He initially predicted it would be a flop, but changed his prediction after hearing about pre-order sales.
It's fine. Let's be honest here--Nintendo's expectations of the market have been off in every respect recently. I've learned to ignore every Nintendo sales "expectation."
We do, however, have sales numbers. Compare the sales numbers to DS, which released in a market with absolutely ZERO iOS/smartphone/tablet market saturation, and it's doing quite well--MUCH better than people thought after it's first 3 months on the market.
I really hope it isn't, otherwise he's more of a fool than I thought he was! /Internet Asshole.Did this actually happen? Is this an actual transcript?
The only reason I brought up the Vita was because you were comparing 1 Sony system (Which you called successful, then backtracked. ) to 2 'struggling' Nintendo systems, while ignoring the almost dead system Sony have around their neck.
I did pick up paper Mario for $20, does that count?
I still think as a business one big flop can effectively kill you off. I can even see them becoming a 3rd party dev if WiiU doesn't succeed.
The other option that no one talks about is Nintendo going private rather than 3rd party. They could conceivably do so and still make a decent business out of being a 1st party niche business.
tlyDidn't know the goal posts had been moved so far...
Part of the understanding I have with the struggles of the 3DS are that apparently, software sales are struggling. Yes, hardware doesn't look too bad, although year-over-year decline is certainly troubling. But I've gotten the impression that some of the Nintendo software does all right, but many third party offerings that would have done well back in the DS days are struggling.
Agreed. Pikmin isn't going to sell this thing at all.
I believe Mario Kart, on the other hand, clearly will. The Wii version sold gangbusters. If they release a holiday bundle with Mario Kart this holiday along with a price cut I honestly believe it could win the holiday season.
They can definitely recover from it. I mean they recovered from the horrible bomb that was the Gamecube.
Mario Kart won't do it either. It's an "evergreen" title, but not something that makes a huge public splash.
Wii hooked in a huge install base with Wii Sports and then Wii Fit, which were newish ideas that caught the public imagination. Wii U needs a game that makes the public say "OMG! I need this!", or it'll languish as a new GameCube. (Neither a success nor a failure, but still a disappointment.)
"I think they misfired on the Wii U," said Pachter. "It's just not that different from the other two [existing] consoles, and the gameplay isn't as unique as the Wii..."
Yeah, its funny. It's like they think he is the one asking himself for interviews and starting threads. The internet equivalent of the crazy guy on the street corner yelling at passersby.
What does he mean by recover? GameCube only sold 21 million and Nintendo still made big profits from it.
Truthfully I am getting tired of Pachter, I wish I can have his job though, get payed for saying randomness.
Why are people telling Pachter to STFU. It's part of his job to provide this analysis.
The other option that no one talks about is Nintendo going private rather than 3rd party. They could conceivably do so and still make a decent business out of being a 1st party niche business.
Bonus Round 2012: "Wii U is fine, 3DS is dead"
Now we are guaranteed that Wii U will make a comeback.
Part of the understanding I have with the struggles of the 3DS are that apparently, software sales are struggling. Yes, hardware doesn't look too bad, although year-over-year decline is certainly troubling. But I've gotten the impression that some of the Nintendo software does all right, but many third party offerings that would have done well back in the DS days are struggling.
Half price in 4 months, tells you something.
Mario Kart Wii sold over a million copies in four days. That's not a "big splash?"
Mario Kart 7 sold 3DS, Mario Kart DS sold DS, and Mario Kart Wii sold Wiis. I'm not sure how this evidence points to anything other than it being a popular title that makes people want the system.
It's not a mistake that they will recover from.So, does this mean it's a mistake Nintendo will recover from, or it wasn't a mistake?
I'm not sure how to apply the "Opposite of Pachter" rule in this case.
I still have faith that Nintendo know what they're doing.
This could simply be part of the plan.
It's fine. Let's be honest here--Nintendo's expectations of the market have been off in every respect recently. I've learned to ignore every Nintendo sales "expectation."
We do, however, have sales numbers. Compare the sales numbers to DS, which released in a market with absolutely ZERO iOS/smartphone/tablet market saturation, and it's doing quite well--MUCH better than people thought after it's first 3 months on the market.
Because Nintendo recovered quite well from the GameCube.
I love how you guys call him the drama queen but then assume his "may never recover" line is him saying the WiiU is going the way of the Dramcast and Nintendo the way of Sega!
I take it as never recover enough to become market leader ala last generation or never recover enough to get solid 3rd party support.
Things change?
While I think it's way too early to call, this console has the ability to really hurt nintendo