Refreshment.01
Member
You are not seeing people grilling AgentOtaku, even suggesting him how the thread should be named? Anyway, its a trivial thing to argue, so leave it at that please.I read the whole thread and never once saw a call for these complaints to be silenced.
This is incredible, so complains for a significant part of your user base should be ignored? There are issues with the control set up, some of them related to ergonomics which impelled Nintendo to even include a stand. Like i said before, i didn't claim the controls are broken however there are some quirks to them.So now "facts" are based on how many people claim something? You could say it is a fact that many people have an issue with the controls, but you can't say it's a fact that the controls are an issue. At best it's a widespread subjective opinion.
Anyway i shouldn't be surprised, i had arguments with people defending Nintendo decision to not include the second pad with as much passion as some of you have to defend this game for not having any quirks in its control set up.
Just love how you dismissed my reply and chose to focus in the review angle solely, the old spin around in circles tactic. Your question has been addressed in the very post to which you are replying, my only advice is to get back and ponder about it. And check this one:How many reviews does it take to make something factual?
Start grilling him nowThe inclusion of a stand with every copy is a pretty bloody big red flag though.
Anyway, it's your ego or appreciation to the game hurt by admitting there can be some issues with the control method? How are these not real, when you are witnessing more frequent complains regarding controls than usual?