• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

At this point how can anyone underestimate or deny Microsoft/Xbox?

MonarchJT

Banned
I'm not sure what there is to discuss here...so I'll pick up the thread on Halo Infinite.

I don't think any gaming studio envies the task handed to 343 with this game.

How does anyone make good on the scope of having a simultaneous launch on 3 platforms, targeting a high-frame rate as a competitive e-sports gameplay focused title, make it accessible to mid-tier PC's to capture the existing F2P market AND make it look like the showcase title of graphical fidelity of what to expect on the latest consoles.

You think you make good by at least prioritizing gameplay and frame rates. Promise F2P multiplayer and 120fps. Finally show it off to the public;-

"Craig looks shit"

Too ambitious with the scope Microsoft.
exactly
 

Hugare

Member
Thats a part of it, but it doesn't tell the whole story, the Switch is selling when the Wii U didn't because it offers something the competition simply can't do, console quality gaming on the go and on TV, its a tablet, but when it was released it was considered quite powerful for $300 and doesn't look cheap like other Nintendo hardware such as the GamePad.

Xbox is gonna have exclusive and the hardware to compete, but in years, Sony got the marketing advantage right now coming from the very successful PlayStation 4 with Naughty Dog games Spider Man and GoW, they have been advertising the Play Starion 5 nonstop while Microsoft had some missteps like Halo Infinite.

However, i would argue Xbox hasn't anywhere to go but UP, while PlayStation 5 could end a less successful platform than its predecessor. Still very early on this gen
It kinda does tell the whole story

Wii U failed for many reasons: stupid ass name that confused the public, for starters. Terrible hardware, lazy gimmick and etc.

Switch being portable is a huge attractive, but lets be real: (almost) no one bought a Switch for 3rd party support.

PS: I dont know if you have a Switch, but that thing feels and looks cheap as fuck. Its literally a tablet with 2 cheap plastic joycons attached.

Compare 1st party software sales with 3rd party. Every Nintendo release is a monster in terms of sales. Animal Crossing alone sold more than whole franchises during decades of releases.

If "good hardware" was enough to garantee success, PS2 wouldnt have dominated that generation against Game Cube and Xbox, ffs. Or Wii against PS3/360. Or SNES against Genesis, PS1 against N64 and so on.

Time and time again history proved us that GAMES are what dictated who wins or who loses.

You kinda proved my point by saying that Sony is riding the wave of good marketing received from well received exclusives.
 
Last edited:

Bankai

Member
I understand what you mean and I truly hope Xbox will get bigger and better, but so far it's all promises.

Don't get me wrong, BC is great & I love it, but I still have to what YEARS before I can play the next Fable, Elders Scrolls or Perfect Dark.
 

jhjfss

Member
false. 3 generation in one of this 3 sony ended the generation by losing money. Anyone who says ps3 won against x360 is a madman or a fanboy it is the money that counts for the companies not the consoles sold in india thanks to a software hack that allowed to play practically for free.

D5DwjRhUwAAs0yn.jpg:large


2007/2013 enjoy it, they had to wait half of the ps4 gen to recover the lost money
I like how people act like sony is noble and honorable for not spending money buying publishers - until you look at this chart. It becomes really obvious why sony sticks to small studio purchases.
 

MonarchJT

Banned
I understand what you mean and I truly hope Xbox will get bigger and better, but so far it's all promises.

Don't get me wrong, BC is great & I love it, but I still have to what YEARS before I can play the next Fable, Elders Scrolls or Perfect Dark.
and meanwhile you wait for those games you will have halo,next forza ..Hellblade2 , starfield ecc ecc the narrative is gonna change if one fo those game deliver
 
Last edited:

Bankai

Member
and meanwhile you wait for those games you will have halo,next forza ..Hellblade2 , starfield ecc ecc the narrative is gonna change if one fo those game deliver

I certainly hope so! Competition is great and I would love to get back to the 360 glorydays.
 
All I see is them focusing on you being able to play all games from the past consoles in slightly better resolution. I havent seen anything that screams "xbox only". There were plenty of AAA games in development for X1 that got canned or turned into turds instead of massive promises (crackdown 3). Id wait much longer before you make a statement like that because lets be real....they couldnt provide HALO for launch after throwing millions at the dev team. And thats like their number one franchise. Lets see how long it takes Bethesda to come out with games for Xbox only because the first few are confirmed multiplatform.
 

GeorgPrime

Banned
Hardware wise we all saw the direction they were going when they designed and came out with the Xbox Series X. That should have been the first sign that they were getting their sh*t together. Then you have game pass, the acquisitions, the XSX and the XSS. Hell look at the elite controllers and the Xbox wireless headphones (not my cup of tea) on the accessories side of things. You had to know that they were bringing it going forward. Some of you acting like they are dabbling in the video industry with no clear plan. This is not to knock Sony or Nintendo in any way.

Will still end up third place anyway
 
I've not looked at the sales figures but most people I know were buying FIFA, COD and AC etc. MS could have had that multiplatform user but screwed up before the gen even started with shit hardware and laughable marketing. They threw away all the X360 goodwill so even casuals wouldn't touch an Xbone. It's going to take some effort to turn that around even though the Series X is good so far.

I do though sometimes feel like I'm in the Emperor's new clothes tale where PS and sometimes Xbox exclusives are riding around in the nude while everyone claps and throws shit at EA, CDPR, Rockstar, Ubisoft etc.
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
All I see is them focusing on you being able to play all games from the past consoles in slightly better resolution. I havent seen anything that screams "xbox only". There were plenty of AAA games in development for X1 that got canned or turned into turds instead of massive promises (crackdown 3). Id wait much longer before you make a statement like that because lets be real....they couldnt provide HALO for launch after throwing millions at the dev team. And thats like their number one franchise. Lets see how long it takes Bethesda to come out with games for Xbox only because the first few are confirmed multiplatform.
Yeah, no they aren’t. 2 PS5 games are being released, but we’ll see what they do with Wolfenstein III and Starfield which could realistically be released within the next 18 months. I suspect they’ll be Xbox/PC/xCloud only.
 

Fredrik

Member
Nobody can feed their whole platform on their own, not even Sony or Nintendo, or MS with 23 1st party studios. One or even two GOTY contenders per year is great but still not enough. But what MS has done is successfully and quite sneakily get multi platform gamers like myself to use Xbox or PC as the everyday main platform.
 

kyussman

Member
Yea,they have made lots of great moves to make Xbox attractive to me after the last two gens being PlayStation only....now I just wait for the games to start rolling in,hopefully they will deliver.
 
MS launched GP without enough first party studios to actually support it, they've run it for almost 4 years now and the service is mostly filler games, when they actually start releasing 1st party games on a semi regular basis then we'll talk. They bought a bunch of small AA style studios who mostly only worked on xbox anyway, Playground which is a AAA quality studio that again only worked on xbox already anyway and now Bethesda who has some very hit and miss studios along with some tired IP to go along with starfield and ES6. I can see why people would doubt them and even after they finally start releasing games the prices are going to go up, they have to. MS has been in this for three gens and haven't learned their lesson yet, hopefully they do but I'm not really sold on a subscription model working out, especially when the majority of titles they are going to be releasing will be AA quality.
 

LMJ

Member
I can truly appreciate MS dedication to hardware and listening to their fans as far as software IO/OS etc is concerned. The XseX is a sexy piece of kit and I'll get one when I have the spare funds.

I can REALLY appreciate the legacy support that MS has dedicated themselves too (HINT HINT HINT Sony) From the BC support to the hardwired improvements MS has created my go to Box when it comes to past non exclusive 3rd party due to this!

That being said I STILL say the SeriesX/S should have been delayed, MS lost their cash cow in Halo and outside of The Medium they haven't really had anything that shows the power of this Juggernaut, over on Sony's side they just got Returnal and soon Ratchet and Clank, the point being while the machine itself is phenominal, if you don't have the games to show it off, then it's simply a great BC machine. yes I know about the patched titles and yes I am aware MS has secured some third party victories in Res/FPS

:pie_eyeroll:*Another One*:pie_eyeroll:

However I'm talking about REAL impressive titles that you stare at and go "yeah that wasn't possible last gen" I have no doubt that the new studios will bring them some seriously awesome games, but for now it seems like a waiting game, so while yes an enthusiast like me loves it for all the reasons above, I DO still think there is a reason to underestimate them/deny their greatness...

Prove me wrong MS

*Sega purchase in 4 days*
 
Last edited:

Clear

CliffyB's Cock Holster
Game Pass is just brilliant and makes sense on so many levels. but as the vast majority in this thread have pointed out, the issue is not the hardware or the services. is the AAA GOTY Game of the Generation New IPs games.

Like I said, its great for hardcore players, but a lot of casuals have just their game, be it Fortnight, or CoD, or whatever. Its all they want to play because its where their friends are.

I think it explains why GP actually works so well financially - simply put, as an offering it appeals most to those who'd be spending more than average anyway.

The problem is that Xbox's offerings are too core-gamer centric, they have over-corrected from the Mattrick-era.

Backwards compatibility as a top-line feature is a classic example of this. Its not much of a draw when casuals are already used to buying a new iteration of their favourite franchises every year!

Yes. new AAA GOTY-caliber titles that you can only get on Xbox will be a great help, but I think there are deeper issues in play here.
 

Fredrik

Member
That being said I STILL say the SeriesX/S should have been delayed
Agreed! It’s completely madness to launch a console without a single 1st party game available for over half a year. I mean Sony’s MLB is ahead of everything on metacritic that MS has published for Series consoles so far lol
 

Banjo64

cumsessed
Spider-Man MM and soon Ratchet and Clank a highly efficient Studio. 230M

Or overpaying for Bethesda. 7B💸
I mean it’s been said to death on here but InSomniac owned none of their IP. Whereas Microsoft not only bought the 6 development studios under Zenimax but also huge established IP like Doom, Quake, Rage, Wolfenstein, Prey, Dishonoured, The Evil Within, TeS online, Fallout and The Elder Scrolls. They also now own the id tech engine also.
 

Riky

$MSFT
Halo Infinite and Flight Simulator are both out this year and in scale and scope they destroy the competition, that's just the start.
I can only imagine what a huge roster of first party games will be available on Xbox by the end of this gen, it will be impossible to ignore Gamepass.
 
I mean it’s been said to death on here but InSomniac owned none of their IP. Whereas Microsoft not only bought the 6 development studios under Zenimax but also huge established IP like Doom, Quake, Rage, Wolfenstein, Prey, Dishonoured, The Evil Within, TeS online, Fallout and The Elder Scrolls. They also now own the id tech engine also.
When are the games for those IPs coming out?
 
Dafaq country are you from? Every big electronics shop has all consoles with areas dedicated to them and even shops where i do my grocerys habe Xbox and ps games next to the movies. And I'm not living in any big Metropol but in a border district of a medium sized city. When I look out my windows I see wheat fields m8.

Central EU knows very well about Xbox, I've even seen TV commercials for it.
Yeah, whe in Europe know about Xbox...but whe dont buy them like whe buy Playstation. XBox will not beat Playstation, they never ever have, and that will stay that way for the forseable future. Xbox will not beat Playstation in Europe.....
 
Last edited:

MistBreeze

Member
talk to me when we see a worthwhile game from microsoft

GamePass alone will not make a console sell

people buy nintindo for mario, donkey kong , smash, pokemon .... etc

Sony for gow , uncharted and last of us , spider man, horizon .... etc ( top AAA adventure games )

microsoft for what??? no killer app yet

and no services do not count
 

MistBreeze

Member
Its clear you didn't read my original post.

Let's iterate Insomniac: MM + R&C for 1st year of PS5. ( Also made the only interesting new IP Xbox had whole XBone gen) 230M

Bethesda: prob 2 PS5 timed exclusives coming out before anything Xbox? 😏

7B for mismanaged publisher💪

nintindo can buy more studios if they wish too

sony also

but

u can only manage to a certain capacity then it become a nightmare ,,, these studios take money for staff and management,, millions for projects...

23 studios to manage is hard

microsoft could not manage less than 10 studios these past years how can they manage 23 studios

u saw sony closed so many studios this past decade ... zipper ... evolution ... for example cause they only can manage so much

how many studios does nintindo have?

I bet they are the least of big 3 yet they always have the best first party output ... it all about mangment and efficiency not quantiy

Bethesda may help Microsoft but they are not what they used to be

why they sold themselves to microsoft ?

a successful publisher will never sell its studios
 
Last edited:

Banjo64

cumsessed
Its clear you didn't read my original post.

Let's iterate Insomniac: MM + R&C for 1st year of PS5. ( Also made the only interesting new IP Xbox had whole XBone gen) 230M

Bethesda: prob 2 PS5 timed exclusives coming out before anything Xbox? 😏

7B for mismanaged publisher💪
You fucking crank :messenger_tears_of_joy: InSomniac would have made a new Ratchet game and the Spider-Man DLC regardless of Sony purchasing them.

That’s just like, your opinion man. Sunset is a great game, but Ori reigns supreme.

Ori And The Will Of The Wisps Art GIF


Mismanaged my arse :messenger_tears_of_joy: they just accepted Sony’s money hatting on 2 games and are happy to honour those contracts. Zenimax recent output;

Doom 2016 87 Metacritic
Doom Eternal 88 Metacritic
Wolfenstein 2 88 Metacritic
Fallout 4 88 Metacritic
Prey 84 Metacritic
Dishonoured 2 88 Metacritic
 
Last edited:

sircaw

Banned
Games, games, games.

Sony has already been delivering this start of the generation, Microsoft as much as they have been spending still has not produced anything compelling for me.

It's great they have invested in buying those studios, I am a big fan of the fallout series, doom, dishonored, a possible quake? but how long till we get to see them, what will the quality of the games look like.

I joined the console generation very late as a gamer, only last generation, but oh boy did the ps4 deliver.

Returnal looks great, R+C to come, horizon zero dawn is meant to be this year? a new god of war probably next year.

Why would I want to change that, at present, all that Microsoft has showed is buzz and pr.

Gamepass is not for me, in fact, the way I game its much much cheaper for me to buy a year's sub with Ps plus than spend it on the game pass, and the quality is there, have you seen what games sony has been giving you month after month.

Maybe in 2-3 years, Microsoft will be a bit more compelling, perhaps I will have a look at what they offer, but they really have a long way to go to make me move from a world-class ecosystem like sony's.
 
Last edited:

Malcolm9

Member
They had stronger hardware with the One X but it made no difference. They've had Gamepass for years and it still didn't change a thing.

As for games, yes they still need to release better quality and consistency to be anywhere near Sony & Nintendo. Having all these studios means nothing if the games aren't that good/average.
 
Last edited:

MonarchJT

Banned
They had stronger hardware with the One X but it made no difference. They've had Gamepass for years and it still didn't change a thing.

As for games, yes they still need to release better quality and consistency to be anywhere near Sony & Nintendo. Having almost these studios means nothing if the games aren't that good/average.
i dont understand what should change? they having consoles constantly sold out and a user exploding service.....surely they will not convince hardcore loyal fanboys to leave sony but mass market is a different beast
 
Top Bottom