• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

Epic: "I think the console guys are going to blow us all away"

gatti-man

Member
The hardware with the best hard specifications isn't going to win the next generation.

The winning platform will be the one figures out why Apple's app store became so popular and Xbox live arcade failed in comparison.

It doesn't matter how great the hardware is. If titles fail to sell on the platform, developers will jump ship very quickly.

Bc the apple app store is super cheap and ms's live marketplace is expensive? Boom what do I win?
 

2San

Member
He did said shelling money for gaming consoles.

BTW, the Epic folks do sound desperate to make sure the next-gen consoles will be cutting edge. What gives?
It's pretty much their business to make cutting edge easier to program for. They need a market where the cutting edge is wanted. Either way, I think it's a noble cause no matter the motivation.
 
Absolutely, the capability of the consoles determines how a PC game is going to look/be in most instances. You have rare PC exclusives, but few and far between.

If you look closely, being at the end of this generation, really the only differences between console -> PC games is resolution and AA.

If you count all the F2P online games I'd say a new exclusive comes out every few seconds for the pc. Not huge AAA titles but neither are console exclusives at this point.
 

Oddduck

Member
PS3 didn't even start selling decently until the price drop to $300-$400 dollars.

When it was $500-$600, the thing was piling up in stores and stores didn't know what to do with all of them cause no one was buying them.

PS3's price drop is what saved it from failure. If that console had stayed any longer at $500-$600, it would have been a disaster for sales.
 

Lothars

Member
I'm with you I'm with you. I dont think the $600 barrier to entry is quite what it was when the ps3 came out. When it did consoles were still just game machines and nothing more.

I think with the advent of Richy Rich Newell's Steam popularity more people are considering pcs. With Apple products, other smartphones and the rise in poc gaming use I wouldnt want to be in charge of marketing the next wave of consoles. Scary horizon for those guys.
I don't think it is because there will always be a market for consoles, If the consoles come out with games people want it won't matter at all.

Apple Products, smartphones and tablets are not the competitor to console gaming that some want to believe it is, PC's are more of a competitor but even than I think they will coexist.

Bc the apple app store is super cheap and ms's live marketplace is expensive? Boom what do I win?
It's not going to be super cheap forever eventually pricing is going to have to even out but yes it's part of the reason, Pricing has alot to do with it.
 

Panajev2001a

GAF's Pleasant Genius
Very interesting

Yes, indeed. I think that experienced game developers can help console developers to push for powerful hardware while having the necessary pragmatic approach needed not to over-engineer it too much. I think that PS Move and PS Vita are two products that came out so well thanks to HW and SW guys working closely together.
 
These are the guys who cost Microsoft a billion dollars with their RAM request, and that turned out vital for the 360. They probably have more clout at Redmond than anyone else when it comes to hardware
 

Sciz

Member
The console gaming experience is about delivering something that's way out past the bleeding edge and subsidising it through the software royalty model - just like Apple does with the phones.

the hell

Apple makes their money by selling hardware at a profit. The two business models couldn't be less alike.

Vic said:
BTW, the Epic folks do sound desperate to make sure the next-gen consoles will be cutting edge. What gives?

They're banking on next gen hardware being far enough ahead that they're the only kid on the block that can take advantage of it out of the gate, the way they were with UE3 this gen. If it's weak enough that competing engines from this gen can still get competitive results, they don't get to enjoy a multi-year stranglehold on the engine licensing market while everyone else scrambles to catch up.
 

SapientWolf

Trucker Sexologist
He did said shelling money for gaming consoles.

BTW, the Epic folks do sound desperate to make sure the next-gen consoles will be cutting edge. What gives?
They're trying to get as close as they possibly can to movie CG quality graphics.
 

antonz

Member
He's dead on, consoles have to be bleeding edge tech otherwise it will be blown away by smartphones in a few years


Most people don't understand that the rate of tech growth for phones and tablets is only to grow

This is entirely false. Cell Phone Tech has advanced as fast as it has because its catching up to where everything else is. Its not going to magically leap frog everyone and suddenly find PCs etc in the past.

That said I don't think its even logical to try and compare Apple products to PCs,Consoles etc.

Apple has people by the balls and has convinced them you need to upgrade every year while the other spaces are designed around multi year investments.
 

Cipherr

Member
At the pace mobile tech is moving. And the start of what appears to be longer console generations to help with rising development costs and whatnot, no matter what the next gen ships with, Ill be seeing similar or better performance from my tablet a few years in more than likely.

Luckily of course, horsepower isn't the one and only metric and method that will determine the success/failure of the next generation of consoles.

They're banking on next gen hardware being far enough ahead that they're the only kid on the block that can take advantage of it out of the gate, the way they were with UE3 this gen. If it's weak enough that competing engines from this gen can still get competitive results, they don't get to enjoy a multi-year stranglehold on the engine licensing market while everyone else scrambles to catch up.

This might be a biiiit extreme, but overall it is correct. UE is a big part of their DNA, they are going to say stuff like this.
 
PS3 didn't even start selling until the price drop to $300-$400 dollars.

When it was $500-$600, the thing was piling up in stores and stores didn't know what to do with all of them cause no one was buying them.

PS3's price drop is what saved it from failure. If that console had stayed any longer at $500-$600, it would have been a disaster for sales.

I'm not saying this is untrue, but a lot of those early pictures were just fanboy horseshit taken to stir up thread wars. I was young, I took part.
 

Bad7667

Member
Doesn't matter how powerful PC's are. Consoles and handhelds will not die as long as exclusives are made for consoles and handhelds.

The fanbases of those exclusive franchises will always buy those consoles/handhelds to play the next installment of a popular series that they can't play on PC.

PC's have their exclusives too. MMO's, RTS's and some Indie games that can't get on the consoles.
 
I don't think it is because there will always be a market for consoles, If the consoles come out with games people want it won't matter at all.

I think its a scary horizon because developers usually follow the money and if there is less money and more risk in console development they wont make those games with the same frequency they do now.
 

RSTEIN

Comics, serious business!
Mark is a bit off with his comparison of the traditional console business model and Apple's iPhone business model. Apple makes a huge gross margin on the hardware. The amount they make from software is peanuts in comparison. Microsoft and Sony make nothing on hardware. The higher the specs, the higher the pain they feel at the beginning of the generation as they aim to keep the console retail price below $499. Apple can put relatively monstrous specs in its iPhones and iPads and still coin it.
 

Htown

STOP SHITTING ON MY MOTHER'S HEADSTONE
Company that specializes in selling game engines says that you have to have to be on the bleeding edge of technology to succeed.

SHOCKING.
 
This is entirely false. Cell Phone Tech has advanced as fast as it has because its catching up to where everything else is. Its not going to magically leap frog everyone and suddenly find PCs etc in the past.

That said I don't think its even logical to try and compare Apple products to PCs,Consoles etc.

Apple has people by the balls and has convinced them you need to upgrade every year while the other spaces are designed around multi year investments.

Mobile chips have the advantage of massive volume, economies of scale, and open competition on a scale well beyond the console or PC space. That's key to understanding mobile's rise and future. They aren't "catching up" either. They are different architectures achieving performance at much lower power consumption.
 

stuminus3

Member
BTW, the Epic folks do sound desperate to make sure the next-gen consoles will be cutting edge. What gives?
It's their business, their bread and butter. It's in their best interests that everyone is hungry for high-end tech. I suspect behind the scenes that their adventures in iOS haven't quite panned out like they'd hoped - we're not living in a high end Unreal powered iOS gaming heaven, regardless of how many pixels our iPads have, and we likely never will be.

Time and time again, everyone forgets that software is king.
 

HylianTom

Banned
Maybe, but you have to find the right balance between bleeding edge technology and profitability.

Much of NeoGAF's Reponse to this:
tumblr_lgy6qhye0S1qasgpw.gif


It's as though no one has learned. It's called the "bleeding edge" for a reason.

Incredible.
 
Epic loves bleeding edge hardware... so where is my big Epic Games Vita exclusive, huh Epic!? They love iPad gaming and seem to be big on mobile stuff, but they ignore the Vita, at least right now.

I think you'll see consoles will be powerful, but technology is moving so fast and companies like Apple iterate every year on their products that even if they build extremely powerful machines, they will be out powered in a few months after release anyway.

I appreciate Epic Games intention and I hope it is very successful though, because I want game to continue to evolve in every aspect.
 

Jb

Member
I find it extremely impressive to see how well Epic managed to position themselves as a premier studio on both consoles and iOS. The amount of cash they must have been generating over the past 5 years or so must be pretty comfortable.
 

obonicus

Member
Not that I think Rein is wrong or lying, but we should probably highlight who exactly is saying something, as opposed to 'Epic'. Big difference between when Rein says something, or when Capps/Sweeney say something. For one, Rein talks a lot more.
 

gatti-man

Member
At the pace mobile tech is moving. And the start of what appears to be longer console generations to help with rising development costs and whatnot, no matter what the next gen ships with, Ill be seeing similar or better performance from my tablet a few years in more than likely.

Luckily of course, horsepower isn't the one and only metric and method that will determine the success/failure of the next generation of consoles.



This might be a biiiit extreme, but overall it is correct. UE is a big part of their DNA, they are going to say stuff like this.

Lol enjoy your on rails slashing games and HD ports of old titles. I have an ipad2 and love IB and the ports but an ipad doesn't and wont hold a candle to next Gen or current Gen.
 
delivering something that's way out past the bleeding edge and subsidising it through the software royalty model - just like Apple does with the phones.
Uhhh. Pretty sure Apple subsidises things by selling them for a lot of money.
Ken Masters said:
He's dead on, consoles have to be bleeding edge tech otherwise it will be blown away by smartphones in a few years
There's no preventing it. The difference between something that's GREAT today and EVEN MORE GREAT today would just delay it by a few months.
 

FLEABttn

Banned
Because it worked so well this gen...

It worked well other generations. The problem with this generation was the amount of money per console that they tried to subsidize at particularly high console prices. A $900 BOM console at a $600 price was stupid. A $500 BOM console at $350 - $400 isn't.
 

BadData

Member
I still dont follow how Apple is goig to "pass them". with what an ipad ? really??how does the gpu in the ipad compare to next gen consoles???not following.

The new iPad is more powerful than an Xbox360 or a Playstation 3. It's more powerful than a Vita, has a bigger screen, and more than triple the battery life. They also come out with a new one every year, instead of in huge 7 year cycles.
 

THE:MILKMAN

Member
What does Epic mean by "Bleeding Edge"?

Bleeding edge today would be a 4-8 core 3.5-4.0Ghz CPU with a GK110 Kepler/AMD HD7900 GPU and 8GB of RAM.

That is just not happening IMO.

Microsoft doesn't seem to need or be targeting the bleeding edge with their focus on Kinect and Sony just can't afford to go bleeding edge. (As mentioned multiple times: Look at Vita's HW)

Maybe one or both will surprise us but I really doubt it at this point.
 

Lothars

Member
The new iPad is more powerful than an Xbox360 or a Playstation 3. It's more powerful than a Vita, has a bigger screen, and more than triple the battery life. They also come out with a new one every year, instead of in huge 7 year cycles.
The thing your not getting is it's finally coming to terms with technology from 7 years ago, Apple is not going to bypass the next gen systems soon and it will hit a point where it will plateau because not all technology has caught up to the same point.
 

gatti-man

Member
The new iPad is more powerful than an Xbox360 or a Playstation 3. It's more powerful than a Vita, has a bigger screen, and more than triple the battery life. They also come out with a new one every year, instead of in huge 7 year cycles.

It costs double the vita, has no controller and almost no console quality games. I think people who suggest the ipad competes directly with consoles don't understand both markets.
 

DarkChild

Banned
The new iPad is more powerful than an Xbox360 or a Playstation 3. It's more powerful than a Vita, has a bigger screen, and more than triple the battery life. They also come out with a new one every year, instead of in huge 7 year cycles.
In what sense is more powerful? Like...more ram? Sure, even Iphone 4 has as much as ram as consoles. Processing power? Absolutely not.
 

stuminus3

Member
The new iPad is more powerful than an Xbox360 or a Playstation 3. It's more powerful than a Vita, has a bigger screen, and more than triple the battery life. They also come out with a new one every year, instead of in huge 7 year cycles.
My PC is still more powerful than the iPad 3, cost less two years ago than what an iPad 2 costs now (so what you could buy for PC now with the same money would blow my PC out of the water), and we all know how that 'high end' market panned out. People aren't buying iPads because of awesome looking videogames. iOS devices are amazing technology, but they are not the be-all and end-all of videogames just because they're powerful. Source: history.
 
The new iPad is more powerful than an Xbox360 or a Playstation 3. It's more powerful than a Vita, has a bigger screen, and more than triple the battery life. They also come out with a new one every year, instead of in huge 7 year cycles.

This is the very definition of brainwashed. Dear God.
 
Absolutely, the capability of the consoles determines how a PC game is going to look/be in most instances. You have rare PC exclusives, but few and far between.

If you look closely, being at the end of this generation, really the only differences between console -> PC games is resolution and AA.

And constant 60+ fps compared to sometimes even 30 ;)
 
Top Bottom