frankie_baby
Member
I don't view it like that GhostTrick, in fact it might not look like it but im being very pragmatic. This is not a small DS screen or even a smart phone one. Since the screen is quite big less, precision is required so finger operation becomes more practical. So probably accuracy issues are not so critical now, hell we can argue that in the world of console gaming accuracy had take a back sit to convenience and general feel of the experience. With what i do agree with is that for precision drawing resistive is superior. But on the other hand potential uses for multi touch for what i can see outweigh this. And anybody is yet to provide me with very compelling cases in which resistive ends up being far superior.
Not to offend but that's a bit short sighted. For example, there could be multiple contexts in one game. In one the traditional controls make sense and in the other multi touch input.
Btw, Krev has done a really good job addressing your concerns.
Buy one with a bigger screen cheap ass
You haven't done any meaningful counter arguments either... oh wait does calling the post silly counts?
Bold part is your fabrication since that's not my line of thinking.
Good post absm. It's not just that they are building these suits, they had them for years already. So this speaks more about costs than what coul potentially open new possibilities.
Remember the screen dimension is substantial. For those types of game Nintendo could have explored other alternatives, maybe? A Draw Pad bundled with a suit of games for this. They were super successful selling a very expensive peripheral like the balance board.
Sound point and a genuine reason for concern. But you can't compare the output of devs making cheap ass shovel ware for apps stores with the kind of polish out of a developer like Nintendo.
I agree with this and it's something people should consider. Regarding the bold part, it's a chicken and egg thing. Of course Nintendo will design a lot of software centered in stylus use since it takes advantage of the screens features.
But anyway ill fold back to an old argument of mine. Why have the same exact type of interaction with a touch screen that other of their very own products have given the user for years? Also orienting the subscreen for finger use makes a lot more sense since after all we will be operating a more traditional control pad.
Why didn't you call Eatchildren post silly? X¬) Hehehe....
Oi, the screen my phone is huge, I've got a galaxy nexus