• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

DF/JF: Battlefield 4 PS4 vs XB1 videos/screens (900p PS4, 720p XB1)

Guerilla

Member
Read the op.

The OP has articles that have theories about it. I was just asking for more opinions because this shit is preposterous and I'm flabbergasted.

Both versions looks disappointing the problem is that the PS4 one looks disappointing because of a post processing effect which made things worse. This kind of shitty AA doesn't even exist in current gen console in most AAA games.
 

GribbleGrunger

Dreams in Digital
This comment on IGN sums it up well:

"Hey guys, I found the setting on my TV to make the colors more vivid

But I'm having trouble finding the option in the settings to remove the jaggies.

Can someone help me out here?"
 

djjinx2

Member
The salt in this thread is fucking incredible. Holy shit, it's fantastic.

The Xbox One version is more pleasing to my eyes, and to a lot of other people's eyes. Feel free to cry about how wrong we are. Delicious tears.

So all the gaming websites saying PS4>XBONE version are WRONG????
 

Valnen

Member
PS4 would look better to me if it wasn't so washed out. I thought the PS4 had a hardware scaler chip like the Xbox One? Or maybe it was a problem with video capture. Doesn't matter to me in the end though, I already bought my console =p. Convinced that the recording equipment's the issue though as the Jack videos look a bit better.
 
I thought that difference would be bigger. Lack of HBAO, resolution cuts and a worse quality of FXAA is not really that big of difference for 50% difference in CU.

It was quite logical that there wont be 50% performance difference between two platforms and we have first proof.

Interested to see MP comparisons from retail units, because thats performance meat of BF games.

900p has 56% more pixels than 720p. How is 56% < 50%?
 

Amir0x

Banned
Re: Crushed black levels

people keep talking about that stuff, and I haven't been able to watch the videos yet, but I thought that was most definitely an issue with how Digital Foundry captured the stuff, since Jack Frags video didn't have that severity?

rvy said:
Ha ha. Weird blurry look due to software upscaler.

Yes. Yes, indeed.

Just quoting Digital Foundry there, I don't know.
 

kitch9

Banned
So let me get this right.

PS4 wins with

Less aliasing
900p
More consistent framerate
AO

But... A weird blurry look due to software upscaler?

FXAA probably. The Xbox has no AA solution, which apparently is better.

Re: Crushed black levels

people keep talking about that stuff, and I haven't been able to watch the videos yet, but I thought that was most definitely an issue with how Digital Foundry captured the stuff, since Jack Frags video didn't have that severity?



Just quoting Digital Foundry there, I don't know.

Everyone else used DICE provided equipment, DF apparently used their own and magically cocked up the levels for some reason.....
 
So here we go:

PS4 version 1600x900 resolution
Xbone version only1280x720

PS4 version with a 50% lead in output pixels overall

PS4 regaining 60fps
Xbone with framerate issues
Xbone with aliasing issues
Xbone "only a stone's throw from the sub-720p resolution" / "highly noticeable sub-pixel break-up"


But:

Yep, as expected. The PS4 version is crushing the Xbone version.
Funny, after all the damage control by Albert Penello.
PS4 version with a 50% lead in output pixels overall and this is just the beginning.
The performance gap will widen in the future.

9yrq.png


Xbone footage:

ibcyLL9DEObrRq.gif

Wow
 
But the PS4 textures look closer to the PC ones in terms of coloring and lighting. Are you suggesting that the XB1 is superior to the PC version?

No?
When did I mention textures?
The problem with PS4 version is that everything looks too soft so the textures don't really pop out, same with the colours.
 

madmackem

Member
I'll spell it out for you as you're having a hard time understanding.

PC version:-

kJKL9wJ.jpg


Xbox One version:-

cjes9jS.jpg


PS4 version:-

ulcFYBk.jpg


The Xbox One and PC versions both have the same textures on the arm and the skybox which shows the Xbox One version was built off the PC build.
For some reason they PS4 version is different.

The clouds are moving when you watch video form, and its been covered that cameo is random.
 
PS4 would look better to me if it wasn't so washed out. I thought the PS4 had a scaler chip like the Xbox One? Or maybe it was a problem with video capture. Doesn't matter to me in the end though, I already bought my console =p.

Not a very good one according to DF.
 

dark10x

Digital Foundry pixel pusher
No?
When did I mention textures?
The problem with PS4 version is that everything looks too soft so the textures don't really pop out, same with the colours.
That's something YOU can decide for yourself. If you want things to "pop out" that's an option available to you.
 

demolitio

Member
Wow, this thread is huge. Reading just the last page though makes me somewhat suspicious of how many people have their TVs calibrated.

Although if they did calibrate their TV's, it sounds like a lot of them would up the contrast and sharpening anyway in their "calibrations".

But like someone said earlier, no one here has ever heard of crushed blacks before tonight in which we just act like we know what it means because we're not video experts and we're just defending the PS4. One of the more unique generalizations of the night for sure.
:)

I just want to know what the excuse would be if DF didn't fuck up their comparison? What would suddenly make the X1 version "look better" then?
 
PS4 would look better to me if it wasn't so washed out. I thought the PS4 had a hardware scaler chip like the Xbox One? Or maybe it was a problem with video capture. Doesn't matter to me in the end though, I already bought my console =p.

How many times......DF fucked up the capture.
 

Skeff

Member
I thought that difference would be bigger. Lack of HBAO, resolution cuts and a worse quality of FXAA is not really that big of difference for 50% difference in CU.

It was quite logical that there wont be 50% performance difference between two platforms and we have first proof.

Interested to see MP comparisons from retail units, because thats performance meat of BF games.

Well 50% better resolution essentially, and you forgot better frame rates.
 

madmackem

Member
Re: Crushed black levels

people keep talking about that stuff, and I haven't been able to watch the videos yet, but I thought that was most definitely an issue with how Digital Foundry captured the stuff, since Jack Frags video didn't have that severity?



Just quoting Digital Foundry there, I don't know.

Yeah they used there own capture device unlike everyone else it seems, which in turn has crushed to hell everything and maybe added sharpness.
 

TUROK

Member
Delusion at its finest
Bitter fanboy tears. I'm not even getting the game, much less either console for a few years.

You're not wrong to enjoy less detail, less stable framerate, horrible aliasing/shimmering and missing lighting effects. But it's definitely an odd preference to have.
Less detail? Lol. Ignoring the sharpening and upscaling artifacts, the textures are exactly the same between the two versions.

So all the gaming websites saying PS4>XBONE version are WRONG????
Yes, because when I said that it was more pleasing to my eyes and the eyes of some other people, I was actually saying "everyone else is wrong."

You nailed it right on the head, bro. Pat yourself on the back.
 

DemonNite

Member
Wow, this thread is huge. Reading just the last page though makes me somewhat suspicious of how many people have their TVs calibrated.

heh... can't wait to see all the threads next year when more 3rd party ports are revealed ;)

Invest in those servers Gaf
 

iceatcs

Junior Member
There is a staggering difference here.

ib0gOrDzD8ScKG.gif

Oh wow that's very big one innit, no AO, lack of AA, one light shade, different texture.

Also the performance and resolution (from DF articles) seem not the same as PS4.

What the - going on with Xbox One? I thought ESRAM will do the work what PS4 can do.
 

TheD

The Detective
The salt in this thread is fucking incredible. Holy shit, it's fantastic.

The Xbox One version is more pleasing to my eyes, and to a lot of other people's eyes. Feel free to cry about how wrong we are. Delicious tears.

It does not fucking matter if you like the look of the XB1 version more, it is OBJECTIVELY better on the PS4!
It has around an extra one half pixels over the XB1 version, it has effects that the XB1 version is lacking and has correct colour, unlike the XB1 version!

If you don't like it go invent a device that can take you to an alternate universe that has the XB1 as the better version, because it is not fucking true in this universe!
 
You DO realize that those comparisons were designed to eliminate resolution as a metric, right? It's common knowledge that the PC can use any desired resolution but that's not the point of the comparison.


Uh, this is proof of a more than 50% increase in performance. That's precisely what the difference in resolution represents.

Haha, ok

noone plays at 720p on a pc unless they have some 8 year old lcd monitor or play on a laptop

you also don't see the irony of eliminating resolution as a metric when they were comparing sub720p games before, that sub native res also adds a ton of blur when actually playing the content on your tv/monitor, and that now that the new consoles can do 900p or 1080p suddenly resolution is all the rage (and a 'whopping' 1600*900)

It's pandering , that's all it's ever been.
All under the guise of being some objective authority on comparing versions and graphics.

The surprise of the poster I quoted at actually seeing what it looks like on a good pc without shitty FXAA shows that it's working too.

But hey, you said that you work for DF, surely you opinion on this is unbiased and you aren't defending your employer at all (and imo you have no credibility to begin with since you started play games with vsync on)
 

thejazzking

Neo Member
I think we can all conclude that the sun is brighter in the XB1 version.

To be honest, it just looks as if they've accidentally turned up the contrast on the XB1 version.
 

Rebel Leader

THE POWER OF BUTTERSCOTCH BOTTOMS
Oh...is that why the blurry PS4 images and the crushed black levels of the XBO version?

I'm just trying to get the story straight here, I woke up to this thread lol

JackFrags, videogamer and IGN do not show the crushed blacks that DF's shows on the XBO
 
I thought that difference would be bigger. Lack of HBAO, resolution cuts and a worse quality of FXAA is not really that big of difference for 50% difference in CU.

It was quite logical that there wont be 50% performance difference between two platforms and we have first proof.

Interested to see MP comparisons from retail units, because thats performance meat of BF games.
You of all people should know how much of a resource hog HBAO is. And those aren't the only differences.
 

rvy

Banned
Just quoting Digital Foundry there, I don't know.

Stop inferring shit, Amir0x. You know damn well what you meant :p

DF will have a glorious time in the coming months if they don't sort their shit out because this is just hilarious on many different levels. It reminds me of the 1up GoW review.
 

Kaako

Felium Defensor
Remember the times when the xbone brethren said that 720p version of xbone games would have much better AA and post processing effects? Yeaaah...good times.
 
I thought that difference would be bigger. Lack of HBAO, resolution cuts and a worse quality of FXAA is not really that big of difference for 50% difference in CU.

It was quite logical that there wont be 50% performance difference between two platforms and we have first proof.

Interested to see MP comparisons from retail units, because thats performance meat of BF games.

50% performance difference is exactly what there is, at least. Hint: pixels.
 

Ty4on

Member
You are joking right? the Xbox picture the weapon is angled do you can't really see the front of the gun......That detail right?

I agree that it is a flawed comparison, but the difference in the angle on the weapon isn't very big. Honestly both look bad, but that is what small details look like without AA.
bhtAiCO.png
 

Piggus

Member
Bitter fanboy tears. I'm not even getting the game, much less either console for a few years.

Less detail? Lol. Ignoring the sharpening and upscaling artifacts, the textures are exactly the same between the two versions.

Well that's lovely. But running a game a lower resolution creates a loss of texture detail regardless of if it's upscaled or not.

So yeah. Less detail. Way to ignore the other points by the way.

Also, having vision that doesn't suck does not make people "bitter fanboys."
 
Top Bottom