Yes but Sony clearly didn't spend effort on optimizing this game for PC, or perhaps Naughty Dog is too noob at game development outside of Playstation. Compare TLOU to Doom and it's night and day, even Cyberpunk ran better performance wise than this on PC.
Well that is true PC can do that the question is will devs code their games to run leverage that much ram. The solution has already been devised though it's called Direct Storage.
Where did you get this data?
In the official Steam survey page, most recent data from Febuary 2023.
Most popular GPU is the 1650, 16Gb of RAM, and CPU from 2.3ghz to 2.7ghz.
the Last of us, PS1 edition!
Should be saying "Building shaders" on bottom right of the screen.
I'm actuallu surprised how 'clean' it looked though for 240p, apart from the kids hair. FSR is some crazy shit lol.the Last of us, PS1 edition!
Yep, I will wait 6 months to a year now days after Cyberpunk fiasco.
Ghost of Tsushima.
They’re just honoring Ezekiel.
I imagine the demands are higher because they are using some middle software to convert from Sonys sdk calls to directx or Vulcan. If that’s what they are doing it could add quite a bit of overhead.Currently sitting at 40% on Steam user reviews, ouch!
Among the most commonly cited problems are: Frequent crashes, jittery camera movement with the mouse, excessive VRAM usage, and overall poor performance with high-end hardware.
Apparently, Naughty Dog has handled this one in-house but I wonder how much they were involved given that the system requirements page has Iron Galaxy's logo on it. Iron Galaxy's Uncharted 4 PC port was alright, not great but passable with the only issues being the jittery mouse movements...and extreme demands compared to the PS5 version.
You don’t have a clue what you are talking about. I suggest you either educate yourself or quit spouting nonsense.
good. hopefully Sony cancels future PC ports.
lol what? dude they released two games in one year last year. Spiderman and Miles.
Yeah, that's brutal. I can't imagine the PS5 using anything less than the High preset so this would put it on the level of a 6800. That's even worse than with Uncharted 4 where it was on the level of a 2080 Ti/3070.Native 4k results. Ouch at 2080 which is supposedly on par with the PS5. These are ultra settings though, the PS5 might be using high. we dont know.
Whats interesting is the 2080 Ti vs 3070 comparisons. Cards offer identical performance but 3070 is only 8 GB VRAM vs 11 GB for the 2080 Ti. Over 25% more performance for just an extra 3 GB.
1440p results are poor for the 10.7 tflops 6600xt. Again, we dont know if the PS5 is using high or ultra, but I doubt going from ultra to high is going to more than double the framerate for that card. You basically need a 20 tflops 6800 xt to get to PS5 performance. I will try and get a benchmark for the delta between high and ultra settings and see if it is really 2x.
Oh really. Sounds like you need more proof. This is serious shit only.
Just checked. There is a lot of weirdness going on if you switch from high to ultra and back without leaving the game. Sometimes, the framerates would remain the same when switching from high to ultra. sometimes, they would drop way below 30 fps for a good minute or two before coming back up and settling around 40 fps on ultra. One time, high went from 45 fps all the way down to 32 fps without any stutter. im like i didnt change anything! i was just moving around the level.
Maybe what it's unoptimized is the PC hardware compared to PS5, and since it has a worse I/O system to stream data to VRAM needs more on PC for games that take advantage of it.
What are you talking about? They already had two ported games released In slightly more than a year after being acquired.
It isn't. And the I/O of any PC also isn't on par with a PS5. In games that take full advantage of the PS5 hardware (I have no idea if it's the case, I assume not) you'll require way higher specs to play with the same settings and performance. And even more to play in Ultra with 4K and a decent framerate.
