GarthVaderUK
Banned
I think it is better to trust thuway then Proelite.....
Didn't one of them say they talk with each other about this stuff?
I think it is better to trust thuway then Proelite.....
Possible Prince of Persia, as well?
That was supposed to be DX11, right?
Didn't one of them say they talk with each other about this stuff?
It isn't...
A 7970m is a downclocked 7870.
If orbis gpu had all 20 CUs it would be a downclocked 7970m (so a downclocked downclocked 7870).
But it isn't that either, it has only 14 CU's for rendering out of those 20, and 4 for GPGPU stuff like physics).
So no, it isn't a downclocked 7870, much closer to a 7770 more likely.
I think it is better to trust thuway then Proelite.....
Those CUs aren't going to be sitting idle, so whatever work they do is saved from the CPU and GPU. If Durango is processing physics on CPU, Orbis will have better physics, and if Durango is processing physics on GPGPU for 3 ms, Orbis will save that time and spend 9 ms using the physics leaving 3 ms bonus for the graphics.
In simple terms, Sony has selected more compute resources and they will come into effect, so the difference will be there in some manner. The specifics of what the 4 CUs do will help under the system. I'm certainly curious how it relates to PC, as it seems a concept that could only be pulled off in a console and may be quite valuable. GPGPU augmentations, especially when audio and video is being taken care of by custom silicon, could mean quite a lot of versatile computer resources for non-direct-graphics work. Maybe light propagation systems, AI sorting, or whatever.
Just to add on Shifty's post, Even if you have "only" 14 CUs available for rendering, these 4 CUs doing their job will still have to "fit" somewhere in Durango.
I think this situation is even worse than the one before for MS since Sony would practically make devs push extra compute in any direction they want and they would still have more shading performance than MS in that case. Not to talk about ROPs, texture units etc. I doubt Durango matches it there anyway.
Dat price is right tactic$401
I have a pretty good feeling were looking at $400 - $450. I don't think were going to see $500
To me, that's way too high in a shrinking industry. We'll see what happens, though.
There is a new Prince of Persia???
It isn't...
A 7970m is a downclocked 7870.
If orbis gpu had all 20 CUs it would be a downclocked 7970m (so a downclocked downclocked 7870).
But it isn't that either, it has only 14 CU's for rendering out of those 20, and 4 for GPGPU stuff like physics).
So no, it isn't a downclocked 7870, much closer to a 7770 more likely.
Wrong, you forgot the 7850 ..It isn't...
A 7970m is a downclocked 7870.
If orbis gpu had all 20 CUs it would be a downclocked 7970m (so a downclocked downclocked 7870).
But it isn't that either, it has only 14 CU's for rendering out of those 20, and 4 for GPGPU stuff like physics).
So no, it isn't a downclocked 7870, much closer to a 7770 more likely.
Shifty Geezer from B3D:
and Ruskie:
there you have it.
Sooo...what's the best estimate on when we will actually see this thing?
There is a new Prince of Persia???
Is it? I am sorry if that is the case then. I always thought Thuway was providing more insights than Proelite regarding both consoles.
But will we see a return of Skyrim and Bayonetta levels of bad port jobs?
You can't compare these machines on paper. Durango better have something to assist with GPU, or else it just got much weaker in comparison.
And doesn't Durango have a rumored 7770 as well? It will be interesting to see what the officially announced specs for both machines will be, but the rumors really are making both these machines sound like carbon copy clones of each other.
We've said this over and over and over again. Orbis and Durango will be good at different thing. Don't be foolish to think one is better than the other in all frames of work. However, this news about CU is something that makes Orbis EVEN better. People are morons. You lot are trying to spin something positive into a negative.
This is akin to Cell processor, that actually is worth hyping. Fuck is wrong with you GAf.
Possible Prince of Persia, as well?
That was supposed to be DX11, right?
MS is in for a rude awakening if they think releasing underwhelming hardware (compared to its competition) and charging for LIVE is OK. Paying $$ for a bunch of clowns to do jumping jacks in front of your under-powered game will not influence me to buy it.
As one of the 5 people that liked PoP 2008, I say yes please.
Have you heard or read anything regarding BC?Theory- 4 CU's modified for BC?
He got it wrong on this one though...it is closer to a 7850 and 7870, than the 7770 going by these specs.
Well...maybe. I mean the gamer in me hopes that whoever goes with an underpowered option gets pummeled but look at history. Wii won, PS2 and PS1 won and they were the weakest each time. Unfortunately power doesn't really mean anything by itself.
MS is in for a rude awakening if they think releasing underwhelming hardware (compared to its competition) and charging for LIVE is OK. Paying $$ for a bunch of clowns to do jumping jacks in front of your under-powered game will not influence me to buy it.
Dude.
It says that when the 4CUs are used for rendering there is only a MINOR boost. This seems to suggest that these 4CUs aren't as capable as the other 14CUs in graphics rendering.
I'm not talking about the other benefits of the 4CUs, just rendering performance.
I was rooting for Durango to be my next system, but if they do bring underwhelming hardware with kinect and all this other stuff i dont require, then i'm buying the Orbis day one and giving MS the finger.
PoP 2008 was a great game albeit it was too easy. I adored the art style.As one of the 5 people that liked PoP 2008, I say yes please.
I think it means that those 4CUs, when used for graphics rendering, offer a minor boost over any other "normal" CUs in the GPU, but that are better suited for compute processing anyway.
Am I missing something here.
VGleaks mentions that only a minor gain in rendering performance will be gained despite a 29% increase in the # of CUs being dedicated to rendering. From that it's reasonable to assume that these other 4CU aren't as capable in their ability to render, right?
Wrong, you forgot the 7850 ..
edit:
7770: 10 CUs
Durango: 12 CUs
Orbis: 14+4 CUs
7850: 16 CUs
Winning consoles don't release at higher than that
4th gen: Super Nintendo - $199
5th gen: PlayStation - $299
6th gen: PlayStation 2 - $299
7th gen: Wii - $249
I really hope there are some early games or at least tech demos that highlight the animation and physic capabilities. Will animations require less work by artists and devs to achieve believable results or will extra development resource be required to take advantage of the hardware?
wii weak and ps2 and ps1 weak are two completely different weaks,Well...maybe. I mean the gamer in me hopes that whoever goes with an underpowered option gets pummeled but look at history. Wii won, PS2 and PS1 won and they were the weakest each time. Unfortunately power doesn't really mean anything by itself.
People seem to follow these guy's words pretty faithfully, hopefully they'll take heed.Shifty Geezer from B3D:
and Ruskie:
there you have it.
Agreed, addition of 4 CU will give PS4 different kind of advantage. With 18CU's they had rendering advantage, now they will have both rendering [12 vs 14 CUs] and substantial compute processing advantage... and easier to manage unified RAM pool.
All is well people, 1st party games will be magnificent and they will continue to improve over the year with developer finding new ways to distinguish their games from competition and optimize their custom GPGPU code.
Proelite is a liar?
Piecing little bits and pieces that I heard,
Orbis:
Customized Kaveri APU with > 1 teraflop
2-4GB of DDR4
Audio DSP
Customized Sea Island discrete GPU 2-3 teraflops
1-2GB GDDR5
ARM + PowerVr SOC (Apps and OS only)
2GB LDDR3
The Arm SOC allows for easy porting of both Vita and mobile games.
MS is in for a rude awakening if they think releasing underwhelming hardware (compared to its competition) and charging for LIVE is OK. Paying $$ for a bunch of clowns to do jumping jacks in front of your under-powered game will not influence me to buy it.
Both are really on par.
Is it too late for MS to add a CU in Durango? I doubt they will sit by and get Sony get a major advantage like that....
Expect a lot of tech demos at E3.
Is it too late for MS to add a CU in Durango? I doubt they will sit by and get Sony get a major advantage like that....