Heisenberg007
Gold Journalism
Everyone knows how Sony invests. They shared their PS5 tech for building the UE5 engine. In exchange, Epic sold them a certain % of ownership. This is how Sony has always operated.Not really for different reasons
1)for the 10 the time sony first party prefeer their own engine and mostly don't want use UE5 ..it only served sony to promote ps5 thanks to the demo. (which as confirmed by the engineer could run on a laptop with a 2080 and an SSD 870 Sam) also sony bought shares of epic for 250m during that period.
2) There is no question that having the same CU's the higher the frequency the higher the performance. But everyone knows that the benefits of parallelization are greater and scale better than Ghz. Not for nothing the biggest gpu producers do nothing but add more cu's. the same could be said with the CPU cores. I don't want to stay here to reiterate some theories that circulated at the launch of the consoles about why the ps5 had so few cu's that go against any evolution happened recently in the world of gpu. In a couple of years we'll know if it was cerny magic or some poor cheap sauce.
3) That game was developed to take advantage of the ps5 you should post other benchmark to be taken seriously and look a bit you will find that it doesn't go just as you say.
I have the responses for your other points, but first I'd wait for a credible link from you that proves an Epic engineer said that a laptop could run that demo.