kobashi100
Banned
More would be greatly appreciated!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=1CcpCnO7JaM
More would be greatly appreciated!
according to wikipedia, the 360 had two game release in February after launch, Full Auto and Fight Night Round 3. The PS3 only had Virtua Fighter 5 and MLB2k7 in it's first February.
February sucks.
How about the "all versions" in the news is just referring to the 360 and Ps3 versions?
Or are there other sources that mention this Wii U delay?
How about the "all versions" in the news is just referring to the 360 and Ps3 versions?
Or are there other sources that mention this Wii U delay?
I can't log in right now... It is on fire?
I suspect you haven't read or understood what I wrote. Maybe I didn't make it clear enough in which case I'll rephrase: I am not buying it at launch because of the delay. Nintendo has nothing to do with it, I'm pretty happy the game is going multiplatform. I am extremely disappointed that the game is getting delayed in this manner and I'm not willing to encourage Ubisoft to reproduce such business decisions with other games on whatever platform, so nope.
Incidentally, how many of the absolute Nintendo faithful punished Nintendo for their shenanigans with Twilight Princess on Gamecube? Not many I'll bet.
Why would games sell well if most of them are lazy and late ports? ZombiU did better than all multiplatform games, and it is a game that is highly unusual for a Nintendo platform. And I don't think that Rayman would sell worse than ZombiU to be honest.
Hmm, that's certainly interesting.I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
But Fight Night Round 3 and Virtua Fighter 5 were amazing games.
As if web pages don't get things wrongWhat possible sense does that make?
Thanks, there it makes it very clear.Ubi's Facebook page nonchalantly confirms it's universal.
They were, I guess I just meant that February sucks if you're looking for a stacked release lineup.
I can't believe the massive jerk move from Ubisoft. Just release the damn game early for Wii U and tell the 360 and PS3 owners to put up with it or buy a Wii U.
Nintendo was going to publish it in Japan, if thats not a form of support then I don't known what's that is.I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
Hmm, that's certainly interesting.
If Nintendo isn't heavily supporting the games from third parties that build on the market they established on the platform, I can see why third parties wouldn't be lining up to support them.
Microsoft on the other hand for example heavily pushes CoD despite having Halo.
I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
Spiderman and need for speed coming next month be happy!Apparently Wii U owners are the only ones that can suck it up and receive old ports
If you're all gung ho for this course of action, you should stop to think what happens if you and many other WiiU owners do the same. What message does it send? "Oh we shouldnt have delayed that version?" Unlikely. It will send the self fulfilling prophecy of "why do we bother releasing games on Nintendo consoles".
For me at the end of the day, the decisions become binary: do I want to see more of this style of game in the future? yes/no. If videogame stores had ballot boxes instead of just a cash register, maybe you could communicate what you think you'd be communicating, but the truth is you'd be fostering the same old assumption amongst third parties.
Incidentally, how many of the absolute Nintendo faithful punished Nintendo for their shenanigans with Twilight Princess on Gamecube? Not many I'll bet.
That's dumb but you're free to do whatever.I suspect you haven't read or understood what I wrote. Maybe I didn't make it clear enough in which case I'll rephrase: I am not buying it at launch because of the delay. Nintendo has nothing to do with it, I'm pretty happy the game is going multiplatform. I am extremely disappointed that the game is getting delayed in this manner and I'm not willing to encourage Ubisoft to reproduce such business decisions with other games on whatever platform, so nope.
Just wow. This is terrible for Wii U owners - screw the console wars nonsense - we need something to play...and soon!
My gf and I were planning on tackling this one together in a few weeks. Sonofa...
I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
Blu? As in, Neogaf blu?Just an example.
Hmm, that's certainly interesting.
If Nintendo isn't heavily supporting the games from third parties that build on the market they established on the platform, I can see why third parties wouldn't be lining up to support them.
Microsoft on the other hand for example heavily pushes CoD despite having Halo.
So, even though you have no proof the Wii U version was ready, you're going to boycott all of their games because of... who knows why.
Hmm, that's certainly interesting.
If Nintendo isn't heavily supporting the games from third parties that build on the market they established on the platform, I can see why third parties wouldn't be lining up to support them.
Microsoft on the other hand for example heavily pushes CoD despite having Halo.
Spiderman and need for speed coming next month be happy!
I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
More would be greatly appreciated!
That's...
wow.
If that's really that case, that is. Nintendo aren't doing themselves any favors.
I aim to please.
And my favorite:
Why are people buying this theory? It doesn't make any sense, even from the mouth of a nebulous insider.
I think this is more Nintendo than Ubisoft. They never really liked Rayman. They don't heavily support games that compete with their first party offerings.
I aim to please.
And my favorite:
And my favorite:
Their not doing themselves any favor buy pushing Rayman Wii U game demos instead of pushing their games and publishing it in Japan? What's Nintendo actual mistake here please tell me.That's...
wow.
If that's really that case, that is. Nintendo aren't doing themselves any favors.
join the club..Radioheadrules83 is a decent artist! Who knew?
Is everyone on Miiverse a GAFfer?