I saw Aliens when I was quite young, but I can't remember much of it.
I don't know how I've let the series pass me by, I've always meant to watch them all but I've just never got around to it. Too many films! This is the perfect excuse to grab the Blu Rays though I think
DerZuhälter;33674547 said:Much better question is:
If it is indeed the space jockeys head.... how did it get back on it's neck in Alien?
Unless it's not the same head..
2014 Blade Runner sequel/remake/prequel update
So....2015 for Blade Runner prequel/sequel/reboot/whatever?
OK, we need to stop this nonsense right now.
Blade Runner was based on a short story that had a clearly defined ending and character arc. Not enough material to demand a sequel IMO. Perfect as is.
...By short story you mean Philip K Dick novel? And DADOES shares almost nothing with Blade Runner narratively.
OK, we need to stop this nonsense right now.
Blade Runner was based on a short story that had a clearly defined ending and character arc. Not enough material to demand a sequel IMO. Perfect as is.
Like I said, this has a whole lot more behind it, but I do feel there is a slight similarity between the two. Its completely unintentional (the idea of Scott aping Boyle is lolz-worthy) of course, but I do see it.
Someone actually wrote a sequel book to Blade Runner in 1995. No idea if it's any good.
...By short story you mean Philip K Dick novel? And DADOES shares almost nothing with Blade Runner narratively.
KW Jeter wrote three sequels actually. And they are supposed to be a continuation of both the book and film.
But it seems clear Scott's BR sequel would be like Prometheus, same universe but with minor connections between films
Nice trailer, but damnit that Inception foghorn thing needs to stop.
OK, we need to stop this nonsense right now.
Blade Runner was based on a short story that had a clearly defined ending and character arc. Not enough material to demand a sequel IMO. Perfect as is.
Yes. And by almost nothing you mean the entire premise of a detective hunting down rogue androids? Or are we talking specifics like how long and drawn out the final showdown between Deckard and Roy was?
KW Jeter wrote three sequels actually. And they are supposed to be a continuation of both the book and film.
Still sounding like you haven't read it.
They are complete shit. It turns out everything was "a reality TV show" or whatever.
I'm not terribly confident in an author who has written 3 sequels to a movie (that have not been considered for production), 3 Star Wars books and 2 Star Trek: Deep Space 9 books.
Just looked up KW Jeter. The first sequel appears to have been poorly received, and there is no review info for the other two (as per wikipedia).
I'm not terribly confident in an author who has written 3 sequels to a movie (that have not been considered for production), 3 Star Wars books and 2 Star Trek: Deep Space 9 books.
OK, we need to stop this nonsense right now.
I read it, several years ago. Would you care to answer my question, please?
Its happening. Deal with it.
Ridley gonna finish his career on top yo
IT'S END
Generally when I read a novel I know I've read a novel and not a short story. Just me, maybe.
Nothing you've said makes any sense from the perspective of someone who has read the book and watched the film.
They ran out of material? So you're saying the novel, which focuses heavily on new age religion synesthesia and the associated social pressures of raising expensive animals on rooftops, and where the android hunt plays out totally differently and mostly just shares some character names, has been thoroughly examined by the film?
So you're saying you haven't read the book, then.
I really hope Scott is alive for another 20 or 30 years to make the A Good Year prequel
Generally when I read a novel I know I've read a novel and not a short story. Just me, maybe.
Nothing you've said makes any sense from the perspective of someone who has read the book and watched the film.
They ran out of material? So you're saying the novel, which focuses heavily on new age religion synesthesia and the associated social pressures of raising expensive animals on rooftops, and where the android hunt plays out totally differently and mostly just shares some character names, has been thoroughly examined by the film?
So you're saying you haven't read the book, then.
Regardless, I don't think a sequel should be made because nerds are raging for it on the internet.
I really hope Scott is alive for another 20 or 30 years to make the A Good Year prequel
Holy shit.
Regardless, I don't think a sequel should be made because nerds are raging for it on the internet.
Has the HD version been posted? Didn't see it in the OP.
Found a 720p version on Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sftuxbvGwiU&feature=player_embedded
It's being made because Ridley and WB want to do it. Internet nerds have no say in the matter.
Haven't watched the trailer yet but I agree with your sentiment. The art of framing a shot well and just leaving it there seems lost on a lot of modern directors. Hate it.What I really like in this trailer is the camera work. Or rather, the lack of camera movement (except at the end with things crashing down).
There are scenes were the camera just stands there even though someone is getting sucked out into space. THAT is how it should be. It really puts emphasis on them being by themselves, and of being mere little insects in the grand scheme of things.
I hope it's mostly like this, rather than someone running with a camera or shaking it every time something dramatic happens.
It's the right way to handle the camera in an alien movie: make it feel like you can only watch and not intervene. Like they are alone, separate from you, and there is nothing you can do about it.