Persona 5, its more popular and more casual friendly. Uncharted lost, The Last of Us lost, those are so called casual. Hell even RDR 2 lost to MGV 5. This whole point is debunked!
2- The second point is for Witcher 3 being on multiplatform, again its easily proved to be false by looking at the other games, Bloodborne defeated Dark Souls 3 and Sekiro, both are presented on multiplatform, God of War managed to take out Nier Automata which is popular and beloved and also multiplaform, Zelda and Bloodborne are doing well, more than games like RDR2 which are insanely popular and multiplatform, so clearly a game being multi is not a reason for it to win. Does it help? probably but its effect will be noticeable on a popular website, this is a niche forum and most users here are serious gamers, they will not hold on a single platform, they will buy more than one to try the best games available on each one.
Bloodborne was essentially the 3rd example of a Souls game. Millions and millions of people played both Dark Souls leading to nothing but an open reception of BB. More people knew what BB was before jumping into it. More people knew about Soulsborne games than anything about Witcher. Contrast that to Witcher 3. Witcher 2 came out on one console, the 360, at the end of it's lifecycle. Most people don't even know that. Witcher 3 is pretty much the first time most people were exposed to the character. The Witcher, a Polish character, from a novel written 35 years ago, only translated in the last 15 years. I'm gonna say something that might hurt your feelings, but TW3 won because it's a better game, not because it was a multiplat. There's nothing wrong with BB maybe winning 3rd place, so you can take solace in that if you are having trouble dealing with it not making the finals. No need to try and make an excuse.Bloodborne defeating less popular multiplatform games doesn't refute the argument that TW3 won because it's multiplat - TW3 is way more popular thatn DS3 or Sekiro. Same goes for the other argument.
Bloodborne was essentially the 3rd example of a Souls game. Millions and millions of people played both Dark Souls leading to nothing but an open reception of BB. More people knew what BB was before jumping into it. More people knew about Soulsborne games than anything about Witcher. Contrast that to Witcher 3. Witcher 2 came out on one console, the 360, at the end of it's lifecycle. Most people don't even know that. Witcher 3 is pretty much the first time most people were exposed to the character. The Witcher, a polish character, from a novel written 35 years ago, only translated in the last 15 years. I'm gonna say something that might hurt your feelings, but TW3 won because it's a better game, not because it was a multiplat. There's nothing wrong with BB maybe winning 3rd place, so you can take solace in that if you are having trouble dealing with it not making the finals. No need to try and make an excuse.
Absolutely right. It's all subjective. I just like seeing the Sony ponies get knocked down a peg. And it obviously hurt their feefees when an unknown Polish studio killed their favorite game for internet points.No need to believe this tournament can tell anyone what game is better than another, either.
Absolutely right. It's all subjective. I just like seeing the Sony ponies get knocked down a peg.
I think you are spot on. I think Witcher 3 would have beat any of the Souls games. But if it had beaten a Souls games proper than the Sony ponies wouldn't be able to hold onto the excuse of W3 being mulitplat and BB being only on Playstation, but it would have been interesting to see the excuses then.I still think it's weird associating Bloodborne's fandom with people being Sony Ponies. I wouldn't expect Dark Souls to do any worse in such a tournament.
You know, i think it's probably about right that MGSV is 4th best of the gen. I mean, the other three titles might be interchangeable with games outside the top 4 but 4th just seems like it belongs to MGSV on any poll. Coulda been first if konami didn't lose their damn minds~For the Bloodborne lovers, you still get to vote for it
Bloodborne was already eliminated by this "mediocre" gameI cant vote, but Bloodborne Is the BEST CHoICE!!! Witcher Is mediocre playable
On a forum with a more representative sampling population, a poll opposing Witcher 3 and Bloodborne would result with Fortnite winning xDOn a forum with a more representative sampling of the gaming population, it never would've been so close.
It being new to people has little to do with how much they're going to like the game, if anything Witcher 3 is much more inviting to players than Bloodborne.Bloodborne was essentially the 3rd example of a Souls game. Millions and millions of people played both Dark Souls leading to nothing but an open reception of BB. More people knew what BB was before jumping into it. More people knew about Soulsborne games than anything about Witcher. Contrast that to Witcher 3. Witcher 2 came out on one console, the 360, at the end of it's lifecycle. Most people don't even know that. Witcher 3 is pretty much the first time most people were exposed to the character. The Witcher, a Polish character, from a novel written 35 years ago, only translated in the last 15 years. I'm gonna say something that might hurt your feelings, but TW3 won because it's a better game, not because it was a multiplat. There's nothing wrong with BB maybe winning 3rd place, so you can take solace in that if you are having trouble dealing with it not making the finals. No need to try and make an excuse.