the most important part of the graphics is the resolution and the framerate. this is a racing game. so help me understand you here, you pass framerate and resolution not as graphics related, but as ...gameplay or ...phsyics?
for this generation, I am willing to bet that there is no better than what forza achieves day 1 in these fundamentals.
and DF article is a testament to that, not to downgrade bullshit.
unless somebody believes that there is a chance for >1080p@60hz, or 1080p@>60hz, which is kind of laughable.
also, people have noticed grahical upgrades too. they even made gifs about them!
yet they where called out as <<cherry pickers>>
one might think that a quality game gets its loads balanced at the end of development, so as to make sure that its primary goal, the 1080/60 is always kept intact.
but no, as I read here, the <<upgrades where unifinished placeholders>>, <<buildings where placed to hide popup>>, and the other bullshit I have read in forza topics today...
its all about them downgrades...
so please continue, just -as i wrote above- let me know when/if another racer -let alone a simracer- reaches 1080p/60 locked and has better shadows in the windows of the second floor of a building, or if it has more than 400.000 spectators lying around the track, that have better detail than forza's 400.000