• Hey, guest user. Hope you're enjoying NeoGAF! Have you considered registering for an account? Come join us and add your take to the daily discourse.

So Target shipped someone an Xbox One already? [Update: console-banned until launch]

Xater

Member
I cannot believe there are people ITT defending MS for this, the guy bought a $500 console and now it's banned because he had the audacity to play it when it arrived at his house after legally purchasing it.

What's wrong with some of you?

There is a defense force for everything sadly. Pretty sure there were people defending MS when they banned people for getting Halo 4 early as well.
 

UberTag

Member
I mean just because one company does something wrong it doesn't we can give another company a pass for doing the same.
Just to note an interesting parallel, an identical situation unfolded around the Vita launch.
Amazon in Canada shipped out a bunch of non-First Edition Vitas prematurely due to a systems glitch.
In fact this was somewhat of an exploit because people were actively taking advantage of it after concluding that systems were shipping prematurely.
So myself and a bunch of other folks on Vita GAF were playing Uncharted, Wipeout, Hot Shots and Little Deviants on February 11th, 2012 well in advance of the system's "street date".
We were sharing screens of the OS. Screens of the games. Getting people hyped and excited.
And did any of these Vitas get banned or bricked? Not a single one.
 

Skeff

Member
Connecting to a service that isn't open to the public is "sneaking in" too. Even if the door is open, if you're not supposed to be there, you get kicked out.

And what exactly says he's not supposed to be there? Doubt it's in the ToS or on the box.
 

sunofsam

Member
I cannot believe there are people ITT defending MS for this, the guy bought a $500 console and now it's banned because he had the audacity to play it when it arrived at his house after legally purchasing it.

What's wrong with some of you?

He didn't get banned for playing it.
 
I cannot believe there are people ITT defending MS for this, the guy bought a $500 console and now it's banned because he had the audacity to play it when it arrived at his house after legally purchasing it.

What's wrong with some of you?

You'd think he'd not play it online.
 
It's pretty sad that this kind of behavior from Microsoft doesn't even surprise me anymore.

I'm going to take this as a public service to stay far away from the Xbone this generation. This is an early warning of their vision of the future that us consumers were too "simple" to understand.
 

Bailers

Member
I'm one of the biggest Xbox fanboys on this board and even I'm having a hard time understanding why your defending MS in this instant. The guy legitimately payed cash for the console. Target sent it to him. He plays it online and gets banned. Specifically, what bit of the terms of service did he infringe to get his console banned. Please point it out if you want to continue to defend this position.

^^^^ This. Microsoft is in for a world of hurt here. The consumer who is shipped a product has no knowledge of or binding to any agreement on street dates.

I'd file a lawsuit and get a lot more than just a new xbone out of it.
 

BigDug13

Member
this is no normal situation here. Just wait for the 22 and we'll see.
Is it hard to understand what i am saying? Dont jump to conclusions.

But Microsoft doesn't issue temp console bans. That's my point. Telling us to wait so that this news slips our mind is fishy. Why do you want us to wait? Why are we never allowed to jump to conclusions if we want to when the precedent has already been set where bans are bans on Xbox?
 

Felsparrow

Neo Member
Target isn't out of this either. I do recall that many stores sign contracts where they get heavily penalized with fines for breaking street date in certain countries.

I do find it funny people are trying to equate this to other situations that aren't similar at all.

And yet another sign why we couldn't trust MS with that digital DRM system they tried dropping on us in the first place.
 

Xater

Member
No, he got banned for posting YouTube videos. He posted the CoD video earlier in the week as well as an unboxing.

So what law did he break? Like others has said he legally bought a console, didn#t sign any NDA, so he can do however he pleases.
 

gogoud

Member
If you got keys to an apartment in a newly constructed building but construction was still taking place, do you think they would let you on the property? Come on guys, get real.

Yes they would. Because they gave you the keys. After the locksmith came and installed the lock on the door, and the superintended gave you the key then you are allowed to move in. They usually give you the key once the apartment/house is finished. If the super feels that the place is finished and you can move in even though the construction for other floors is still ongoing then you can move in and be enjoy the noises of all things construction.

Target shipped the console. Ms had no right to ban it. No warning signs. Logic has nothing to do with it. You paid for the product, ms should not have banned anyone for using the product early. Target should replace the product or MS should lift the ban. And if target is to replace the product, they should replace it asap and not after the product is released.
 

cyberheater

PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 PS4 Xbone PS4 PS4
No, he got banned for posting YouTube videos. He posted the CoD video earlier in the week as well as an unboxing.

I can't see how this would construe as a violation of the terms of service.
 

zainetor

Banned
But Microsoft doesn't issue temp console bans. That's my point. Telling us to wait so that this news slips our mind is fishy. Why do you want us to wait? Why are we never allowed to jump to conclusions if we want to when the precedent has already been set where bans are bans on Xbox?

People have been unbanned, so what? How can you tell this ban isnt simply them keeping him out of live, till it's open for everybody?
simply we dont know yet.
 
I cannot believe there are people ITT defending MS for this, the guy bought a $500 console and now it's banned because he had the audacity to play it when it arrived at his house after legally purchasing it.

What's wrong with some of you?

He'd most likely have been fine if he didn't start uploading stuff to the web. If that's why Microsoft banned the console, I say fair enough. If they reinstate his console upon release, then no biggie as he can still play the games in the meantime.
 

syllogism

Member
I cannot believe there are people ITT defending MS for this, the guy bought a $500 console and now it's banned because he had the audacity to play it when it arrived at his house after legally purchasing it.

What's wrong with some of you?
He is free to return it to Target and possibly be compensated in some manner for the expenses involved in doing so. I don't see the problem. If Target has indicated that they would not accept it back, that's then there is a problem.
 

Alx

Member
You're splitting hairs. He got banned for going online. What's the difference.

The difference is that he owns the console, not the online servers. He can use the hardware as much as he wishes because he bought it, but if MS decides the additional services are not available, then they're not.
 

BigDug13

Member
People have been unbanned, so what? How can you tell this ban isnt simply them keeping him out of live, till it's open for everybody?
simply we dont know yet.

I'm going based on MS track record when it comes to banning. There is "some" recourse to console bans, but they're mostly permanent.
 

liquidtmd

Banned
People have been unbanned, so what? How can you tell this ban isnt simply them keeping him out of live, till it's open for everybody?
simply we dont know yet.

That's the point though - as far as he's communicated, they've not told him either.

Clarifying at least that would be the decent thing to do
 
There is the TOS.

Can you spend some time to defend your argument and find the specific mention in the terms of service which relates directly to the effective ban on pre-release gaming footage and a user's obligation to no upload said footage?

I'm actually curious.
 

D4Danger

Unconfirmed Member
the sensible thing to do would to be whitelist consoles so he couldn't go online and get the patch to begin with

what are they doing to do if someone gets their console a week/day/hour early? where's the line now?
 

drproton

Member
The difference is that he owns the console, not the online servers. He can use the hardware as much as he wishes because he bought it, but if MS decides the additional services are not available, then they're not.

I think that's a legitimate viewpoint, but it doesn't necessarily apply in this case.

He accessed those servers with MS's implicit permission because they allowed him access. They could block him without permanently banning his console, presumably. MS is punishing him for breaking the rules without divulging them first.
 

GSG Flash

Nobody ruins my family vacation but me...and maybe the boy!
So did they just ban him from Live? Or did they completely lock his console? Because I'm pretty sure the latter is borderline illegal.
 
Top Bottom