I think they just didn't want to have people focus on comparing the two too much and missing the whole package which is why they showed off multiplayer more. They're saying "see it does look better and here is an aspect you haven't seen before".I have to agree. A lot of people are drawing their own conclusions that not showing the campaign at E3 means that it will be terrible. I tend to think that it just wasn't ready (and they will show it soon) or that they simply wanted to focus on the multiplayer. I'm not of the opinion that it's a disaster and that 343 are afraid to show the finished product.
Can,'t really say the difference on my mobile phone. Up or downgrade?
I see a downgrade
Looks better, but the baseline is so low.The fact that they brushed over the single player aspect and only showed a vista that looked in no real way an improvement over last year makes me think this game won't be getting the visual upgrade many people might be expecting.
yeah now go to sleep warrior ahahahIt looks the same, but just under two different lighting conditions.
It's not really a meaningful comparison.
Yeah, sure, that’s exactly what they did. They delayed it for a year, sat on their collective arses, sucked their thumbs, and spun around on their spinny chairs.So they delayed it for a year for nothing?
May as well have let the Halo fans have this game as a Series X launch title.
As per Joe Staten the game was already "content complete" and he played through the whole campaign when he joined(around August 2020). If nothing changed until now, then they have literally sat in their chair for more than a year.Yeah, sure, that’s exactly what they did. They delayed it for a year, sat on their collective arses, sucked their thumbs, and spun around on their spinny chairs.
Behave yourself.
Yeah, sure, that’s exactly what they did. They delayed it for a year, sat on their collective arses, sucked their thumbs, and spun around on their spinny chairs.
Behave yourself.
I see a downgrade
I think it's odd they're all hardcore Sony fansThose saying it looks the same are full of shit or blind. Huge improvement.
Not odd at all. Predictable yes but not oddI think it's odd they're all hardcore Sony fans
I see a downgrade
Cheer up? Oh, I am. MP looks sick. The best part is I don't have to pay $70 for it.
It does look pretty sick. My jab was in jest. I'm hoping to come back to Halo with infinite. As I was a huge fan in the Bungie days. Played it religiously.Cheer up? Oh, I am. MP looks sick. The best part is I don't have to pay $70 for it.
I have noticed I see you in every single xbox thread trying to derail.Hey I'm just looking at the screens in the OP.
I can't even tell which is supposed to be before and which is supposed to be after.
So yes, they may as well have put the game in the hands of fans, even Phil buried this by putting it in the middle of their E3 show - sandwiched in between a plethora of games that not only looked better but showed a lot more promise.
I have noticed I see you in every single xbox thread trying to derail.
Do you honestly have nothing better to do with your time?
It's really quite sad.
Focus on the things you enjoy, you'll be a lot happier, as you just come across as really bitter.
You speak the truth.
Also, I preferred the original suit... The rest seems like a few tweaks.
I don't see what some people see to it, my guess is that they see what they hope it would be.
Right it’s just People just love to shit on Microsoft, the game is looking good. People just assume the campaign is gonna have mind blowing graphics when no open world game has that. The multiplayer looks too amazing.Yeah, sure, that’s exactly what they did. They delayed it for a year, sat on their collective arses, sucked their thumbs, and spun around on their spinny chairs.
Behave yourself.
I hope I can wear the non junk version of chief's armour. The clean and new model looked great to me.
Actually, it'd be awesome to find weapons with different levels of wear. Although probably too expensive for the gain.
Well, it's better than before. I imagine it will take seeing the actual campaign game to be really impressed.
I don't do it often but I 100% agree with you.The next time people tell you to "stop nitpicking" or "stop worrying about graphics" or "it's fine dude," send them to this thread.
Always SPEAK up and demand better. The internet did Microsoft a service last summer
don't campaigns typically look better than mplayer versions anyways. mplayer already look good imo so it should only be better.I have to agree. A lot of people are drawing their own conclusions that not showing the campaign at E3 means that it will be terrible. I tend to think that it just wasn't ready (and they will show it soon) or that they simply wanted to focus on the multiplayer. I'm not of the opinion that it's a disaster and that 343 are afraid to show the finished product.
Almost always. What is interesting is that some were deciding how good the game will be based on graphics alone. It's like the story is a complete afterthought.don't campaigns typically look better than mplayer versions anyways. mplayer already look good imo so it should only be better.
I was under impression that the new dirty suit was some batman arkham style armor degradation (especially considering the new story lead is from the arkham shit) that we'd see across the campaign, but im pretty sure that clip was near the start of the game so it must be a redesign.Original suit looked fantastic, but was way too clean and perfect for someone who was just literally left for a dead in a floating field of space debris.
Honestly this is the what they should have showed us last yr