3rdamention
Member
Don't bother, Metroid-Squadron and Joeki11a are high likely astroturfing members.
Wow no kidding. Putting down the graphics and particles in Infamous SS? Claiming Watch Dogs looks just as good?
Lol....
Don't bother, Metroid-Squadron and Joeki11a are high likely astroturfing members.
Watching this now:
He can't hack people's phones without his backdoor into CTOS, but he can hack cameras and everything else?
He can steal the server codes by looking at a particular guard through the camera??
Did he have to kill the guards to enter the access point?
This all seems really counter-intuitive and nonsensical.
Wow mephixto, still using this awful video compression filled screenshot of Infamous SS to downplay the games visuals. Despite so many of us posting so many better direct feed video screen grabs that don't look like arse.
It's like GaneFAQs levels of fanboy selective screen grab posting.
You must have posted this exact video capture who knows how times now lol.
Yes. It would help if Ubi released more properly encoded footage and not this crap.Definitely. People need to stop taking captures from heavily compressed segments of video as indicative of the actual level of detail and graphical potency in a game. They're some form of representation, sure, but not enough for fair pixel peeping.
Yep.So if we post Watchdogs from an awful video corpessiong filled screenshot, the game looks bad but if someone do the same with SS it's not. Double standard much?
That is good to hear. The footage shown had a TON of pop up, shadow issues, and jaggies. Luckily all of those things should be taken care of with optimization.This was recorded in June BTW
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?t=667205&highlight=
Ubi just released the full demo today. So ya old demo confirmed
Heh. The idea of building systems based upon Hollywood's conception of computers and hacking is a hilarious one.It seems pretty standard affair for hacking to be represented in such a way in the media, check out the BBC's knowledge:
Surprised by all the negativity - I thought it looked really good! The MP part at the end was awesome!
So much indifference in this thread. Weird. Game looks unique and compelling.
So how did the invading player find this player's game? Can anybody jump into anybody else's world at any time?
How many players are going to hack away the money I stole fair and square from single mothers?
There could be some interesting emergent scenarios that come about in players working at odds with other players, but I hope the motivation is more than "this aggression will not stand, dude".
Hope you aply the same you said to this:
So how did the invading player find this player's game? Can anybody jump into anybody else's world at any time?
How many players are going to hack away the money I stole fair and square from single mothers?
There could be some interesting emergent scenarios that come about in players working at odds with other players, but I hope the motivation is more than "this aggression will not stand, dude".
Heh. The idea of building systems based upon Hollywood's conception of computers and hacking is a hilarious one.
My complaint isn't so much about realism - it's more that I just don't understand whatever funky logic they have going on, and the video didn't seem to explain it. Just how in the world do I steal server codes by way of peering at a guard through a camera?I'm really not too concerned about how 100% realistic the hacking is.
GTA IV's Mafia Work was one of my favorite bits of co-op this gen, so I'm definitely open to the idea of hunting down or otherwise sabotaging my friends in open world scenarios. Especially when drunk.Although they haven't released anything official they have confirmed in interviews you can play solo and not allow people in your game, I imagine it's a toggle in the options menu that will flag you as an available world, I would also assume you could either join a friends game as per shadowfall in the gamescom conference or you could bring up some sort of matchmaking service. But the latter half of this is just assumptions.
Which one do you guys prefer, wd or this:
That shit had me laughing so hard.
'You just hacked into someone's webcam. You can hear a baby wailing in the background; so this is the home of a new mother. Her bank info is out in the open guys. Obviously if you hack this and take the mother's money, nobody will see you and you won't lose reputation. It's up to the player to choose to hack it or not. So this game is all about MORALLY GRAY actions.'
Seriously what in the universe is gray about that action? That'd be instant -10,000 Paragon right there lol
So much indifference in this thread. Weird. Game looks unique and compelling.
Getting to the main box is the challenge.Speaking of how simple the hacking is...
does anyone else find it a little odd how every game this gen that has a dumb 'hacking' element usually has SOME form of extra depth to that aspect, like a mini-game or a something, but the one game that is about hacking, you press X for victory?
I mean I suspect that'd get old if you had to do it for every phone, but the main box you have to hack... you'd think it'd take a little more effort in the hacking arena.
What's with the overblown contrast and black crush?
Not that I can't, but this thread is not about Watch Dofs anymoreAnd you can't do that because?
My complaint isn't so much about realism - it's more that I just don't understand whatever funky logic they have going on, and the video didn't seem to explain it. Just how in the world do I steal server codes by way of peering at a guard through a camera?
It doesn't have to be real, but its off-putting when it doesn't make any kind of sense.
Even Syndicate had an active reload element to it.Speaking of how simple the hacking is...
does anyone else find it a little odd how every game this gen that has a dumb 'hacking' element usually has SOME form of extra depth to that aspect, like a mini-game or a something, but the one game that is about hacking, you press X for victory?
I mean I suspect that'd get old if you had to do it for every phone, but the main box you have to hack... you'd think it'd take a little more effort in the hacking arena.
I can't wait for people to put GTAV in their tray and see how it looks/runs nothing near this game. How is that even an argument...
It's not, few people are really making that argument. However, those of us with a competent PC are eagerly awaiting to put GTAV in our "trays", in which case we'll get 1080p, 60fps+, every effect maxed and then in a few months slap on the enb mod and get a game that melts minds for being a current gen port.
Speaking of how simple the hacking is...
does anyone else find it a little odd how every game this gen that has a dumb 'hacking' element usually has SOME form of extra depth to that aspect, like a mini-game or a something, but the one game that is about hacking, you press X for victory?
I mean I suspect that'd get old if you had to do it for every phone, but the main box you have to hack... you'd think it'd take a little more effort in the hacking arena.
Those are PS4 visuals? Damn, they're pretty underwhelming.
It's PC.
It's PC.
So, you have no proof then, all you have is your distorted perception. Got it.
Ubisoft Montreal's games always look unique and compelling, until you actually play them.
What do you mean by 'hack him'? Not his phone right? Since phones are off limits until you put the backdoor in.The camera helped you identify the guy, but you still had to hack him once identified. There were two objectives - identify, then hack.
I've got a monster PC as well, so I understand you there. I was speaking in terms of console since thats what the focus of this thread is.
I think everyone needs to understand that consoles don't compete with PC's (high end ones at least) in terms of graphics, ever.
Cry some more.you are trying too hard son..seriously
It's PC.