Damn beat me.
late... just like the port
Damn beat me.
Why would they make it worse?
Why not? Another studio can use the successful formula to make a good game while Rocksteady is given the time to work on something new and exciting.
VG247 own sources confirm that Rocksteady Studios is not developing this particular game.
It's not as if Rocksteady has made a great Batman game since Arkham Asylum. I'm curious to see who is making this.
It's not as if Rocksteady has made a great Batman game since Arkham Asylum. I'm curious to see who is making this.
Hype deflated until I know more.
So what is Rocksteady actually working on?
Rocksteady - nextgen Golden/Silver Age Batman & few JL friends
Somebody else - 3rd Arkham game for PS360 with perfunctory next gen launch window ports.
Sounds OK.
It's not as if Rocksteady has made a great Batman game since Arkham Asylum. I'm curious to see who is making this.
It's likely developed at WB Montreal.
It's not as if Rocksteady has made a great Batman game since Arkham Asylum. I'm curious to see who is making this.
City was a goddamn mess. Asylum was perfection. More of everything =/= better, Rocksteady. AA was a 9.5 type of game. AC? A 6.5 or 7.0.
Will it have a Bebop soundtrack?Clearly Ninja Turtles.
And if you believe that, then maybe the lobotomy didn't take.
But in AC it was more AND better.City was a goddamn mess. Asylum was perfection. More of everything =/= better
City was a goddamn mess. Asylum was perfection. More of everything =/= better, Rocksteady. AA was a 9.5 type of game. AC? A 6.5 or 7.0.
But in AC it was more AND better.
Better combat system, better boss fights, better puzzles, more overall diversity, etc.
The only clear step back was a less focused and more confused overarching plot, but if you people are into games for the plot and value it above everything else, then I would be tempted to suggest to go renting a fucking movie, instead.
AC was better in just about every way. More involved Riddler challenges, better cast of characters, more fleshed out combat, catwoman (playing as her in combat was more fun than Batman IMO), better boss battles, more challenge rooms and more difficult ones too. The list could go on.
For once I actually agree with Derrick01.AC was better in just about every way. More involved Riddler challenges, better cast of characters, more fleshed out combat, catwoman (playing as her in combat was more fun than Batman IMO), better boss battles, more challenge rooms and more difficult ones too. The list could go on.
But in AC it was more AND better.
Better combat system, better boss fights, better puzzles, more overall diversity, etc.
The only clear step back was a less focused and more confused overarching plot, but if you people are into games for the plot and value it above everything else, then I would be tempted to suggest to go renting a fucking movie, instead.
Cant't wait to see the GOTY version.
I would only say that AC has improved combat and graphics over AA. That's it. AA's narrative unfolded in a much more natural way which lent itself to the villains (compared to AC's philosophy of seemingly picking baddies first and fitting a half-assed skeleton plot around it). The way the island got progressively unlocked (aka the pacing) was perfect, and almost nothing in the game is superfluous or needless bloat.
AC is a typical sequel. More of everything. More (mostly terrible) gadgets, more boss fights, bigger environment, etc. It's bloated as fuck, lacks focus and I've already forgotten the paper thin story.
sweet, rocksteady need to move on and turn around another franchise like they did with buttman.
Indeed.
I wrapped Asylum in under a week, and couldn't even finish City. Something about it completely failed to grab me the way Asylum did.
sweet, rocksteady need to move on and turn around another franchise like they did with buttman.